Communications in Theoretical Physics ›› 2021, Vol. 73 ›› Issue (1): 015603. doi: 10.1088/1572-9494/abc46e
• Statistical Physics, Soft Matter and Biophysics • Previous Articles Next Articles
Yao Wang1,Yu-Ying Liu1,Jian Liang1,Peng-Ye Wang2,Ping Xie2,()
Received:
2020-09-04
Revised:
2020-10-22
Accepted:
2020-10-26
Published:
2021-01-01
Contact:
Ping Xie
E-mail:pxie@iphy.ac.cn
Yao Wang,Yu-Ying Liu,Jian Liang,Peng-Ye Wang,Ping Xie, Commun. Theor. Phys. 73 (2021) 015603.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks
Figure 1.
Dynamics of the cooperative transport by two different kinesin motors under no external force. One corresponds to WT kinesin-1 motor having velocity v1 and rebinding rate $\mu ,$ and the other corresponds to mutant kinesin-1 motor having velocity ${v}_{1}/\alpha $ and rebinding rate $\mu .$ Lines are simulated results. Symbols are experimental data, with red circles from Rogers et al [21] and black squares from Xu et al [23]. (a) Velocity ratio v2/v1 versus $\alpha .$ The errors of the experimental data are calculated with Δ($v$2/$v$1) = $\left|\partial \left({v}_{2}/{v}_{1}\right)/\partial {v}_{1}\right|{\rm{\Delta }}{v}_{1}+\left|\partial \left({v}_{2}/{v}_{1}\right)/\partial {v}_{2}\right|{\rm{\Delta }}{v}_{2}.$ (b) Run-length ratio L2/L1 versus $\alpha .$ The errors of the experimental data are calculated with ${\rm{\Delta }}\left({L}_{2}/{L}_{1}\right)=\left|\partial \left({L}_{2}/{L}_{1}\right)/\partial {L}_{1}\right|{\rm{\Delta }}{L}_{1}$ $+\left|\partial \left({L}_{2}/{L}_{1}\right)/\partial {L}_{2}\right|{\rm{\Delta }}{L}_{2}.$ (c) Velocity distribution for asymmetric unbinding rate. Lines are Gaussian fits. Left, middle and right panels are the distribution for the cooperative transport by a WT kinesin motor and a mutant kinesin motor with its velocity slowed by 15-fold, the distribution for the single WT motor and the distribution for the single mutant motor, respectively. (d) Run-length distribution for asymmetric unbinding rate. Lines are single-exponential fits. Left, middle and right panels are the distribution for the cooperative transport by a WT kinesin motor and a mutant kinesin motor with its velocity slowed by 15-fold, the distribution for the single WT motor and the distribution for the single mutant motor, respectively."
Figure 2.
Dynamics of the cooperative transport by two different kinesin motors under the external force. One motor corresponds to WT kinesin-1 having velocity v1 and rebinding rate $\mu ,$ and the other corresponds to mutant kinesin-1 having velocity ${v}_{1}/\alpha $ ($\alpha $ = 15) and rebinding rate $\mu .$ The panel shows velocity v2 and run length L2 versus external force Fext."
Figure 3.
Dynamics of the cooperative transport by two identical kinesin motors with rebinding rate $\beta \mu .$ For kinesin-1 $\beta $ = 1, and for kinesi-2 $\beta $ = 4. Lines are simulated results. (a) Velocity ratio v2/v1 versus $\beta $ under no external force. (b) Run-length ratio L2/L1 versus $\beta $ under no external force. Symbols are experimental data from Feng et al [18], where K1–K1 represents the cooperative transport by two kinesin-1 motors and K1–K2 represents the cooperative transport by a kinesin-1 motor and a kinesin-2 motor. The errors of the experimental data are calculated with ${\rm{\Delta }}\left({L}_{2}/{L}_{1}\right)=\left|\partial \left({L}_{2}/{L}_{1}\right)/\partial {L}_{1}\right|$ ${\rm{\Delta }}{L}_{1}+\left|\partial \left({L}_{2}/{L}_{1}\right)/\partial {L}_{2}\right|{\rm{\Delta }}{L}_{2}.$ (c) Velocity v2 and run length L2 versus external force Fext for $\beta $ = 1 and $\alpha $ = 1. Inset shows stall force versus $\beta .$ (d) Velocity v2 and run length L2 versus external force Fext for $\beta $= 4 and $\alpha $ = 1."
Figure 4.
Dynamics of the cooperative transport by two different kinesin motors under no external force. One motor has velocity v1 and rebinding rate $\mu ,$ and the other has velocity ${v}_{1}/\alpha $ ($\alpha $ = 1.18) and rebinding rate $\beta \mu .$ (a) Velocity ratio v2/v1 versus $\beta .$ (b) Run-length ratio L2/L1 versus $\beta .$ (c) Velocity for transport by single kinesin-1 motor (K1), velocity for cooperative transport by two kinesin-1 motors (K1–K1) and velocity for cooperative transport by a kinesin-1 motor and a kinesin-2 motor (K1–K2). Kinesin-1 has velocity v1 and rebinding rate $\mu ,$ and kinesin-2 has velocity ${v}_{1}/\alpha $ ($\alpha $ = 1.18) and rebind rate $\beta \mu $ ($\beta $ = 4). (d) Run length for transport by single kinesin-1 motor (K1), run length for cooperative transport by two kinesin-1 motors (K1–K1) and run length for cooperative transport by a kinesin-1 motor and a kinesin-2 motor (K1–K2). For comparison, the experimental data of Feng et al [18] are also shown."
Figure 5.
Dynamics of the cooperative transport by two different kinesin motors under no external force. One motor has velocity v1 and rebinding rate $\mu ,$ and the other has velocity ${v}_{1}/\alpha $ and rebinding rate $\beta \mu .$ (a) Velocity ratio v2/v1 versus $\beta $ for different values of $\alpha .$ (b) Run-length ratio L2/L1 versus $\beta $ for different values of $\alpha .$"
Figure 6.
Dynamics of the cooperative transport by N (N > 1) identical kinesin motors under no external force. The motor has velocity v1 and rebinding rate $\mu .$ Lines are simulated results. Symbols are experimental data from Derr et al [20]. (a) Velocity ratio v2/v1 versus N. The errors of the experimental data are calculated with ${\rm{\Delta }}\left({v}_{2}/{v}_{1}\right)=\left|\partial \left({v}_{2}/{v}_{1}\right)/\partial {v}_{1}\right|{\rm{\Delta }}{v}_{1}+\left|\partial \left({v}_{2}/{v}_{1}\right)/\partial {v}_{2}\right|{\rm{\Delta }}{v}_{2}.$ (b) Run-length ratio L2/L1 versus N. The errors of the experimental data are calculated with ${\rm{\Delta }}\left({L}_{2}/{L}_{1}\right)=\left|\partial \left({L}_{2}/{L}_{1}\right)/\partial {L}_{1}\right|{\rm{\Delta }}{L}_{1}+\left|\partial \left({L}_{2}/{L}_{1}\right)/\partial {L}_{2}\right|{\rm{\Delta }}{L}_{2}.$ (c) Simulated results of velocity distribution for asymmetric unbinding rate. Lines are Gaussian fits. Left and middle panels correspond to N = 4 and 7, respectively, and right panel shows the half width of the Gaussian velocity distribution versus N. (d) Simulated results of run-length distribution for asymmetric unbinding rate. Lines are single-exponential fits. Left, middle and right panels correspond to N = 4, 5 and 7, respectively."
1 |
Hirokawa N 1998 Science 279 519
doi: 10.1126/science.279.5350.519 |
2 |
Hirokawa N Noda Y Tanaka Y Niwa S 2009 Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 10 682
doi: 10.1038/nrm2774 |
3 |
Holzbaur E L Goldman Y E 2010 Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 22 4
doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2009.12.014 |
4 |
Encalada S E Goldstein L S 2014 Annu. Rev. Biophys. 43 141
doi: 10.1146/annurev-biophys-051013-022746 |
5 |
Hancock W O Rev N 2014 Mol. Cell. Biol. 15 615
doi: 10.1038/nrm3853 |
6 |
Schnitzer M J Block S M 1997 Nature 388 386
doi: 10.1038/41111 |
7 |
Visscher K Schnitzer M J Block S M 1999 Nature 400 184
doi: 10.1038/22146 |
8 |
Nishiyama M Higuchi H Yanagida T 2002 Nat. Cell Biol. 4 790
doi: 10.1038/ncb857 |
9 |
Andreasson J O L Milic B Chen G Y Guydosh N R Hancock W O Block, S M 2015 eLife 4 e07403
doi: 10.7554/eLife.07403 |
10 |
Xie P 2010 Int. J. Biol. Sci. 6 665
doi: 10.7150/ijbs.6.665 |
11 |
Schnitzer M J Visscher K Block S M 2000 Nat. Cell Biol. 2 718
doi: 10.1038/35036345 |
12 |
Fisher M E Kolomeisky A B 2001 Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98 7748
doi: 10.1073/pnas.141080498 |
13 |
Liepelt S Lipowsky R 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 258102
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.258102 |
14 |
Guo S K Wang P Y Xie P 2017 J. Theor. Biol. 414 62
doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2016.11.023 |
15 |
Xie P Chen, H 2018 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 20 4752
doi: 10.1039/C7CP05557A |
16 |
Guo S K Wang W C Wang P Y Xie P 2019 Molecules 24 287
doi: 10.3390/molecules24020287 |
17 |
McLaughlin R T Diehl M R Kolomeisky A B 2015 Soft Matter. 12 14
doi: 10.1039/C5SM01609F |
18 |
Feng Q Mickolajczyk K J Chen G Y Hancock W O 2018 Biophys. J. 114 400
doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2017.11.016 |
19 |
Larson A G Landahl E C Rice S E 2009 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 11 4890
doi: 10.1039/b900968j |
20 |
Derr N D Goodman B S Jungmann R Leschziner A E Shih W M Reck-peterson S L 2012 Science 338 662
doi: 10.1126/science.1226734 |
21 |
Rogers A R Driver J W Constantinou P E Jamison D K Diehl M R 2009 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 11 4882
doi: 10.1039/b900964g |
22 |
Jamison D K Driver J W Rogers A R Constantinou P E Diehl M R 2010 Biophys. J. 99 2967
doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2010.08.025 |
23 |
Xu J Shu Z King S J Gross S P 2012 Traffic 13 1198
doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2012.01385.x |
24 |
Campas O Kafri Y Zeldovich K B Casademunt J Joanny J F 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 038101
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.038101 |
25 |
Bhat D Gopalakrishnan M 2017 Europhys. Lett. 117 28004
doi: 10.1209/0295-5075/117/28004 |
26 |
Berger F Keller C Klumpp S Lipowsky R 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 208101
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.208101 |
27 |
Berger F Keller C Klumpp S Lipowsky R 2015 Phys. Rev. E 91 022701
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.91.022701 |
28 |
Driver J W Rogers A R Diehl M R 2010 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 12 10398
doi: 10.1039/c0cp00117a |
29 |
Driver J W Jamison D K Uppulury K Rogers A R Kolomeisky A B Diehl M R 2011 Biophys. J. 101 386
doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2011.05.067 |
30 |
Wang Z Li M 2009 Phys. Rev. E 80 041923
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.80.041923 |
31 |
Bameta T Das D Padinhateeri R Inamdar M M 2017 Phys. Rev. E 95 022406
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.95.022406 |
32 |
Kunwar A Vershinin M Xu J Gross S P 2008 Curr. Biol. 18 1173
doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.07.027 |
33 |
Takshak A Mishra N Kulkarni A Kunwar A 2017 Physica A 467 395
doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2016.10.022 |
34 |
Bouzat S 2016 Phys. Rev. E 93 012401
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.93.012401 |
35 |
Fu Y B Guo S K Wang P Y Xie P 2019 Eur. Phys. J. E 42 41
doi: 10.1140/epje/i2019-11801-4 |
36 |
Khataee H Howard J 2019 Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 188101
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.188101 |
37 |
Klumpp S Lipowsky R 2005 Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102 17284
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0507363102 |
38 |
Milic B Andreasson J O L Hancock W O Block S M 2014 Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111 14136
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1410943111 |
39 |
Xie P Guo S K Chen H 2019 J. Chem. Inf. Model. 59 360
doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.8b00577 |
40 |
Xie P Guo S K Chen H 2019 Int. J. Mol. Sci. 20 4911
doi: 10.3390/ijms20194911 |
41 |
Xie P 2020 J. Theor. Biol. 490 110173
doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2020.110173 |
42 |
Guo S K Shi X X Wang P Y Xie P 2018 FEBS Open Bio 8 1332
doi: 10.1002/2211-5463.12486 |
43 |
Xie P 2020 ACS Omega 5 5721
doi: 10.1021/acsomega.9b03738 |
44 |
Kunwar A et al. 2011 Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108 18960
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1107841108 |
45 |
Guo S K Shi X X Wang P Y Xie P 2019 Biophys. Chem. 253 106216
doi: 10.1016/j.bpc.2019.106216 |
46 |
Coppin C M Pierce D W Hsu L Vale R D 1997 Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94 8539
doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.16.8539 |
47 |
Leduc C Campas O Zeldovich K B Roux A Jolimaitre P Bourel-Bonnet L Goud B Joanny J F Bassereau P 2004 Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101 17096
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0406598101 |
48 |
Uppulury K Efremov A K Driver J W Jamison D K Diehl M R Kolomeisky A B 2012 J. Phys. Chem. B 116 8846
doi: 10.1021/jp304018b |
49 |
Berger F Keller C Lipowsky R Klumpp S 2013 Cell. Mol. Bioeng. 6 48
doi: 10.1007/s12195-012-0258-3 |
50 |
Vu H T Chakrabarti S Hinczewski M Thirumalai D 2016 Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 078101
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.078101 |
51 |
Guo S K Shi X X Wang P Y Xie P 2019 Sci. Rep. 9 16973
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-53550-2 |
52 |
Telley I A Bieling P Surrey T 2009 Biophys. J. 96 3341
doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2009.01.015 |
53 |
Schneider R Korten T Walter W J Diez S 2015 Biophys. J. 108 2249
doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2015.03.048 |
54 |
Rank M Frey E 2018 Biophys. J. 115 1068
doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2018.07.017 |
[1] | Ping Xie. Insight into the chemomechanical coupling mechanism of kinesin molecular motors [J]. Commun. Theor. Phys. 73 (2021) 57601. |
[2] | Xiao-Ping Yuan,Li-Yan Qiao,Xia Huang. A dynamical transition of a chain of charged particles in a 2D substrate potential [J]. Commun. Theor. Phys. 72 (2020) 75602. |
[3] | WANG Zi-Qing, SHU Yao-Gen, LI Ming. A New Cooperation Mechanism of Kinesin Motors when Extracting Membrane Tube [J]. Commun. Theor. Phys. 60 (2013) 753. |
[4] | LI Ming, SHU Yao-Gen, and OU-YANG Zhong-Can. Mechanochemical Coupling of Kinesin Studied with a Neck-Linker Swing Model [J]. Commun. Theor. Phys. 51 (2009) 1143. |
[5] | ZHAN Yong, ZHAO Tong-Jun, YU Hui, SONG Yan-Li, and AN Hai-Long. The Stepping Motion of Brownian Particle Derived by Nonequilibrium Fluctuation [J]. Commun. Theor. Phys. 39 (2003) 653. |
[6] | YU Hui, ZHAO Tong-Jun, JI Qing, SONG Yan-Li, WANG Yong-Hong and ZHAN Yong. Dipole-Dipole Interaction and the Directional Motion of Brownian Motors [J]. Commun. Theor. Phys. 37 (2002) 381. |
|
Copyright © 2009-2019 Editorial Office of Communications in Theoretical Physics
Support by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd. Tel: 86-010-62662699 E-mail: support@magtech.com.cn