Investigation of soliton solutions with different wave structures to the (2 &plus; 1)-dimensional Heisenberg ferromagnetic spin chain equation

M S Osman; K U Tariq; Ahmet Bekir; A Elmoasry; Nasser S Elazab; M Younis; Mahmoud Abdel-Aty

doi:10.1088/1572-9494/ab6181

PDF(755 KB)

Communications in Theoretical Physics ›› 2020, Vol. 72 ›› Issue (3) : 35002. DOI: 10.1088/1572-9494/ab6181

Investigation of soliton solutions with different wave structures to the (2 + 1)-dimensional Heisenberg ferromagnetic spin chain equation

Author information +

History +

Abstract

The principal objective of this article is to construct new and further exact soliton solutions of the (2 + 1)-dimensional Heisenberg ferromagnetic spin chain equation which investigates the nonlinear dynamics of magnets and explains their ordering in ferromagnetic materials. These solutions are exerted via the new extended FAN sub-equation method. We successfully obtain dark, bright, combined bright-dark, combined dark-singular, periodic, periodic singular, and elliptic wave solutions to this equation which are interesting classes of nonlinear excitation presenting spin dynamics in classical and semi-classical continuum Heisenberg systems. 3D figures are illustrated under an appropriate selection of parameters. The applied technique is suitable to be used in gaining the exact solutions of most nonlinear partial/fractional differential equations which appear in complex phenomena.

Key words

soliton solutions / Heisenberg ferromagnetic equation / FAN sub-equation method

Cite this article

EndNote

Ris (Procite)

Bibtex

Download Citations

M S Osman, K U Tariq, Ahmet Bekir, et al. Investigation of soliton solutions with different wave structures to the (2 + 1)-dimensional Heisenberg ferromagnetic spin chain equation[J]. Communications in Theoretical Physics, 2020, 72(3): 35002 https://doi.org/10.1088/1572-9494/ab6181

1. Introduction

Solitons have been widely studied in theory and experiment in recent years. Nowadays, the investigation of the soliton solutions of a number of complex nonlinear equations plays a considerable role due to the expectant effectuation in the real world, especially in different aspects of mathematical and physical phenomena [1–9]. Most complex phenomena arising in applied science, such as nuclear physics, chemical reactions, signal processing, optical fibers, fluid mechanics, plasma, nonlinear optics and ecology, can be sometimes modeled and described by these equations. Hereby, a massive number of mathematicians and physicists have attempted to invent various approaches by which one can obtain the soltion solutions of such equations. Among several present methods, we mention the Riccati-Bernoulli sub-ODE method [10, 11], exp-function method [12, 13], sine-cosine method [14, 15], tanh-sech method [16, 17], extended tanh-method [18, 19], F-expansion method [20–22], homogeneous balance method [23, 24], Jacobi elliptic function method [25, 26], the unified method and its generalized form [27–33], and so on. This work is established to utilize the extended Fan Sub-equation technique [34, 35] in determining the soliton and elliptic solutions of the (2+1)-dimensional Heisenberg ferromagnetic spin chain (HFSC) equation [36–40].

The HFSC equation [36–40] is given by:

\begin{array}{rcl} i ψ_{t} + ϱ_{1} ψ_{x x} + ϱ_{2} ψ_{y y} + ϱ_{3} ψ_{x y} - ϱ_{4} | ψ |^{2} ψ = 0. \end{array}

(1)

Here, ψ = ψ(x, y, t) is a complex valued function, x, y and t denote the scaled spatial and time coordinates, respectively and the coefficients ϱ_j for j = 1, 2, 3, 4; are real constants given by [7, 39]

\begin{array}{rcl} \begin{array}{rcl} ϱ_{1} & = & κ^{4} (Λ + Λ_{2}), ϱ_{2} = κ^{4} (Λ_{1} + Λ_{2}), \\ ϱ_{3} & = & 2 κ^{4} Λ_{2}, ϱ_{4} = 2 κ^{4} Ω, \end{array} \end{array}

where the parameters Λ, Λ₁ represent the coefficients of bilinear exchange interactions in the xy-plane, Λ₂ denotes the neighboring interaction along the diagonal, Ω is the uniaxial crystal field anisotropy parameter, and κ is a lattice parameter.

Heisenberg ferromagnetic spin chain equation with different magnetic interactions in the classical and semi-classical continuum limit have been identified as interesting nonlinear model systems exhibiting integrability properties including soliton spin excitations. This equation can be used to depict the propagation of long waves, which has many applications in the percolation of water.

The rest of this continuing article is methodized as follows: In section 2, we propound the formation of the extended Fan Sub-equation method and we implement this technique to find new soliton and elliptic solutions of the HFSC equation. The physical behavior of the solutions together with their graphical illustration is within section 3. Finally, section 4 is comprised of conclusions in a suitable manner.

2. Mathematical analysis

To solve equation (1), we first need to apply the traveling wave transformation

\begin{array}{rcl} ψ = V (ξ) e^{i Φ}, ξ = a x + b y - μ t, Φ = p x + q y - r t, \end{array}

(2)

where a, b, μ, p, q, and r are constants to be determined.

Utilizing the wave transformation (2) in equation (1), we attain the following imaginary and real parts, respectively:

\begin{array}{rcl} μ = 2 a ϱ_{1} p + 2 b ϱ_{2} q + ϱ_{3} (b q + a q), \end{array}

(3)

\begin{array}{rcl} δ_{1} V^{''} + δ_{2} V^{3} + δ_{3} V = 0, \end{array}

(4)

where

\begin{array}{rcl} \begin{array}{rcl} δ_{1} & = & ϱ_{4} a^{2} + ϱ_{2} b^{2} + ϱ_{3} a b, \\ δ_{2} & = & - ϱ_{4}, \\ δ_{3} & = & r - ϱ_{1} p^{2} - q (ϱ_{2} q + ϱ_{3} p) . \end{array} \end{array}

By applying the homogeneous balance to equation (4), we have n = 1. Suppose equation (4) has the solution of the form

\begin{array}{rcl} V = a_{0} + a_{1} ϕ (ξ), \end{array}

(5)

where φ satisfies the following general elliptic equation,

\begin{array}{rcl} {(\frac{d ϕ (ξ)}{d ξ})}^{2} = ζ_{0} + ζ_{1} ϕ (ξ) + ζ_{2} ϕ^{2} (ξ) + ζ_{3} ϕ^{3} (ξ) + ζ_{4} ϕ^{4} (ξ), \end{array}

(6)

ζ _i (i = 0, 1, 2, 3, 4) are real constants.

Substituting (5) along (6) in (4) and collecting the coefficients of

ϕ^{j} ϕ^{(k)}

\begin{array}{rcl} \begin{array}{rcl} a_{0} (a_{0}^{2} δ_{2} + δ_{3}) + \frac{1}{2} a_{1} δ_{1} ζ_{1} & = & 0, \\ a_{1} (3 a_{0}^{2} δ_{2} + δ_{3}) + a_{1} δ_{1} ζ_{2} & = & 0, \\ 3 a_{0} a_{1}^{2} δ_{2} + \frac{3}{2} a_{1} δ_{1} ζ_{3} & = & 0, \\ a_{1}^{3} δ_{2} + 2 a_{1} δ_{1} ζ_{4} & = & 0, \end{array} \end{array}

we select variables suitably, to have the most of ζ_i, (i = 0, 1, 2, 3, 4),

\begin{array}{rcl} \begin{array}{rcl} ζ_{1} & = & - \frac{2 a_{0} (a_{0}^{2} δ_{2} + δ_{3})}{a_{1} δ_{1}}, \\ ζ_{2} & = & - \frac{3 a_{0}^{2} δ_{2} + δ_{3}}{δ_{1}}, \\ ζ_{3} & = & - \frac{2 a_{0} a_{1} δ_{2}}{δ_{1}}, \\ ζ_{4} & = & - \frac{a_{1}^{2} δ_{2}}{2 δ_{1}}, \end{array} \end{array}

which give

\begin{array}{rcl} \begin{array}{rcl} a_{0} & = & \frac{\sqrt{δ_{1} (- ζ_{2}) - δ_{3}}}{\sqrt{3} \sqrt{δ_{2}}}, \\ a_{1} & = & \frac{\sqrt{2} \sqrt{- δ_{1}} \sqrt{ζ_{4}}}{\sqrt{δ_{2}}}, \end{array} \end{array}

therefore,

\begin{array}{rcl} ψ = (a_{0} + a_{1} ϕ (ξ)) e^{i Φ} . \end{array}

(7)

We have following solutions, for more details see also [34, 35].

Case I.

ζ_{0} = ϑ_{3}^{2}, ζ_{1} = 2 ϑ_{1} ϑ_{3}

ζ_{2} = 2 ϑ_{2} ϑ_{3} + ϑ_{1}^{2}, ζ_{3} = 2 ϑ_{1} ϑ_{2}, ζ_{4} = ϑ_{2}^{2}

, where

ϑ_{1}, ϑ_{2},

and

ϑ_{3}

are arbitrary constants. The solutions of (1) are

ψ_{η}^{I}, (η = 1, 2, \dots, 24) .

Some of important solitons are listed below.

Type I: when

ϑ_{1}^{2} - 4 ϑ_{2} ϑ_{3} > 0

ϑ_{1} ϑ_{2} \neq 0

ϑ_{2} ϑ_{3} \neq 0

. The following family of dark solitons is obtained as

\begin{array}{rcl} \begin{array}{l} ψ_{1}^{I} (ξ) = [a_{0} \\ + a_{1} (- \frac{\sqrt{ϑ_{1}^{2} - 4 ϑ_{2} ϑ_{3}} \tanh (\frac{1}{2} ξ \sqrt{ϑ_{1}^{2} - 4 ϑ_{2} ϑ_{3}}) + ϑ_{1}}{2 ϑ_{2}})] e^{i Φ} . \end{array} \end{array}

(8)

The family of combined bright-dark soliton is obtained as,

\begin{array}{rcl} \begin{array}{rcl} ψ_{3}^{I} (ξ) & = & [a_{0} - \frac{a_{1}}{2 ϑ_{2}} (\sqrt{ϑ_{1}^{2} - 4 ϑ_{2} ϑ_{3}} \\ \times (i s e c h (ξ \sqrt{ϑ_{1}^{2} - 4 ϑ_{2} ϑ_{3}}) \\ + \tanh (ξ \sqrt{ϑ_{1}^{2} - 4 ϑ_{2} ϑ_{3}})) + ϑ_{1})] e^{i Φ} . \end{array} \end{array}

(9)

The family of combined dark-singular solitons is obtained as

\begin{array}{rcl} \begin{array}{rcl} ψ_{5}^{I} (ξ) & = & [a_{0} - \frac{a_{1}}{2 ϑ_{2}} (\sqrt{ϑ_{1}^{2} - 4 ϑ_{2} ϑ_{3}} \\ \times (\tanh (\frac{1}{4} ξ \sqrt{ϑ_{1}^{2} - 4 ϑ_{2} ϑ_{3}}) \\ + \coth (\frac{1}{4} ξ \sqrt{ϑ_{1}^{2} - 4 ϑ_{2} ϑ_{3}})) + ϑ_{1})] e^{i Φ} . \end{array} \end{array}

(10)

The family of solitons is obtained as

\begin{array}{rcl} \begin{array}{rcl} ψ_{10}^{I} (ξ) & = & [a_{0} + a_{1} (2 \cosh (ξ \sqrt{ϑ_{1}^{2} - 4 ϑ_{2} ϑ_{3}}) \\ \times (\sqrt{ϑ_{1}^{2} - 4 ϑ_{2} ϑ_{3}} \sinh (ξ \sqrt{ϑ_{1}^{2} - 4 ϑ_{2} ϑ_{3}}) \\ - (ϑ_{1} \cosh (ξ \sqrt{ϑ_{1}^{2} - 4 ϑ_{2} ϑ_{3}}) \\ {\pm i \sqrt{ϑ_{1}^{2} - 4 ϑ_{2} ϑ_{3}}))}^{- 1})] e^{i Φ} . \end{array} \end{array}

(11)

Type II: when

ϑ_{1}^{2} - 4 ϑ_{2} ϑ_{3} < 0

ϑ_{1} ϑ_{2} \neq 0

ϑ_{2} ϑ_{3} \neq 0

. The following families of periodic solitons are obtained

\begin{array}{rcl} \begin{array}{l} ψ_{13}^{I} (ξ) = [a_{0} \\ + a_{1} (- \frac{\sqrt{4 ϑ_{2} ϑ_{3} - ϑ_{1}^{2}} \tan (\frac{1}{2} ξ \sqrt{4 ϑ_{2} ϑ_{3} - ϑ_{1}^{2}}) - ϑ_{1}}{2 ϑ_{2}})] e^{i Φ}, \end{array} \end{array}

(12)

\begin{array}{rcl} \begin{array}{l} ψ_{20}^{I} (ξ) = [a_{0} + a_{1} (- \frac{2 ϑ_{3} \cos (\frac{1}{2} ξ \sqrt{4 ϑ_{2} ϑ_{3} - ϑ_{1}^{2}})}{\sqrt{4 ϑ_{2} ϑ_{3} - ϑ_{1}^{2}} \sin (\frac{1}{2} ξ \sqrt{4 ϑ_{2} ϑ_{3} - ϑ_{1}^{2}}) + ϑ_{1} \cos (\frac{1}{2} ξ \sqrt{4 ϑ_{2} ϑ_{3} - ϑ_{1}^{2}})})] e^{i Φ}, \end{array} \end{array}

(13)

\begin{array}{rcl} \begin{array}{rcl} ψ_{24}^{I} (ξ) & = & [a_{0} + a_{1} ((4 r \sin (\frac{1}{4} ξ \sqrt{4 ϑ_{2} ϑ_{3} - ϑ_{1}^{2}}) \\ \times \cos (\frac{1}{4} ξ \sqrt{4 ϑ_{2} ϑ_{3} - ϑ_{1}^{2}})) \\ \times (2 \sqrt{4 ϑ_{2} ϑ_{3} - ϑ_{1}^{2}} \cos^{2} (\frac{1}{4} ξ \sqrt{4 ϑ_{2} ϑ_{3} - ϑ_{1}^{2}}) \\ - 2 ϑ_{1} \sin (\frac{1}{4} ξ \sqrt{4 ϑ_{2} ϑ_{3} - ϑ_{1}^{2}}) \\ \times \cos (\frac{1}{4} ξ \sqrt{4 ϑ_{2} ϑ_{3} - ϑ_{1}^{2}}) \\ {- \sqrt{4 ϑ_{2} ϑ_{3} - ϑ_{1}^{2}})}^{- 1})] e^{i Φ} . \end{array} \end{array}

(14)

Case II.

ζ_{0} = ϑ_{3}^{2}, ζ_{1} = 2 ϑ_{1} ϑ_{3}, ζ_{2} = 0

ζ_{3} = 2 ϑ_{1} ϑ_{2}, ζ_{4} = ϑ_{2}^{2}

, the solutions of (1) are

ψ_{η}^{I I}, (η = 1, 2, \dots, 12) .

A family of dark soliton is obtained

\begin{array}{rcl} \begin{array}{l} ψ_{1}^{I I} (ξ) = [a_{0} \\ + a_{1} (- \frac{\sqrt{- 6 ϑ_{2} ϑ_{3}} \tanh (\frac{1}{2} ξ \sqrt{- 6 ϑ_{2} ϑ_{3}}) + \sqrt{- 2 ϑ_{2} ϑ_{3}}}{2 ϑ_{2}})] e^{i Φ} . \end{array} \end{array}

(15)

Another form of dark-singular soliton is obtained

\begin{array}{rcl} \begin{array}{l} ψ_{5}^{I I} (ξ) = [a_{0} + a_{1} (- \frac{\sqrt{- 6 q r} (\tanh (\frac{1}{4} ξ \sqrt{- 6 q r}) + \coth (\frac{1}{4} ξ \sqrt{- 6 q r})) + 2 \sqrt{- 2 q r}}{4 q})] e^{i Φ}, \end{array} \end{array}

(16)

Case III.

If ζ₀ = ζ₁ = 0, we have the following solution of (1) in the form

ψ_{η}^{I I I}, (η = 1, 2, \dots, 10)

Type I:

ζ_{2} = 1, ζ_{3} = \frac{- 2 λ_{3}}{λ_{1}}, ζ_{4} = \frac{λ_{3}^{2} - λ_{2}^{2}}{λ_{1}^{2}}

, where

λ_{1}, λ_{2}, λ_{3}

are arbitrary constants.

\begin{array}{rcl} ψ_{1}^{I I I} (ξ) = [a_{0} + a_{1} (\frac{λ_{1} s e c h (ξ)}{λ_{2} s e c h (ξ) + λ_{3}})] e^{i Φ} . \end{array}

(17)

Type II:

ζ_{2} = 1, ζ_{3} = \frac{- 2 λ_{3}}{λ_{1}}, ζ_{4} = \frac{λ_{3}^{2} + λ_{2}^{2}}{λ_{1}^{2}}

, where λ₁, λ₂, λ₃ are arbitrary constants.

\begin{array}{rcl} ψ_{2}^{I I I} (ξ) = [a_{0} + a_{1} (\frac{λ_{1} c s c h (ξ)}{λ_{2} c s c h (ξ) + λ_{3}})] e^{i Φ} . \end{array}

(18)

In particular, if we take

λ_{2} = 0

in above equations (17)–(18). We obtain the families of bright and singular solitons as follows

\begin{array}{rcl} ψ_{1}^{I I I} (ξ) = [a_{0} + a_{1} (\frac{λ_{1} s e c h (ξ)}{λ_{3}})] e^{i Φ} . \end{array}

(19)

\begin{array}{rcl} ψ_{2}^{I I I} (ξ) = [a_{0} + a_{1} (\frac{λ_{1} c s c h (ξ)}{λ_{3}})] e^{i Φ} . \end{array}

(20)

Type III:

ζ_{2} = 4, ζ_{3} = - \frac{4 (2 λ_{2} + λ_{4})}{λ_{1}}

ζ_{4} = \frac{4 λ_{2}^{2} + 4 λ_{4} λ_{2} + λ_{3}^{2}}{λ_{1}^{2}}

, where λ₁, λ₂, λ₃, λ₄ are arbitrary constants.

\begin{array}{rcl} ψ_{3}^{I I I} (ξ) = [a_{0} + a_{1} (\frac{λ_{1} {s e c h}^{2} (ξ)}{λ_{2} \tanh (ξ) + λ_{3} + λ_{4} {s e c h}^{2} (ξ)})] e^{i Φ} . \end{array}

(21)

Type IV:

ζ_{2} = 4, ζ_{3} = \frac{4 (λ_{4} - 2 λ_{2})}{λ_{1}}

ζ_{4} = \frac{4 λ_{2}^{2} - 4 λ_{4} λ_{2} + λ_{3}^{2}}{λ_{1}^{2}}

, where λ₁, λ₂, λ₃, λ₄ are arbitrary constants.

\begin{array}{rcl} ψ_{4}^{I I I} (ξ) = [a_{0} + a_{1} (\frac{λ_{1} {c s c h}^{2} (ξ)}{λ_{2} \coth (ξ) + λ_{3} + λ_{4} {c s c h}^{2} (ξ)})] e^{i Φ} . \end{array}

(22)

In particular, if we consider λ₂ = λ₄; another family of dark and singular solitons are obtained as follows

\begin{array}{rcl} ψ_{4}^{I I I} (ξ) = [a_{0} + a_{1} (\frac{λ_{1} {c s c h}^{2} (ξ)}{λ_{2} \coth (ξ) + λ_{3} + λ_{2} {c s c h}^{2} (ξ)})] e^{i Φ} . \end{array}

(23)

Type V:

ζ_{2} = - 1, ζ_{3} = \frac{2 λ_{3}}{λ_{1}}, ζ_{4} = \frac{λ_{3}^{2} - λ_{2}^{2}}{λ_{1}^{2}}

, where λ₁, λ₂, λ₃ are arbitrary constants.

\begin{array}{rcl} \begin{array}{l} ψ_{6}^{I I I} (ξ) = [a_{0} + a_{1} (- \frac{λ_{1} (\sinh (λ_{1} ξ) + \cosh (λ_{1} ξ)) (\sinh (λ_{1} ξ) + \cosh (λ_{1} ξ) + λ_{2})}{λ_{3}})] e^{i Φ} . \end{array} \end{array}

(24)

Type VI:

ζ_{2} = 4, ζ_{3} = \frac{- 2 λ_{3}}{λ_{1}}, ζ_{4} = \frac{λ_{3}^{2} - λ_{2}^{2}}{λ_{1}^{2}}

, where

λ_{1}, λ_{2}, λ_{3}

are arbitrary constants.

\begin{array}{rcl} ψ_{8}^{I I I} (ξ) = [a_{0} + a_{1} (\frac{λ_{1} \csc (ξ)}{λ_{2} \csc (ξ) + λ_{3}})] e^{i Φ} . \end{array}

(25)

Type VII:

ζ_{2} = - 4, ζ_{3} = \frac{4 (2 λ_{2} + λ_{4})}{λ_{1}}

ζ_{4} = - \frac{4 λ_{2}^{2} + 4 λ_{4} λ_{2} - λ_{3}^{2}}{λ_{1}^{2}}

, where λ₁, λ₂, λ₃, λ₄ are arbitrary constants.

\begin{array}{rcl} ψ_{9}^{I I I} (ξ) = [a_{0} + a_{1} (\frac{λ_{1} \sec^{2} (ξ)}{λ_{2} \tan (ξ) + λ_{3} + λ_{4} \sec^{2} (ξ)})] e^{i Φ} . \end{array}

(26)

Case IV.

If ζ₁ = ζ₃ = 0, we have the following solutions of (1) in the form

ψ_{η}^{I V}, (η = 1, 2, \dots, 16)

[34, 35].

For

ζ_{0} = \frac{1}{4}, ζ_{2} = \frac{1 - 2 m^{2}}{2}, ζ_{4} = \frac{1}{4}

, the solution of (1) is of the form

\begin{array}{rcl} ψ_{3}^{I V} (ξ) = [a_{0} + a_{1} (c n ξ)] e^{i Φ}, \end{array}

(27)

gives the bright soliton for

m \to 1

\begin{array}{rcl} ψ_{3}^{I V} (ξ) = [a_{0} + a_{1} s e c h (ξ)] e^{i Φ}, \end{array}

(28)

and the periodic singular solution for

m \to 0

\begin{array}{rcl} ψ_{3}^{I V} (ξ) = [a_{0} + a_{1} \cos (ξ)] e^{i Φ}, \end{array}

(29)

for

ζ_{0} = \frac{1}{4}, ζ_{2} = \frac{1 - 2 m^{2}}{2}, ζ_{4} = \frac{1}{4}

, the solution of (1) is of the form

\begin{array}{rcl} ψ_{13}^{I V} (ξ) = [a_{0} + a_{1} (n s ξ \pm c s ξ)] e^{i Φ}, \end{array}

(30)

gives the combined dark-singular wave solution for

m \to 1

\begin{array}{rcl} ψ_{13}^{I V} (ξ) = [a_{0} + a_{1} (\coth (ξ) + c s c h (ξ))] e^{i Φ}, \end{array}

(31)

and the periodic singular solution for

m \to 0

\begin{array}{rcl} ψ_{13}^{I V} (ξ) = [a_{0} + a_{1} (\cot (ξ) + \csc (ξ))] e^{i Φ} . \end{array}

(32)

3. Physical description

The graphical representation of solitons has been illustrated in the following figures, for various values of the parameters. Mathematica 11 is used to carry out simulations and to visualize the behavior of nonlinear waves observed by the equation (1).

Figures 1(a), (b), and (c) illustrate the 3D chart of the absolute value of

ψ_{1}^{I} (x, y, t)

established in Case I (Type I) when t = −0.5, t = 0, and t = 0.5 respectively. Figure 1 represents complex solitary wave solution with the parameters ϑ₁ = 1, ϑ₂ = −1, ϑ₃ = 1, ϱ₁ = 1, ϱ₂ = 3, ϱ₃ = 4, ϱ₄ = −1, a = 1, b = −1, p = −2, q = 1, and r = −3.

Figure 1. $| ψ_{1}^{I} (x, y, t) | :$ The complex solitary wave solution when (a) t = −0.5 (b) t = 0 (c) t = 0.5.

Full size|PPT slide

Figures 2(a), (b), and (c) show the 3D chart of the absolute value of

ψ_{1}^{I I I} (x, y, t)

established in Case III (Type I) when t = −0.5, t = 0, and t = 0.5 respectively. Figure 2 represents complex bright soliton wave solution with the parameters λ₁ = −1, λ₂ = −1, λ₃ = −2, ϱ₁ = 1, ϱ₂ = 3, ϱ₃ = 4, ϱ₄ = −1, a = 1, b = −1, p = −2, q = 1, and r = −3.

Figure 2. $| ψ_{1}^{I I I} (x, y, t) | :$ The complex bright soliton wave solution when (a) t = −0.5 (b) t = 0 (c) t = 0.5.

Full size|PPT slide

Figures 3(a), (b), and (c) show the 3D chart of the absolute value of

ψ_{3}^{I I I} (x, y, t)

established in Case III (Type III) when t = −0.5, t = 0, and t = 0.5 respectively. Figure 3 represents complex dark soliton wave (a ’W ’ shape wave) solution with the parameters λ₁ = 1, λ₂ = −1, λ₃=−2, λ₄ = 1, ϱ₁ = 1, ϱ₂ = 3, ϱ₃ = 4, ϱ₄ = −1, a = 1, b = −1, p = −2, q = 1, and r = −3.

Figure 3. $| ψ_{3}^{I I I} (x, y, t) | :$ The complex dark soliton wave solution when (a) t = −0.5 (b) t = 0 (c) t = 0.5.

Full size|PPT slide

Figures 4(a), 4(b), and 4(c) show the 3D chart of the absolute value of

ψ_{3}^{I V} (x, y, t)

established in Case IV when t = −0.5, t = 0, and t = 0.5 respectively. Figure 4 represents complex elliptic wave solution with the parameters λ₁ = −1,

λ_{2}

=-1, λ₃ = −2, ϱ₁ = 1, ϱ₂ = 3, ϱ₃ = 4, ϱ₄ = −1,

ζ_{0} = \frac{1}{4}, ζ_{2} = \frac{1 - 2 m^{2}}{2}, ζ_{4} = \frac{1}{4}, m = \frac{1}{3}, a = 1

, b = −1, p =−2, q = 1, and r = −3.

Figure 4. $| ψ_{3}^{I V} (x, y, t) | :$ The complex elliptic wave solution when (a) t = −0.5 (b) t = 0 (c) t = 0.5.

Full size|PPT slide

4. Conclusions

In this study, new soliton and elliptic wave solutions with different wave structures for the Heisenberg ferromagnetic spin chain equation have been constructed via the extended FAN sub-equation method. A set of new exact solutions is found corresponding to various parameters. The graphical representations of the solutions are also demonstrated by figures 1–4, to investigate the behavior of the nonlinear model. Moreover, it is observed that the proposed approach can also be applied to other types of more complex models of contemporary science.

References

List( Publishing order | Descend order by publishing year | Descend order by cited within ) Chart analysis

1	Liu J G Osman M S Zhu W H Zhou L Ai G P 2019 Different complex wave structures described by the Hirota equation with variable coefficients in inhomogeneous optical fibers Appl. Phys. B 125 175 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00340-019-7287-8 Cited in this article [1]

2	Tariq K U Younis M Rezazadeh H Rizvi S T R Osman M S 2018 Optical solitons with quadratic-cubic nonlinearity and fractional temporal evolution Mod. Phys. Lett. B 32 1850317 https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217984918503177

3	Osman M S Lu D Khater M M A Attia R A M 2019 Complex wave structures for abundant solutions related to the complex Ginzburg-Landau model Optik 192 162927 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2019.06.027

4	Jawad A J A M Biswas A Abdelaty M Zhou Q Moshokoa S P Belic M 2018 Chirped singular and combo optical solitons for Gerdjikov-Ivanov equation using three integration forms Optik 172 144 149 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2018.07.013

5	Abdel-Aty M 2014 Linear entropy of a driven central spin interacting with an antiferromagnetic environment Natural Science 6 532 539 https://doi.org/10.4236/ns.2014.67052

6	Triki H Jovanoski Z Biswas A 2014 Solitary waves, shock waves and singular solitons of the generalized ostrovsky-benjamin-bona-mahoney equation Applied Mathematics & Information Sciences 8 113 116 https://doi.org/10.12785/amis/080113

7	Latha M M Vasanthi C C 2014 An integrable model of (2 + 1)-dimensional Heisenberg ferromagnetic spin chain and soliton excitations Phys. Scr. 89 065204 https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-8949/89/6/065204 Cited in this article [1]

Wang

Q M

Gao

Y T

C Q

Mao

B Q

Gao

Yang

J W

2015 Dark solitonic interaction and conservation laws for a higher-order (2 + 1)-dimensional nonlinear Schrödinger-type equation in a Heisenberg ferromagnetic spin chain with bilinear and biquadratic interaction Ann. Phys. 363 440 456

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aop.2015.10.001

9	Liu D Y Tian B Jiang Y Xie X Y Wu X Y 2016 Analytic study on a (2 + 1)-dimensional nonlinear Schrödinger equation in the Heisenberg ferromagnetism Comput. Math. Appl. 71 2001 2007 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2016.03.020 Cited in this article [1]

10	Yang X F Deng Z C Wei Y 2015 A Riccati-Bernoulli sub-ODE method for nonlinear partial differential equations and its application Advances in Difference equations 2015 117 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-015-0452-4 Cited in this article [1]

11	Hassan S Z Abdelrahman M A 2019 A Riccati-Bernoulli sub-ODE method for some nonlinear evolution equations International Journal of Nonlinear Sciences and Numerical Simulation 20 303 313 https://doi.org/10.1515/ijnsns-2018-0045 Cited in this article [1]

12	Guner O 2017 Exp-function method and fractional complex transform for space-time fractional KP-BBM equation Commun. Theor. Phys. 68 149 https://doi.org/10.1088/0253-6102/68/2/149 Cited in this article [1]

13	Shakeel M Mohyud-Din S T Iqbal M A 2018 Modified extended exp-function method for a system of nonlinear partial differential equations defined by seismic sea waves Pramana 91 28 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12043-018-1601-6 Cited in this article [1]

14	Sabi’u J Jibril A Gadu A M 2019 New exact solution for the (3 + 1) conformable space-time fractional modified Korteweg-de-Vries equations via Sine-Cosine method Journal of Taibah University for Science 13 91 95 https://doi.org/10.1080/16583655.2018.1537642 Cited in this article [1]

15	Wazwaz A M 2004 A sine-cosine method for handlingnonlinear wave equations Math. Comput. Modell. 40 499 508 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2003.12.010 Cited in this article [1]

16	Malfliet W Hereman W 1996 The tanh method: I. Exact solutions of nonlinear evolution and wave equations Phys. Scr. 54 563 https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-8949/54/6/003 Cited in this article [1]

17	Wazwaz A M 2006 Two reliable methods for solving variants of the KdV equation with compact and noncompact structures Chaos, Solitons Fractals 28 454 462 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2005.06.004 Cited in this article [1]

18	Abdou M A 2007 The extended tanh method and its applications for solving nonlinear physical models Appl. Math. Comput. 190 988 996 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2007.01.070 Cited in this article [1]

19	Zhang W 2010 The extended tanh method and the exp-function method to solve a kind of nonlinear heat equation Mathematical Problems in Engineering 2010 https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/935873 Cited in this article [1]

20	Islam M S Khan K Akbar M A 2017 Application of the improved F-expansion method with Riccati equation to find the exact solution of the nonlinear evolution equations Journal of the Egyptian Mathematical Society 25 13 18 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joems.2016.03.008 Cited in this article [1]

21	Kaur B Gupta R K 2019 Dispersion analysis and improved F-expansion method for space-time fractional differential equations Nonlinear Dyn. 96 837 852 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-019-04825-w

22	Ma Y L Li B Q Fu Y Y 2018 A series of the solutions for the Heisenberg ferromagnetic spin chain equation Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 41 3316 3322 https://doi.org/10.1002/mma.4818 Cited in this article [1]

23	Rady A A Osman E S Khalfallah M 2010 The homogeneous balance method and its application to the Benjamin-Bona-Mahoney (BBM) equation Appl. Math. Comput. 217 1385 1390 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2009.05.027 Cited in this article [1]

24	Jafari H Tajadodi H Baleanu D 2014 Application of a homogeneous balance method to exact solutions of nonlinear fractional evolution equations J. Comput. Nonlinear Dyn. 9 021019 https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4025770 Cited in this article [1]

25	Elboree M K 2011 The Jacobi elliptic function method and its application for two component BKP hierarchy equations Comput. Math. Appl. 62 4402 4414 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2011.10.015 Cited in this article [1]

Kumar

V S

Rezazadeh

Eslami

Izadi

Osman

M S

2019 Jacobi elliptic function expansion method for solving KdV equation with conformable derivative and dual-power law nonlinearity International Journal of Applied and Computational Mathematics 5 127

https://doi.org/10.1007/s40819-019-0710-3

Cited in this article [1]

27	Osman M S Ghanbari B Machado J A T 2019 New complex waves in nonlinear optics based on the complex Ginzburg-Landau equation with Kerr law nonlinearity The European Physical Journal Plus 134 20 https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/i2019-12442-4 Cited in this article [1]

28	Osman M S 2018 On complex wave solutions governed by the 2D Ginzburg-Landau equation with variable coefficients Optik 156 169 174 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2017.10.127

29	Osman M S Wazwaz A M 2019 A general bilinear form to generate different wave structures of solitons for a (3 + 1)-dimensional Boiti-Leon-Manna-Pempinelli equation Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 42 6277 6283 https://doi.org/10.1002/mma.5721

30	Osman M S 2019 One-soliton shaping and inelastic collision between double solitons in the fifth-order variable-coefficient Sawada-Kotera equation Nonlinear Dyn. 96 1491 1496 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-019-04866-1

31	Abdel-Gawad H I Tantawy M Osman M S 2016 Dynamic of DNA’s possible impact on its damage Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 39 168 176 https://doi.org/10.1002/mma.3466

32	Osman M S 2016 Multi-soliton rational solutions for quantum Zakharov-Kuznetsov equation in quantum magnetoplasmas Waves Random Complex Medium 26 434 443 https://doi.org/10.1080/17455030.2016.1166288

33	Javid A Raza N Osman M S 2019 Multi-solitons of thermophoretic motion equation depicting the wrinkle propagation in substrate-supported graphene sheets Commun. Theor. Phys. 71 362 https://doi.org/10.1088/0253-6102/71/4/362 Cited in this article [1]

34	Yomba E 2005 The extended fan sub-equation method and its application to the (2 + 1)-dimensional dispersive long wave and Whitham-Broer-Kaup equations Chin. J. Phys. 43 789 805 (https://www.ps-taiwan.org/cjp/issues.php?vol=43&num=4) Cited in this article [3]

35	Yomba E 2006 The modified extended Fan sub-equation method and its application to the (2 + 1)-dimensional Broer-Kaup-Kupershmidt equation Chaos, Solitons Fractals 27 187 196 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2005.03.021 Cited in this article [3]

36	Li B Q Ma Y L 2019 Lax pair, Darboux transformation and Nth-order rogue wave solutions for a (2 + 1)-dimensional Heisenberg ferromagnetic spin chain equation Comput. Math. Appl. 77 514 524 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2018.09.054 Cited in this article [2]

37	Li B Q Ma Y L 2019 Characteristics of rogue waves for a (2 + 1)-dimensional Heisenberg ferromagnetic spin chain system J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 474 537 543 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2018.10.133

38	Zhao X H Tian B Liu D Y Wu X Y Chai J Guo Y J 2016 Dark solitons interaction for a (2 + 1)-dimensional nonlinear Schrödinger equation in the Heisenberg ferromagnetic spin chain Superlattices Microstruct. 100 587 595 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spmi.2016.10.014

39	Triki H Wazwaz A M 2016 New solitons and periodic wave solutions for the (2 + 1)-dimensional Heisenberg ferromagnetic spin chain equation J. Electromagn. Waves Appl. 30 788 794 https://doi.org/10.1080/09205071.2016.1153986 Cited in this article [1]

40	Bulut H Sulaiman T A Baskonus H M 2018 Dark, bright and other soliton solutions to the Heisenberg ferromagnetic spin chain equation Superlattices Microstruct. 123 12 19 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spmi.2017.12.009 Cited in this article [2]

Acknowledgments

This work is funded by the Basic Science Research Unit, Scientific Research Deanship at Majmaah University, project number RGP-2019-4. The authors is extremely grateful to Majmaah University, Deanship of Scientific Research and Basic Science Research Unit, Majmaah University.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

PDF(755 KB)

873

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections

Recommended

Abstract
Key words
Cite this article
1. Introduction
2. Mathematical analysis
3. Physical description
Figure 1. $| ψ_{1}^{I} (x, y, t) | :$ The complex solitary wave solution when (a) t = −0.5 (b) t = 0 (c) t = 0.5.
Figure 2. $| ψ_{1}^{I I I} (x, y, t) | :$ The complex bright soliton wave solution when (a) t = −0.5 (b) t = 0 (c) t = 0.5.
Figure 3. $| ψ_{3}^{I I I} (x, y, t) | :$ The complex dark soliton wave solution when (a) t = −0.5 (b) t = 0 (c) t = 0.5.
Figure 4. $| ψ_{3}^{I V} (x, y, t) | :$ The complex elliptic wave solution when (a) t = −0.5 (b) t = 0 (c) t = 0.5.
4. Conclusions
References
Acknowledgments
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Received	Revised	Accepted	Published
2019-09-30	2019-11-21	2019-12-08	2020-03-01
Issue Date
2020-03-09

Please choose a citation manager

Content to export

Abstract

Key words

Cite this article

1. Introduction

2. Mathematical analysis

3. Physical description

Figure 1. $| ψ_{1}^{I} (x, y, t) | :$ The complex solitary wave solution when (a) t = −0.5 (b) t = 0 (c) t = 0.5.

Figure 2. $| ψ_{1}^{I I I} (x, y, t) | :$ The complex bright soliton wave solution when (a) t = −0.5 (b) t = 0 (c) t = 0.5.

Figure 3. $| ψ_{3}^{I I I} (x, y, t) | :$ The complex dark soliton wave solution when (a) t = −0.5 (b) t = 0 (c) t = 0.5.

Figure 4. $| ψ_{3}^{I V} (x, y, t) | :$ The complex elliptic wave solution when (a) t = −0.5 (b) t = 0 (c) t = 0.5.

4. Conclusions

{{custom_sec.title}}

{{custom_sec.title}}

References

{{custom_fnGroup.title_en}}

Footnotes

Acknowledgments

{{custom_ack.title_en}}

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

模态框（Modal）标题

Please choose a citation manager

Content to export

Abstract

Key words

Cite this article

1. Introduction

2. Mathematical analysis

3. Physical description

Figure 1. |ψ1I(x,y,t)|: The complex solitary wave solution when (a) t = −0.5 (b) t = 0 (c) t = 0.5.

Figure 2. |ψ1III(x,y,t)|: The complex bright soliton wave solution when (a) t = −0.5 (b) t = 0 (c) t = 0.5.

Figure 3. |ψ3III(x,y,t)|: The complex dark soliton wave solution when (a) t = −0.5 (b) t = 0 (c) t = 0.5.

Figure 4. |ψ3IV(x,y,t)|: The complex elliptic wave solution when (a) t = −0.5 (b) t = 0 (c) t = 0.5.

4. Conclusions

{{custom_sec.title}}

{{custom_sec.title}}

References

{{custom_fnGroup.title_en}}

Footnotes

Acknowledgments

{{custom_ack.title_en}}

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Figure 1. $| ψ_{1}^{I} (x, y, t) | :$ The complex solitary wave solution when (a) t = −0.5 (b) t = 0 (c) t = 0.5.

Figure 2. $| ψ_{1}^{I I I} (x, y, t) | :$ The complex bright soliton wave solution when (a) t = −0.5 (b) t = 0 (c) t = 0.5.

Figure 3. $| ψ_{3}^{I I I} (x, y, t) | :$ The complex dark soliton wave solution when (a) t = −0.5 (b) t = 0 (c) t = 0.5.

Figure 4. $| ψ_{3}^{I V} (x, y, t) | :$ The complex elliptic wave solution when (a) t = −0.5 (b) t = 0 (c) t = 0.5.