Welcome to visit Communications in Theoretical Physics,
Quantum Physics and Quantum Information

Single-photon quantum router based on asymmetric intercavity couplings

  • Ji-Yang Li 1 ,
  • Xin-Lei Li 1 ,
  • Guo-An Yan
Expand
  • College of Physics and Engineering, Qufu Normal University, Qufu 273165, China

1 Both authors contributed equally to this work.

Received date: 2020-01-08

  Revised date: 2020-02-13

  Accepted date: 2020-02-26

  Online published: 2020-05-09

Copyright

© 2020 Chinese Physical Society and IOP Publishing Ltd

Abstract

As a special quantum node in a quantum network, the quantum router plays an important role in storing and transferring quantum information. In this paper, we propose a quantum router scheme based on asymmetric intercavity couplings and a three-level Λ-type atomic system. This scheme implements the quantum routing capability very well. It can perfectly transfer quantum information from one quantum channel to another. Compared with the previous quantum routing scheme, our proposed scheme can achieve the transfer rate of single photons from one quantum channel to another quantum channel reaching 100%, the high transfer rate is located in the almost quadrant regions with negative values of the two variables λa and λb, and their maximum values ${T}_{u}^{b}+{T}_{d}^{b}=1$ emerge in the center point λa = λb = −1. Therefore, it is possibly feasible to efficiently enhance the routing capability of the single photons between two channels by adjusting the inter-resonator couplings, and the asymmetric intercavity coupling provides a new method for achieving high-fidelity quantum routers.

Cite this article

Ji-Yang Li , Xin-Lei Li , Guo-An Yan . Single-photon quantum router based on asymmetric intercavity couplings[J]. Communications in Theoretical Physics, 2020 , 72(5) : 055101 . DOI: 10.1088/1572-9494/ab7ed5

1. Introduction

The scalable quantum information processing [19] in the fields of quantum communication and quantum computation is achieved based on quantum networks [10]. A quantum network is composed of the quantum nodes and quantum channels. Quantum nodes coherently connect different channels, in which the routers control the transport of signals in the different channels. In an efficient optical quantum network, photons are used as ideal information carriers due to their fast propagation speeds, stable coherence, and low dissipations. Recently, the rapid development of photon transport technology in coupled-resonator waveguide (CRW) systems [1115] provides an ideal platform for single-photon quantum routing, in which the CRW is utilized as a quantum channel for optical signal transmission, and the quantum emitter coupled to the CRW is used to route photons to each channel. Currently, considerable attention has been paid to photon quantum routing that has been implemented in many systems including a whispering-gallery-mode resonator [16], quantum dot [17], cavity quantum electrodynamics [1822], and optomechanical system [23].
However, in the current routing system, the routing rate of the routers from the main channel to other channels is not more than 50% [1820], which may limit its more potential applications. A high routing rate can achieve an efficient expected allocation of information between channels. Therefore, it is vital to design a quantum router with a high routing rate for a multi-channel quantum network. To address the problem, many proposals based on the chiral photon-emitter couplings in waveguide-emitter routers have been put forward recently [2429]. However, in this work, we propose a single-photon routing scheme using the two one-dimensional CRWs with tunable asymmetric intercavity couplings and a three-level Λ-type atomic system. Compared with previous work, our proposed scheme can improve the transfer rate of a single photon from one quantum channel to another, and the maximum transfer rate can reach 100%. We also find that the present setup can be directly realized by the four resonators coupled by a coupler qutrit.

2. Model and Hamiltonian

The system under consideration is composed of two one-dimensional CRWs whose cavity modes are described by the creation operators ${a}_{x}^{\dagger }$ and ${b}_{x}^{\dagger }$(and subscript $j=-\infty ,\,\ldots ,\,+\infty $), and a three-level system characterized by a ground state $| g\rangle $, an intermediate state $| s\rangle $ and an excited state $| e\rangle $. The transition $| g\rangle \leftrightarrow | e\rangle $ is dipole-coupled to the cavity modes a0 and b0 with a coupling strengths of ga and gb. A classical field drives the transition $| s\rangle \leftrightarrow | e\rangle $ with the Rabi frequency Ω. For the two one-dimensional CRWs, we will focus on the case of asymmetric intercavity couplings. Here, we assume that all resonators in CRW − a(CRW − b) have the same frequency ωa(ωb), and the hopping energies ζa (ζb) between any two nearest-neighbor cavities in CRW − a(CRW − b) are the same, except two couplings(${\zeta }_{a}^{{\prime} }$ and ${\zeta }_{b}^{{\prime} }$)between the 0th and 1st resonates in the two one-dimensional CRWs. ${\lambda }_{a}(b)=({\zeta }_{a}^{{\prime} }(b)-{\zeta }_{a}(b))/{\zeta }_{a}(b)$ is introduced to denote the relation between ${\zeta }_{a}(b)$ and ${\zeta }_{a}^{{\prime} }(b)$ [30]. The model is schematically depicted in figure 1.
Figure 1. Schematic of the single-photon quantum router in two channels made of two CRWs.
The Hamiltonian of the whole system is (setting ℏ = 1)
$\begin{eqnarray}H={H}_{a}+{H}_{c}+{H}_{{\rm{int}}},\end{eqnarray}$
where
$\begin{eqnarray*}\begin{array}{rcl}{H}_{a} & = & {\omega }_{s}| s\rangle \langle s| +{\omega }_{e}| e\rangle \langle e| ,\\ {H}_{c} & = & \sum _{j}[{\omega }_{a}{a}_{j}^{\dagger }{a}_{j}-{\zeta }_{a}({a}_{j}^{\dagger }{a}_{j+1}+{\rm{h}}{\rm{.}}{\rm{c}}.)]\\ & & -{\lambda }_{a}{\zeta }_{a}({a}_{0}^{\dagger }{a}_{1}+{a}_{1}^{\dagger }{a}_{0})\\ & & +\sum _{j}[{\omega }_{b}{b}_{j}^{\dagger }{b}_{j}-{\zeta }_{b}({b}_{j}^{\dagger }{b}_{j+1}+{\rm{h}}{\rm{.}}{\rm{c}}.]\\ & & -{\lambda }_{b}{\zeta }_{b}({b}_{0}^{\dagger }{b}_{1}+{b}_{1}^{\dagger }{b}_{0}),\\ {H}_{{\rm{int}}} & = & {g}_{a}| e\rangle \langle g| {a}_{0}+{\rm{\Omega }}| e\rangle \langle s| +{g}_{b}| e\rangle \langle g| {b}_{0}+{\rm{h}}{\rm{.}}{\rm{c}}.,\end{array}\end{eqnarray*}$
where the Hamiltonian Hc describes the free energy of two one-dimensional ${\rm{CRWs}},{H}_{a}$ is the free Hamiltonian of the three-level atom, and Hint describes the interactions among the cavity mode, the classical field and the atom. The frequencies ωs and ωe are the energy of the intermediate state and excited state, respectively. Using the Fourier transform $D={D}_{x}{{\rm{e}}}^{{{\rm{i}}{k}}_{D}x}/\sqrt{2\pi }$, (D = a, b), we can find that each bare CRW supports plane waves with a nonlinear dispersion relation ${E}_{k}^{D}={\omega }_{D}-2{\zeta }_{D}\cos {{lk}}_{D}$ (setting l = 1), and each CRW owns an energy band with the bandwidth 4ζD [22]. Here, l is the distance between two neighboring cavities, and k is the photon wave vectors.
For the photonic band inside the CRWs, the single photon incident with energy E is scattered elastically. Therefore, the particle either is propagated inside the cavity or is absorbed by the three-level atom system. This means that the stationary eigenstate of the full system is
$\begin{eqnarray}\begin{array}{rcl}| {\rm{\Psi }}\rangle & = & \sum _{j}\alpha (j){a}_{x}^{\dagger }| g{0}_{p}\rangle +\sum _{j}\beta (j){b}_{x}^{\dagger }| g{0}_{p}\rangle \\ & & +{u}_{s}| s{0}_{p}\rangle +{u}_{e}| e{0}_{p}\rangle ,\end{array}\end{eqnarray}$
where $| {0}_{p}\rangle $ denotes the joint state in which the field is the vacuum state of the two CRWs, and α(j) and β(j) are the probability amplitudes of the single photon in the jth cavity of the two CRWs. us and ue are the probability amplitudes of the atomic state $| s\rangle $ and $| e\rangle $.
Using the eigenequation $H| {\rm{\Psi }}\rangle =E| {\rm{\Psi }}\rangle $, we can obtain the discrete scattering equation
$\begin{eqnarray*}\begin{array}{rcl}(E-{\omega }_{a})\alpha (j) & = & -{\zeta }_{a}[\alpha (j-1)+\alpha (j+1)]+{\delta }_{j0}[\alpha (0){V}_{a}\\ & & +\beta (0)G]-{\delta }_{j1}{\lambda }_{a}{\zeta }_{a}\alpha (0)-{\delta }_{j0}{\lambda }_{a}{\zeta }_{a}\alpha (1)\\ (E-{\omega }_{b})\beta (j) & = & -{\zeta }_{b}[\beta (j-1)+\beta (j+1)]+{\delta }_{j0}[\beta (0){V}_{b}\\ & & +\alpha (0)G]-{\delta }_{j1}{\lambda }_{b}{\zeta }_{b}\beta (0)-{\delta }_{j0}{\lambda }_{b}{\zeta }_{b}\beta (1),\end{array}\end{eqnarray*}$
where ${V}_{a}={g}_{a}^{2}(E-{\omega }_{s})/[(E-{\omega }_{e})(E-{\omega }_{s})-{{\rm{\Omega }}}^{2}]$ and ${V}_{b}\,={g}_{b}^{2}(E-{\omega }_{s})/[(E-{\omega }_{e})(E-{\omega }_{s})-{{\rm{\Omega }}}^{2}]$ are defined as energy-dependent delta-like potential, and $G\,={g}_{a}{g}_{b}(E-{\omega }_{s})/[(E-{\omega }_{e})(E-{\omega }_{s})-{{\rm{\Omega }}}^{2}]$ is the effective dispersive coupling strength, which leads to the channel-switching.
The wave functions in the asymptotic regions are given, respectively, by
$\begin{eqnarray*}\alpha (j)=\left\{\begin{array}{ll}{{\rm{e}}}^{{{\rm{i}}{k}}_{a}j}+{r}^{a}{{\rm{e}}}^{-{{\rm{i}}{k}}_{a}j} & j\lt 0,\\ {t}^{a}{{\rm{e}}}^{{{\rm{i}}{k}}_{a}j} & j\gt 0,\end{array}\right.\end{eqnarray*}$
and
$\begin{eqnarray*}\beta (j)=\left\{\begin{array}{ll}{t}_{d}^{b}{{\rm{e}}}^{-{{\rm{i}}{k}}_{b}j} & j\lt 0,\\ {t}_{u}^{b}{{\rm{e}}}^{{{\rm{i}}{k}}_{b}j} & j\gt 0,\end{array}\right.\end{eqnarray*}$
where ${r}^{a},{t}^{a},{t}_{d}^{b}$ and tbu and denote the left, right, down, and up transmission amplitude of the router, respectively. By solving the above equation, we can obtain the scattering amplitudes
$\begin{eqnarray}{r}^{a}=\displaystyle \frac{2{\rm{i}}{\zeta }_{a}{\rm{\sin }}{k}_{a}(2{\rm{i}}{\zeta }_{b}{\rm{\sin }}{k}_{b}-{V}_{b}+2{\lambda }_{b}{\zeta }_{b}{{\rm{e}}}^{{{\rm{i}}{k}}_{b}}+{\lambda }_{b}^{2}{\zeta }_{b}{{\rm{e}}}^{{{\rm{i}}{k}}_{b}})}{(2{\rm{i}}{\zeta }_{a}{\rm{\sin }}{k}_{a}-{V}_{a}+2{\lambda }_{a}{\zeta }_{a}{{\rm{e}}}^{{{\rm{i}}{k}}_{a}}+{\lambda }_{a}^{2}{\zeta }_{a}{{\rm{e}}}^{{{\rm{i}}{k}}_{a}})(2{\rm{i}}{\zeta }_{b}{\rm{\sin }}{k}_{b}-{V}_{b}+2{\lambda }_{b}{\zeta }_{b}{{\rm{e}}}^{{{\rm{i}}{k}}_{b}}+{\lambda }_{b}^{2}{\zeta }_{b}{{\rm{e}}}^{{{\rm{i}}{k}}_{b}})-{G}^{2}}-1,\end{eqnarray}$
$\begin{eqnarray}{t}^{a}=\displaystyle \frac{2{\rm{i}}{\zeta }_{a}{\rm{\sin }}{k}_{a}(2{\rm{i}}{\zeta }_{b}{\rm{\sin }}{k}_{b}-{V}_{b}+2{\lambda }_{b}{\zeta }_{b}{{\rm{e}}}^{{{\rm{i}}{k}}_{b}}+{\lambda }_{b}^{2}{\zeta }_{b}{{\rm{e}}}^{{{\rm{i}}{k}}_{b}})(1+{\lambda }_{a})}{(2{\rm{i}}{\zeta }_{a}{\rm{\sin }}{k}_{a}-{V}_{a}+2{\lambda }_{a}{\zeta }_{a}{{\rm{e}}}^{{{\rm{i}}{k}}_{a}}+{\lambda }_{a}^{2}{\zeta }_{a}{{\rm{e}}}^{{{\rm{i}}{k}}_{a}})(2{\rm{i}}{\zeta }_{b}{\rm{\sin }}{k}_{b}-{V}_{b}+2{\lambda }_{b}{\zeta }_{b}{{\rm{e}}}^{{{\rm{i}}{k}}_{b}}+{\lambda }_{b}^{2}{\zeta }_{b}{{\rm{e}}}^{{{\rm{i}}{k}}_{b}})-{G}^{2}},\end{eqnarray}$
$\begin{eqnarray}{t}_{u}^{b}=\displaystyle \frac{2{\rm{i}}{\zeta }_{a}{\rm{\sin }}{k}_{a}G(1+{\lambda }_{b})}{(2{\rm{i}}{\zeta }_{a}{\rm{\sin }}{k}_{a}-{V}_{a}+2{\lambda }_{a}{\zeta }_{a}{{\rm{e}}}^{{{\rm{i}}{k}}_{a}}+{\lambda }_{a}^{2}{\zeta }_{a}{{\rm{e}}}^{{{\rm{i}}{k}}_{a}})(2{\rm{i}}{\zeta }_{b}{\rm{\sin }}{k}_{b}-{V}_{b}+2{\lambda }_{b}{\zeta }_{b}{{\rm{e}}}^{{{\rm{i}}{k}}_{b}}+{\lambda }_{b}^{2}{\zeta }_{b}{{\rm{e}}}^{{{\rm{i}}{k}}_{b}})-{G}^{2}},\end{eqnarray}$
$\begin{eqnarray}{t}_{d}^{b}=\displaystyle \frac{2{\rm{i}}{\zeta }_{a}{\rm{\sin }}{k}_{a}G}{(2{\rm{i}}{\zeta }_{a}{\rm{\sin }}{k}_{a}-{V}_{a}+2{\lambda }_{a}{\zeta }_{a}{{\rm{e}}}^{{{\rm{i}}{k}}_{a}}+{\lambda }_{a}^{2}{\zeta }_{a}{{\rm{e}}}^{{{\rm{i}}{k}}_{a}})(2{\rm{i}}{\zeta }_{b}{\rm{\sin }}{k}_{b}-{V}_{b}+2{\lambda }_{b}{\zeta }_{b}{{\rm{e}}}^{{{\rm{i}}{k}}_{b}}+{\lambda }_{b}^{2}{\zeta }_{b}{{\rm{e}}}^{{{\rm{i}}{k}}_{b}})-{G}^{2}}.\end{eqnarray}$
It can be observed that ${t}_{u}^{b}={t}_{d}^{b}=0$ at E = ωs, which means that the incident photon with energy E = ωs will be totally transmitted in its original CRW due to the vanishing the effective dispersive coupling strength. It also means that a single photon cannot enter from one quantum channel to another.

3. Single-photon quantum router

To compare with previous research work, we first discuss the routing capability when ${\lambda }_{a}={\lambda }_{b}=0$, this case is the same as the single-photon quantum router scheme proposed by Zhou et al [18]. The quantum router can implement the routing capability regardless of turned on or turned off of the classical field, but the maximum conversion rate of the information carried by a single photon is only 50%. To visually express the conversion rate of a single photon in this case, in figure 2, we plotted the transmittance Ta, transfer rate ${T}_{u}^{b}+{T}_{d}^{b}$ and reflectance Ra as function of the incident energy E. Three different band configurations are presented.
Figure 2. (a)Ra, Ta and ${T}_{u}^{b}+{T}_{d}^{b}$ as a function of the energy of the incident wave when ωs = Ω = 0; (b) Ra, Ta and ${T}_{u}^{b}+{T}_{d}^{b}$ as a function of the energy of the incident wave when Ω = 0.5 and ωs = 8. The remaining parameters are set as follows: ωa = ωb = ωe = 8, ζa = ζb = 1, λa = λb = 0, and ga = gb = 0.5.
For ${\lambda }_{a}\ne 0,{\lambda }_{b}=0$ and Ω = 0, to study this mechanism, we plot the current flow of the photon in CRW − b in figure 3(a), which are described by the coefficients ${T}_{u}^{b}+{T}_{d}^{b}$. We find that when ${\lambda }_{a}\geqslant 0$, the transfer ${T}_{u}^{b}+{T}_{d}^{b}$ into CRW − b is limited to be no more than 50%, which has been examined in the previous schemes. But when λa < 0, the transfer rate far more than 50%, and the peak transfer rate are centered at E = ωs. The width of the peak for the transfer rate ${T}_{u}^{b}+{T}_{d}^{b}$ is determined by the λa. The smaller the product λa is, the wider the peak is. When a classical field is turned on, we plot ${T}_{u}^{b}+{T}_{d}^{b}$ as a function of the energy of the incident wave in figure 3(b), except the classical field makes one dip be split into two dips, the conservation relation and the related scattering properties are the same as those in figure 3(a). In figure 4, we plot the transfer rate ${T}_{u}^{b}+{T}_{d}^{b}$ as a function of the energy of the incident wave when ${\lambda }_{a}=0,{\lambda }_{b}\ne 0$ and ${\rm{\Omega }}=0({\rm{\Omega }}\ne 0)$. We find that no matter what λb ≥ 0 or λb < 0, the transfer ${T}_{u}^{b}+{T}_{d}^{b}$ into CRW − b is limited to be no more than 50%, and other physical phenomena are the same as in figure 3.
Figure 3. (a) ${T}_{u}^{b}+{T}_{d}^{b}$ as a function of the energy of the incident wave when ωs = Ω = 0; (b) ${T}_{u}^{b}+{T}_{d}^{b}$ as a function of the energy of the incident wave when ωs = 8 and Ω = 0.5. Other parameters are taken as ωa = ωb = ωe = 8, ζa = ζb = 1, ωs = 8, and ga = gb = 0.5.
Figure 4. ${T}_{u}^{b}+{T}_{d}^{b}$ as a function of the energy of the incident wave when ωs = Ω = 0; (b) ${T}_{u}^{b}+{T}_{d}^{b}$ as a function of the energy of the incident wave when ωs = 8 and Ω = 0.5. Other parameters are taken as ωa = ωb = ωe = 8, ζa = ζb = 1, and ga = gb = 0.5.
We know from figures 3 and 4 that whether or not the classical field exists, only when λa < 0, the transfer rate ${T}_{u}^{b}+{T}_{d}^{b}$ will far exceed 50%. To gain a deeper insight into the dependence of the photon routing capability on the two variables λa and λb, figure 5 displays the transfer rate ${T}_{u}^{b}+{T}_{d}^{b}$. As seen, the high transfer rate is located in the almost quadrant regions with negative values of the two variables, and their maximum values ${T}_{u}^{b}+{T}_{d}^{b}=1$ emerge in the center point ${\lambda }_{a}={\lambda }_{b}=-1$. So, it is possibly feasible to efficiently enhance the routing capability of the single photons between two channels by adjusting the inter-resonator couplings.
Figure 5. (a)–(c) ${T}_{u}^{b}+{T}_{d}^{b}$ as a function of the energy of the incident wave when ωs = Ω = 0; (d), (e) and (f) ${T}_{u}^{b}+{T}_{d}^{b}$ as a function of the energy of the incident wave when ωs= and Ω = 0.5. Here, the chosen parameters ωa = ωb = ωe = 8, ζa = ζb = 1, and ga = gb = 0.5.

4. Discuss and conclusion

The tunable coupling between two neighboring resonators can be realized by coupled single-mode superconducting transmission line resonators and a gap-tunable qubit. Consider a system composed of four resonators and a superconducting qutrit A with states $| 0\rangle ,| 1\rangle ,| 2\rangle $, for the four resonators each of which consists of N identical superconducting transmission line resonators, linked with each other through capacitors. The model is schematically depicted in figure 6. The four resonators coupled by a coupler superconducting qutrit may be used as a basic circuit block to build a two-dimensional quantum network for quantum information processing. This is exactly similar to the function of quantum routers in quantum networks. In other words, the quantum routers we propose can be implemented in superconducting circuits. For the model in figure 6, Yang et al [31] and Li et al [32] have verified its practicability, and the model has high fidelity for information transmission.
Figure 6. Diagram of a superconducting qutrit A coupled capacitively to four one-dimensional coplanar waveguide resonators through ${C}_{a},{C}_{a}^{1},{C}_{b},{C}_{b}^{1}$, respectively.
In conclusion, we considered a system composed of two one-dimensional CRWs with two inter-resonator hopping coefficients that are designed to be tunable and a Λ-type atom which behaves as a quantum multichannel router. Whether the classical field exists or not, the quantum router we propose can implement the routing function. Compared with previous work, our proposed scheme can improve the transfer rate of a single photon from one quantum channel to another, and the maximum transfer rate can reach 100%. We also find that the present setup can be directly realized by the four resonators coupled by a coupler qutrit. Thus, we believe that the present investigation may open an approach for the realization of a large-scale quantum network.

This work is supported by the Project of Introduction and Cultivation for Young Innovative Talents in Colleges and Universities of Shandong Province.

1
Chen G-Y Lambert N Chou C-H Chen Y-N Nor F 2011 Surface plasmons in a metal nanowire coupled to colloidal quantum dots: scattering properties and quantum entanglement Phys. Rev. B 84 045310

DOI

2
Zheng H Baranger H U 2013 Persistent quantum beats and long-distance entanglement from waveguide-mediated interactions Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 113601

DOI

3
Zheng H Gauthier D J Baranger H U 2013 Waveguide-QED based photonic quantum computation Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 090502

DOI

4
Gonzalez-Ballestero C Moreno E Garcia-Vidal F J 2014 Generation, manipulation, and detection of two-qubit entanglement in waveguide QED Phys. Rev. A 89 042328

DOI

5
Facchi P Kim M S Pascazio S Pepe F V Pomarico D Tufarelli T 2016 Bound states and entanglement generation in waveguide quantum electrodynamics Phys. Rev. A 94 043839

DOI

6
Vermersch B Guimond P O Pichler H Zoller P 2017 Quantum state transfer via noisy photonic and phononic waveguides Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 133601

DOI

7
Mahmoodian S Lodahl P Sorensen A S 2016 Quantum networks with chiral-light–matter interaction in waveguides Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 240501

DOI

8
Shen J T Fan S H 2005 Coherent single photon transport in a one-dimensional waveguide coupledwith superconducting quantum bits Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 213001

DOI

9
Roy D Wilson C M Firstenberg O 2017 Colloquium: Strongly interacting photons in one-dimensional continuum Rev. Mod. Phys. 89 021001

DOI

10
Kimble H J 2008 The quantum internet Nature 453 1023

DOI

11
Cheng M-T Ma X-S Ding M-T Luo Y-Q Zhao G-X 2012 Single-photon transport in one-dimensional coupled-resonator waveguide with local and nonlocal coupling to a nanocavity containing a two-level system Phys. Rev. A 85 053840

DOI

12
Shi T Fan S Sun C P 2011 Two-photon transport in a waveguide coupled to a cavity in a two-level system Phys. Rev. A 84 063803

DOI

13
Zhou L Gong Z R Liu Y-X Sun C P Nori F 2008 Controllable scattering of a single photon inside a one-dimensional resonator waveguide Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 100501

DOI

14
Werra J F M Longo P Busch K 2013 Spectra of coherent resonant light pulses interacting with a two-level atom in a waveguide Phys. Rev. A 87 063821

DOI

15
Zheng H Gauthier D J Baranger H U 2012 Strongly correlated photons generated by coupling a three-or four-level system to a waveguide Phys. Rev. A 85 043832

DOI

16
Cao C Duan W Y Chen X Zhang R Wang T J Wang C 2017 Implementation of single-photon quantum routing and decoupling using a nitrogen-vacancy center and a whispering-gallery-mode resonator-waveguide system Opt. Express 25 16931

DOI

17
Bentham C Itskevich I E Coles R J Royall B Clarke E OHara J Prtljaga N Fox A M Skolnick M S Wilson L R 2015 On-chip electrically controlled routing of photons from a single quantum dot Appl. Phys. Lett. 106 221101

DOI

18
Zhou L L P Yang Li Y Sun C P 2013 Quantum routing of single photons with a cyclic three-Level system Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 103604

DOI

19
Lu J Zhou L Kuang L M Nori F 2014 Single-photon router: coherent control of multichannel scattering for single photons with quantum interferences Phys. Rev. A 89 013805

DOI

20
Yan G A Qiao H X Lu H Chen A X 2017 Quantum information-holding single-photon router based on spontaneous emission Sci. China Phys., Mech. Astron. 60 090311

DOI

21
Zheng H X Gauthier D J Baranger H U 2011 Cavity-free photon blockade induced by many-body bound states Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 223601

DOI

22
Yan G A Cai Q Y Chen A X 2016 Information-holding quantum router of single photons using natural atom Eur. Phys. J. D 70 93

DOI

23
Agarwal G S Huang S 2012 Optomechanical systems as singlephoton routers Phys. Rev. A 85 021801

DOI

24
Yan C H Li Y Yuan H D Wei L F 2018 Targeted photonic routers with chiral photon-atom interactions Phys. Rev. A 97 023821

DOI

25
Li T Miranowicz A Hu X D Xia K Y Nori F 2018 Quantum memory and gates using a Λ-type quantum emitter coupled to a chiral waveguide Phys. Rev. A 97 062318

DOI

26
Cheng M T Ma X R Fan J W Xu J P Zhu C J 2017 Controllable single-photon nonreciprocal propagation between two waveguides chirally coupled to a quantum emitter Opt. Lett. 15 42

DOI

27
Cheng M T Ma X S Zhang J Y Wang B 2016 Single photon transport in two waveguides chirally coupled by a quantum emitter Opt. Express 17 24

DOI

28
Gonzalez-Ballestero C Moreno E Garcia-Vidal F J Gonzalez-Tudela A 2016 Nonreciprocal few-photon routing schemes based on chiral waveguide-emitter couplings Phys. Rev. A 94 063817

DOI

29
Ahumada M Orellana P A Dominguez-Adame F Malyshev A V 2019 Tunable single-photon quantum router Phys. Rev. A 99 033827

DOI

30
Huang J S Wang J W Li Y L Wang Y Huang Y W 2019 Tunable quantum routing via asymmetric intercavity couplings Quantum Inf. Process. 18 59

DOI

31
Yang C P Su Q P Zheng S B Han S Y 2013 Generating entanglement between microwave photons and qubits in multiple cavities coupled by a superconducting qutrit Phys. Rev. A 87 022320

DOI

32
Baust A 2015 Tunable and switchable coupling between two superconducting resonators Phys. Rev. B 91 014515

DOI

Outlines

/