Communications in Theoretical Physics ›› 2021, Vol. 73 ›› Issue (8): 085601. doi: 10.1088/1572-9494/ac0135
• Statistical Physics, Soft Matter and Biophysics • Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:
2021-02-08
Revised:
2021-05-14
Accepted:
2021-05-14
Published:
2021-08-01
Contact:
Leilei Li
E-mail:lileilei@mail.itp.ac.cn
Leilei Li, Commun. Theor. Phys. 73 (2021) 085601.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks
Figure 1.
A coarse-grained model of the cell. Extracellular food is transported into the cell and is decomposed into amino acids (AA) by metabolic proteins. Amino acids are assembled into various proteins by ribosomes and are allocated to metabolic proteins, ribosomes, and housekeeping proteins reasonably to get a maximal growth rate. → φ means the degradation of proteins. μ is the growth rate."
Figure 2.
The deterministic trajectories of chemical populations, P, T, R, Q, I, D and volume V versus time t. Parameters of the ATRQID system are k = 3000 h−1, Σ = 3 ∗ 10−5 μm3 h−1, KD = 4 ∗ 10−12 h−1, KI = 6 ∗ 10−12 h−1, dR = dQ = dT = 0.1 h−1, Dc = 200, Ic = 200, Dr = 0, Ir = 0, and the other parameters of the model are shown in the table 1. The population values in (a) and (b) have been adjusted to make all of populations shown on the same figure by some multiplier factors. (a) The trajectory of populations versus time in a cell with the initial condition IC1: A(0) = 103, T(0) = 105, R(0) = 103, Q(0) = 104, I(0) = 20, D(0) = 10. The populations’ dynamics evolve to a steady state, and the chemical populations in the daughter cell at the birth are Ab = 1.28 ∗ 109, Tb = 8.39 ∗ 105, Rb = 5.26 ∗ 104, Qb = 1.71 ∗ 106, Ib = 88, Db = 0. The doubling time is 0.7235 h. (b) The trajectory of populations versus time in a cell with the initial condition IC2: A(0) = 109, T(0) = 3∗106, R(0) = 5∗104, Q(0) = 5∗106, I(0) = 10, D(0) = 100. The population dynamics reach a same steady state as IC1. (c) The plot of cell size versus time on the two initial conditions IC1 and IC2. (d) The 2D space of Q/R and T/R shows that the trajectories converge to the same attractor independent of initial conditions."
Table 1.
The dynamics parameters and biological constants in the ATRQID system."
Constants/Parameters | Symbol | Value | Reference |
---|---|---|---|
Protein density | g | 0.25 g cm−3 | [ |
Molecular weight per ribosome R | nR | 7336aa | [ |
Molecular weight per metabolic protein T on average | nT | 325aa | [ |
Molecular weight per housekeeping protein P on average | nQ | 325aa | [ |
Protein degradation rate respectively | dR, dT, dQ | Given | [ |
The efficiency of metabolic enzymes T | k | Given | |
Ribosomal catalytic efficiency | Σ | Given | |
The fractions of ribosomes engaged in making ribosomes R | fR | Optimized by growth rate | Equation ( |
The fractions of ribosomes engaged in making metabolic protein T | fT | Optimized by growth rate | Equation ( |
The fractions of ribosomes engaged in making housekeeping protein T | fQ | 0.45 | [ |
DNA replication initiation protein per origin threshold | Ic | Given | |
Cell division initiation protein threshold | Dc | Given | |
The average mass of amino acids | mA | 3000Da | [ |
DNA replication initiation protein synthesis rate constant | KI | Given | |
Cell division initiation protein synthesis rate constant | KD | Given |
Figure 3.
The stochastic trajectories and the scale-free property of cell size. (a) The stochastic trajectories of chemical populations, P, T, R, Q, I, D and volume V versus time t. Parameters of the dynamics systems are k = 3000 h−1, Σ = 3 ∗ 10−5 μm3 h−1, KD = 4 ∗ 10−12 h−1, KI = 6 ∗ 10−12 h−1, dR = dQ = dT = 0.1 h−1, Dc = 200, Ic = 200, Dr = 0, Ir = 0, and the other parameters of the model are shown in the table 1. The population values in figure 3(a) have been adjusted to make all of populations shown on the same figure by some multiplier factors. (b) The frequency distribution of cell division size, birth size, added size, and inter-division time in the steady state. The average division cell size 〈Vd〉 is 3.279 μm3, average birth cell size 〈Vb〉 = 1.642 μm3, average added cell size 〈Δ〉 = 1.637 μm3, average division time 〈τ〉 = 0.723 h. (c) The frequency distribution of cellular variables is re-scaled by their respective means. The curves denoted by cell division size, cell birth size, added size and doubling time stand for Vd/〈Vd〉, Vb/〈Vb〉, Δ/〈Δ〉 and τ/〈τ〉. The coefficient of variation of those cellular variables are 0.071, 0.093, 0.113, 0.094."
Figure 4.
The cell birth size distribution versus cell size distribution of lineage data. (a) In the same lineage, the distribution of tens of thousands of consecutive cells at birth. Three distributions are used to fit this distribution, namely: Gaussian distribution, gamma distribution, and lognormal distribution. (b) In the same lineage, the cell size distribution of cell lineage data for dozens of consecutive generations."
Figure 5.
The division-centric picture and the replication-centric picture of the cell cycle. (a) In the division-centric picture, the cell cycle is separated into three periods. The first period is from cell birth to initiation of DNA replication, named B period. The second period is the time interval DNA replication occupies, called C period. The last one is from the completion of the chromosome of replication to cell division, named D period. DNA replication begins at the origin when the cell size reaches a critical volume Vi and ends at the terminus. (b) The replication-centric picture is defined as two consecutive chromosome replication initiations. It is worth noting that (b) is only tenable at a slow growth rate. When doubling time is shorter than C + D, there will be more than one round replication in the cell. All the biological variables are defined in table 2."
Figure 6.
The Pearson correlation coefficients and slopes between various variables in the division-centric picture. Each point stands for one cell in 20 000 consecutive divisions after the system gets into the steady state. The red line is the linear fitting curve. (a) The X-axis refers to the cell birth volume, and the Y-axis refers to the increased volume during the division cycle. In the ideal adder model, the correlation coefficient of Vb and Δ should be 0. Our result is −0.050, so that add property is proved in our model. (b) The correlation coefficient of Vb, volume at birth time, and Vd, volume at division time, is 0.760. The slope of the fitting curve is about 1. (c) The doubling time τ is negatively correlated with birth size. In the ideal adder model, the correlation coefficient should be −0.5, compared with our model −0.531. (d) The replication initiation size Vi is positively correlated with Vb with the correlation coefficient being 0.259. If Donchie’s hypothesis is correct, the value should be 0."
Table 2.
Variables definitions."
Variables | Symbol |
---|---|
Size at birth | Vb |
Size at division | Vd |
Doubling time | τ |
Size at replication | Vi |
initiation | |
Duration between birth | τbi |
and replication | |
Size per origin at initial | Si |
replication initiation | |
Size per origin at final | Sf |
replication initiation | |
Duration between consecutive | τif |
replication initiations | |
Size per origin at birth | Sb |
Duration between replication | τib |
initiations and birth | |
Cell growth rate | $\mu =1/\tau {\rm{ln}}({V}_{d}/{V}_{b})$ |
Division added size | Δ = Vd − Vb |
Replication added size | Δif = Sf − Si |
Birth-to-initiation added size | Λbi = Vi − Vb |
Initiation-to-birth added size | Λib = Sb − Si |
Figure 7.
The Pearson correlation coefficients and slopes between various variables in the replication-centric picture. Each point stands for one cell in 20 000 consecutive cells after the system gets into the steady state. The red line is the linear fitting curve. (a) The increment between cell replication cycle Δif is uncorrelated with volume Si at replication initiation per origin. This result certificates the adder property in the replication-centric picture. (b) The correlation coefficient between the volume Si at the initial replication initiation per origin and the volume Sf at the final replication initiation per origin is 0.561 and the slope of the curve 1.123. (c) The time between replication initiation and cell division C + D is negatively correlated with Si. (d) The auto-correlation coefficient of Si is 0.562. If Donchie’s hypothesis is right, the value should be 0."
Figure 8.
The Pearson correlation coefficients and slopes between birth size, replication initiation size, and added size in the replication-centric picture and division-centric picture when DNA initiation proteins are expressed periodically. Parameters of the dynamics systems are k = 3000 h−1, Σ = 3 ∗ 10−5 μm3 h−1, KD = 4 ∗ 10−12 h−1, KI = $9.2\ast {10}^{-12}\ast | \sin (t\ast \pi /1.446)| /\mathrm{hr}$, dR = dQ = dT = 0.1 h−1, and the other parameters of the model are shown in the table 1. (a) The mean added volume is unchangeable whatever the birth size is, in conflict with co-regulation theory. (b) The periodical oscillation expression of chromosome replication protein changes the initiation mass, destroying the replication adder."
Figure 9.
The Pearson correlation coefficients and slopes between birth size, replication initiation size, and added size in the replication-centric picture and division-centric picture when division proteins are expressed periodically. Parameters of the dynamics systems are k = 3000 h−1, Σ = 3 ∗ 10−5 μm3 h−1, ${K}_{D}=4\ast {10}^{-12}\ast | \sin (t\ast \pi /1.446)| /\mathrm{hr}$, KI = 3.4 ∗ 10−12 h−1, dR = dQ = dT = 0.1 h−1, and the other parameters of the model are shown in the table 1. (a) The oscillation of division protein destroys adder property. The smaller the birth size is, the bigger the adder size. (b) DNA replication initiation is not influenced by periodical division protein production, and replication adder is kept."
Figure 10.
The Pearson correlation coefficients and the slopes between birth size and added size when division protein degradation rate is zero or not zero, and cells have an auto-inhibition mechanism. Parameters of the dynamics systems are k = 3000 h−1, Σ = 3 ∗ 10−5 μm3 h−1, KD = [200/(200 + d)] ∗ 10−11 h−1, KI = 7 ∗ 10−12 h−1, dR = dQ = dT = 0.1hr−1, and the other parameters of the model are shown in the table 1. (a) The degradation rate of division protein dD is 0. Cells represent adder property. (b) The degradation rate of division protein dD is 1hr−1. Cells slightly deviate from adder property to sizer property."
1 |
Jun S Si F Pugatch R Scott M 2018 Fundamental principles in bacterial physiology-history, recent progress, and the future with focus on cell size control: a reviewRep. Prog. Phys. 81 056601
doi: 10.1088/1361-6633/aaa628 |
2 |
Luef B et al. 2015 Diverse uncultivated ultra-small bacterial cells in groundwaterNat. Commun. 6 1 8
doi: 10.1038/ncomms7372 |
3 |
Mendell J E Clements K D Choat J H Angert E R 2008 Extreme polyploidy in a large bacteriumProc. Natl Acad. Sci. 105 6730 6734
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0707522105 |
4 |
Young K D 2006 The selective value of bacterial shapeMicrobiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 70 660 703
doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00001-06 |
5 |
Jun S Taheri-Araghi S 2015 Cell-size maintenance: universal strategy revealedTrends Microbiol. 23 4 6
doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2014.12.001 |
6 |
Schaechter M Williamson J P Jun HJRKoch A L 1962 Growth, cell and nuclear divisions in some bacteriaMicrobiology 29 421 434
doi: 10.1099/00221287-29-3-421 |
7 |
Tzur A Kafri R LeBleu V S Lahav G Kirschner M W 2009 Cell growth and size homeostasis in proliferating animal cellsScience 325 167 171
doi: 10.1126/science.1174294 |
8 |
Zatulovskiy E Skotheim J M 2020 On the molecular mechanisms regulating animal cell size homeostasisTrends Genet. 36 360 372
doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2020.01.011 |
9 |
Wood E Nurse P 2013 Pom1 and cell size homeostasis in fission yeastCell Cycle 12 3417 3425
doi: 10.4161/cc.26462 |
10 |
Ginzberg M B Kafri R Kirschner M 2015 On being the right (cell) sizeScience 348 1245075
doi: 10.1126/science.1245075 |
11 |
Schaechter M Maaløe O Kjeldgaard N O 1958 Dependency on medium and temperature of cell size and chemical composition during balanced growth of salmonella typhimuriumMicrobiology 19 592 606
doi: 10.1099/00221287-19-3-592 |
12 |
Cooper S 2008 On the fiftieth anniversary of the schaechter, maaløe, kjeldgaard experiments: implications for cell-cycle and cell-growth controlBioEssays 30 1019 1024
doi: 10.1002/bies.20814 |
13 |
Taheri-Araghi S Bradde S Sauls J T Hill N S Levin P A Paulsson J Vergassola M Jun S 2015 Cell-size control and homeostasis in bacteriaCurr. Biol. 25 385 391
doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2014.12.009 |
14 |
Wang J D Levin P A 2009 Metabolism, cell growth and the bacterial cell cycleNat. Rev. Microbiol. 7 822 827
doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2202 |
15 |
Chien A-C Hill N S Levin P A 2012 Cell size control in bacteriaCurr. Biol. 22 R340 R349
doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2012.02.032 |
16 |
Valgepea K Adamberg K Seiman A Vilu R 2013 Escherichia coli achieves faster growth by increasing catalytic and translation rates of proteinsMol. Biosyst. 9 2344 2358
doi: 10.1039/c3mb70119k |
17 |
Willis L Huang K C 2017 Sizing up the bacterial cell cycleNat. Rev. Microbiol. 15 606 620
doi: 10.1038/nrmicro.2017.79 |
18 |
Amir A 2017 Point of view: Is cell size a spandrel?Elife 6 e22186
doi: 10.7554/eLife.22186 |
19 |
Donachie W D 1968 Relationship between cell size and time of initiation of dna replicationNature 219 1077 1079
doi: 10.1038/2191077a0 |
20 |
Cooper S Helmstetter C E 1968 Chromosome replication and the division cycle of escherichia coli brJ. Mol. Biol. 31 519 540
doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(68)90425-7 |
21 |
Cooper S 1969 Cell division and dna replication following a shift to a richer mediumJ. Mol. Biol. 43 1 11
doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(69)90074-6 |
22 |
Si F et al. 2017 Invariance of initiation mass and predictability of cell size in escherichia coliCurr. Biol. 27 1278 1287
doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.03.022 |
23 |
Campos M Surovtsev I V Kato S Paintdakhi A Beltran B Ebmeier S E Jacobs-Wagner C 2014 A constant size extension drives bacterial cell size homeostasisCell 159 1433 1446
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.11.022 |
24 |
Koch A L Schaechter M 1962 A model for statistics of the cell division processMicrobiology 29 435 454
doi: 10.1099/00221287-29-3-435 |
25 |
Donnan L John P C L 1983 Cell cycle control by timer and sizer in chlamydomonasNature 304 630 633
doi: 10.1038/304630a0 |
26 |
Soifer I Robert L Amir A 2016 Single-cell analysis of growth in budding yeast and bacteria reveals a common size regulation strategyCurr. Biol. 26 356 361
doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.11.067 |
27 |
Sauls J T Li D Jun S 2016 Adder and a coarse-grained approach to cell size homeostasis in bacteriaCurr. Opin. Cell Biol. 38 38 44
doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2016.02.004 |
28 |
Amir A 2014 Cell size regulation in bacteriaPhys. Rev. Lett. 112 96 100
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.208102 |
29 |
Eun Y-J Ho P-Y Kim M LaRussa S Robert L Renner L D Schmid A Garner E Amir A 2018 Archaeal cells share common size control with bacteria despite noisier growth and divisionNat. Microbiol. 3 148 154
doi: 10.1038/s41564-017-0082-6 |
30 |
Pandey P P Singh H Jain S 2020 Exponential trajectories, cell size fluctuations, and the adder property in bacteria follow from simple chemical dynamics and division controlPhys. Rev. E 101 062406
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.101.062406 |
31 |
Osella M Nugent E Lagomarsino M C 2014 Concerted control of escherichia coli cell divisionProc. Natl Acad. Sci. 111 3431 3435
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1313715111 |
32 |
Ho P-Y Amir A 2015 Simultaneous regulation of cell size and chromosome replication in bacteriaFrontiers Microbiol. 6 662
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00662 |
33 |
Ghusinga K R Vargas-Garcia C A Singh A 2016 A mechanistic stochastic framework for regulating bacterial cell divisionSci. Rep. 6 1 9
doi: 10.1038/srep30229 |
34 |
Witz G van Nimwegen E Julou T 2019 Initiation of chromosome replication controls both division and replication cycles in e. coli through a double-adder mechanismElife 8 e48063
doi: 10.7554/eLife.48063 |
35 |
Si F Le Treut G Sauls J T Vadia S Levin P A Jun S 2019 Mechanistic origin of cell-size control and homeostasis in bacteriaCurr. Biol. 29 1760 1770
doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.04.062 |
36 |
Pandey P P Jain S 2016 Analytic derivation of bacterial growth laws from a simple model of intracellular chemical dynamicsTheory Biosci. 135 121 130
doi: 10.1007/s12064-016-0227-9 |
37 |
Micali G Grilli J Osella M Lagomarsino M C 2018 Concurrent processes set e. coli cell divisionSci. Adv. 4 eaau3324
doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aau3324 |
38 |
Ojkic N Serbanescu D Banerjee S 2019 Surface-to-volume scaling and aspect ratio preservation in rod-shaped bacteriaElife 8 e47033
doi: 10.7554/eLife.47033 |
39 |
Monod J 1949 The growth of bacterial culturesAnnu. Rev. Microbiol. 3 371 394
doi: 10.1146/annurev.mi.03.100149.002103 |
40 |
Azam T A Iwata A Nishimura A Ueda S Ishihama A 1999 Growth phase-dependent variation in protein composition of the escherichia coli nucleoidJ. Bacteriol. 181 6361
doi: 10.1128/JB.181.20.6361-6370.1999 |
41 |
Erickson H P Anderson D E Osawa M 2010 Ftsz in bacterial cytokinesis: cytoskeleton and force generator all in oneMicrobiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 74 504 528
doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00021-10 |
42 |
Jia C Grima R 2021 Frequency domain analysis of fluctuations of mRNA and protein copy numbers within a cell lineage: theory and experimental validationPhys. Rev. X 11 021032
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevX.11.021032 |
43 |
Gillespie D T 2001 Approximate accelerated stochastic simulation of chemically reacting systemsJ. Chem. Phys. 115 1716 1733
doi: 10.1063/1.1378322 |
44 |
Rathinam M Petzold L R Cao Y Gillespie D T 2003 Stiffness in stochastic chemically reacting systems: The implicit tau-leaping methodJ. Chem. Phys. 119 12784 12794
doi: 10.1063/1.1627296 |
45 |
Giometto A Altermatt F Carrara F Maritan A Rinaldo A 2013 Scaling body size fluctuationsProc. Natl Acad. Sci. 110 4646 4650
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1301552110 |
46 |
Kennard A S Osella M Javer A Grilli J Nghe P Tans S J Cicuta P Lagomarsino M C 2016 Individuality and universality in the growth-division laws of single E.coli cellsPhys. Rev. E 93 012408
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.93.012408 |
47 |
Modi S Vargas-Garcia C A Ghusinga K R Singh A 2017 Analysis of noise mechanisms in cell-size controlBiophys. J. 112 2408 2418
doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2017.04.050 |
48 |
Jia C Singh A Grima R 2021 Cell size distribution of lineage data: analytic results and parameter inferenceIscience 24 102220
doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2021.102220 |
49 |
Si F et al. 2017 Invariance of initiation mass and predictability of cell size in escherichia coliCurr. Biol. 27 1278 1287
doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.03.022 |
50 |
Adiciptaningrum A Osella M Moolman M C Lagomarsino M C Tans S J 2015 Stochasticity and homeostasis in the e. coli replication and division cycleSci. Rep. 5 18261
doi: 10.1038/srep18261 |
51 |
Wallden M Fange D Lundius E G Baltekin O ¨ Elf J 2016 The synchronization of replication and division cycles in individual e. coli cellsCell 166 729 739
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.06.052 |
52 |
Deforet M Van Ditmarsch D Xavier J B 2015 Cell-size homeostasis and the incremental rule in a bacterial pathogenBiophys. J. 109 521 528
doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2015.07.002 |
53 |
Donachie W D Blakely G W 2003 Coupling the initiation of chromosome replication to cell size in escherichia coliCurr. Opin. Microbiol. 6 146 150
doi: 10.1016/S1369-5274(03)00026-2 |
54 |
Browning S T Castellanos M Shuler M L 2004 Robust control of initiation of prokaryotic chromosome replication: Essential considerations for a minimal cellBiotechnol. Bioeng. 88 575 584
doi: 10.1002/bit.20223 |
55 |
Harris L K Theriot J A 2016 Relative rates of surface and volume synthesis set bacterial cell sizeCell 165 1479 1492
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.05.045 |
56 |
Vadia S Jessica L T Lucena R Yang Z Kellogg D R Wang J D Levin P A 2017 Fatty acid availability sets cell envelope capacity and dictates microbial cell sizeCurr. Biol. 27 1757 1767
doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.05.076 |
57 |
Harris L K Theriot J A 2018 Surface area to volume ratio: a natural variable for bacterial morphogenesisTrends Microbiol. 26 815 832
doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2018.04.008 |
58 |
Oldewurtel E R Kitahara Y Cordier B Özbaykal G Van Teeffelen S 2019 Bacteria control cell volume by coupling cell-surface expansion to dry-mass growthBioRxiv 769786
doi: 10.1101/769786 |
59 |
Zheng H et al. 2020 General quantitative relations linking cell growth and the cell cycle in escherichia coliNat. Microbiol. 5 995 1001
doi: 10.1038/s41564-020-0717-x |
60 |
Nobs J-B Maerkl S J 2014 Long-term single cell analysis of s. pombe on a microfluidic microchemostat arrayPLoS One 9 e93466
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093466 |
61 |
Lin J Amir A 2018 Homeostasis of protein and mrna concentrations in growing cellsNat. Commun. 9 1 11
doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-06714-z |
62 |
Jia C Xie P Chen M Zhang M Q 2017 Stochastic fluctuations can reveal the feedback signs of gene regulatory networks at the single-molecule levelSci. Rep. 7 1 9
doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-15464-9 |
63 |
Jia C Qian H Chen M Zhang M Q 2018 Relaxation rates of gene expression kinetics reveal the feedback signs of autoregulatory gene networksJ. Chem. Phys. 148 095102
doi: 10.1063/1.5009749 |
64 |
Jia C et al. 2019 Single-cell stochastic gene expression kinetics with coupled positive-plus-negative feedbackPhys. Rev. E 100 052406
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.100.052406 |
65 |
Jia C Grima R 2020 Small protein number effects in stochastic models of autoregulated bursty gene expressionJ. Chem. Phys. 152 084115
doi: 10.1063/1.5144578 |
66 |
Jia C Grima R 2020 Dynamical phase diagram of an auto-regulating gene in fast switching conditionsJ. Chem. Phys. 152 174110
doi: 10.1063/1.5144578 |
67 |
Sharma P Pandey P P Jain S 2018 Modeling the cost and benefit of proteome regulation in a growing bacterial cellPhys. Biol. 15 046005
doi: 10.1088/1478-3975/aabe43 |
68 |
Lenski R E Rose M R Simpson S C Tadler S C 1991 Long-term experimental evolution in escherichia coli: I. Adaptation and divergence during 2000 generationsAm. Nat. 138 1315 1341
doi: 10.1086/285289 |
69 |
Lenski R E Travisano M 1994 Dynamics of adaptation and diversification: a 10,000-generation experiment with bacterial populationsProc. Natl Acad. Sci. 91 6808 6814
doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.15.6808 |
70 |
Zhang J 2000 Protein-length distributions for the three domains of lifeTrends Genet. 16 107 109
doi: 10.1016/S0168-9525(99)01922-8 |
71 |
Maurizi M 1992 Proteases and protein degradation in escherichia coliExperientia 48 178 201
doi: 10.1007/BF01923511 |
72 |
Nath K Koch A L 1970 Protein degradation in escherichia coli: I. Measurement of rapidly and slowly decaying componentsJ. Biol. Chem. 245 2889 2900
doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)63072-8 |
73 |
Scott M Gunderson C W Mateescu E M Zhang Z Hwa T 2010 Interdependence of cell growth and gene expression: origins and consequencesScience 330 1099 1102
doi: 10.1126/science.1192588 |
74 |
Phillips R Kondev J Theriot J Garcia H G Orme N 2012 Physical Biology of the Cell New YorkGarland Science
doi: 10.1201/9781134111589 |
75 |
Bremer H D P P et al. 2008 Modulation of chemical composition and other parameters of the cell by growth rateEcoSal Plus 3 1 49
doi: 10.1128/ecosal.5.2.3 |
76 |
Bakshi S Siryaporn A Goulian M Weisshaar J C 2012 Superresolution imaging of ribosomes and rna polymerase in live escherichia coli cellsMol. Microbiol. 85 21 38
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2012.08081.x |
No related articles found! |
|
Copyright © 2009-2019 Editorial Office of Communications in Theoretical Physics
Support by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd. Tel: 86-010-62662699 E-mail: support@magtech.com.cn