An innovative technique to solve a fractal damping Duffing-jerk oscillator

Yusry O El-Dib, Nasser S Elgazery, Youmna M Khattab, Haifa A Alyousef

Communications in Theoretical Physics ›› 2023, Vol. 75 ›› Issue (5) : 55001.

PDF(834 KB)
Welcome to visit Communications in Theoretical Physics, June 6, 2025
PDF(834 KB)
Communications in Theoretical Physics ›› 2023, Vol. 75 ›› Issue (5) : 55001. DOI: 10.1088/1572-9494/acc646
Mathematical Physics

An innovative technique to solve a fractal damping Duffing-jerk oscillator

Author information +
History +

Abstract

The idea of the present article is to look into the nonlinear dynamics and vibration of a damping Duffing-jerk oscillator in fractal space exhibiting the non-perturbative approach. Using a new analytical technique, namely, the modification of a He's fractal derivative that converts the fractal derivative to the traditional derivative in continuous space, this study provides an effective and easy-to-apply procedure that is dependent on the He's fractal derivative approach. The analytic approximate solution has a significant match with the results of the numerical simulation as the fractal parameter is very closer to unity, which proves the reliability of the method. Stability behavior is discussed and illustrated graphically. These new powerful analytical tools are developed in an attempt to obtain effective analytical tools, valid for any fractal nonlinear problems.

Key words

modification of He's fractal derivative / fractal duffing-jerk vibration / stability analysis / non-perturbative approach / damping nonlinear fractal system

Cite this article

Download Citations
Yusry O El-Dib, Nasser S Elgazery, Youmna M Khattab, et al. An innovative technique to solve a fractal damping Duffing-jerk oscillator[J]. Communications in Theoretical Physics, 2023, 75(5): 55001 https://doi.org/10.1088/1572-9494/acc646

Abbreviations

u                       Displacement variable

t                        Independent variable

α                       Fractal dimension

S                       Fractal parameter

η,μ                   The first and second coefficients of damping

Q                       The coefficient of Duffing

f(u)                   Restoring force

F(u;α)              Equivalent restoring force

ηeq(α),μeq(α)   Equivalent coefficients

ω0                      Linear frequency

Ω                       Non-conservative frequency

ω                        Conservative frequency

1. Introduction

Many different phenomena in physics and the engineering sciences are represented by nonlinear systems of differential equations, which include the third-order derivative. The importance of these phenomena appears greatly in many applications in daily life, for example, in electrical circuits, mechanics, dynamic processes, and acoustics [16]. The study of this type of system has gained importance since Schot defined the rate of change of the acceleration vector as the jerk (1978) [7]. The investigation of the acceleration of charged particles that emit radiation is one of the most important applications for the time-jerk equation in the field of laser physics. As common, the influences of studying surface tension may be represented by an equation that has third order. Therefore, studying the flow control of the boundary layer of viscous liquid which has a free surface is also a critically important application of this equation in the field of surface tension. Furthermore, in the human body examination, the study of the physiological balance clarifies a significant application for the Duffing-jerk equation in the field of biology [8] and [9].
One can consider the nonlinear oscillation phenomenon as a significant phenomenon in engineering, biology, and physics, which can be described by oscillator equations such as Duffing oscillators [10]. To deal with these nonlinear oscillators, several numerical and analytical approaches have been applied. For this type of system, analytical periodic solutions must be obtained, so Nayfeh and Mook [11] and Nayfeh [12] introduced the classical perturbation and multiple-scale method to analyze Duffing oscillator with damping force, respectively. The homotopy perturbation approach was also proposed by He [1315]. Recently, El-Dib has used the non-perturbative technique to introduce a simple approach for solving nonlinear jerk-Duffing and Rayleigh–Helmholtz–Duffing equations in [1618]. Ji-Huan He, a famous Chinese mathematician, has recently proposed 'He's frequency formulation’ [19], an easy formula for determining the frequency of nonlinear models. One of the most significant benefits of this procedure over other perturbation techniques is its high accuracy and simplicity of use when dealing with nonlinear systems, particularly non-conservative models [20]. Several scientists were extremely motivated to use this methodology for this reason to demonstrate its scientific accuracy. For more recent applications of He's frequency formulation, Ma [21] suggested an alternative modification for He's frequency formulation to solve a quintic/cubic Duffing equation. For modeling a damped forced parametric pendulum model, Alyousef et al [22] used He's frequency formulation. Feng and Niu [23] also estimated a new analytical solution for a fractal Toda model. For an electromechanical system on a nano-scale, He et al [24] have extended He's frequency formula for faster calculation of the pull voltage. Also, an efficient simulation of He's formula has recently been published by El-Dib and his group [2529].
The fractal studying is an interesting idea that has distinctive applications in assorted areas, for instance, the physical phenomena of the hierarchical structure, diffusion, thermal conductivity within branched networks, meteorology, fluids flow resistance in micro-channels, ocean and atmosphere dynamics, nuclear and petroleum engineering, thermo elasticity, and materials design [3038]. As a result of these important applications, the study of fractals was a fertile field for many scientists. Sheng et al [39] studied the fractal model of shale through a porous medium. For the fluid flow through a porous structure, another fractal model was investigated by Miao et al [40]. Further, by utilizing the mechanism of homotopy perturbation, He et al [41] evaluated an approximate solution for the Toda oscillator with fractal space. By employing the Hamilton principle, He et al [42.] also introduced a modern fractal modification to calculate a periodic solution for a fractal Duffing oscillator. During the steady state, an exact solution of a damped forced fractal oscillator was calculated in [43]. Furthermore, by applying two-scale fractal derivatives, Feng [44] obtained an analytic solution for Duffing oscillator in fractal space. Ain and He [45] investigated the two-scale dimension to investigate some applications of fractal theory. Anjum and his colleagues [46, 47] also introduced the two-scale fractal theory to investigate the mathematical models of tsunami waves and population, respectively. By using the two-scale fractal calculus, He and El-Dib [48] analyzed the application of the fractal Shabat–Zhiber model. The fractal with two-scale and harmonic balance techniques was also applied by Lu and Chen [49] to analyze a fractal Yao-Cheng oscillator. Further, Ain et al [50] used the two-scale fractal dimension to provide an in-depth study of the alcohol-drinking model that includes the fractional derivative. Zuo and Liu [51] investigated a fractal rheological problem for SiC pastes using a fractal derivative. A two-scale technique was also used by Ain et al [52] and Yang et al [53] to investigate time-fractional heat transport and Varicella-Zoster virus models, respectively. Also, based on the two-scale fractal calculus, Huang et al [54]. developed a permeability fractal model for a porous medium. Moreover, Wang [55] used He's frequency formula to solve another nonlinear fractal oscillator. In [56, 57], the same author also proposed a clear frequency formulation to investigate the nonlinear oscillators with fractal space. In addition, Tian [58] introduced another frequency formulation to deal with a system of fractal oscillators. Lately, in [59], He et al also employed fractals with two-scale derivatives to investigate a fractal vibration. In the field of microgravity space, Wang [60] also used the Fourier series to propose a new technique for a class of fractal nonlinear oscillators that have discontinuities. For more analysis of the dynamical systems, El-Nabulsi et al [61] achieved a novel local derivative operator with fractal via both Hamiltonian and Lagrangian functions. On the other hand, there are a lot of effective contributions to ‘analytical approximation’ and ‘fractional/fractal’ modeling in the literature. By employing natural transforms and fractional calculus, respectively, Nadeem et al [62] and Elgazery [63] proposed numerical and analytical solutions to the fractional nonlinear Newell-Whitehead-Siegel model. A numerical solution of a reaction-diffusion/advection model with time fraction derivatives in porous media was also introduced by Pandey et al [64]. El-Dib et al [65] also provided an analytical solution for the Klein–Gordon model with time fraction derivatives. For more recent and significant contributions, see [28, 6668].
Furthermore, the usage of nonlinear fractal vibrations has spread significantly in the literature over the past few decades due to its great role in studying practical problems for several disciplines of science and engineering that cannot be solved by traditional techniques. Consequently, fractal oscillation behaves differently than traditional behavior since there are important applications for the Duffing-Jerk equation in our everyday activities as mentioned in the literature. Recently, El-Dib and Elgazery [66, 67] have suggested an efficient novel approach to convert the fractal model into a traditional one. Hence, the current study aims to extend El-Dib and Elgazery's studies to introduce a novel technique to solve a fractal damping Duffing-jerk oscillator. This article is constructed in such a way that the details of the basic idea to convert the fractal space to a smooth one are presented in section 2. The methodology and solution are described in section 3. The stability analysis is outlined in section 4. The numerical illustrations are displayed in section 5. Finally, in section 6 the conclusions are given.

2. The basic idea is to transform from fractal space to smooth space

When the fractal dimension is positive or zero integers, the two-scale fractional derivative is consistent with the nth-order differential derivatives [48].
The fractal derivative via He's definition is written as follows [59, 6871]:
dαudtα=Γ(1+α)Limtt0ΔtΔt0u(t)u(t0)(tt0)α,
(1)
here along the t direction, α is the fractal dimension. Additionally, this fractal derivative exhibits some of the following characteristics [25, 41, 69, 72]:
Limα0dudtα=u,Limα1dudtα=u˙ and Limα2dudtα=u¨,
(2)
here the traditional derivative concerning the variable t is mentioned with the over dots.
As evidenced by the literature, the traditional approach of substituting tα with τ cannot produce the desired result. Except in exceptional instances, the solution cannot be readily available. At this point, it is urgently necessary to investigate a novel strategy that enables discovering the damping fractal model solution. It is necessary to convert the fractal model into its continuous space equivalent. A good strategy is to adhere to El-Dib and Elgazery's most recent publications [66, 67]. The following proposal is offered to address this property:
dudtα=Sαcos(12πα)u+Sα1sin(12πα)u˙;0<α<1.
(3)
This is called the global He's a fractal derivative of first-order which represents a modification to He's fractal derivative. Consequently, it can be verified that the nth global fractal derivative has the form
dudtnα=(Sαcos(12πα)+Sα1sin(12πα)D)nu;n=1,2,3...
(4)
where the operator D refers to the first classical derivative with respect to the variable t.
Over the past few decades, the use of nonlinear fractal vibrations has grown dramatically due to its important role in researching real-world issues in many engineering and science disciplines that cannot be solved by conventional methods. Fractal oscillation performs differently from conventional behavior as a result. Consider a fractal system of the Duffing-jerk oscillating which has numerous significant applications in daily life in the form
dudt3α+ηdudt2α+μdudtα+f(u)=0;0<α<1;u(0)=A,ddtαu(0)=0,ddt2αu(0)=0,
(5)
here u, dudt3α, dudt2α, and dudtα are a dynamical variable, third-, second- and third-order time fractal derivatives, respectively. The definition of restoring force f(u) can take the form
f(u)=ω0u+Qu3.
(6)
This system in the case of α=1 the form [1]
u+ηu¨+μu˙+ω0u+Qu3=0,
(7)
where the first, second, and third derivatives of t are indicated by the upper dots. Here η, μ, and Q are constants and ω0 is a constant natural frequency.
The original fractal system (5) can be converted to the traditional form by letting n=1 one time, n=2 a second time, and finally n=3 into He's global fractal derivative (4); and employing the results into (5) gives
b3(α)(D+a(α))3u+ηb2(α)(D+a(α))2u+μb(α)(D+a(α))u+ω0u+Qu3=0,
(8)
where the notations a(α) and b(α) are
a(α)=Scot(12πα),andb(α)=Sα1sin(12πα).
(9)
Equation (8) is the critically damped Duffing-jerk oscillator, in the continuous space, in which the form is
u+ηeq(α)u¨+μeq(α)u˙+F(u,α)=0,
(10)
here the coefficients ηeq(α),μeq(α) and the restoring force F(u,α) are given by
ηeq(α)=3a(α)+ηb(α),
(11)
μeq(α)=3a2(α)+2ηa(α)b(α)+μb2(α),
(12)
F(u;α)=(a3(α)+ηa2(α)b(α)+μa(α)b2(α)+ω0b3(α))u+Qu3b3(α).
(13)
As a result, the initial conditions in the smooth space are changed to have amplitude–displacement oscillations and are only allowed to have initial acceleration and velocity that are not equal to zero as:
u(0)=A,u˙(0)=Aa(α),u¨(0)=Aa2(α).
(14)
The estimation of the fractal parameter S, which first appears in the transformation (3), can be accomplished through the comparison between the original restoring force f(u) and the equivalent restoring force F(u;α). The comparison between the nonlinearity in u leads to b3(α)1. This occurs only when α1; otherwise, b3(α)1 in which case the critical result may be obtained from the comparison of the original linear stiffness with the equivalent linear stiffness. This yields the following value of the fractal parameter S:
S3=ω0S3αsin3(12πα)S3αcos3(12πα)+ηS2αcos2(12πα)+μSαcos(12πα)+ω0.
(15)
It is noted that in the limiting case as α0, the parameter S should be zero, which is true. On the other side, in the limiting case when α1, the abovementioned relationship will be satisfied automatically. To explain the connection between the two parameters S α, the relation (15) has been plotted for S as a function α. The system considered in this calculation is for η=2 and μ=3 with some variation in ω0 (ω0=0.1,0.2,0.3,0.4). The calculations appear in figure 1. It is observed that S and α have a nonlinear relationship where S increases as α increases till a maximum point then the parameter S has gradually decreased. Also, the curve of the parameter S has been affected by increasing the parameter ω0. In figure 2, the parameter S is drawn versus ω0 the variation in α. It is noted that as ω0 increases, the parameter S increases. Two roles are observed for the parameter α growth. The right end for the S-curve has moved up as α increases from α=0 to 0.7, then, as the value of α continues to increase until α1, the right end of the S-curve has moved in the direction of decreasing S. This is the interpretation of the nonlinear relationship between the parameters S and α.
Figure 1. Representation of the fractal parameter S versus the parameter α for variation of ω0.

Full size|PPT slide

Figure 2. Representation of the fractal parameter S as a function of the linear frequency ω0 with the variation of α.

Full size|PPT slide

3. The methodology and solution

To convert the nonlinear equation (10) into the equivalent linearized form, the following trial solution may be introduced:
U(t)=AAΩa(α)sinΩt+AΩ2a2(α)(1cosΩt),
(16)
where Ω is the non-conservative frequency to be determined later. Because of (16), the equivalent linearized form of (10) may be sought as:
u+ηeq(α)u¨+μeq(α)u˙+ω(Ω)u=0,
(17)
where the conservative frequency ω(Ω) is estimated [26], in the presence of the damping forces, as
ω(Ω)=0TUF(U)dt0TU2dt;T=2πΩ,
(18)
Employing (16) into (18) the final integration gives
ω(Ω)=ab2(a2b2+abη+μ)+1b3ω0+(a2+Ω2)(35a4+40a2Ω2+8Ω4)4Ω4b3(3a2+2Ω2)A2Q.
(19)
Equation (17) is a linear critically damped jerk oscillator with constant coefficients depending on the fractional parameter α. The following method is used to get the exact solution for equation (17). Let us assume a solution in the following manner.
u(t)=ξ(t)eϕt.
(20)
It is understood that three significant unknown parameters, the total damping rate coefficient ϕ, unknown function ξ(t), and non-conservative frequency Ω are needed for covering the conservative frequency ω in the equivalent equation (17). Employing (20) into equation (17) gives
ξ(t)+12P(ϕ)ξ¨(t)+P(ϕ)ξ˙(t)+(P(ϕ)+ω)ξ(t)=0,
(21)
where the derivative for ϕ is represented by the dash, and P(ϕ) is estimated to be
P(ϕ)=ϕ3+ηeq(α)ϕ2+μeq(α)ϕ.
(22)
The velocillator configuration requires that the unknown parameter ϕ has to fulfill the ensuing equation:
ϕ3+ηeq(α)ϕ2+μeq(α)ϕ+ω(Ω)=0.
(23)
Keeping in mind the above condition, the solution of equation (21) can be performed as:
ξ(t)=e12(3φ+ηeq)t(C1cosΩt+C2sinΩt)dt+C3,
(24)
where the arbitrary constants Ci;i=1,2,3 are established by the equivalent initial conditions (14).
Making the above integration and applying conditions (14) yield solution (20) as:
u(t)=A(a+ϕ)e12(ϕ+ηeq)tΩ(4Ω2+9ϕ2+6ϕηeq+ηeq2)[4Ω(2ϕ+ηeqa)cosΩt+(4Ω2+3ϕ26aϕ+ηeq(ηeq+4ϕ2a))sinΩt]+Aeϕt[4Ω2+ηeq(ηeq+2ϕ4a)+(2aϕ)2](4Ω2+9ϕ2+6ϕηeq+ηeq2).
(25)
It is noted that the frequency Ω, established due to the velocillator technology, is given by
Ω2=P(ϕ)116P2(ϕ).
(26)
Employing (22) into (26) reduces it to
Ω2=14(3ϕ2+2ηeqϕ+4μeqηeq2).
(27)
This is the frequency formula as a function of the damping rate coefficient ϕ. Solving the cubic equation (23) and inserting the real root into (27) gives the desired real values of Ω2.

4. Stability analysis

There is an effective condition making the obtained solution (25) bounded. That is, Ω2 must have positive values, which requires that the polynomial of ϕ in (27) must be positive. Since this polynomial is of the second-degree in ϕ, then the stability requires that the discernment must be negative which leads to
4μeqηeq2>0.
(28)
As seen, the frequency Ω2 has been sought in terms of the parameter ϕ. To reformulate it in terms of the coefficients of the linearized equation (23), the following procedure can be utilized:
To perform the frequency equation (27) free of the parameter ϕ, condition (23) can be used for this purpose. The procedure depends on removing ϕ2 and ϕ3 from (23); and using (27) yields the following relationship:
ϕ=9ω+ηeq3+4ηeq(Ω2μeq)12Ω2+ηeq23μeq.
(29)
Employing (29) into (27), finally the following formula for the frequency Ω is estimated explicitly as
Ω612(3μeqηeq2)Ω4+116(ηeq23μeq)2Ω2164[27ω2+12ηeq(2ηeq29μeq)ωμeq2(ηeq24μeq)]=0.
(30)
To numerically explain the stability behavior, the root Ω2 of equation (30) has been plotted versus the fractal parameter α for some variation of the linear frequency ω0. The computations are done assuming that the system has A=1,Q=0.1,η=2, and μ=3. In the case where α=1, this system is chosen to satisfy the stability condition (28). The frequency curve has divided the plane (Ω2α) into two regions. This curve separates the positive side from the negative side. The region characterized with positive values represents the stable region, while the other side refers to the unstable region. The results are displayed in figure 5. Inspecting this graph, two roles are observed. The first role conserves the variation of the fractional parameter α. It is shown that the increase α leads to an increase in the unstable region. The maximum instability occurs corresponding to the largest value of α<1. This means that the decrease in α has a stabilizing influence. This behavior is consistent with what is observed in figures 3 and 4. The second important observation concerns the variation of the original linear frequency ω0. It has been shown that the increase in ω0 causes the transition curve to move in the direction of increasing Ω2, leaving more increase in the unstable area. This behavior demonstrates the destabilizing effects of increasing ω0.
Figure 3. Demonstrated a stability diagram for the influence of the parameter α on the fractal solution (25). The calculations are made with different values of ω0.

Full size|PPT slide

Figure 4. The representation of the solution (25) with the numerical solution of equation (7) for the variation of the fractal parameter α for a system having Q=0.1,A=1,ω0=1.75,η=2,μ=3.

Full size|PPT slide

5. Numerical illustration

For the same system taken into consideration in figure 3, the numerical representation of the solution (25) has been produced using two distinct values of the linear frequency ω0. The numerical calculations are displayed in figures 4 and 5. Figure 4 represents the system having ω0=1.75. The analytical solution (25) and the numerical solution of equation (7), applied in the instance of α=1, are compared. This graph analysis reveals a damping behavior with a highly good matching between the numerical and analytical representation. For checking the impact of α on the profile of the analytical solution (25), the calculations, with the variation in the fractal parameter 0<α<1, are done and collected in this graph, too. It is noted that the amplitude of the vibration decreases as α decreases. This means that the dwindling in the value of α has backed up the system-dampening behavior. This simulates the stability behavior as shown in figure 3.
Investigating the same system in figure 4, except that ω0=2, is the subject of figure 5. A significant change in the numerical and analytical solution behavior is observed as ω0 increases. There is a divergence in the amplitude of the vibration as t increases. The major observation in this examination is that the decrease in α hinders the developmental role of the amplitude of oscillation and transforms it into a damping behavior. This is a great advantage of the fractal parameter effect. Finally, it is evident from the preceding figures that fractal oscillation behaves differently from traditional behavior. Therefore, there is a great advantage to studying the fractal model and the influence of the fractal parameter, which has important contributions to the analysis of dynamic oscillation.
Figure 5. The representation of the solution (25) with the numerical solution of equation (7) for the same system as given in figure 3 except that ω0=2.

Full size|PPT slide

6. Conclusion

Fractal oscillation performs differently from conventional behavior, so in the current work, a new analysis of the fractal-damping Duffing-jerk oscillator has been proposed. Two converting approaches have been applied in this investigation. The first one concerns the transforming of the fractal derivative to the traditional one to describe the fractal Duffing jerk oscillator into continuous space. The procedure is an insightful and comprehensive formularization based on a global definition of the He's fractal derivative. So the limitations of this new analysis are the restrictions of the He's definition. The second involves turning a nonlinear jerk oscillator into a damping linear jerk oscillator using a non-perturbative methodology. This alternative form of the fractal jerk appears with equivalent coefficients having contributions of the fractal order α. The analytical solution of the linear jerk oscillation is given and the stability behavior is briefly explained. To illustrate the operability and effectiveness of the method, the analytical solution, with α very closer to unity, is compared with the numerical one, which shows a great agreement. The contribution of the fractal derivative order α has an impact on the jerk stability profile. The effectiveness of the fractal derivative order α has been explained graphically, which shows that the decrease in its values plays a destabilizing influence. Further, it can transform the behavior of the growth in the oscillation amplitude into the behavior of damping in the amplitude of the vibration characteristics.

Acknowledgments

The authors express their gratitude to Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University Researchers Supporting Project number (PNURSP2023R17), Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Competing interests and funding

The authors got no financial support for this article, publication, or authorship of the current investigation.

Statements and declarations

In connection with the publication of this search, the authors declare that there are no competing interests.

References

1
El-Dib Y O 2022 An efficient approach to solving fractional Van der Pol–Duffing jerk oscillator Commun. Theor. Phys. 74 105006
2
Eager D Pendrill A-M Reistad N 2016 Beyond velocity and acceleration: jerk, snap and higher derivatives Eur. J. Phys. 37 65008
3
Tedesco L 2018 Ellipsoidal expansion of the Universe, cosmic shear, acceleration and jerk parameter Eur. Phys. J. Plus. 133 188
4
Gómez-Aguilar J F Rosales-García J Escobar-Jiménez R F López-López M G Alvarado-Martínez V M Olivares-Peregrino V H 2016 On the possibility of the jerk derivative in electrical circuits Adv. Math. Phys. 2016 9740410
5
El-Nabulsi R A 2018 Time-nonlocal kinetic equations, jerk and hyperjerk in plasmas and solar physics Adv. Space Res. 61 2914 2931
6
El-Nabulsi R A 2021 Free variable mass nonlocal systems, jerks, and snaps, and their implications in rotating fluids in rockets Acta Mech. 232 89 109
7
Schot S H 1978 Jerk: the time rate of change of acceleration Am. J. Phys. 46 1090 1094
8
Duffy B R Wilson S K 1997 A third-order differential equation arising in thin-film flows and relevant to Tanner's law Appl. Math. Lett. 10 63 68
9
Tiryaki A Aktaş M F 2007 Oscillation criteria of a certain class of third order nonlinear delay differential equations with damping J. Math. Anal. Appl. 325 54 68
10
Duffing G 1918 Erzwungene Schwingungen bei Veränderlicher Eigenfrequenz Braunschweig Vieweg u Sohn p 7
11
Nayfeh A H Mook D T 1979 Non-Linear Oscillations New York, USA John Wily & Sons
12
Nayfeh A H 1973 Perturbation Methods New York, USA John Wily & Sons
13
He J H 1999 Homotopy perturbation technique Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 178 257 262
14
He J-H 2000 A coupling method of a homotopy technique and a perturbation technique for non-linear problems Int. J. Non Linear Mech. 35 37 43
15
He J-H 2005 Homotopy perturbation method for bifurcation of nonlinear problems Int. J. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 6 207 208
16
El-Dib Y O 2021 The frequency estimation for non-conservative nonlinear oscillation ZAMM-J. Appl. Math. Mech. für Angew Math. und Mech. 101 e202100187
17
El-Dib Y O 2022 The simplest approach to solving the cubic nonlinear jerk oscillator with the non-perturbative method Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 45 5165 5183
18
El-Dib Y O 2022 The damping Helmholtz–Rayleigh–Duffing oscillator with the non-perturbative approach Math. Comput. Simul 194 552 562
19
He J-H 2006 Some asymptotic methods for strongly nonlinear equations Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 20 1141 1199
20
He J-H 2008 Comment on 'He's frequency formulation for nonlinear oscillators' Eur. J. Phys. 29 L19
21
Ma H 2022 A short remark on He's frequency formulation J. Low Freq. Noise, Vib. Act. Control. 41 1380 1385
22
Alyousef H A Salas A H Alharthi M R El-Tantawy S A 2022 Galerkin method, ansatz method, and He's frequency formulation for modeling the forced damped parametric driven pendulum oscillators J. Low Freq. Noise, Vib. Act. Control. 41 1426 1445
23
Feng G Niu J 2023 An analytical solution of the fractal toda oscillator Results Phys. 106208
24
He J-H Qie N He C-H Gepreel K 2022 Fast identification of the pull-in voltage of a nano/micro-electromechanical system J. Low Freq. Noise, Vib. Active Control 41 566 571
25
El-Dib Y O 2022 Immediate solution for fractional nonlinear oscillators using the equivalent linearized method J. Low Freq. Noise, Vib. Active Control 41 1411 1425
26
El-Dib Y O 2023 Insightful and comprehensive formularization of frequency amplitude formula for strong or singular nonlinear oscillators J. Low Freq. Noise, Vib. Act. Control 42 89 109
27
El-Dib Y O Elgazery N S 2022 Periodic solution of the parametric Gaylord's oscillator with a non-perturbative approach Europhys. Lett. 140 52001
28
El-Dib Y O Elgazery N S Gad N S 2023 A novel technique to obtain a time-delayed vibration control analytical solution with simulation of He's formula J. Low Freq. Noise, Vib. Act. Control
29
El-Dib Y O Elgazery N S Lyousef H A 2023 A heuristic approach to the prediction of a periodic solution for a damping nonlinear oscillator with the non-perturbative technique Front. Phys. 11 1122592
30
Chen M Yu B Xu P Chen J 2007 A new deterministic complex network model with hierarchical structure Physica A 385 707 717
31
Yang S Fu H Yu B 2017 Fractal analysis of flow resistance in tree-like branching networks with roughened microchannels Fractals 25 1750008
32
Miao T Chen A Xu Y Yang S Yu B 2016 Optimal structure of damaged tree-like branching networks for the equivalent thermal conductivity Int. J. Therm. Sci. 102 89 99
33
Liang M Gao Y Yang S Xiao B Wang Z Li Y 2018 An analytical model for two-phase relative permeability with Jamin effect in porous media Fractals 26 1850037
34
El-Nabulsi R A Anukool W 2022 Modeling of combustion and turbulent jet diffusion flames in fractal dimensions Contin. Mech. Thermodyn. 34 1219 1235
35
El-Nabulsi R A Anukool W 2022 Fractal dimensions in fluid dynamics and their effects on the Rayleigh problem, the Burger's Vortex and the Kelvin–Helmholtz instability Acta Mech. 233 363 381
36
El-Nabulsi R A Anukool W 2022 Fractal nonlocal thermoelasticity of thin elastic nanobeam with apparent negative thermal conductivity J. Therm. Stresses 45 303 318
37
El-Nabulsi R A Anukool W 2022 Ocean-atmosphere dynamics and Rossby waves in fractal anisotropic media Meteorol. Atmos. Phys. 134 33
38
El-Nabulsi R A Anukool W 2022 Grad–Shafranov equation in fractal dimensions Fusion Sci. Technol. 78 449 467
39
Sheng M Li G Tian S Huang Z Chen L 2016 A fractal permeability model for shale matrix with multi-scale porous structure Fractals 24 1650002
40
Miao T Chen A Xu Y Cheng S Yu B 2019 A fractal permeability model for porous–fracture media with the transfer of fluids from porous matrix to fracture Fractals 27 1950121
41
He J-H El-Dib Y O Mady A A 2021 Homotopy perturbation method for the fractal toda oscillator Fractal Fract. 5 93
42
He J-H Qie N He C Saeed T 2021 On a strong minimum condition of a fractal variational principle Appl. Math. Lett. 119 107199
43
Elías-Zúñiga A Martínez-Romero O Olvera-Trejo D Palacios-Pineda L M 2021 Exact steady-state solution of fractals damped, and forced systems Results Phys. 28 104580
44
Feng G-Q 2021 He's frequency formula to fractal undamped duffing equation J. Low Freq. Noise, Vib. Act. Control 40 1671 1676
45
Ain Q T He J-H 2019 On two-scale dimension and its applications Therm. Sci. 23 1707 1712
46
Anjum N Ain Q T Li X X 2021 Two-scale mathematical model for tsunami wave GEM—Int. J. Geomath. 12 1 12
47
Anjum N He C-H He J-H 2021 Two-scale fractal theory for the population dynamics Fractals 29 2150182
48
He J-H El-Dib Y O 2021 A tutorial introduction to the two-scale fractal calculus and its application to the fractal Zhiber–Shabat oscillator Fractals 29 1 9
49
Lu J Chen L 2022 Numerical analysis of a fractal modification of Yao-Cheng oscillator Results Phys. 38 105602
50
Tul Ain Q Sathiyaraj T Karim S Nadeem M Kandege Mwanakatwe P 2022 ABC fractional derivative for the alcohol drinking model using two-scale fractal dimension Complexity 2022 8531858
51
Zuo Y Liu H 2021 A fractal rheological model for sic paste using a fractal derivative J. Appl. Comput. Mech. 7 13 18
52
Ain Q T Anjum N He C-H 2021 An analysis of time-fractional heat transfer problem using two-scale approach GEM—Int. J. Geomath. 12 1 10
53
Yang J Afzal F Appiah P 2022 Fractional derivative for varicella-zoster virus using two-scale fractal dimension approach with vaccination Adv. Math. Phys. 2022 1725110
54
Huang Z Wang H Su X Liao W 2023 A two-scale fractal permeability model for vuggy porous media Phys. Fluids 35 027116
55
Wang K 2021 He's frequency formulation for fractal nonlinear oscillator arising in a microgravity space Numer. Methods Partial Differential Equ. 37 1374 1384
56
Wang K-L 2021 A new fractal transform frequency formulation for fractal nonlinear oscillators Fractals 29 2150062
57
Wang K-L Wei C-F 2021 A powerful and simple frequency formula to nonlinear fractal oscillators J. Low Freq. Noise, Vib. Act. Control 40 1373 1379
58
Tian Y 2022 Frequency formula for a class of fractal vibration system Rep. Mech. Eng. 3 55 61
59
He J-H Kou S-J He C-H Zhang Z-W Gepreel K A 2021 Fractal oscillation and its frequency–amplitude property Fractals 29 2150105
60
Wang K-L 2022 Novel approach for fractal nonlinear oscillators with discontinuities by Fourier series Fractals 30 2250009
61
El-Nabulsi R A Khalili Golmankhaneh A Agarwal P 2022 On a new generalized local fractal derivative operator Chaos Solitons Fractals 161 112329
62
Nadeem M He J-H He C-H Sedighi H M Shirazi A 2022 A numerical solution of nonlinear fractional Newell-Whitehead-Segel equation using natural transform TWMS J. PURE Appl. Math. 13 168 182
63
Elgazery N S 2020 A periodic solution of the newell-whitehead-segel (NWS) wave equation via fractional calculus J. Appl. Comput. Mech. 6 1293 1300
64
Pandey P Kumar S Gómez-Aguilar J F 2022 Numerical solution of the time fractional reaction-advection-diffusion equation in porous media J. Appl. Comput. Mech. 8 84 96
65
El-Dib Y O Elgazery N S Mady A A 2021 Nonlinear dynamical analysis of a time-fractional Klein–Gordon equation Pramana 95 1 8
66
El-Dib Y O Elgazery N S 2022 A novel pattern in a class of fractal models with the non-perturbative approach Chaos, Solitons Fractals 164 112694
67
El-Dib Y O Elgazery N S 2023 An efficient approach to converting the damping fractal models to the traditional system Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 118 107036
68
Wang K-L Liu S-Y 2017 He's fractional derivative and its application for fractional Fornberg–Whitham equation Therm. Sci. 21 2049 2055
69
He J H Ain Q T 2020 New promises and future challenges of fractal calculus: from two-scale thermodynamics to fractal variational principle Therm. Sci. 24 659 681
70
Hu Y He J-H 2016 On fractal space-time and fractional calculus Therm. Sci. 20 773 777
71
Liu C 2021 Periodic solution of fractal Phi-4 equation Therm. Sci. B 25 1345 1350
72
Zuo Y 2021 A gecko-like fractal receptor of a three-dimensional printing technology: a fractal oscillator J. Math. Chem. 59 735 744

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

© 2023 Institute of Theoretical Physics CAS, Chinese Physical Society and IOP Publishing
PDF(834 KB)

Collection(s)

Mathematical Physics

140

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/