Lump solution and interaction solutions to the fourth-order extended (2&plus;1)-dimensional Boiti-Leon-Manna-Pempinelli equation

Wenxia Chen; Yi Wang; Lixin Tian

doi:10.1088/1572-9494/acf3d6

PDF(1680 KB)

Communications in Theoretical Physics ›› 2023, Vol. 75 ›› Issue (10) : 105003. DOI: 10.1088/1572-9494/acf3d6

Lump solution and interaction solutions to the fourth-order extended (2+1)-dimensional Boiti-Leon-Manna-Pempinelli equation

Author information +

History +

Abstract

In this paper, we explore the exact solutions to the fourth-order extended (2+1)-dimensional Boiti-Leon-Manna-Pempinelli equation. Based on Hirota bilinear method, lump solution, periodic cross-kink solutions and bright-dark soliton solutions were investigated. By calculating and solving, the peak and trough of lump solution are obtained, and the maximum and minimum points of each are solved. The three-dimensional plots and density plots of periodic cross-kink solution and bright-dark soliton solution are drawn and the dynamics of solutions under different parameters are observed.

Key words

Hirota bilinear method / eBLMP equation / lump solution / interation solution

Cite this article

EndNote

Ris (Procite)

Bibtex

Download Citations

Wenxia Chen, Yi Wang, Lixin Tian. Lump solution and interaction solutions to the fourth-order extended (2+1)-dimensional Boiti-Leon-Manna-Pempinelli equation[J]. Communications in Theoretical Physics, 2023, 75(10): 105003 https://doi.org/10.1088/1572-9494/acf3d6

1. Introduction

Nonlinear science is an interdisciplinary subject which researches the commonness of nonlinear phenomena. Its rapid development promotes the development of related fields of mathematical physics. With the development of soliton theory, solitons have become an important branch of nonlinear science. Soliton equations can describe many nonlinear phenomena, for example, they play an important role in nonlinear mechanics, fluid optics, Marine science and other fields. So it is an important subject to study the nonlinear waves and exact solutions of soliton equations, such as Schödinger equation [1, 2], Korteweg-de Vries equation [3, 4], Boussinesq equation [5] and so on. With the deepening of the research, the development of nonlinear wave theory is promoted, especially in the Chen-Lee-Liu equation [6] and Manakov system [7–10], which show a lot of the latest progress of nonlinear wave theory. Many exact solutions have also been proposed, such as soliton solution, lump solution, rogue wave solution, periodic wave solution, breather solution, bright and dark soliton solution and so on. Lump wave [11–13] and rough wave [9, 14, 15] are both local waves. Rough waves are localized in space and time, while lump waves are only rational function waves localized in space. The interaction between lump waves and some solitary waves will lead to many new interaction solutions. They collide after interaction, and we can observe many interesting physical phenomena by drawing them.

In recent years, many methods have been found to solve the exact solutions of soliton equations. For example, Hirota bilinear method [16–18], Generalized bilinear method [19, 20], homogeneous balance method [21, 22], Riemann-Hilbert method [23–25], Darboux transformation [26–28], Riccati expansion method [29, 30] and so on. Hirota bilinear method is a common method to solve soliton equations, and Ma has solved many soliton equations with lump solutions and exact solutions by Hirota bilinear method [31]. Generalized bilinear method was proposed by Ma in 2015. Batwa and Ma used this method to solve the lump-type and interaction solutions of the (3+1)-dimensional Jimbo-Miwa-like equation [20]. Recently, Riemann-Hilbert method has been widely used to solve soliton solutions of equations. Explicit soliton solutions of a higher-order Chen-Lee-Liu equation [25], N-soliton solutions for the Maxwell-Bloch equations [32] are obtained by this method.

In this research, we focus on the fourth-order extended (2+1)-dimensional Boiti-Leon-Manna-Pempinelli (eBLMP) equation [33], given as

\begin{array}{rcl} \begin{array}{l} u_{y t} - c_{2} u_{x y} - c_{4} u_{y y} + c_{1} u_{x x y} \\ + c_{3} (u_{y y y y} - 6 {v u}_{y y}) \\ - 3 c_{1} (u_{y} u_{x x} + u_{x} u_{x y}) = 0, \\ u_{y y} - v_{x} = 0, \end{array} \end{array}

(1)

where

c_{i} (i = 1, 2, 3, 4)

are arbitrary constants. The fourth-order eBLMP equation describes a physical phenomenon in nature, namely the evolution of nonlinear shallow-water wave propagation. It is widely used in optical fiber, traffic flow and other physical phenomena. Ren [33] has given the Hirota bilinear method of eBLMP equation, solved the eBLMP equation with WTO method, and obtained the D'Alembert-type wave and solitary wave. Through the following transformation

\begin{array}{rcl} u = - 2 {(l n f)}_{x}, v = - 2 {(l n f)}_{y y}, \end{array}

(2)

the bilinear form of equation (1) gives

\begin{array}{rcl} \begin{array}{l} (D_{t} D_{y} + c_{1} D_{x}^{3} D_{y} - c_{2} D_{x} D_{y} \\ + c_{3} D_{y}^{4} - c_{4} D_{y}^{2}) f \cdot f = 0. \end{array} \end{array}

(3)

It is not difficult to rewrite equation (3) into the following equivalent form

\begin{array}{rcl} \begin{array}{l} 2 f_{y t} f - 2 f_{y} f_{t} + c_{1} (2 f_{x x x y} f \\ - 2 f_{x x x} f_{y} - 6 f_{x x y} f_{x} + 6 f_{x x} f_{x y}) \\ - c_{2} (2 f_{x y} f - 2 f_{x} f_{y}) \\ + c_{3} (2 f_{y y y y} f - 8 f_{y y y} f_{y} + 6 f_{y y}^{2}) \\ + c_{4} (2 f_{y y} f - 2 f_{y}^{2}) = 0. \end{array} \end{array}

(4)

Select c₁ = 1, c₂ = c₃ = c₄ = 0, and from equation (1), we obtain the (2+1)-dimensional BLMP equation [34]. This equation is closely related to the KdV equation. Select c₃ = 0, and from equation (1), we obtain the (2+1)-dimensional ePBLMP equation [35]. BLMP equation is an important integrable model, which is widely used in physics and engineering phenomena such as fluid, traffic flow and plasma. Recently, some new interaction solutions to (2+1)-dimensional BLMP have been obtained by using the Hirota bilinear method [36]. The (3+1)-dimensional BLMP equation [37] describes the formation of liquid and its exact solutions are obtained by bilinear method. There are many ways to solve the BLMP equation such as discovering the exact solutions to (2+1), (3+1) and (4+1) dimensional time-fractional BLMP equations through the extended tanh method [38]. The exact multiwave solutions to BLMP equation are constructed by multiple exp-function method [39]. The mixed lump-soliton solutions to BLMP equation are obtained by the Generalized bilinear method [40]. Some interation solutions to eBLMP equation are obtained by the Hirota bilinear method [41].

The outline of our article is organized as follows. In section 2, solve the lump solution to the (2+1)-dimensional eBLMP equation, provide appropriate parameters, draw three-dimensional and density plots of the solutions u and v, and calculate their extreme points. At the same time, we also analyze the motion paths of the lump wave at different time t. In section 3, two groups of periodic cross-kink solutions are calculated, and the dynamic paths of the solution at different times are analyzed, and the influence of different parameters on the periodic cross-kink solution is discussed. In section 4, two groups of bright-dark soliton solutions are calculated, and the appropriate parameters are selected to draw the three-dimensional plots and density plots of the bright-dark soliton solutions u and v, and analyze the trajectory of the solution u at different times. In section 5, we summarize the whole article.

2. Lump solution to the eBLMP equation

In order to get the lump solution to equation (1), the following quadratic function can be assumed

\begin{array}{rcl} \begin{array}{rcl} f & = & g^{2} + h^{2} + a_{9}, \\ g & = & a_{1} x + a_{2} y + a_{3} t + a_{4}, \\ h & = & a_{5} x + a_{6} y + a_{7} t + a_{8}, \end{array} \end{array}

(5)

where a_i(i = 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9) are constants to be determined.

Substituting expression (5) into (4), then equating all coefficients of x, y, t. Letting x, y, t have coefficients of different powers of zero, then we can get a set of nonlinear algebraic equations about a_i(i = 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9). After solving the system of equations, we obtain some values of the parameters as:

\begin{array}{rcl} \begin{array}{rcl} a_{1} & = & a_{1}, a_{2} = a_{2}, a_{3} = \frac{a_{1} a_{6} c_{2} - a_{2} a_{7}}{a_{6}}, \\ a_{4} & = & a_{4}, a_{5} = 0, a_{6} = a_{6}, a_{7} = a_{7}, a_{8} = a_{8}, \\ a_{9} & = & - \frac{3 (a_{1}^{3} a_{2} c_{1} + a_{2}^{4} c_{3} + 2 a_{2}^{2} a_{6}^{2} c_{3} + a_{6}^{4} c_{3})}{a_{6} a_{7}}, \\ c_{1} & = & c_{1}, c_{2} = c_{2}, c_{3} = c_{3}, c_{4} = - \frac{a_{7} (a_{2}^{2} + a_{2}^{2})}{a_{1}^{2} a_{6}}, \end{array} \end{array}

(6)

where a_i(i = 1, 2, 4, 6, 7, 8), c₁, c₂, c₃ are real number that satisfy a₁ ≠ 0, a₆ ≠ 0 and a₇ ≠ 0. By means of transformation (2), the lump solution to equation (1) can be obtained

\begin{array}{rcl} \begin{array}{rcl} u & = & - \frac{4 a_{1} g}{f}, \\ v & = & - \frac{4 (a_{2}^{2} + a_{6}^{2})}{f} + \frac{2 {(2 a_{2} g + 2 a_{6} h)}^{2}}{f^{2}}, \end{array} \end{array}

(7)

where

\begin{array}{rcl} \begin{array}{rcl} f & = & g^{2} + h^{2} \\ - \frac{3 (a_{1}^{3} a_{2} c_{1} + a_{2}^{4} c_{3} + 2 a_{2}^{2} a_{6}^{2} c_{3} + a_{6}^{4} c_{3})}{a_{6} a_{7}}, \\ g & = & a_{1} x + a_{2} y + \frac{a_{1} a_{6} c_{2} - a_{2} a_{7}}{a_{6}} t + a_{4}, \\ h & = & a_{6} y + a_{7} t + a_{8} . \end{array} \end{array}

The parameters are selected as

\begin{array}{rcl} \begin{array}{rcl} a_{1} & = & 1, a_{2} = \frac{1}{2}, a_{4} = 1, a_{6} = 1, a_{7} = - 1, \\ a_{8} & = & 1, c_{1} = \frac{1}{2}, c_{2} = 1, c_{3} = \frac{1}{2} . \end{array} \end{array}

(8)

The solutions of u and v are shown in figure 1. We can observe the local characteristics of the lump solution at t = 0. From figure 1, it can be seen that the lump wave of u has one peak and one trough, and is highly symmetrical, while the lump wave of v has one trough and two peaks.

Figure 1. Plots of lump solution u (a) three-dimensional plot; (b) contour plot. Plots of lump solution v (c) three-dimensional plot; (d) contour plot.

Full size|PPT slide

The critical points of the lump wave are solved

\begin{array}{rcl} \begin{array}{rcl} \frac{\partial u (x, y)}{\partial x} & = & 0, \frac{\partial u (x, y)}{\partial y} = 0, \\ \frac{\partial v (x, y)}{\partial x} & = & 0, \frac{\partial v (x, y)}{\partial y} = 0. \end{array} \end{array}

(9)

By solving the above condition (9), we find two extremum points of u as

\begin{array}{rcl} \begin{array}{rcl} (x_{1}, y_{1}) & = & (- \frac{a_{7} ((- 2 a_{7} t - a_{8}) a_{2} + (a_{1} c_{2} t + a_{4}) a_{6}) + \sqrt{3} \sqrt{- a_{6} a_{7} ({(a_{2}^{2} + a_{6}^{2})}^{2} c_{3} + a_{1}^{3} a_{2} c_{1})}}{a_{1} a_{6} a_{7}}, - \frac{a_{7} t + a_{8}}{a_{6}}), \\ (x_{2}, y_{2}) & = & (- \frac{a_{7} ((- 2 a_{7} t - a_{8}) a_{2} + (a_{1} c_{2} t + a_{4}) a_{6}) - \sqrt{3} \sqrt{- a_{6} a_{7} ({(a_{2}^{2} + a_{6}^{2})}^{2} c_{3} + a_{1}^{3} a_{2} c_{1})}}{a_{1} a_{6} a_{7}}, - \frac{a_{7} t + a_{8}}{a_{6}}) . \end{array} \end{array}

(10)

Explicitly, the above two critical points are symmetrical at the point

\begin{array}{rcl} \begin{array}{l} (x, y) = (\frac{(2 a_{2} a_{7} - a_{1} a_{6} c_{2}) t + a_{2} a_{8} - a_{4} a_{6}}{a_{1} a_{6}}, \\ - \frac{a_{7} t + a_{8}}{a_{6}}) . \end{array} \end{array}

Similarly, we can find three extreme points of v as

\begin{array}{rcl} \begin{array}{rcl} (x_{1}, y_{1}) & = & (\frac{(2 a_{2} a_{7} - a_{1} a_{6} c_{2}) t + a_{2} a_{8} - a_{4} a_{6}}{a_{1} a_{6}}, \\ - \frac{a_{7} t + a_{8}}{a_{6}}), \\ (x_{2}, y_{2}) & = & (\frac{(2 a_{2} a_{7} - a_{1} a_{6} c_{2}) t + a_{2} a_{8} - a_{4} a_{6}}{a_{1} a_{6}}, \\ \frac{θ_{1} + θ_{2}}{a_{6} a_{7} (a_{2}^{2} + a_{6}^{2})}), \\ (x_{3}, y_{3}) & = & (\frac{(2 a_{2} a_{7} - a_{1} a_{6} c_{2}) t + a_{2} a_{8} - a_{4} a_{6}}{a_{1} a_{6}}, \\ \frac{θ_{1} - θ_{2}}{a_{6} a_{7} (a_{2}^{2} + a_{6}^{2})}), \end{array} \end{array}

(11)

where

\begin{array}{rcl} \begin{array}{rcl} θ_{1} & = & - (a_{2}^{2} + a_{6}^{2}) a_{7}^{2} t - (a_{2}^{2} + a_{6}^{2}) a_{7} a_{8}, \\ θ_{2} & = & 3 \sqrt{- a_{6} a_{7} (a_{2}^{2} + a_{6}^{2}) (a_{1}^{3} a_{2} c_{1} + a_{2}^{4} c_{3} + 2 a_{2}^{2} a_{6}^{2} c_{3} + a_{6}^{4} c_{3})} . \end{array} \end{array}

Then, we figure out the Hessian matrix and v_yy at point

(x_{1}, y_{1})

\begin{array}{rcl} \begin{array}{l} Δ = {| \begin{array}{ll} \frac{\partial^{2} v (x, y)}{\partial y^{2}} & \frac{\partial^{2} v (x, y)}{\partial x \partial y} \\ \frac{\partial^{2} v (x, y)}{\partial x \partial y} & \frac{\partial^{2} v (x, y)}{\partial x^{2}} \end{array} |}_{(x_{1}, y_{1})} \\ = \frac{64 {(a_{2}^{2} + a_{6}^{2})}^{2} a_{1}^{2} a_{7}^{4} a_{6}^{6}}{27 {(a_{1}^{3} a_{2} c_{1} + a_{2}^{4} c_{3} + 2 a_{2}^{2} a_{6}^{2} c_{3} + a_{6}^{4} c_{3})}^{4}} \\ = \frac{104857600}{32019867} > 0, \\ v_{y y} (x_{1}, y_{1}) \\ = \frac{8 {(a_{2}^{2} + a_{6}^{2})}^{2} a_{6}^{2} a_{7}^{2}}{3 {(a_{1}^{3} a_{2} c_{1} + a_{2}^{4} c_{3} + 2 a_{2}^{2} a_{6}^{2} c_{3} + a_{6}^{4} c_{3})}^{2}} \\ = \frac{12800}{3267} > 0, \end{array} \end{array}

(12)

and the Hessian matrix and v_yy at point

(x_{2}, y_{2})

and

(x_{3}, y_{3})

\begin{array}{rcl} \begin{array}{l} Δ = {| \begin{array}{ll} \frac{\partial^{2} v (x, y)}{\partial y^{2}} & \frac{\partial^{2} v (x, y)}{\partial x \partial y} \\ \frac{\partial^{2} v (x, y)}{\partial x \partial y} & \frac{\partial^{2} v (x, y)}{\partial x^{2}} \end{array} |}_{(x_{i}, y_{i})} \\ = \frac{{(a_{2}^{2} + a_{6}^{2})}^{2} a_{1}^{2} a_{7}^{4} a_{6}^{6}}{108 {(a_{1}^{3} a_{2} c_{1} + a_{2}^{4} c_{3} + 2 a_{2}^{2} a_{6}^{2} c_{3} + a_{6}^{4} c_{3})}^{4}} \\ = \frac{409600}{32019867} > 0, \\ v_{y y} (x_{i}, y_{i}) \\ = - \frac{{(a_{2}^{2} + a_{6}^{2})}^{2} a_{6}^{2} a_{7}^{2}}{12 {(a_{1}^{3} a_{2} c_{1} + a_{2}^{4} c_{3} + 2 a_{2}^{2} a_{6}^{2} c_{3} + a_{6}^{4} c_{3})}^{2}} \\ = - \frac{400}{3267} < 0, i = 2, 3. \end{array} \end{array}

(13)

Therefore, the v at the extreme point

(x_{1}, y_{1})

is the minimum value of lump solution, that is, the trough depth is

\begin{array}{rcl} D = v_{min} = v (- \frac{1}{2}, - 1) = - \frac{160}{99}, \end{array}

(14)

and the v at the extreme points

(x_{2}, y_{2})

and

(x_{3}, y_{3})

are the maximum value of lump solution, that is, the peak height is

\begin{array}{rcl} \begin{array}{l} H = v_{max} = v (- \frac{1}{2}, - 1 + \frac{3 \sqrt{330}}{20}) \\ = v (- \frac{1}{2}, - 1 - \frac{3 \sqrt{330}}{20}) = \frac{20}{99} . \end{array} \end{array}

(15)

The moving path of the lump wave can intuitively describe the moving of the lump solution. By solving f_x = f_y = 0, we can obtain the moving path of the lump wave in (7). The exact moving path of the lump wave is written as

\begin{array}{rcl} \begin{array}{l} y = \frac{a_{1} a_{7} x}{a_{1} a_{6} c_{2} - 2 a_{2} a_{7}} \\ - \frac{(- a_{1} a_{8} c_{2} + a_{4} a_{7}) a_{6} + a_{2} a_{7} a_{8}}{(a_{1} a_{6} c_{2} - 2 a_{2} a_{7}) a_{6}} . \end{array} \end{array}

(16)

Through figure 2, it was found that c₂ affects the moving path of the lump waves. Figures 2(a) and (b) take c₂ = 1, and figures 2(c) and (d) take c₂ = −3. The contour plots of the lump wave u are presented at t = − 40, −20, 0, 20, 40. The contour plots of the lump wave v are presented at t = −20, −10, 0, 10, 20. The orange lines in figures 2(a), (b) and figures 2(c), (d) represent the relevant movement progression, where

y = - \frac{1}{2} x - \frac{5}{4}

and

y = \frac{1}{2} x - \frac{3}{4}

, respectively. From figure 2, it can be observed that the lump waves move uniformly in a straight line along the moving path, only changing with times.

Figure 2. The moving path of the lump wave u is at (a) c₂ = 1, (c) c₂ = −3. The moving path of the lump wave v is at (b) c₂ = 1, (d) c₂ = −3.

Full size|PPT slide

3. Periodic cross-kink solutions to the eBLMP equation

In order to find periodic cross-kink solutions to equation (1),we assume that

\begin{array}{rcl} f = e^{- g} + k_{1} e^{g} + k_{2} \sin (h) + k_{3} \sinh (n) + k_{4}, \end{array}

(17)

where k₁, k₂, k₃, k₄ are arbitary constants, and g, h and n are defined as follows

\begin{array}{rcl} \begin{array}{rcl} g & = & a_{1} x + a_{2} y + a_{3} t + a_{4}, \\ h & = & a_{5} x + a_{6} y + a_{7} t + a_{8}, \\ n & = & a_{9} x + a_{10} y + a_{11} t + a_{12}, \end{array} \end{array}

where a_i(i = 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12) are arbitary constants to be determined. Substituting expression (17) into (4), then equating all coefficients of

e^{- g}, e^{g}, \sin (h), \cos (h), \sinh (n), \cosh (n)

. Letting

e^{- g}, e^{g}, \sin (h), \cos (h), \sinh (n), \cosh (n)

have coefficients of different powers of zero, then we can get a set of nonlinear algebraic equations about a_i(i = 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12). The symbolic computing software Maple is used to solve the above algebraic equations, and the following two groups of solutions were obtained.

Case 1:

\begin{array}{rcl} \begin{array}{rcl} a_{2} & = & 0, k_{1} = 0, a_{5} = \frac{a_{6} a_{9}}{a_{10}}, \\ a_{7} & = & \frac{a_{6} a_{9} (3 a_{9}^{2} c_{1} + c_{2})}{a_{10}}, \\ a_{11} & = & a_{9} (3 a_{9}^{2} c_{1} + c_{2}), c_{1} = c_{1}, \\ c_{2} & = & c_{2}, c_{3} = - \frac{c_{1} a_{9}^{3}}{a_{10}^{3}}, c_{4} = a_{9} a_{10} c_{1}, \\ k_{i} & = & k_{i} (i = 2, 3, 4), \\ a_{j} & = & a_{j} (j = 1, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 10, 12), \end{array} \end{array}

(18)

where

k_{i} (i = 2, 3, 4), a_{j} (j = 1, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 10, 12)

and c₁, c₂ are arbitary constants and a₁₀ ≠ 0. By means of transformation (2), the periodic cross-kink solution to equation (1) can be obtained

\begin{array}{rcl} u = - \frac{2 (- a_{1} e^{- a_{1} x - a_{3} t - a_{4}} + \frac{k_{2} a_{6} a_{9}}{a_{10}} \cos (h) + k_{3} a_{9} \cosh (n))}{e^{- a_{1} x - a_{3} t - a_{4}} + k_{2} \sin (h) + k_{3} \sinh (n) + k_{4}}, \end{array}

(19)

where

\begin{array}{rcl} \begin{array}{rcl} h & = & \frac{a_{6} a_{9}}{a_{10}} x + a_{6} y + \frac{a_{6} a_{9} (3 a_{9}^{2} c_{1} + c_{2})}{a_{10}} t + a_{8}, \\ n & = & a_{9} x + a_{10} y + a_{9} (3 a_{9}^{2} c_{1} + c_{2}) t + a_{12} . \end{array} \end{array}

Case 2:

\begin{array}{rcl} \begin{array}{rcl} a_{3} & = & \frac{a_{1} (a_{1} c_{4} + a_{2} c_{2})}{a_{2}}, \\ a_{5} & = & \frac{a_{1} a_{6}}{a_{2}}, a_{7} = \frac{a_{1} a_{6} (a_{1} c_{4} + a_{2} c_{2})}{a_{2}^{2}}, \\ a_{10} & = & \frac{a_{2} a_{9}}{a_{1}}, a_{11} = \frac{a_{9} (a_{1} c_{4} + a_{2} c_{2})}{a_{2}}, \\ c_{1} & = & c_{1}, c_{2} = c_{2}, c_{3} = - \frac{c_{1} a_{1}^{3}}{a_{2}^{3}}, \\ c_{4} & = & c_{4}, k_{i} = k_{i} (i = 1, 2, 3, 4), \\ a_{j} & = & a_{j} (j = 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 9, 12), \end{array} \end{array}

(20)

where

k_{i} (i = 1, 2, 3, 4), a_{j} (j = 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 9, 12)

and c₁, c₂, c₄ are arbitary constants and a₂ ≠ 0. By means of transformation (2), the periodic cross-kink solution to equation (1) can be obtained

\begin{array}{rcl} u = - \frac{2 (- a_{1} e^{- g} + k_{1} a_{1} e^{g} + \frac{k_{2} a_{1} a_{6}}{a_{2}} \cos (h) + k_{3} a_{9} \cosh (n))}{e^{- g} + k_{1} e^{g} + k_{2} \sin (h) + k_{3} \sinh (n) + k_{4}}, \end{array}

(21)

where

\begin{array}{rcl} \begin{array}{rcl} g & = & a_{1} x + a_{2} y + \frac{a_{1} (a_{1} c_{4} + a_{2} c_{2})}{a_{2}} t + a_{8}, \\ h & = & \frac{a_{1} a_{6}}{a_{2}} x + a_{6} y + \frac{a_{1} a_{6} (a_{1} c_{4} + a_{2} c_{2})}{a_{2}^{2}} t + a_{8}, \\ n & = & a_{9} x + \frac{a_{2} a_{9}}{a_{1}} y + \frac{a_{9} (a_{1} c_{4} + a_{2} c_{2})}{a_{2}} t + a_{12} . \end{array} \end{array}

In particular, appropriate parameters are chosen for equation (21), which are

a_{1} = \frac{1}{2}

, a₂ = 1, a₄ = 1, a₆ = 2, a₈ = −2, a₉ = 1,

a_{10} = - \frac{1}{2}

, a₁₂ = 3, c₁ = 1, c₂ = 2, c₄ = 1,

k_{1} = \frac{1}{10}

, k₂ = −1,

k_{3} = \frac{1}{2}

, k₄ = 2. Then we get the following periodic cross-kink solution

\begin{array}{rcl} u = - \frac{2 (- \frac{1}{2} e^{- \frac{x}{2} - y - 1} + \frac{1}{20} e^{\frac{x}{2} + y + 1} - \cos (x + 2 y - 2) + \frac{1}{2} \cosh (x - \frac{y}{2} + 3))}{e^{- \frac{x}{2} - y - 1} + \frac{1}{10} e^{\frac{x}{2} + y + 1} - \sin (x + 2 y - 2) + \frac{1}{2} \sinh (x - \frac{y}{2} + 3) + 2} . \end{array}

(22)

The characteristics of the periodic cross-kink solution with time t = −4, 0, 2 are shown in figure 3. It can be seen from figure 3 that with the increase of time t, the periodic cross-kink wave propagates in a certain direction. In figure 4, we change the values of parameters k₁, k₂, k₃ and k₄, and it is observed that the change of parameters has certain influence on the periodic cross-kink solution (21). Compared with figure 3(b): in figure 4(a) k₁ is turned negative, the periodic cross-kink waves move down, the peaks get shorter and the amplitudes decrease. In figure 4(b) k₂ is turned positive, and the periodic cross-kink waves move upward and the amplitude increases. As k₃ in figure 4(c) increases to 2, the periodic cross-kink waves move upward and the amplitude increases markedly. When k₄ in figure 4(g) changes to −20, the amplitude of the periodic cross-kink waves increases and the periodic cross-kink waves spread out.

Figure 3. The periodic cross-kink solution (22) takes $k_{1} = \frac{1}{10}, k_{2} = - 1, k_{3} = \frac{1}{2}, k_{4} = 2$ at t = −4, 0, 2.

Full size|PPT slide

Figure 4. The same as figures 3(b) (e) except that (a) (d) k₁ = −1, (b) (e) k₂ = 17, (c) (f) k₃ = 2, (g) (h) k₄ = −20.

Full size|PPT slide

4. Bright-dark soliton solutions to the eBLMP equation

In order to find bright-dark soliton solutions to equation (1),we assume that

\begin{array}{rcl} f = k_{1} \cosh (g) + k_{2} \cos (h) + k_{3} \cosh (n) + a_{13}, \end{array}

(23)

where k₁, k₂, k₃ are nonzero real numbers, and g, h and n are defined as follows

\begin{array}{rcl} \begin{array}{rcl} g & = & a_{1} x + a_{2} y + a_{3} t + a_{4}, \\ h & = & a_{5} x + a_{6} y + a_{7} t + a_{8}, \\ n & = & a_{9} x + a_{10} y + a_{11} t + a_{12}, \end{array} \end{array}

where a_i(i = 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13) are arbitary constants to be determined.

Substituting expression (23) into (4), then equating all coefficients of

\sinh (g), \cosh (g), \sin (h), \cos (h), \sinh (n), \cosh (n)

. Letting

\sinh (g), \cosh (g), \sin (h), \cos (h), \sinh (n), \cosh (n)

have coefficients of different powers of zero, then we can get a set of nonlinear algebraic equations about a_i(i = 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13). After calculation, we get the following two sets of solutions.

Case 1:

\begin{array}{rcl} \begin{array}{l} a_{1} = a_{1}, a_{2} = 0, a_{3} = - a_{1} (a_{1}^{2} c_{1} - c_{2}), a_{4} = a_{4}, a_{5} = 0, \\ a_{6} = a_{6}, a_{7} = - a_{6} c_{3} (3 a_{10}^{2} - a_{6}^{2}), a_{8} = a_{8}, a_{9} = 0, \\ a_{10} = a_{10}, a_{11} = - a_{10} c_{3} (a_{10}^{2} - 3 a_{6}^{2}), a_{12} = a_{12}, \\ a_{13} = 0, c_{1} = c_{1}, c_{2} = c_{2}, c_{3} = c_{3}, c_{4} = \frac{3 c_{3} a_{6}^{2} a_{10}^{2}}{a_{1}^{2}}, \\ k_{1} = \frac{\sqrt{a_{10}^{4} k_{3}^{2} + a_{6}^{2} a_{10}^{2} k_{2}^{2} + a_{6}^{2} a_{10}^{2} k_{3}^{2} + a_{6}^{4} k_{2}^{2}}}{a_{6} a_{10}}, k_{2} = k_{2}, k_{3} = k_{3}, \end{array} \end{array}

(24)

where

a_{i} (i = 1, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12), k_{2}, k_{3}

and c₁, c₂, c₃ are real number that satisfy a₁ ≠ 0, a₆a₁₀ ≠ 0. By means of transformation (2), the bright-dark soliton solution to equation (1) can be obtained

\begin{array}{rcl} \begin{array}{rcl} u & = & \frac{2 \sqrt{a_{10}^{4} k_{3}^{2} + a_{6}^{2} a_{10}^{2} k_{2}^{2} + a_{6}^{2} a_{10}^{2} k_{3}^{2} + a_{6}^{4} k_{2}^{2}} a_{1} \sinh (g)}{a_{6} a_{10} (\frac{\sqrt{a_{10}^{4} k_{3}^{2} + a_{6}^{2} a_{10}^{2} k_{2}^{2} + a_{6}^{2} a_{10}^{2} k_{3}^{2} + a_{6}^{4} k_{2}^{2}}}{a_{6} a_{10}} \cosh (g) + k_{2} \cos (h) + k_{3} \cosh (n))}, \\ v & = & - \frac{2 (- k_{2} a_{6}^{2} \cos (h) + k_{3} a_{10}^{2} \cosh (n))}{\frac{\sqrt{a_{10}^{4} k_{3}^{2} + a_{6}^{2} a_{10}^{2} k_{2}^{2} + a_{6}^{2} a_{10}^{2} k_{3}^{2} + a_{6}^{4} k_{2}^{2}}}{a_{6} a_{10}} \cosh (g) + k_{2} \cos (h) + k_{3} \cosh (n)} \\ + \frac{2 {(k_{2} a_{6} \sin (g) - k_{3} a_{10} \sinh (n))}^{2}}{{(\frac{\sqrt{a_{10}^{4} k_{3}^{2} + a_{6}^{2} a_{10}^{2} k_{2}^{2} + a_{6}^{2} a_{10}^{2} k_{3}^{2} + a_{6}^{4} k_{2}^{2}}}{a_{6} a_{10}} \cosh (g) + k_{2} \cos (h) + k_{3} \cosh (n))}^{2}}, \end{array} \end{array}

(25)

where

\begin{array}{rcl} \begin{array}{rcl} g & = & - a_{1} x + a_{1} (a_{1}^{2} c_{1} - c_{2}) t - a_{4}, \\ h & = & - a_{6} y + a_{6} c_{3} (3 a_{10}^{2} - a_{6}^{2}) t - a_{8}, \\ n & = & - a_{10} y + a_{10} c_{3} (a_{10}^{2} - 3 a_{6}^{2}) t - a_{12} . \end{array} \end{array}

Case 2:

\begin{array}{rcl} \begin{array}{rcl} a_{1} & = & 0, a_{2} = - a_{10}, a_{3} = 4 a_{10}^{3} c_{3}, a_{4} = a_{4}, \\ a_{5} & = & a_{5}, a_{6} = a_{6}, a_{8} = a_{8}, a_{9} = 0, a_{10} = a_{10}, \end{array} \end{array}

\begin{array}{rcl} \begin{array}{rcl} a_{7} & = & - \frac{a_{10}^{4} c_{3} + 2 a_{6}^{2} a_{10}^{2} c_{3} - 3 a_{6}^{4} c_{3} - a_{5} a_{6} c_{2}}{a_{6}}, \\ a_{11} & = & - 4 a_{10}^{3} c_{3}, a_{12} = a_{12}, a_{13} = 0, c_{2} = c_{2}, c_{3} = c_{3}, \\ c_{1} & = & - \frac{c_{3} (a_{10}^{4} + 2 a_{6}^{2} a_{10}^{2} + a_{6}^{4})}{a_{5}^{3} a_{6}}, \\ c_{4} & = & - \frac{3 c_{3} (a_{10}^{4} + 2 a_{6}^{2} a_{10}^{2} + a_{6}^{4})}{a_{5}^{2}}, \\ k_{1} & = & k_{1}, k_{2} = k_{2}, k_{3} = k_{3}, \end{array} \end{array}

(26)

where

a_{i} (i = 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12), k_{1}, k_{2}, k_{3}

and c₂, c₃ are real number that satisfy a₅a₆ ≠ 0. By means of transformation (2), the bright-dark soliton solution to equation (1) can be obtained

\begin{array}{rcl} \begin{array}{rcl} u & = & - \frac{2 k_{2} a_{5} \sin (h)}{k_{1} \cosh (g) + k_{2} \cos (h) + k_{3} \cosh (n)}, \\ v & = & - \frac{2 (k_{1} a_{10}^{2} \cosh (g) - k_{2} a_{6}^{2} \cos (h) + k_{3} a_{10}^{2} \cosh (n))}{k_{1} \cosh (g) + k_{2} \cos (h) + k_{3} \cosh (n)} \\ + \frac{2 {(- k_{1} a_{10} \sinh (g) + k_{2} a_{6} \sin (h) - k_{3} a_{10} \sinh (n))}^{2}}{{(k_{1} \cosh (g) + k_{2} \cos (h) + k_{3} \cosh (n))}^{2}}, \end{array} \end{array}

(27)

where

\begin{array}{rcl} \begin{array}{rcl} g & = & - a_{10} y + 4 a_{10}^{3} c_{3} t + a_{4}, \\ h & = & - a_{5} x - a_{6} y \\ + \frac{a_{10}^{4} c_{3} + 2 a_{6}^{2} a_{10}^{2} c_{3} - 3 a_{6}^{4} c_{3} - a_{5} a_{6} c_{2}}{a_{6}} t - a_{8}, \\ n & = & - a_{10} y + 4 a_{10}^{3} c_{3} t - a_{12} . \end{array} \end{array}

In particular, appropriate parameters are chosen for equation (27), which are a₄ = −3, a₅ = 1,

a_{6} = \frac{1}{2}

, a₈ = 1,

a_{10} = \frac{1}{2}

a_{12} = - \frac{1}{2}

, c₂ = 1, c₃ = 2,

k_{1} = \frac{1}{2}

, k₂ = 5, k₃ = 3. Then we get the following bright-dark soliton solutions

\begin{array}{rcl} \begin{array}{rcl} u & = & \frac{10 \sin (x + \frac{1}{2} y + t + 1)}{\frac{1}{2} \cosh (- \frac{1}{2} y + t - 3) + 5 \cos (x + \frac{1}{2} y + t + 1) + 3 \cosh (- \frac{1}{2} y + t + \frac{1}{2})}, \\ v & = & - \frac{2 (\frac{1}{8} \cosh (- \frac{1}{2} y + t - 3) - \frac{5}{4} \cos (x + \frac{1}{2} y + t + 1) + \frac{3}{4} \cosh (- \frac{1}{2} y + t + \frac{1}{2}))}{\frac{1}{2} \cosh (- \frac{1}{2} y + t - 3) + 5 \cos (x + \frac{1}{2} y + t + 1) + 3 \cosh (- \frac{1}{2} y + t + \frac{1}{2})} \\ + \frac{2 {(- \frac{1}{4} \sinh (- \frac{1}{2} y + t - 3) - \frac{5}{2} \sin (x + \frac{1}{2} y + t + 1) - \frac{3}{2} \sinh (- \frac{1}{2} y + t + \frac{1}{2}))}^{2}}{{(\frac{1}{2} \cosh (- \frac{1}{2} y + t - 3) + 5 \cos (x + \frac{1}{2} y + t + 1) + 3 \cosh (- \frac{1}{2} y + t + \frac{1}{2}))}^{2}} . \end{array} \end{array}

(28)

The characteristics of the bright-dark soliton solutions with t = 0 are shown in figure 5. In addition, the motion trajectories of bright-dark soliton solution u at different time can be observed through figure 6. We can find that the bright-dark soliton solution u maintains its shape and amplitude unchanged during the propagation process.

Figure 5. Plots of bright-dark soliton solution (28) u: (a) three-dimensional plot and contour plot. Plots of lump solution (28) v: (b) three-dimensional plot and contour plot.

Full size|PPT slide

Figure 6. The bright-dark soliton solution (28) takes $k_{1} = \frac{1}{2}, k_{2} = - 5, k_{3} = 3$ at t = −3, 4, 8.

Full size|PPT slide

5. Conclusion

In this paper, we explore the exact solutions to the fourth-order extended (2+1)-dimensional eBLMP equation. First of all, the bilinear form of the eBLMP equation was obtained by Hirota bilinear method, and the lump solution to the equation was calculated, two symmetric extreme points of u and three extreme points of v were obtained. At the same time, the moving path of the lump waves were plotted and analyzed. Secondly, two sets of periodic cross-kink solutions were obtained, and the motion states of the solution at different times were analyzed. Different parameters were selected to compare the three-dimensional and density plots of the solution, and the effect of the parameters on the solution was observed. Finally, two groups of bright-dark soliton solutions were obtained by calculation, and the motion states of the solution at different times were analyzed. Other knowledge of eBLMP equation will be studied and explored carefully in the future.

References

List( Publishing order | Descend order by publishing year | Descend order by cited within ) Chart analysis

1	Che W J Chen S C Liu C Zhao L C Akhmediev N 2022 Nondegenerate Kuznetsov-Ma solitons of Manakov equations and their physical spectra Phys. Rev. A 105 043526 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.105.043526 Cited in this article [1]

2	Chen S C Liu C 2022 Hidden Akhmediev breathers and vector modulation instability in the defocusing regime Physica D 438 133364 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physd.2022.133364 Cited in this article [1]

3	Akbulut A Kaplan M Kaabar M K 2022 New conservation laws and exact solutions of the special case of the fifth-order KdV equation J. Ocean Eng. Sci. 7 377 382 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joes.2021.09.010 Cited in this article [1]

4	Althobaiti A Althobaiti S El Rashidy K Seadawy A R 2021 Exact solutions for the nonlinear extended KdV equation in a stratified shear flow using modified exponential rational method Results Phys. 29 104723 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2021.104723 Cited in this article [1]

5	Ren B 2021 Characteristics of the soliton molecule and lump solution in the (2+1)-dimensional higher-order boussinesq equation Adv. Math. Phys. 2021 1 7 https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5545984 Cited in this article [1]

6	Liu C Wu Y H Chen S C Yao X K Akhmediev N 2021 Exact analytic spectra of asymmetric modulation instability in systems with self-steepening effect Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 094102 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.094102 Cited in this article [1]

7	Che W J Liu C Akhmediev N 2023 Fundamental and second-order dark soliton solutions of two- and three-component Manakov equations in the defocusing regime Phys. Rev. E 107 054206 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.107.054206 Cited in this article [1]

8	Liu C Chen S C Yao X K Akhmediev N 2022 Modulation instability and non-degenerate Akhmediev breathers of Manakov equations Chin. Phys. Lett. 39 094201 https://doi.org/10.1088/0256-307X/39/9/094201

9	Liu C Chen S C Yao X K Akhmediev N 2022 Non-degenerate multi-rogue waves and easy ways of their excitation Physica D 433 133192 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physd.2022.133192 Cited in this article [1]

10	Chen S C Liu C Yao X K Zhao L C Akhmediev N 2021 Extreme spectral asymmetry of Akhmediev breathers and Fermi-Pasta-Ulam recurrence in a Manakov system Phys. Rev. E 104 024215 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.104.024215 Cited in this article [1]

11	Guo F Lin J 2020 Lump, mixed lump-soliton, and periodic lump solutions of a (2+1)-dimensional extended higher-order Broer-Kaup System Mod. Phys. Lett. B 34 2050384 https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217984920503844 Cited in this article [1]

12	Wang C 2017 Lump solution and integrability for the associated Hirota bilinear equation Nonlinear Dyn. 87 2635 2642 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-016-3216-0

13	Ismael H F Murad M A S Bulut H 2022 Various exact wave solutions for KdV equation with time-variable coefficients J. Ocean Eng. Sci. 7 409 418 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joes.2021.09.014 Cited in this article [1]

14	Bilman D Ling L Miller P 2020 Extreme superposition: rogue waves of infinite order and the Painlevé-III hierarchy Duke Math. J. 169 671 760 https://doi.org/10.1215/00127094-2019-0066 Cited in this article [1]

15	Wang X B Tian S F Feng L L Zhang T T 2018 On quasi-periodic waves and rogue waves to the (4+1)-dimensional nonlinear Fokas equation J. Math. Phys. 59 073505 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5046691 Cited in this article [1]

16	Gai L Ma W X Li M C 2020 Lump-type solutions, rogue wave type solutions and periodic lump-stripe interaction phenomena to a (3+1)-dimensional generalized breaking soliton equation Phys. Lett. A 384 126178 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2019.126178 Cited in this article [1]

17	Ma H C Wu H F Ma W X Deng A P 2021 Lump and interaction solutions of the (2+1)-dimensional BSK equation East Asian J. Appl. Math. 11 674 685 https://doi.org/10.4208/eajam.090920.180121

18	Ma W X 2019 Interaction solutions to Hirota-Satsuma-Ito equation in (2+1)-dimensions Front. Math. China 14 619 629 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11464-019-0771-y Cited in this article [1]

19	Shi C G Zhao B Z Ma W X 2015 Exact rational solutions to a Boussinesq-like equation in (1+1)-dimensions Appl. Math. Lett. 48 170 176 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aml.2015.04.002 Cited in this article [1]

20	Batwa S Ma W X 2018 A study of lump-type and interaction solutions to a (3+1)-dimensional Jimbo-Miwa-like equation Comput. Math. Appl. 76 1576 1582 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2018.07.008 Cited in this article [2]

21	Li L Zhang J Wang M 2022 Application of simplified homogeneous balance method to multiple solutions for (2+1)-dimensional burgers' equations Mathematics 10 3402 https://doi.org/10.3390/math10183402 Cited in this article [1]

22	Radha B Duraisamy C 2021 The homogeneous balance method and its applications for finding the exact solutions for nonlinear equations J. Amb. Intel. Hum. Comput. 12 6591 6597 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-020-02278-3 Cited in this article [1]

23	de Monvel A B Shepelsky D 2013 A Riemann-Hilbert approach for the Degasperis-Procesi equation Nonlinearity 26 2081 https://doi.org/10.1088/0951-7715/26/7/2081 Cited in this article [1]

24	Zhao P Fan E 2020 Finite gap integration of the derivative nonlinear Schrödinger equation: a Riemann-Hilbert method Physica D 402 132213 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physd.2019.132213

25	Ma X 2022 Riemann-Hilbert approach for a higher-order Chen-Lee-Liu equation with high-order poles Commun. Nonlinear Sci. 114 106606 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2022.106606 Cited in this article [2]

26	Wang X B Tian S F 2022 Exotic vector freak waves in the nonlocal nonlinear Schrödinger equation Physica D 442 133528 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physd.2022.133528 Cited in this article [1]

27	Ling L Zhao L C Guo B 2015 Darboux transformation and multi-dark soliton for N-component nonlinear Schrödinger equations Nonlinearity 28 3243 https://doi.org/10.1088/0951-7715/28/9/3243

28	Qin Y H Zhao L C Ling L 2019 Nondegenerate bound-state solitons in multicomponent Bose-Einstein condensates Phys. Rev. E 100 022212 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.100.022212 Cited in this article [1]

29	Liang J F Wang X 2019 Investigation of interaction solutions for modified Korteweg-de Vries equation by consistent Riccati expansion method Math. Probl. Eng. 2019 9535294 https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/9535294 Cited in this article [1]

30	Karaman B 2022 New wave form solutions of time-fractional gardner equation via fractional riccati expansion method TWMS J. Appl. Eng. Math. 12 1329 1335 Cited in this article [1]

31	Ma W X 2019 Lump and interaction solutions to linear (4+1)-dimensional PDEs Acta Math. Sci. 39 498 508 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10473-019-0214-6 Cited in this article [1]

32	Li Y Li J Wang R 2021 N-soliton solutions for the Maxwell-Bloch equations via the Riemann-Hilbert approach Mod. Phys. Lett. B 35 2150356 https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217984921503565 Cited in this article [1]

33	Ren B 2021 Dynamics of a D' Alembert wave and a soliton molecule for an extended BLMP equation Commun. Theor. Phys. 73 035003 https://doi.org/10.1088/1572-9494/abda17 Cited in this article [2]

34	Tang Y Tao S Zhou M Guan Q 2017 Interaction solutions between lump and other solitons of two classes of nonlinear evolution equations Nonlinear Dyn. 89 429 442 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-017-3462-9 Cited in this article [1]

35	Li M Tan W Dai H 2022 Integrability tests and some new soliton solutions of an extended potential Boiti-Leon-Manna-Pempinelli equation J. Appl. Math. Phys. 10 2895 2905 https://doi.org/10.4236/jamp.2022.1010194 Cited in this article [1]

36	He C Tang Y Ma W Ma J 2019 Interaction phenomena between a lump and other multi-solitons for the (2+1)-dimensional BLMP and Ito equations Nonlinear Dyn. 95 29 42 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-018-4548-8 Cited in this article [1]

37	Ali M R Ma W X 2019 New exact solutions of nonlinear (3+1)-dimensional Boiti-Leon-Manna-Pempinelli equation Adv. Math. Phys. 2019 1 7 https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/9801638 Cited in this article [1]

38	Cevikel A C 2022 New solutions for the high-dimensional fractional BLMP equations J. Ocean Eng. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joes.2022.06.023 Cited in this article [1]

39	Darvishi M Najafi M Kavitha L Venkatesh M 2012 Stair and step soliton solutions of the integrable (2+1) and (3+1)-dimensional Boiti-Leon-Manna-Pempinelli equations Commun. Theor. Phys. 58 785 https://doi.org/10.1088/0253-6102/58/6/01 Cited in this article [1]

40	Shi K Z Ren B 2022 Dynamics of mixed lump-soliton solutions to the (3+1)-dimensional Boiti-Leon-Manna-Pempinelli-like equation PDE Appl. Math. 5 100276 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.padiff.2022.100276 Cited in this article [1]

41	Guo H D Xia T C 2020 Lump and lump-kink soliton solutions of an extended Boiti-Leon-Manna-Pempinelli equation Int. J. Nonlinear Sci. Num. 21 371 377 https://doi.org/10.1515/ijnsns-2019-0117 Cited in this article [1]

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 11731014).

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

PDF(1680 KB)

Collection(s)

Mathematical Physics

100

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections

Recommended

Abstract
Key words
Cite this article
1. Introduction
2. Lump solution to the eBLMP equation
Figure 1. Plots of lump solution u (a) three-dimensional plot; (b) contour plot. Plots of lump solution v (c) three-dimensional plot; (d) contour plot.
Figure 2. The moving path of the lump wave u is at (a) c2 = 1, (c) c2 = −3. The moving path of the lump wave v is at (b) c2 = 1, (d) c2 = −3.
3. Periodic cross-kink solutions to the eBLMP equation
Figure 3. The periodic cross-kink solution (22) takes $k_{1} = \frac{1}{10}, k_{2} = - 1, k_{3} = \frac{1}{2}, k_{4} = 2$ at t = −4, 0, 2.
Figure 4. The same as figures 3(b) (e) except that (a) (d) k1 = −1, (b) (e) k2 = 17, (c) (f) k3 = 2, (g) (h) k4 = −20.
4. Bright-dark soliton solutions to the eBLMP equation
Figure 5. Plots of bright-dark soliton solution (28) u: (a) three-dimensional plot and contour plot. Plots of lump solution (28) v: (b) three-dimensional plot and contour plot.
Figure 6. The bright-dark soliton solution (28) takes $k_{1} = \frac{1}{2}, k_{2} = - 5, k_{3} = 3$ at t = −3, 4, 8.
5. Conclusion
References
Acknowledgments
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Received	Revised	Accepted	Published
2023-05-15	2023-08-25	2023-08-25	2023-10-01
Issue Date
2023-09-20

Please choose a citation manager

Content to export

Abstract

Key words

Cite this article

1. Introduction

2. Lump solution to the eBLMP equation

Figure 1. Plots of lump solution u (a) three-dimensional plot; (b) contour plot. Plots of lump solution v (c) three-dimensional plot; (d) contour plot.

Figure 2. The moving path of the lump wave u is at (a) c₂ = 1, (c) c₂ = −3. The moving path of the lump wave v is at (b) c₂ = 1, (d) c₂ = −3.

3. Periodic cross-kink solutions to the eBLMP equation

Figure 3. The periodic cross-kink solution (22) takes $k_{1} = \frac{1}{10}, k_{2} = - 1, k_{3} = \frac{1}{2}, k_{4} = 2$ at t = −4, 0, 2.

Figure 4. The same as figures 3(b) (e) except that (a) (d) k₁ = −1, (b) (e) k₂ = 17, (c) (f) k₃ = 2, (g) (h) k₄ = −20.

4. Bright-dark soliton solutions to the eBLMP equation

Figure 5. Plots of bright-dark soliton solution (28) u: (a) three-dimensional plot and contour plot. Plots of lump solution (28) v: (b) three-dimensional plot and contour plot.

Figure 6. The bright-dark soliton solution (28) takes $k_{1} = \frac{1}{2}, k_{2} = - 5, k_{3} = 3$ at t = −3, 4, 8.

5. Conclusion

{{custom_sec.title}}

{{custom_sec.title}}

References

{{custom_fnGroup.title_en}}

Footnotes

Acknowledgments

{{custom_ack.title_en}}

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

模态框（Modal）标题

Please choose a citation manager

Content to export

Abstract

Key words

Cite this article

1. Introduction

2. Lump solution to the eBLMP equation

Figure 1. Plots of lump solution u (a) three-dimensional plot; (b) contour plot. Plots of lump solution v (c) three-dimensional plot; (d) contour plot.

Figure 2. The moving path of the lump wave u is at (a) c2 = 1, (c) c2 = −3. The moving path of the lump wave v is at (b) c2 = 1, (d) c2 = −3.

3. Periodic cross-kink solutions to the eBLMP equation

Figure 3. The periodic cross-kink solution (22) takes k1=110,k2=−1,k3=12,k4=2 at t = −4, 0, 2.

Figure 4. The same as figures 3(b) (e) except that (a) (d) k1 = −1, (b) (e) k2 = 17, (c) (f) k3 = 2, (g) (h) k4 = −20.

4. Bright-dark soliton solutions to the eBLMP equation

Figure 5. Plots of bright-dark soliton solution (28) u: (a) three-dimensional plot and contour plot. Plots of lump solution (28) v: (b) three-dimensional plot and contour plot.

Figure 6. The bright-dark soliton solution (28) takes k1=12,k2=−5,k3=3 at t = −3, 4, 8.

5. Conclusion

{{custom_sec.title}}

{{custom_sec.title}}

References

{{custom_fnGroup.title_en}}

Footnotes

Acknowledgments

{{custom_ack.title_en}}

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Figure 2. The moving path of the lump wave u is at (a) c₂ = 1, (c) c₂ = −3. The moving path of the lump wave v is at (b) c₂ = 1, (d) c₂ = −3.

Figure 3. The periodic cross-kink solution (22) takes $k_{1} = \frac{1}{10}, k_{2} = - 1, k_{3} = \frac{1}{2}, k_{4} = 2$ at t = −4, 0, 2.

Figure 4. The same as figures 3(b) (e) except that (a) (d) k₁ = −1, (b) (e) k₂ = 17, (c) (f) k₃ = 2, (g) (h) k₄ = −20.

Figure 6. The bright-dark soliton solution (28) takes $k_{1} = \frac{1}{2}, k_{2} = - 5, k_{3} = 3$ at t = −3, 4, 8.