Manipulation of a temporal electron-spin splitter via a δ-potential in an embedded magnetic-electric-barrier microstructure

doi:10.1088/1572-9494/ac3327

Submission & Tracking

Communications in Theoretical Physics ›› 2021, Vol. 73 ›› Issue (12): 125704. doi: 10.1088/1572-9494/ac3327

• Condensed Matter Theory • Previous Articles

Manipulation of a temporal electron-spin splitter via a δ-potential in an embedded magnetic-electric-barrier microstructure

Gui-Xiang Liu,Ge Tang,Jian-Lin Liu,Qing-Meng Guo(),Shuai-Quan Yang,Shi-Shi Xie

College of Science, Shaoyang University, Shaoyang 422000, China

Received: 2021-08-05 Revised: 2021-10-25 Accepted: 2021-10-26 Published: 2021-12-01
Contact: Qing-Meng Guo E-mail:qimegu@126.com

Abstract

Abstract:

We theoretically explore the manipulation of a temporal electron-spin splitter by a δ-potential in an embedded magnetic-electric-barrier microstructure (EMEBM), which is constructed by patterning a ferromagnetic stripe and a Schottky-metal stripe on the top and bottom of an InAs/Al_xIn_1−xAs heterostructure, respectively. Spin polarization of the dwell time remains, even though a δ-potential is inserted by atomic-layer doping. Both the magnitude and sign of the spin-polarized dwell time can be manipulated by changing the weight or position of the δ-potential. Thus, a structurally controllable temporal electron-spin splitter can be obtained for spintronics device applications.

Key words: embedded magnetic-electric-barrier microstructure (EMEBM), δ-potential, dwell time, spin polarization, manipulable temporal spin splitter

Gui-Xiang Liu,Ge Tang,Jian-Lin Liu,Qing-Meng Guo,Shuai-Quan Yang,Shi-Shi Xie, Commun. Theor. Phys. 73 (2021) 125704.

Figures/Tables 4

References 36

1	Tanaka M Harbison J P DeBoeck J Sands T Philips B Cheeks T L Keramidas V G 1993 Appl. Phys. Lett. 62 1565 doi: 10.1063/1.108642
2	Carmona H A Geim A K Nogaret A Main P C Foster T J Henini M Beaumont S P Blamire M G 1995 Phys. Rev. Lett. 74 3009 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.74.3009
3	Matulis A Peeters F M Vasilopoulos P 1994 Phys. Rev. Lett. 72 1518. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.72.1518
4	Nogaret A 2010 J. Phys. Condens. Matter 22 253201 doi: 10.1088/0953-8984/22/25/253201
5	Li C L Yan X Jun Z Wang X M Yuan R Y Guo Y 2020 Acta Phys. Sin. 69 107201
6	Liu G X Tang G Ma W Y 2019 J. Electron. Mater. 48 2055 doi: 10.1007/s11664-019-07023-x
7	Liu X H Liu C S Xiao B F Lu Y G 2018 Vacuum 148 173 doi: 10.1016/j.vacuum.2017.11.009
8	Liu X H Tang Z H Kong Y H Fu X Gong Y J 2017 J. Comput. Electron. 16 115
9	Shen L H Zhang G L Yang D C 2016 Physica E 83 450 doi: 10.1016/j.physe.2016.01.014
10	Liu X H Zhang G L Kong Y H Li A H Fu X 2014 Appl. Surf. Sci. 313 545 doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.06.019
11	Lu M W Chen S Y Zhang G L Huang X H 2018 J. Phys.-Condens. Matter 30 145302 doi: 10.1088/1361-648X/aab0b2
12	Cao X L Chen S Y Lu M W Huang D H Huang X H 2021 Superlattice Microst. 156 106934 doi: 10.1016/j.spmi.2021.106934
13	Liu X H Liu C S Xiao B F Lu Y G 2018 Chin. J. Phys. 56 1212 doi: 10.1016/j.cjph.2018.04.023
14	Zŭtic I Fabian J Sarma S D 2004 Rev. Mod. Phys. 76 323 doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.76.323
15	Wang L Guo Y 2006 Phys. Rev. B 73 205311 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.73.205311
16	Zhai F Guo Y Gu B L 2002 Eur. Phys. J. B 29 147 doi: 10.1140/epjb/e2002-00273-y
17	Xu H Z Liu P J Zhang Y F 2003 Phys. Status Solidi b 240 160 doi: 10.1002/pssb.200301874
18	Zimmerman T Mishra S Doran B R Gordon D F Landsman A S 2016 Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 233603 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.233603
19	Ranfagni A Mugnai D Fabeni P Pazzi G P 1991 Appl. Phys. Lett. 58 774 doi: 10.1063/1.104544
20	Steinberg A M Kwiat P G Chiao R Y 1993 Phys. Rev. Lett. 71 708 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.71.708
21	Spielmann C Szipöcs R Stingl A Krausz F 1994 Phys. Rev. Lett. 73 2308 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.73.2308
22	Ramos R Spierings D Racicot I Steinberg A M 2020 Nature 583 529 doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2490-7
23	Lu M W Chen S Y Cao X L Huang X H 2020 Results Phys. 19 103375 doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2020.103375
24	Winful H G 2003 P. Rev Lett. 91 260401 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.260401
25	Guo Q M Lu M W Huang X H Yang S Q Qin Y J 2021 Vacuum 186 110059 doi: 10.1016/j.vacuum.2021.110059
26	Lu M W Chen S Y Cao X L Huang X H 2021 IEEE T. Electron. Dev. 68 860 doi: 10.1109/TED.2020.3044555
27	Chen S Y Zhang G L Cao X L Peng F F 2021 J. Comput. Electron. 20 785 doi: 10.1007/s10825-020-01653-9
28	Guo Q M Chen S Y Cao X L Yang S Q 2021 Semicond. Sci. Tech. 36 055013 doi: 10.1088/1361-6641/abec14
29	Zhang G L Lu M W Chen S Y Peng F F Meng J S 2021 IEEE T. Magn. 57 1400305
30	Yang S Lu M W Guo Q M Qin Y J Xie S S 2021 Results Phys. 30 104898
31	Slobodskyy A Gould C Slobodskyy T Becker C R Schmidt G Molenkamp L W 2003 Phys. Rev. Lett. 90 246601 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.246601
32	Kozodaev M G Chernikova A G Korostylev E V Park M H Schroeder U Hwang C S Markeev A M 2017 Appl. Phys. Lett. 111 132903 doi: 10.1063/1.4999291
33	Liu G X Zhang G L Ma W Y Shen L H 2016 Solid State Commun. 231 6 doi: 10.1016/j.ssc.2016.01.016
34	Nogaret A Bending S J Henini M 2000 Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 2231 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.2231
35	Papp G Peeters F M 2001 Appl. Phys. Lett. 78 2184 doi: 10.1063/1.1360224
36	Lu K Y Lu M W Chen S Y Cao X L Huang X H 2019 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 491 165491 doi: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2019.165491

[1]	R Essajai,E Salmani,M Bghour,A Labrag,F Goumrhar,M Fahoume,H Ez-Zahraouy. Co-, Fe-, Ni-doped and co-doped rutile GeO₂: insights from ab-initio calculations [J]. Commun. Theor. Phys. 74 (2022) 45701.
[2]	M Ayub,Z Iqbal,H A Shah,G Murtaza. Energy transport for ion acoustic waves in a spin polarized quantum plasma [J]. Commun. Theor. Phys. 72 (2020) 15502.
[3]	Z. Iqbal, G. Murtaza, A. Hussain. Linear Analysis of Obliquely Propagating Longitudinal Waves in Partially Spin Polarized Degenerate Magnetized Plasma [J]. Commun. Theor. Phys. 68 (2017) 791.
[4]	YANG Fu-Bin, CHENG Yan, LIU Fu-Ti, CHEN Xiang-Rong, CAI Ling-Cang. Spin-Filtering Transport in Double Parallel Quantum Wires on a Graphene Sheet [J]. Commun. Theor. Phys. 63 (2015) 385.
[5]	WU Qing-Ping, LIU Zheng-Fang, CHEN Ai-Xi, HE Xing-Dao. Spin Polarization Oscillation and Spin-Polarized Diode Based on Graphene Rashba-Strain Double Junctions [J]. Commun. Theor. Phys. 61 (2014) 135.
[6]	ZHAO Hua, ZHANG Xiao-Wei, CAI Tuo, and ZHOU Guang-Hui. A Scheme for Spin Manipulation in a Quantum Dot with Both Charge andSpin Bias [J]. Commun. Theor. Phys. 55 (2011) 359.
[7]	SHU Qi-Qing,, LIU Wen-Jun,, WANG Shao-Ming, JIANG Yi, and MA Wen-Gan. Transmission and Dwell Time Oscillations Caused by Coexistence of Tunneling and Propagating in a Trapezoidal Barrier [J]. Commun. Theor. Phys. 53 (2010) 462.
[8]	WANG Hai-Yan. Biased Diffusive Search Triggered by ATP Binding During Kinesin's Stepping [J]. Commun. Theor. Phys. 53 (2010) 525.
[9]	CUI Juan,, YANG Yong-Hong, and WANG Jun. Controllable Spin Polarization of Charge Current by Rashba Spin Orbital Coupling [J]. Commun. Theor. Phys. 52 (2009) 949.
[10]	ZHU Lin, YAO Kai-Lun,, and LIU Zu-Li,. Ab initio Study of Electronic Structure and Magnetic Properties of Two Novel Neptunium (V) Sulfates:NaK_3(NpO_2)_4(SO_4)_4(H_2O)_2 and NaNpO_2SO_4H_2O [J]. Commun. Theor. Phys. 48 (2007) 921.
[11]	YAO Kai-Lun,, ZU Feng-Xia, LIU Zu-Li, andZOU Wei-Dong. Strong Ferromagnetic Coupling of{[Cu(Hpht)(N3)]•H2O}n with Simultaneous End-on Azido and Carboxylato Bridges: a First Principle Study [J]. Commun. Theor. Phys. 43 (2005) 349.

Manipulation of a temporal electron-spin splitter via a δ-potential in an embedded magnetic-electric-barrier microstructure

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 4

References 36

Related Articles 11

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0