Welcome to visit Communications in Theoretical Physics,
Quantum Physics and Quantum Information

Fisher and Shannon information entropies for a noncentral inversely quadratic plus exponential Mie-type potential

  • Ituen B Okon , 1, 4 ,
  • Cecilia N Isonguyo , 1 ,
  • Akaninyene D Antia , 1 ,
  • Akpan N Ikot , 2 ,
  • Oyebola O Popoola , 3
Expand
  • 1Theoretical Physics Group, Department of Physics, University of Uyo, Uyo, Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria
  • 2Department of Physics, University of South Africa, Pretoria, 0002, South Africa
  • 3Theoretical Physics Group, Department of Physics, University of Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria

4Author to whom any correspondence should be addressed.

Received date: 2019-11-25

  Revised date: 2020-02-13

  Accepted date: 2020-02-26

  Online published: 2020-06-10

Copyright

© 2020 Chinese Physical Society and IOP Publishing Ltd

Abstract

In this work, we determine the Fisher and Shannon entropies, the expectation values and the squeeze state for a noncentral inversely quadratic plus exponential Mie-type potential analytically. The proposed potential is solved under the Schrödinger equation using a special Greene Aldrich approximation to the centrifugal term to obtain a normalised wave function within the framework of the Nikiforov–Uvarov method. Numerical results are obtained for different screening parameters: α = 0.1, 0.12 and 0.13 for varying real constant parameter (B). The numerical solutions are obtained only for ground state. The numerical results of Fisher entropy both for position and momentum spaces are in good agreement with existing literature. The normalisation constant, wave function, and probability density plots are carried out using a well designed Mathematica algorithm. The Fourier transform of position space entropy gives the momentum space entropy.

Cite this article

Ituen B Okon , Cecilia N Isonguyo , Akaninyene D Antia , Akpan N Ikot , Oyebola O Popoola . Fisher and Shannon information entropies for a noncentral inversely quadratic plus exponential Mie-type potential[J]. Communications in Theoretical Physics, 2020 , 72(6) : 065104 . DOI: 10.1088/1572-9494/ab7ec9

1. Introduction

Entropic measures and information theory in general provides a clear understanding of quantum mechanical systems. In recent years, the study of bound state and scattering state solutions for both relativistic and non-relativistic wave equations has a gained wider interest because of their potential applications, particularly in the areas of information entropies and quantum technologies. Information entropy is a significant tool in studying the electronic structure of atoms and molecules. The Fisher information measurement is used as a tool for characterising complex signals of quantum mechanical systems with applications to biology, atomic physics and other related science disciplines [113]. Shannon, Fisher and other quantum information entropies usually measure the spread of probability distribution for allowed quantum mechanical states in a D-dimensional space [1418]. Quantum information theory has a direct relationship with the Heisenberg uncertainty principle, which plays a very significant role in the simultaneous measurement of position and momentum of quantum mechanical particles. In 1948, a new uncertainty relation, based on Shannon entropy, was established as a basic tool for investigating the fundamental limit of signal processing [19, 20]. In this work, we developed a novel potential called a Noncentral Inversely Quadratic plus exponential Mie-type potential to study Fisher and and Shannon entropies, their expectation values, and their squeeze state, using suitable real constant parameters. This potential has applications in signal processing. The wave function and probability density plots obtained in this work reveal some significant properties and characteristics of quantum systems. We have discovered that all odd values of the wave function give the property of a wave function, while even values of the wave function plots give probability density. Larger values of the Shannon entropy are indicative of a more delocalised density while smaller values are associated with localised distribution. This means that Shannon entropy increases with an increase in uncertainty and vice versa [21]. There are other information entropies as investigated by various researchers. Recently Jen-Hao and Yew Ho carried out fantastic work on the benchmark calculations of Renyi, Tsallis and Onicescu information entropies for ground state helium using a correlated Hylleraas wave function [22]. The new Shannon entropy was first introduced by Beckner, Bialynicki-Birula and Mycieslki in 1975 as ${S}_{x}+{S}_{p}\geqslant D(1+{log}\pi )$ [2325] where D represents the spatial dimension. However, the position Sx and momentum Sp is defined as [2629].
$\begin{eqnarray}{S}_{x}=-{\int }_{-\infty }^{+\infty }{\left|{\rm{\Psi }}(x)\right|}^{2}\mathrm{log}{\left|{\rm{\Psi }}(x)\right|}^{2}{\rm{d}}{x}\end{eqnarray}$
$\begin{eqnarray}{S}_{p}=-{\int }_{-\infty }^{+\infty }{\left|\phi (p)\right|}^{2}\mathrm{log}{\left|\phi (p)\right|}^{2}{\rm{d}}{p}\end{eqnarray}$
where &PSgr;(x) is a normalised eigen function in a spatial coordinate and φ(x) is the normalised Fourier transform. In general, the momentum space entropy is obtained by taking the Fourier transform of position space in a spatial coordinate [30, 31]. Equations (1) and (2) give the measure of the spread of a single particle density of position and momentum space respectively. Equation (1) and (2) can also be expressed as
$\begin{eqnarray}{S}_{x}=-{\int }_{-\infty }^{+\infty }\rho (x)\mathrm{ln}\rho (x){\rm{d}}{x}\end{eqnarray}$
$\begin{eqnarray}{S}_{p}=-{\int }_{-\infty }^{+\infty }\rho (p)\mathrm{ln}\rho (p){\rm{d}}{p},\end{eqnarray}$
where $\rho (x)={\left|{\rm{\Psi }}(x)\right|}^{2}$ and $\rho (p)={\left|{\rm{\Psi }}(p)\right|}^{2}$ respectively. Equation (3) can further be expressed as
$\begin{eqnarray}\begin{array}{rcl}{S}_{x} & = & -{\displaystyle \int }_{-\infty }^{+\infty }\left(\displaystyle \frac{1}{{d}^{2}}{\left|{P}_{n}(x)\right|}^{2}w(x\right)\\ & & \times \mathrm{log}\left(\displaystyle \frac{1}{{d}^{2}}{\left|{P}_{n}(x)\right|}^{2}w(x\right){\rm{d}}{x},\end{array}\end{eqnarray}$
where
$\begin{eqnarray}{S}_{x}=\mathrm{log}({{\rm{d}}}_{n}^{2})+\displaystyle \frac{1}{{{\rm{d}}}^{2}}\left({E}_{n}+{I}_{n}\right).\end{eqnarray}$
Here, the term En and In can then be expressed as
$\begin{eqnarray}{E}_{n}=-{\int }_{-\infty }^{+\infty }\left({\left|{P}_{n}(x)\right|}^{2}w(x\right)\mathrm{log}\left({\left|{P}_{n}(x)\right|}^{2}\right){\rm{d}}{x},\end{eqnarray}$
$\begin{eqnarray}{I}_{n}=-{\int }_{-\infty }^{+\infty }\left({\left|{P}_{n}(x)\right|}^{2}w(x\right)\mathrm{log}\left(w(x\right){\rm{d}}{x}.\end{eqnarray}$
This work is divided into seven sections. Section 1 gives a brief introduction of the article. In section 2, we provide an overview of the generalised parametric Nikiforov–Uvarov method. In section 3 we solve analytically the radial solution of a Schrödinger wave equation to obtain a normalised wave function and the energy-eigen equation. In section 4 we apply the normalised wave function obtained in section 3 to analytically obtained position and momentum space Shannon entropy. In section 5, we obtain analytical solutions to Fisher position and momentum space entropies. We present the numerical solutions , their expectation values and the squeeze state in section 6. Results and discussion are presented in section 7 while section 8 gives the conclusion of the article. The adopted parameter values for both the wave function and probability density plots were all real constants. We discover that the proposed potential is most suitable for ground state energy. This is a further reason why our plots for wave functions and probability densities are all plotted for n, l = 0 using a well designed rigorous mathematica algorithm. We also discover that at higher state, that is for n, l > 0, The plots were not suitable in providing solutions to the information measures of Shannon and Fisher entropies for this particular potential. Therefore, this work is limited to ground state energy and wave function. The normalisation constant, the wave function plots, the probability density plots, and all numerical computations were carried out using Mathematica. The graph for the noncentral potential is given in figure 1, while that of the Greene Aldrich approximation and special Greene Aldrich approximation are presented in figures 1(a) and (b) respectively. The combination of the noncentral and exponential Mie-type potential is significant in the study of vibrational and rotational energies of diatomic molecules and their degeneracies for a particular quantum state [32]. In most cases, the topological properties of atoms of diatomic molecules, including their chemical functional groups, are evaluated using Density Functional theory(DFT) and pseudopotential formalism [33]. Inversely quadratic potential is a long range potential and in combination with other exponential type potentials may be used in finding the shape of organic molecules such as cyclic polyenes and benzene [22].
Figure 1. The graph of the Noncentral potential. (a) The centrifugal term $\tfrac{1}{{r}^{2}}$ for standard Greene Aldrich approximation with varying α = 0.1 to 0.5. (b) The centrifugal term $\tfrac{1}{{r}^{2}}$ for special Greene Aldrich approximation with varying α = 0.1 to 0.5. (c) The normalised wave function plot 1. (d) The normalised wave function plot 2. (e) The normalised wave function plot 3. (f) The probability density function plot 1. (g) The probability density function plot 2. (h) The probability density function plot 3. (i) The normalised wave function plot 1(a). (j) The normalised wave function plot 2(a). (k) The normalised wave function plot 3(a). (l) The probability density function plot 1(b). (m) The probability density function plot 2(b). (n) The probability density function plot 3(b).

2. The generalised parametric Nikiforov–Uvarov method

The NU method was presented by Nikiforov and Uvarov [31] and has been employed to solve second order differential equations such as Schrödinger wave equations (SWE), Klein–Gordon equations (KGE), Dirac equations (DE), etc. The Schrödinger wave equation is given as
$\begin{eqnarray}\displaystyle \frac{{{\rm{d}}}^{2}{\rm{\Psi }}(r)}{{{\rm{d}}{r}}^{2}}+\displaystyle \frac{2\mu }{{{\hslash }}^{2}}\left[{E}_{{nl}}-V(r)-\displaystyle \frac{{{\hslash }}^{2}l(l+1)}{2\mu {r}^{2}}\right]{\rm{\Psi }}(r)=0,\end{eqnarray}$
correspondingly, for the purpose of this work, we shall be considering the exact solution of a Schrödinger equation where the orbital angular quantum number l = 0, hence equation (9) reduces to
$\begin{eqnarray}\displaystyle \frac{{{\rm{d}}}^{2}{\rm{\Psi }}(r)}{{{\rm{d}}{r}}^{2}}+\displaystyle \frac{2\mu }{{{\hslash }}^{2}}\left[{E}_{{nl}}-V(r)\right]{\rm{\Psi }}(r)=0.\end{eqnarray}$
Equation (10) can be solved by transforming it into an hypergeometric type equation using the transformation s = s(x) and its resulting equation is expressed as:
$\begin{eqnarray}\psi ^{\prime\prime} (s)+\displaystyle \frac{\tilde{\tau }(s)}{\sigma (s)}\psi ^{\prime} (s)+\displaystyle \frac{\tilde{\sigma }(s)}{{\sigma }^{2}(s)}\psi (s)=0,\end{eqnarray}$
where σ (s) and $\tilde{\sigma }(s)$ must be polynomials of at most second degree, $\tilde{\tau }(s)$ is the first degree polynomial, and ψ (s) is a function of the hypergeometric type. The parametric generalisation of the NU method is given by the generalised hypergeometric type equation 12.
$\begin{eqnarray}\begin{array}{l}\psi ^{\prime\prime} (s)+\displaystyle \frac{({c}_{1}-{c}_{2}s)}{s(1-{c}_{3}s)}\psi ^{\prime} (s)\\ \quad +\,\displaystyle \frac{1}{{s}^{2}{\left(1-{c}_{3}s\right)}^{2}}\left[-{\xi }_{1}{s}^{2}+{\xi }_{2}s-{\xi }_{3}\right]\psi (s)=0.\end{array}\end{eqnarray}$
Equation (12) has been applied to provide bound state solutions to both relativistic and non-relativistic wave equations with considerable potential such as Hulthen, Eckart, Coulomb, Pseudoharmonic and many others [3441]. Equation (12) is solved by comparing with equation (11) and the following polynomials are obtained.
$\begin{eqnarray}\begin{array}{rcl}\tilde{\tau }(s) & = & \left({c}_{1}-{c}_{2}s\right),\sigma (s)=s\left(1-{c}_{3}s\right),\\ \tilde{\sigma }(s) & = & -{\epsilon }_{1}{s}^{2}+{\epsilon }_{2}s-{\epsilon }_{3}.\end{array}\end{eqnarray}$
According to the NU method, the energy eigenvalue equation and eigen wave function, respectively, satisfy the following set of equations:
$\begin{eqnarray}\begin{array}{l}{c}_{2}^{}n-\left(2n+1\right){c}_{5}\left(2n+1\right)\left(\sqrt{{c}_{9}}+{c}_{3}\sqrt{{c}_{8}}\right)\\ \quad +\,n\left(n-1\right){c}_{3}+{c}_{7}2{c}_{3}{c}_{8}+2\sqrt{{c}_{8}{c}_{9}}=0,\end{array}\end{eqnarray}$
$\begin{eqnarray}\psi (s)={N}_{{nl}}{s}^{{c}_{12}}{\left(1-{c}_{3}s\right)}^{-{c}_{12}-\tfrac{{c}_{11}}{{c}_{3}}}{P}_{n}^{\left({c}_{10}-1,\,\tfrac{{c}_{11}}{{c}_{3}}-{c}_{10}-1\right)}\left(1-2{c}_{3}s,,\right)\end{eqnarray}$
where
$\begin{eqnarray}\left.\begin{array}{l}\,{c}_{4}=\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}\left(1-{c}_{1}\right);\,{c}_{5}=\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}\left({c}_{2}-{c}_{3}\right);\,{c}_{6}={c}_{5}^{2}+{\epsilon }_{1}\\ \,{c}_{7}=2{c}_{4}{c}_{5}-{\epsilon }_{2};\,{c}_{8}={c}_{4}^{2}+{\epsilon }_{3};\\ \,{c}_{9}={c}_{3}{c}_{7}+{c}_{3}^{2}{c}_{8}+{c}_{6}\\ {c}_{10}={c}_{1}+2{c}_{4}+2\sqrt{{c}_{8}};\\ {c}_{11}={c}_{2}-2{c}_{5}+2\left(\sqrt{{c}_{9}}+{c}_{3}\sqrt{{c}_{8}}\right)\\ {c}_{12}={c}_{4}+\sqrt{{c}_{8}};\,{c}_{13}={c}_{5}-\left(\sqrt{{c}_{9}}+{c}_{3}\sqrt{{c}_{8}}\right)\end{array}\right\}.\end{eqnarray}$

3. The radial solution of the proposed potential in a Schrödinger equation using the Nikiforov–Uvarov method

The noncentral Inversely quadratic plus exponential Mie-type potential is given as
$\begin{eqnarray}V(r)=\displaystyle \frac{A\sin \alpha }{{r}^{2}}+\displaystyle \frac{\left(B-\eta \right){{\rm{e}}}^{-\alpha r}\sin \alpha }{r}+C,\end{eqnarray}$
where A is the potential depth in electron volts, B, η and C are real constant parameters. α is the screening parameter. The graph of this potential is shown in figure 1.
Substituting equation (17) into (10) gives
$\begin{eqnarray}\begin{array}{l}\displaystyle \frac{{{\rm{d}}}^{2}{\rm{\Psi }}(r)}{{{\rm{d}}{r}}^{2}}+\displaystyle \frac{2\mu }{{{\hslash }}^{2}}\left[{E}_{{nl}}-\displaystyle \frac{A\sin \alpha }{{r}^{2}}\right.\\ \quad \left.-\,\displaystyle \frac{\left(B-\eta \right){{\rm{e}}}^{-\alpha r}\sin \alpha }{r}-C\right]{\rm{\Psi }}(r)=0.\end{array}\end{eqnarray}$
To solve equation (18) analytically, we treat sin $\alpha $ as a constant trignometric function that tends to 1 and define special Greene Aldrich approximation to the centrifugal term as
$\begin{eqnarray}\displaystyle \frac{1}{{r}^{2}}=\displaystyle \frac{4{\alpha }^{2}{{\rm{e}}}^{-2\alpha r}\sin \alpha }{{\left(1-{{\rm{e}}}^{-2\alpha r}\sin \alpha \right)}^{2}}\Rightarrow \displaystyle \frac{1}{r}=\displaystyle \frac{2\alpha {{\rm{e}}}^{-\alpha r}\sin \alpha }{\left(1-{{\rm{e}}}^{-2\alpha r}\sin \alpha \right)}.\end{eqnarray}$
Let us define a special transformation to S-coordinate as
$\begin{eqnarray}s={{\rm{e}}}^{-2\alpha r}\sin \alpha .\end{eqnarray}$
By comparing the graph of a standard Greene Aldrich approximation in figure 1(a) to a special Greene Aldrich approximation in figure 1(b), it can be observed that figure 1(a) converges asymptotically for different values of the screening parameter α = 0.1 to 0.5. The same thing is also applicable to figure 1(b). This signifies that the special Greene Aldrich approximation could be approximated to the standard Greene Aldrich approximation; this serves as a good approximation to the proposed potential. Substituting equation (19) into 18, and making use of equation (20), equation (18) is reduced to a hypergeometric type equation:
$\begin{eqnarray}\begin{array}{l}\displaystyle \frac{{{\rm{d}}}^{2}{\rm{\Psi }}(s)}{{{\rm{d}}{s}}^{2}}+\displaystyle \frac{(1-s)}{s(1-s)}\displaystyle \frac{{\rm{d}}{\rm{\Psi }}(s)}{{\rm{d}}{s}}+\displaystyle \frac{1}{s(1-s)}\\ \times \,\left[\begin{array}{l}-\left({\varepsilon }^{2}+{\chi }_{2}+{\chi }_{3}\right){s}^{2}+\left(2{\varepsilon }^{2}-{\chi }_{1}-{\chi }_{2}+2{\chi }_{3}\right)s\\ -\left({\varepsilon }^{2}+{\chi }_{3}\right)\end{array}\right]\\ \times \,{\rm{\Psi }}(s)=0,\end{array}\end{eqnarray}$
where
$\begin{eqnarray}\begin{array}{rcl}{\chi }_{1} & = & \displaystyle \frac{\mu A}{{{\hslash }}^{2}}\ ;\ {\chi }_{2}=\displaystyle \frac{\mu \left(B-\eta \right)}{\alpha {{\hslash }}^{2}}\ ;\ {\chi }_{3}=\displaystyle \frac{2\mu C}{4{\alpha }^{2}{{\hslash }}^{2}};\\ {\varepsilon }^{2} & = & -\displaystyle \frac{2\mu {E}_{{nl}}}{4{\alpha }^{2}{{\hslash }}^{2}}.\end{array}\end{eqnarray}$
Comparing equation (12) to equation (21), and using equation (16), the following parametric constants are obtained:
$\begin{eqnarray}\begin{array}{l}{c}_{1}={c}_{2}={c}_{3}=1;\ \ {c}_{4}=0;\\ {c}_{5}=-\displaystyle \frac{1}{2};\ \ {c}_{6}=\displaystyle \frac{1}{4}+{\varepsilon }^{2};\\ {c}_{7}=\left(-2{\varepsilon }^{2}+{\chi }_{1}+{\chi }_{2}-2{\chi }_{3}\right);\\ {c}_{8}=\left({\varepsilon }^{2}+{\chi }_{3}\right);\ \ {c}_{9}=\left(\displaystyle \frac{1}{4}+{\chi }_{1}+2{\chi }_{2}\right);\\ {c}_{10}=\left(1+2\sqrt{{\varepsilon }^{2}+{\chi }_{3}}\right);\\ {c}_{11}=2+2\left(\sqrt{\displaystyle \frac{1}{4}+{\chi }_{1}+2{\chi }_{2}}+\sqrt{{\varepsilon }^{2}+{\chi }_{3}}\right);\\ {c}_{12}=\sqrt{{\varepsilon }^{2}+{\chi }_{3}};\\ {c}_{13}=-\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}-\left(\sqrt{\displaystyle \frac{1}{4}+{\chi }_{1}+2{\chi }_{2}}+\sqrt{{\varepsilon }^{2}+{\chi }_{3}}\right);\\ {\xi }_{1}=\left({\varepsilon }^{2}+{\chi }_{2}+{\chi }_{3}\right);\\ {\xi }_{2}=\left(2{\varepsilon }^{2}-{\chi }_{1}-{\chi }_{2}+2{\chi }_{3}\right);\ \ {\xi }_{3}=\left({\varepsilon }^{2}+{\chi }_{3}\right).\end{array}\end{eqnarray}$
By making use of equation (14), the energy-eigen equation for the proposed potential is given as
$\begin{eqnarray}\begin{array}{c}\begin{array}{l}{E}_{{nl}}=\displaystyle \frac{-2{\alpha }^{2}{\hslash }^{2}}{\mu }\times \,{\left\{\displaystyle \frac{\left({n}^{2}+n+\tfrac{1}{2}\right)+\left(n+\tfrac{1}{2}\right)\sqrt{1+\tfrac{4\mu A}{{\hslash }^{2}}+\tfrac{8\mu \left(B-\eta \right)}{\alpha {\hslash }^{2}}}+\tfrac{\mu A}{{\hslash }^{2}}+\tfrac{\mu \left(B-\eta \right)}{\alpha {\hslash }^{2}}}{\left(2n+1\right)+\sqrt{1+\tfrac{4\mu A}{{\hslash }^{2}}+\tfrac{8\mu \left(B-\eta \right)}{\alpha {\hslash }^{2}}}}\right\}}^{2}+\,C.\end{array}\end{array}\end{eqnarray}$
Also, by making use of equation (15), the total wave function is given as
$\begin{eqnarray}\begin{array}{l}{{\rm{\Psi }}}_{n}(s)={N}_{n}{S}^{\sqrt{{\varepsilon }^{2}+{\chi }_{3}}}{\left(1-s\right)}^{-\tfrac{1}{2}-\left(\sqrt{\tfrac{1}{4}+{\chi }_{1}+2{\chi }_{2}}+\sqrt{{\varepsilon }^{2}+{\chi }_{3}}\right)}\\ \times \,{P}_{n}^{\left[\left(1+2\sqrt{{\varepsilon }^{2}+{\chi }_{3}}\right),2+2\left(\sqrt{\displaystyle \frac{1}{4}+{\chi }_{1}+2{\chi }_{2}}+\sqrt{{\varepsilon }^{2}+{\chi }_{3}}\right)\right]}(1-2s)\\ \Rightarrow \,{{\rm{\Psi }}}_{n}(s)={N}_{n}{\left({{\rm{e}}}^{-2\alpha r}\sin \alpha \right)}^{\sqrt{\tfrac{2\mu C}{4{\alpha }^{2}{{\hslash }}^{2}}-\displaystyle \frac{2\mu {E}_{{nl}}}{4{\alpha }^{2}{{\hslash }}^{2}}}}\\ \times \,{\left(1-{{\rm{e}}}^{-2\alpha r}\sin \alpha \right)}^{-\tfrac{1}{2}-\left(\sqrt{\tfrac{1}{4}+\tfrac{\mu A}{{{\hslash }}^{2}}+2\displaystyle \frac{\mu \left(B-\eta \right)}{\alpha {{\hslash }}^{2}}}+\sqrt{\displaystyle \frac{2\mu C}{4{\alpha }^{2}{{\hslash }}^{2}}-\displaystyle \frac{2\mu {E}_{{nl}}}{4{\alpha }^{2}{{\hslash }}^{2}}}\right)}\\ \times \,{P}_{n}^{\left[\left(1+2\sqrt{\tfrac{2\mu C}{4{\alpha }^{2}{{\hslash }}^{2}}-\displaystyle \frac{2\mu {E}_{{nl}}}{4{\alpha }^{2}{{\hslash }}^{2}}}\right),2+2\left(\sqrt{\displaystyle \frac{1}{4}+\displaystyle \frac{\mu A}{{{\hslash }}^{2}}+2\displaystyle \frac{\mu \left(B-\eta \right)}{\alpha {{\hslash }}^{2}}}+\sqrt{\displaystyle \frac{2\mu C}{4{\alpha }^{2}{{\hslash }}^{2}}-\displaystyle \frac{2\mu {E}_{{nl}}}{4{\alpha }^{2}{{\hslash }}^{2}}}\right)\right]}\\ \times \,(1-2{{\rm{e}}}^{-2\alpha r}\sin \alpha ).\end{array}\end{eqnarray}$
The normalised wave function and probability density curves for the first set of real constant parameters are given below.
The graph for the second set of adopted parameters, with specific adjustable screening parameters, were also plotted for wave function and probability density for the sake of comparison, as shown in the figures below.
Figures 1(c), (d) and (e) are wave function plots for the first set of real constant parameters for &PSgr;, ${\left|{\rm{\Psi }}\right|}^{2}$, and ${\left|{\rm{\Psi }}\right|}^{3}$, respectively, while figures 1(i), (j) and (k) represent the wave function plots &PSgr;, ${\left|{\rm{\Psi }}\right|}^{2}$, and ${\left|{\rm{\Psi }}\right|}^{3}$, respectively, for the second set of real constant parameters. However,by observation, the wave function plots for these two sets of real parameters are almost the same, and this enables us to propose a generalised conclusion that odd value wave functions have the same properties, especially when the wave function is continuous, having continuous partial derivatives. A careful observation of the probability density in figures 1(f), (g) and (h) for the first set of parameter and (l), (m) and (n) for the second set of parameter shows that even values of the wave function represent the probability density for a continuous wave function having continuous partial derivatives.

4. Position and momentum space for Shannon entropy

In order to determine both position and momentum space for Shannon entropy, one needs to calculate the probability density from the wave function. Meanwhile, the wave function must be normalised. First, we simplify equation (25) for easy normalisation. Assuming that ${\sigma }_{1}=\sqrt{{\varepsilon }^{2}+{\chi }_{3}}$ and $\ {\sigma }_{2}=\sqrt{\tfrac{1}{4}+{\chi }_{1}+2{\chi }_{2}}$ Then equation (25) reduces to
$\begin{eqnarray}{{\rm{\Psi }}}_{n}(s)={N}_{n}{S}^{{\sigma }_{1}}{\left(1-s\right)}^{-\tfrac{1}{2}-\left({\sigma }_{2}+{\sigma }_{1}\right)}{P}_{n}^{\left[\left(1+2{\sigma }_{1}\right),2+2\left({\sigma }_{2}+{\sigma }_{1}\right)\right]}(1-2s).\end{eqnarray}$
The probability density is the square of the wave function. Hence, squaring equation (26) gives
$\begin{eqnarray}\begin{array}{rcl}\rho (x) & = & \rho (r)={N}_{n}^{2}{S}^{2{\sigma }_{1}}{\left(1-s\right)}^{-1-2\left({\sigma }_{2}+{\sigma }_{1}\right)}\\ & & \times {\left|{P}_{n}^{\left[\left(1+2{\sigma }_{1}\right),2+2\left({\sigma }_{2}+{\sigma }_{1}\right)\right]}(1-2s)\right|}^{2}.\end{array}\end{eqnarray}$
From (20), the integration boundaries from $(-\infty ,+\infty )$ in r-dimension change to (0,1) in s-dimension and by making use of equation (3), the Shannon entropy for position space for the noncentral potential is given as
$\begin{eqnarray}\begin{array}{l}{S}_{x}^{{NCP}}=-\displaystyle \frac{{N}_{n}^{2}}{2\alpha }{\displaystyle \int }_{0}^{1}\ \times \ \left[\begin{array}{l}\left({S}^{2{\sigma }_{1}-1}{\left(1-s\right)}^{-1-2\left({\sigma }_{2}+{\sigma }_{1}\right)}{\left|{P}_{n}^{\left[\left(1+2{\sigma }_{1}\right),2+2\left({\sigma }_{2}+{\sigma }_{1}\right)\right]}(1-2s)\right|}^{2}\right)\\ \ \times \ \mathrm{log}{N}_{n}^{2}\left({S}^{2{\sigma }_{1}-1}{\left(1-s\right)}^{-1-2\left({\sigma }_{2}+{\sigma }_{1}\right)}{\left|{P}_{n}^{\left[\left(1+2{\sigma }_{1}\right),2+2\left({\sigma }_{2}+{\sigma }_{1}\right)\right]}(1-2s)\right|}^{2}\right)\end{array}\right]{\rm{d}}{s}.\end{array}\end{eqnarray}$
Equation (28) can also be reduced to
$\begin{eqnarray}\begin{array}{l}{S}_{x}^{{NCP}}=-\displaystyle \frac{{N}_{n}^{2}}{2\alpha }{\displaystyle \int }_{0}^{1}\ \times \ \left[\begin{array}{l}\left({S}^{2{\sigma }_{1}-1}{\left(1-s\right)}^{-1-2\left({\sigma }_{2}+{\sigma }_{1}\right)}{\left|{P}_{n}^{\left[\left(1+2{\sigma }_{1}\right),2+2\left({\sigma }_{2}+{\sigma }_{1}\right)\right]}(1-2s)\right|}^{2}\right)\\ \ \times \ \left(\begin{array}{l}\mathrm{log}\left({N}_{n}^{2}\right)+\mathrm{log}\left({S}^{2{\sigma }_{1}-1}{\left(1-s\right)}^{-1-2\left({\sigma }_{2}+{\sigma }_{1}\right)}\right)\\ +\mathrm{log}\left({\left|{P}_{n}^{\left[\left(1+2{\sigma }_{1}\right),2+2\left({\sigma }_{2}+{\sigma }_{1}\right)\right]}(1-2s)\right|}^{2}\right)\end{array}\right)\end{array}\right]{\rm{d}}{s}.\end{array}\end{eqnarray}$
Equation (29) can further be separated into three separate integrals as shown in equation (30)
$\begin{eqnarray}\begin{array}{l}{S}_{x}^{{NCP}}=-\mathrm{log}\left({N}_{n}^{2}\right)\\ \times \,\displaystyle \frac{{N}_{n}^{2}}{2\alpha }{\displaystyle \int }_{0}^{1}\left[\begin{array}{l}\left({S}^{2{\sigma }_{1}-1}{\left(1-s\right)}^{-1-2\left({\sigma }_{2}+{\sigma }_{1}\right)}\right)\\ \ \times \ \left({\left|{P}_{n}^{\left[\left(1+2{\sigma }_{1}\right),2+2\left({\sigma }_{2}+{\sigma }_{1}\right)\right]}(1-2s)\right|}^{2}\right)\end{array}\right]{\rm{d}}{s}\\ -\displaystyle \frac{{N}_{n}^{2}}{2\alpha }{\int }_{0}^{1}\left[\begin{array}{l}\left({S}^{2{\sigma }_{1}-1}{\left(1-s\right)}^{-1-2\left({\sigma }_{2}+{\sigma }_{1}\right)}\right)\\ \ \times \ \left({\left|{P}_{n}^{\left[\left(1+2{\sigma }_{1}\right),2+2\left({\sigma }_{2}+{\sigma }_{1}\right)\right]}(1-2s)\right|}^{2}\right)\\ \ \times \ \mathrm{log}\left({S}^{2{\sigma }_{1}-1}{\left(1-s\right)}^{-1-2\left({\sigma }_{2}+{\sigma }_{1}\right)}\right)\end{array}\right]{\rm{d}}{s}\\ \\ -\displaystyle \frac{{N}_{n}^{2}}{2\alpha }{\int }_{0}^{1}\left[\begin{array}{l}\left({S}^{2{\sigma }_{1}-1}{\left(1-s\right)}^{-1-2\left({\sigma }_{2}+{\sigma }_{1}\right)}\right)\\ \ \times \ \left({\left|{P}_{n}^{\left[\left(1+2{\sigma }_{1}\right),2+2\left({\sigma }_{2}+{\sigma }_{1}\right)\right]}(1-2s)\right|}^{2}\right)\\ \ \times \ \mathrm{log}\left({\left|{P}_{n}^{\left[\left(1+2{\sigma }_{1}\right),2+2\left({\sigma }_{2}+{\sigma }_{1}\right)\right]}(1-2s)\right|}^{2}\right)\end{array}\right]{\rm{d}}{s}.\end{array}\end{eqnarray}$
The first integral of equation (30) signifies normalisation with a unique value of one as shown in equation (31)
$\begin{eqnarray}\begin{array}{l}\displaystyle \frac{{N}_{n}^{2}}{2\alpha }{\displaystyle \int }_{0}^{1}\left[\left({S}^{2{\sigma }_{1}-1}{\left(1-s\right)}^{-1-2\left({\sigma }_{2}+{\sigma }_{1}\right)}\right)\right.\\ \times \,\left.\left({\left|{P}_{n}^{\left[\left(1+2{\sigma }_{1}\right),2+2\left({\sigma }_{2}+{\sigma }_{1}\right)\right]}(1-2s)\right|}^{2}\right)\right]{\rm{d}}{s}=1.\end{array}\end{eqnarray}$
Equation (30) finally reduces to
$\begin{eqnarray}\begin{array}{rcl}{S}_{x}^{{NCP}} & = & -\mathrm{log}{N}_{n}^{2}+\displaystyle \frac{{N}_{n}^{2}}{2\alpha }\left[E\left({P}_{n}^{\left[\left(1+2{\sigma }_{1}\right),2+2\left({\sigma }_{2}+{\sigma }_{1}\right)\right]}(1-2s\right)\right.\\ & & \left.+I\left({P}_{n}^{\left[\left(1+2{\sigma }_{1}\right),2+2\left({\sigma }_{2}+{\sigma }_{1}\right)\right]}(1-2s\right)\right]\end{array}\end{eqnarray}$
where E and I are entropic integrals with the following expressions:
$\begin{eqnarray}\begin{array}{l}E\left[{P}_{n}^{\left[\left(1+2{\sigma }_{1}\right),2+2\left({\sigma }_{2}+{\sigma }_{1}\right)\right]}(1-2s)\right]\\ =\,-{\displaystyle \int }_{0}^{1}\left[\begin{array}{l}\left({S}^{2{\sigma }_{1}-1}{\left(1-s\right)}^{-1-2\left({\sigma }_{2}+{\sigma }_{1}\right)}\right)\\ \ \times \ \left({\left|{P}_{n}^{\left[\left(1+2{\sigma }_{1}\right),2+2\left({\sigma }_{2}+{\sigma }_{1}\right)\right]}(1-2s)\right|}^{2}\right)\\ \times \ \mathrm{log}\left({\left|{P}_{n}^{\left[\left(1+2{\sigma }_{1}\right),2+2\left({\sigma }_{2}+{\sigma }_{1}\right)\right]}(1-2s)\right|}^{2}\right)\end{array}\right]{\rm{d}}{s}\\ I\left[{P}_{n}^{\left[\left(1+2{\sigma }_{1}\right),2+2\left({\sigma }_{2}+{\sigma }_{1}\right)\right]}(1-2s)\right]\\ =\,-{\int }_{0}^{1}\left[\begin{array}{l}\left({S}^{2{\sigma }_{1}-1}{\left(1-s\right)}^{-1-2\left({\sigma }_{2}+{\sigma }_{1}\right)}\right)\\ \ \times \ \left({\left|{P}_{n}^{\left[\left(1+2{\sigma }_{1}\right),2+2\left({\sigma }_{2}+{\sigma }_{1}\right)\right]}(1-2s)\right|}^{2}\right)\\ \ \times \ \mathrm{log}\left({S}^{2{\sigma }_{1}-1}{\left(1-s\right)}^{-1-2\left({\sigma }_{2}+{\sigma }_{1}\right)}\right)\end{array}\right]{\rm{d}}{s}.\end{array}\end{eqnarray}$
Guerrero and Aptekarev define entropic integrals using digamma functions [42, 43] as
$\begin{eqnarray}\begin{array}{l}E\left[{P}_{n}^{\left(\alpha ,\beta \right)}(x)\right]=-{\displaystyle \int }_{a}^{b}w\left(\alpha ,\beta \right){\left|{P}_{n}^{\left(\alpha ,\beta \right)}(x)\right|}^{2}\\ \quad \ \times \ \mathrm{log}{\left|{P}_{n}^{\left(\alpha ,\beta \right)}(x)\right|}^{2}{\rm{d}}{x}\\ =\,\mathrm{log}\left(\pi \right)-1-\left(\alpha +\beta \right)\mathrm{log}2+o(1),\end{array}\end{eqnarray}$
$\begin{eqnarray}\begin{array}{l}I\left|{P}_{n}^{\left(\alpha ,\beta \right)}(x)\right|=-{\displaystyle \int }_{-1}^{1}w\left(\alpha ,\beta \right){\left|{P}_{n}^{\left(\alpha ,\beta \right)}(x)\right|}^{2}\mathrm{log}w\left(\alpha ,\beta \right){\rm{d}}{x}\\ =\,-\alpha \psi \left(n+\alpha +1\right)-\beta \psi \left(n+\beta +1\right)+\left(\alpha +\beta \right)\\ \times \,\left[-\mathrm{log}2+\displaystyle \frac{1}{\left(2n+\alpha +\beta +1\right)}+2\psi \left(2n+\alpha +\beta +1\right)\right.\\ \left.-\,\psi (n+\alpha +\beta +1)\right].\end{array}\end{eqnarray}$
In order to express En as a digamma function, we consider equation (32) such that
$\begin{eqnarray}\alpha =2{\sigma }_{1}+1\begin{array}{cc}; & 2+2\left({\sigma }_{1}+{\sigma }_{2}\right)\end{array}\begin{array}{cc}; & x=1-2s.\end{array}\end{eqnarray}$
Then, by making use of equation (34), the following can be obtained:
$\begin{eqnarray}\begin{array}{l}I\left|{P}_{n}^{\left(\alpha ,\beta \right)}(x)\right|=-\left(1+2{\sigma }_{1}\right)\psi \left(n+2{\sigma }_{1}+2\right)\\ -\,\left(2+2{\sigma }_{1}+2{\sigma }_{2}\right)\psi \left(n+2+2{\sigma }_{1}+2{\sigma }_{2}\right)\\ +\,\left(4{\sigma }_{1}+2{\sigma }_{2}+3\right)\left[-\mathrm{log}2+\displaystyle \frac{1}{\left(2n+4{\sigma }_{1}+2{\sigma }_{2}+4\right)}\right.\\ \left.+\,2\psi \left(2n+4{\sigma }_{1}+2{\sigma }_{2}+3\right)-\psi \left(n+4{\sigma }_{1}+2{\sigma }_{2}+4\right)\right].\end{array}\end{eqnarray}$
Substituting equations (35) and (37) into (32) gives the position space Shannon entropy for the noncentral potential as
$\begin{eqnarray}\begin{array}{l}{S}_{n}^{{NCP}}=-\mathrm{log}{N}_{n}^{2}+\displaystyle \frac{{N}_{n}^{2}}{2\alpha }\times \,\left\{\begin{array}{l}\mathrm{log}\left(\pi \right)-\left(4{\sigma }_{1}+2{\sigma }_{2}+3\right)-1+o\left(1\right)-\left(1+2{\sigma }_{1}\right)\psi \left(n+2{\sigma }_{1}+2\right)\\ -\left(2+2{\sigma }_{1}+2{\sigma }_{2}\right)\psi (n+2+2{\sigma }_{1}+2{\sigma }_{2})\\ \times \left[\begin{array}{l}-\mathrm{log}2+\displaystyle \frac{1}{\left(2n+4{\sigma }_{1}+2{\sigma }_{2}+4\right)}+2\psi \left(2n+4{\sigma }_{1}+2{\sigma }_{2}+3\right)\\ -\psi (n+4{\sigma }_{1}+2{\sigma }_{2}+4)\end{array}\right]\end{array}\right\}.\end{array}\end{eqnarray}$
To obtain the normalised wave function for the position space Shannon entropy, the normalisation constant can be evaluated using
$\begin{eqnarray}{\int }_{-\infty }^{+\infty }{\rm{\Psi }}(x){{\rm{\Psi }}}^{* }(x){\rm{d}}{x}={\int }_{-\infty }^{\infty }{\left|{\rm{\Psi }}(x)\right|}^{2}{\rm{d}}{x}=1.\end{eqnarray}$
Substituting equation (26) into (39), and using Mathematica software, the normalisation constant for n = 0 is obtained as
$\begin{eqnarray}{N}_{0}^{{NCP}}=\displaystyle \frac{1.41421}{\left(\tfrac{{\rm{\Gamma }}\left(2{\sigma }_{1}\right){\left(-\sin (\alpha \right)}^{-2{\sigma }_{1}}{\left(-{\sin }^{2}(\alpha \right)}^{2{\sigma }_{1}}{}_{2}{F}_{1}\left(2{\sigma }_{1},2{\sigma }_{1}+2{\sigma }_{2}+1.;2{\sigma }_{1}+1;\sin (\alpha \right)}{\alpha {\rm{\Gamma }}\left(2{\sigma }_{1}+1\right)}\right){}^{0.5}}.\end{eqnarray}$
Note that if the Jacobi polynomial for n = 0 is unity, then the total normalised ground state wave function for position space is given as
$\begin{eqnarray}\begin{array}{l}{{\rm{\Psi }}}_{0}^{{NCP}}(r)=\,\left[\displaystyle \frac{1.41421}{{\left(\tfrac{{\rm{\Gamma }}\left(2{\sigma }_{1}\right){\left(-\sin (\alpha \right)}^{-2{\sigma }_{1}}{\left(-{\sin }^{2}(\alpha \right)}^{2{\sigma }_{1}}{}_{2}{F}_{1}\left(2{\sigma }_{1},2{\sigma }_{1}+2{\sigma }_{2}+1.;2{\sigma }_{1}+1;\sin (\alpha \right)}{\alpha {\rm{\Gamma }}\left(2{\sigma }_{1}+1\right)}\right)}^{0.5}}\right]\times \,{S}^{{\sigma }_{1}}{\left(1-s\right)}^{-\tfrac{1}{2}-\left({\sigma }_{2}+{\sigma }_{1}\right)}.\end{array}\end{eqnarray}$
The corresponding normalised wave function in momentum space is derived by taking the Fourier transform of the position space wave function. The Fourier transform is given as
$\begin{eqnarray}{{\rm{\Psi }}}_{0}^{\mathrm{NCP}}(P)=\displaystyle \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi }}{\int }_{0}^{\infty }{{\rm{\Psi }}}_{0}^{\mathrm{NCP}}(r){{\rm{e}}}^{-{\rm{i}}{pr}}{\rm{d}}{r}.\end{eqnarray}$
The corresponding normalised momentum space wave function is then given as
$\begin{eqnarray}\begin{array}{l}{{\rm{\Psi }}}_{0}^{\mathrm{NCP}}(P)=\,\displaystyle \frac{0.282095{\left(-\sin (\alpha \right)}^{-{\sigma }_{1}}{\left(-{\sin }^{2}(\alpha \right)}^{{\sigma }_{1}}{\rm{\Gamma }}\left(\tfrac{{\rm{i}}{p}}{2\alpha }+{\sigma }_{1}\right){}_{2}{F}_{1}\left(\tfrac{{\rm{i}}{p}}{2\alpha }+{\sigma }_{1},{\sigma }_{1}+{\sigma }_{2}+0.5;\tfrac{{\rm{i}}{p}}{2\alpha }+{\sigma }_{1}+1;\sin (\alpha \right)}{\alpha {\rm{\Gamma }}\left(\tfrac{{\rm{i}}{p}}{2\alpha }+{\sigma }_{1}+1\right)\left(\tfrac{{\rm{\Gamma }}\left(2{\sigma }_{1}\right){\left(-\sin (\alpha \right)}^{-2{\sigma }_{1}}{\left(-{\sin }^{2}(\alpha \right)}^{2{\sigma }_{1}}{}_{2}{F}_{1}\left(2{\sigma }_{1},2{\sigma }_{1}+2{\sigma }_{2}+1.;2{\sigma }_{1}+1;\sin (\alpha \right)}{\alpha {\rm{\Gamma }}\left(2{\sigma }_{1}+1\right)}\right){}^{0.5}}.\end{array}\end{eqnarray}$
Substituting equation (43) into equation (4) gives the Shannon momentum entropy, which gives a highly complicated integral of a regularised confluent hypergeometric type as shown in equation (44)
$\begin{eqnarray}{S}_{n}^{{NCP}}(p)=-{\int }_{0}^{\infty }\left[{{\rm{\Psi }}}_{0}^{{NCP}}(p)\right]\mathrm{log}\left[{{\rm{\Psi }}}_{0}^{{NCP}}(p)\right]{\rm{d}}{p}.\end{eqnarray}$

5. Position and momentum space for Fisher entropy

Fisher, in 1925, defines position space Fisher information as
$\begin{eqnarray}{I}_{x}=\int \displaystyle \frac{{\left[{\rho }_{n}(x)\right]}^{2}}{\rho (x)}{\rm{d}}{x}=4\int {\left[{\rm{\Psi }}^{\prime} (r)\right]}^{2}{\rm{d}}{r}=4\langle {p}^{2}\rangle .\end{eqnarray}$
The Fisher information for the noncentral potential is given as
$\begin{eqnarray}{I}_{x}^{{NCP}}=4{\int }_{0}^{\infty }{\left[{\rm{\Psi }}{{\prime} }^{{NCP}}(r)\right]}^{2}{\rm{d}}{r}.\end{eqnarray}$
From (20), if α is very small such that $\sin \alpha \to 1$, then by expressing equation (45) in terms of (20), the position space information entropy reduces to
$\begin{eqnarray}\begin{array}{rcl}{I}_{x}^{{NCP}} & = & -\displaystyle \frac{2}{\alpha }{\displaystyle \int }_{0}^{\infty }\displaystyle \frac{1}{s}{\left[{\rm{\Psi }}{{\prime} }^{{NCP}}(s)\right]}^{2}{\rm{d}}{s}\\ & = & \ \displaystyle \frac{2}{\alpha }{\displaystyle \int }_{-1}^{+1}\displaystyle \frac{2}{\left(1-x\right)}{\left[{\rm{\Psi }}{{\prime} }^{{NCP}}(x)\right]}^{2}{\rm{d}}{x}.\end{array}\end{eqnarray}$
In order to carry out the derivative of equation (26), which involves the Jacobi polynomial, it should be noted that the derivative of classical orthogonal polynomials of the same family but with different parameters can be done using orthogonality Pearson’s relations. This is applicable to hypergeometric functions of Jacobi, Laguerre and Hermite polynomials as [44]
$\begin{eqnarray}\begin{array}{l}\displaystyle \frac{{\rm{d}}}{{\rm{d}}{x}}{P}_{n}^{\left(\alpha ,\beta \right)}(x)={{nP}}_{n-1}^{\left(\alpha +1,\beta +1\right)}(x)\begin{array}{cc}; & \displaystyle \frac{{\rm{d}}}{{\rm{d}}{x}}{L}_{n}^{\left(\alpha \right)}(x)=\end{array}{{nL}}_{n-1}^{\left(\alpha +1\right)}(x)\\ \displaystyle \frac{{\rm{d}}}{{\rm{d}}{x}}{H}_{n}(x)={{nH}}_{n-1}(x).\end{array}\end{eqnarray}$
Differentiating equation (26) with the help of the above gives
$\begin{eqnarray}\begin{array}{l}{\rm{\Psi }}{{\prime} }^{{NCP}}=\displaystyle \frac{{\rm{d}}{{\rm{\Psi }}}^{{NCP}}}{{\rm{d}}{x}}=\,{N}_{n}\left\{\begin{array}{l}\left[{\left(\displaystyle \frac{1-x}{2}\right)}^{{\sigma }_{1}}{\left(\displaystyle \frac{1+x}{2}\right)}^{-\tfrac{1}{2}-\left({\sigma }_{2}+{\sigma }_{1}\right)}{{nP}}_{n-1}^{\left[\left(2+2{\sigma }_{1}\right),\left(3+2({\sigma }_{2}+{\sigma }_{1}\right)\right]}(x)\right]\\ -\left[\left(\displaystyle \frac{1}{4}+\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}\left({\sigma }_{2}+{\sigma }_{1}\right)\right){\left(\displaystyle \frac{1-x}{2}\right)}^{{\sigma }_{1}}{\left(\displaystyle \frac{1+x}{2}\right)}^{-\tfrac{3}{2}-\left({\sigma }_{2}+{\sigma }_{1}\right)}{P}_{n}^{\left[\left(1+2{\sigma }_{1}\right),\left(2+2({\sigma }_{2}+{\sigma }_{1}\right)\right]}(x)\right]\\ -\left[\left(\displaystyle \frac{{\sigma }_{1}}{2}\right){\left(\displaystyle \frac{1-x}{2}\right)}^{{\sigma }_{1}-1}{\left(\displaystyle \frac{1+x}{2}\right)}^{-\tfrac{1}{2}-\left({\sigma }_{2}+{\sigma }_{1}\right)}{P}_{n}^{\left[\left(1+2{\sigma }_{1}\right),\left(2+2({\sigma }_{2}+{\sigma }_{1}\right)\right]}(x)\right]\end{array}\right\},\end{array}\end{eqnarray}$
where ${P}_{n}^{\left(\alpha ,\beta \right)}\left(x\right)$, ${L}_{n}^{\left(\alpha \right)}\left(x\right)$ and ${H}_{n}\left(x\right)$ are Jacobi, Laguerre and Hermite polynomials, respectively. Substituting equation (48) into (46) gives the Fisher entropy for position space as
$\begin{eqnarray}\begin{array}{l}{I}_{x}^{{NCP}}=\displaystyle \frac{2{N}_{n}^{2}}{\alpha }{\displaystyle \int }_{-1}^{+1}\displaystyle \frac{2}{\left(1-x\right)}\times \,{\left\{\begin{array}{l}\left[{\left(\displaystyle \frac{1-x}{2}\right)}^{{\sigma }_{1}}{\left(\displaystyle \frac{1+x}{2}\right)}^{-\tfrac{1}{2}-\left({\sigma }_{2}+{\sigma }_{1}\right)}{{nP}}_{n-1}^{\left[\left(2+2{\sigma }_{1}\right),\left(3+2({\sigma }_{2}+{\sigma }_{1}\right)\right]}(x)\right]\\ -\left[\begin{array}{l}\left(\displaystyle \frac{1}{4}+\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}\left({\sigma }_{2}+{\sigma }_{1}\right)\right){\left(\displaystyle \frac{1-x}{2}\right)}^{{\sigma }_{1}}{\left(\displaystyle \frac{1+x}{2}\right)}^{-\tfrac{3}{2}-\left({\sigma }_{2}+{\sigma }_{1}\right)}\\ {P}_{n}^{\left[\left(1+2{\sigma }_{1}\right),\left(2+2({\sigma }_{2}+{\sigma }_{1}\right)\right]}(x)\end{array}\right]\\ -\left[\left(\displaystyle \frac{{\sigma }_{1}}{2}\right){\left(\displaystyle \frac{1-x}{2}\right)}^{{\sigma }_{1}-1}{\left(\displaystyle \frac{1+x}{2}\right)}^{-\tfrac{1}{2}-\left({\sigma }_{2}+{\sigma }_{1}\right)}{P}_{n}^{\left[\left(1+2{\sigma }_{1}\right),\left(2+2({\sigma }_{2}+{\sigma }_{1}\right)\right]}(x)\right]\end{array}\right\}}^{2}{\rm{d}}{x}.\end{array}\end{eqnarray}$
Equation (49) is a complicated integral. However, in this article we evaluate only for the Fisher and Shannon information entropies for the ground state, that is for n = 0. The Fisher information at ground state is given as
$\begin{eqnarray}\begin{array}{l}{I}_{x}^{{NCP}}=-\displaystyle \frac{2{N}_{0}^{{NCP}}}{\alpha }{\displaystyle \int }_{-1}^{+1}\displaystyle \frac{2}{\left(1-x\right)}\\ \times {\left\{\begin{array}{l}\left[\left(\displaystyle \frac{1}{4}+\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}\left({\sigma }_{2}+{\sigma }_{1}\right)\right){\left(\displaystyle \frac{1-x}{2}\right)}^{{\sigma }_{1}}{\left(\displaystyle \frac{1+x}{2}\right)}^{-\tfrac{3}{2}-\left({\sigma }_{2}+{\sigma }_{1}\right)}\right]\\ +\left[\left(\displaystyle \frac{{\sigma }_{1}}{2}\right){\left(\displaystyle \frac{1-x}{2}\right)}^{{\sigma }_{1}-1}{\left(\displaystyle \frac{1+x}{2}\right)}^{-\tfrac{1}{2}-\left({\sigma }_{2}+{\sigma }_{1}\right)}\right]\end{array}\right\}}^{2}{\rm{d}}{x}.\end{array}\end{eqnarray}$
The integral of equation (50) is carried using mathematica. Hence, the solution to equation (50) expressed in terms of regularised hypergeometric function is given as
$\begin{eqnarray}\begin{array}{l}{I}_{x}^{{NCP}}=-\displaystyle \frac{2{N}_{0}^{{NCP}}}{\alpha }\times \,\left[\begin{array}{l}\left(\begin{array}{l}{2}^{3+{\sigma }_{2}}{\rm{\Gamma }}\left(-2\left({\sigma }_{2}+{\sigma }_{1}\right)\right){}_{2}{F}_{1}\left(1\begin{array}{cc}, & 3-\end{array}2{\sigma }_{1}\begin{array}{cc}, & 1-2{\sigma }_{1}-\end{array}2{\sigma }_{2}\begin{array}{cc}, & -1\end{array}\right)\\ +{\rm{\Gamma }}\left(-2+2{\sigma }_{1}\right){}_{2}{F}_{1}\left(1\begin{array}{cc}, & 1+2{\sigma }_{1}+2{\sigma }_{2}\begin{array}{cc}, & -1+2{\sigma }_{1}\begin{array}{cc}, & -1\end{array}\end{array}\end{array}\right)\end{array}\right){\sigma }_{1}\\ +\left(\displaystyle \frac{1}{4}+\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}\left({\sigma }_{2}+{\sigma }_{1}\right)\right)\\ \times {2}^{\tfrac{3}{2}-{\sigma }_{1}+{\sigma }_{2}}\times \left(\begin{array}{l}\displaystyle \frac{{}_{2}{F}_{1}\left(\begin{array}{cc}1, & \tfrac{1}{2}+{\sigma }_{1}+{\sigma }_{2}\begin{array}{cc}, & 1+2{\sigma }_{1}\begin{array}{cc}, & -1\end{array}\end{array}\end{array}\right)}{2{\sigma }_{1}}\\ +2\times \left(\displaystyle \frac{{}_{2}{F}_{1}\left(\begin{array}{cc}1, & 1-2{\sigma }_{1}\begin{array}{cc}, & \tfrac{3}{2}-{\sigma }_{1}-{\sigma }_{2}\begin{array}{cc}, & -1\end{array}\end{array}\end{array}\right)}{\left(1-2{\sigma }_{1}-2{\sigma }_{2}\right)}\right)\end{array}\right)\end{array}\right].\end{array}\end{eqnarray}$
Equation (52) is the position space Fisher entropy for the proposed noncentral potential. However, taking the Fourier transform of the position space Fisher entropy gives the corresponding momentum space Fisher entropy. This is obtained by substituting equation (43) into (45) which gives a more complicated integral.

6. Numerical computations for Fisher information entropy

In this section, we carry out numerical computations for both position and momentum Fisher entropies. we calculated the expectation values of $\langle r\rangle $, $\langle {r}^{2}\rangle $, $\langle p\rangle $, and $\langle {p}^{2}\rangle $. We calculated the Heinsenberg uncertainties in position and momentum using the variance relations $\langle r\rangle =\sqrt{\langle {r}^{2}\rangle -\langle r{\rangle }^{2}}$ and $\langle p\rangle \,=\sqrt{\langle {p}^{2}\rangle -\langle p{\rangle }^{2}}$. The Heinsenberg uncertainty principle is the product of uncertainties of position and momentum, which is expressed in terms of Planck’s constant as ${\rm{\Delta }}(r){\rm{\Delta }}(p)\geqslant \tfrac{{\hslash }}{2\pi }$. Meanwhile the expectation values are calculated numerically using the following expressions:
$\begin{eqnarray}\begin{array}{l}\langle r\rangle ={\displaystyle \int }_{0}^{\infty }\left({{\rm{\Psi }}}_{0}^{{NCP}}(r\right)r\left({{\rm{\Psi }}}_{0}^{{NCP}}(r\right){\rm{d}}{r},\\ \langle {r}^{2}\rangle ={\displaystyle \int }_{0}^{\infty }\left({{\rm{\Psi }}}_{0}^{{NCP}}(r\right){r}^{2}\left({{\rm{\Psi }}}_{0}^{{NCP}}(r\right){\rm{d}}{r},\\ \langle p\rangle ={\displaystyle \int }_{0}^{\infty }\left({{\rm{\Psi }}}_{0}^{{NCP}}(p\right)p\left({{\rm{\Psi }}}_{0}^{{NCP}}(p\right){\rm{d}}{p},\\ \langle {p}^{2}\rangle ={\displaystyle \int }_{0}^{\infty }\left({{\rm{\Psi }}}_{0}^{{NCP}}(p\right){p}^{2}\left({{\rm{\Psi }}}_{0}^{{NCP}}(p\right){\rm{d}}{p}.\end{array}\end{eqnarray}$
The adopted real numerical constants parameters are: $A=0.5\,\mathrm{eV}$ representing the potential depth, B varies infinitesimally from 0.001 to 0.03 in the step of 0.001, η = 0.01 and ℏ = 1.

7. Results and discussion

First, we demonstrated from figures 1(c) to (n) that in general, odd powers of wave function give the property of a wave function while even powers of wave function represent the probability density for a continuous wave function with continuous partial derivatives. The wave function and probability density curves were plotted for two set of parameters: (A = 0.01, B = 0.02), (A = 0.02, B = −0.04), (A = 0.04, B = −0.08), (A = 0.08, B = 0.01) and (A = 0.01, B = 0.02), (A = 0.02, B = −0.04), (A = 0.05, B = −0.07), (A = −0.002, B = −0.1).
The numerical computations for position and momentum Fisher information for the three different values of α=0.1, 0.12 and 0.13 give perfect results for values of variation parameter B, because it is expected that ${I}_{r}.{I}_{p}\geqslant 36.0$ which is shown in tables 1, 2 and 3. The computation of various expectation values for different values of α also gave a good result, which is in agreement with existing literature. Here, it is expected that the Heinsenberg uncertainty relation of the product of position and momentum entropies should be given as as ${\rm{\Delta }}(r){\rm{\Delta }}(p)\geqslant \tfrac{{\hslash }}{2\pi }$ such that the squeeze state of ${\rm{\Delta }}{(r)}^{2}{\rm{\Delta }}{(p)}^{2}$ should be a minimum of 0.250 00. Tables 4, 5 and 6 gives the various expectation values for different values of α and their corresponding squeeze state. This table is in agreement with existing literature with a squeeze state value of more than 0.250 00. The expectation values of $\langle r\rangle $, $\langle {r}^{2}\rangle $ decrease with an increase in the variation parameter (B), while $\langle {p}^{2}\rangle $ and Δ (p) increase with an increase in the variation parameter (B) for α = 0.1, 0.12, and 0.13, respectively, as shown in tables 4, 5 and 6. The graph of position entropy in figure 2 for different values of α increases exponentially. However, the graph of momentum entropy as presented in figure 3 shows a clear distinction and quantisation of momentum theory for different values of α. Figure 4 is the graph of the squeeze state which is the product of position and momentum entropy with variation parameter (B) for different values of α. This graph gives a perfect curve with distinct quantisation for different values of α.
Figure 2. Fisher Position entropy for n = 0.
Figure 3. Fisher momentum entropy for n = 0.
Figure 4. The product of position and momentum entropy for n = 0.
Table 1. Numerical results for Fisher information for n = 0, with various values of  B, with A = 0.5 eV for the noncentral potential (NCP) for α = 0.1.
B Ir Ip ${I}_{r}{I}_{p}\geqslant 36.0$ min(${I}_{r}{I}_{p}$)
0.001 0.96355 97.0367 93.4997 36.0
0.002 1.01546 96.2569 97.7455 36.0
0.003 1.06619 95.4925 101.814 36.0
0.004 1.11572 94.7429 105.707 36.0
0.005 1.16403 94.0077 109.428 36.0
0.006 1.21111 93.2865 112.981 36.0
0.007 1.25695 92.5789 116.367 36.0
0.008 1.30155 91.8843 119.592 36.0
0.009 1.34489 91.2025 122.657 36.0
0.010 1.38696 90.5330 125.566 36.0
0.011 1.46732 89.8755 128.322 36.0
0.012 1.42777 89.2295 130.928 36.0
0.013 1.50559 88.5949 133.387 36.0
0.014 1.54259 87.9711 135.703 36.0
0.015 1.57832 87.3580 137.879 36.0
0.016 1.61279 86.7553 139.918 36.0
0.017 1.64598 86.1625 141.822 36.0
0.018 1.67791 85.5795 143.595 36.0
0.019 1.70858 85.0061 145.240 36.0
0.020 1.73800 84.4418 146.760 36.0
0.021 1.76617 83.8865 148.157 36.0
0.022 1.79309 83.3400 149.436 36.0
0.023 1.81877 82.8020 150.598 36.0
0.024 1.84322 82.2723 151.646 36.0
0.025 1.86645 81.7507 152.584 36.0
0.026 1.86647 81.2369 153.413 36.0
0.027 1.90928 80.7309 154.138 36.0
0.028 1.92889 80.2323 154.759 36.0
0.029 1.94732 79.7410 155.281 36.0
0.030 1.96456 79.2569 155.705 36.0
Table 2. Numerical results for Fisher information for n = 0, with various values of  B, with A = 0.5 eV for the noncentral potential (NCP) for α = 0.12.
B Ir Ip ${I}_{r}{I}_{p}\geqslant 36.0$ min(${I}_{r}{I}_{p}$)
0.001 1.04867 64.3148 67.4451 36.0
0.002 1.09086 63.8761 69.6802 36.0
0.003 1.13221 63.4448 71.8329 36.0
0.004 1.17271 63.0204 73.9046 36.0
0.005 1.21235 62.6029 75.8964 36.0
0.006 1.25112 62.1922 77.8097 36.0
0.007 1.28902 61.7879 79.6457 36.0
0.008 1.32604 61.3899 81.4057 36.0
0.009 1.36219 60.9981 83.0911 36.0
0.010 1.39746 60.6124 84.7031 36.0
0.011 1.43183 60.2324 86.2429 36.0
0.012 1.46533 59.8582 87.7119 36.0
0.013 1.49793 59.4896 89.1114 36.0
0.014 1.52965 59.1264 90.4427 36.0
0.015 1.56048 58.7685 91.7069 36.0
0.016 1.59042 58.4158 92.9054 36.0
0.017 1.61947 58.0681 94.0393 36.0
0.018 1.64763 57.7253 95.1100 36.0
0.019 1.67491 57.3873 96.1187 36.0
0.020 1.70131 57.0540 97.0666 36.0
0.021 1.72682 56.7254 97.9548 36.0
0.022 1.75146 56.4012 98.7846 36.0
0.023 1.77523 56.0814 99.5571 36.0
0.024 1.79812 55.7658 100.274 36.0
0.025 1.82014 55.4545 100.935 36.0
0.026 1.84130 55.1472 101.543 36.0
0.027 1.86160 54.8440 102.098 36.0
0.028 1.88105 54.5446 102.601 36.0
0.029 1.89964 54.2491 103.054 36.0
0.030 1.91739 53.9574 103.458 36.0
Table 3. Numerical results for Fisher information for n = 0, with various values of  B, with A = 0.5 eV for the noncentral potential (NCP) for α = 0.13.
B Ir Ip ${I}_{r}{I}_{p}\geqslant 36.0$ min(${I}_{r}{I}_{p}$)
0.001 1.08189 53.5829 57.9710 36.0
0.002 1.09086 53.2419 59.6565 36.0
0.003 1.13221 52.9061 61.2833 36.0
0.004 1.17271 52.5754 62.8524 36.0
0.005 1.21235 52.2496 64.3646 36.0
0.006 1.25112 51.9287 65.8206 36.0
0.007 1.28902 51.6126 67.2214 36.0
0.008 1.32604 51.3010 68.5679 36.0
0.009 1.36219 50.9939 69.8610 36.0
0.010 1.39746 50.6912 71.1014 36.0
0.011 1.43183 50.3928 72.2901 36.0
0.012 1.46533 50.0986 73.4279 36.0
0.013 1.49793 49.8084 74.5157 36.0
0.014 1.52965 49.5223 75.5544 36.0
0.015 1.56048 49.2400 76.5447 36.0
0.016 1.59042 48.9616 77.4876 36.0
0.017 1.61947 48.6869 78.3838 36.0
0.018 1.64763 48.4159 79.2343 36.0
0.019 1.67491 48.1484 80.0398 36.0
0.020 1.70131 47.8843 80.8011 36.0
0.021 1.72682 47.6237 81.5191 36.0
0.022 1.75146 47.3665 82.1946 36.0
0.023 1.77523 47.1125 82.8283 36.0
0.024 1.79812 46.8617 83.4210 36.0
0.025 1.82014 46.6140 83.9736 36.0
0.026 1.84130 46.3694 84.4868 36.0
0.027 1.86160 46.1277 84.9613 36.0
0.028 1.88105 45.8890 85.3979 36.0
0.029 1.89964 45.6533 85.7974 36.0
0.030 1.91739 45.4203 86.1604 36.0
Table 4. Numerical results for uncertainty relation in the ground eigenstates for various values of  B, with n, l = 0, A = 0.5 eV α = 0.1.
B $\left\langle {r}^{2}\right\rangle $ $\left\langle r\right\rangle $ Δ (r) r)2 $\left\langle {p}^{2}\right\rangle $ Δ (p) ${\rm{\Delta }}(r){\rm{\Delta }}(p)\geqslant \tfrac{{\hslash }}{2}$ ${({\rm{\Delta }}r)}^{2}{({\rm{\Delta }}p)}^{2}$ min $\left\{{({\rm{\Delta }}r)}^{2}{({\rm{\Delta }}p)}^{2}\right\}$
0.001 24.2592 3.40874 3.55523 2.90712 0.96354 0.490803 1.74492 3.04474 0.250000
0.002 24.0642 3.39462 3.54130 2.89748 1.01546 0.503851 1.78429 3.18368 0.250000
0.003 23.8731 3.38073 3.52757 2.88797 1.06619 0.516283 1.82123 3.31687 0.250000
0.004 23.6857 3.36707 3.51406 2.87857 1.11572 0.528139 1.85591 3.44440 0.250000
0.005 23.5019 3.35362 3.50074 2.86929 1.16403 0.539452 1.88848 3.56635 0.250000
0.006 23.3216 3.34038 3.48762 2.86013 1.21111 0.550253 1.91907 3.68284 0.250000
0.007 23.1447 3.32735 3.47469 2.85107 1.25695 0.560570 1.94781 3.79395 0.250000
0.008 22.9711 3.31451 3.46195 2.84213 1.30155 0.570427 1.97479 3.89979 0.250000
0.009 22.8006 3.30187 3.44939 2.83329 1.34488 0.579846 2.00011 4.00046 0.250000
0.010 22.6332 3.28941 3.43700 2.82456 1.38696 0.588847 2.02387 4.09604 0.250000
0.011 22.4689 3.27714 3.42479 2.81593 1.42777 0.597447 2.04613 4.18666 0.250000
0.012 22.3074 3.26505 3.41275 2.80740 1.46731 0.605664 2.06698 4.27240 0.250000
0.013 22.1487 3.25312 3.40087 2.28090 1.50558 0.613512 2.08647 4.35337 0.250000
0.014 21.9928 3.24137 3.38914 2.79063 1.54259 0.621005 2.10468 4.42967 0.250000
0.015 21.8395 3.22978 3.37758 2.78239 1.57832 0.628157 2.12165 4.50139 0.250000
0.016 21.6888 3.21835 3.36616 2.77424 1.61278 0.634977 2.13744 4.56864 0.250000
0.017 21.5406 3.20707 3.35495 2.76618 1.64598 0.641479 2.15209 4.63151 0.250000
0.018 21.3949 3.19595 3.34377 2.75821 1.67791 0.647671 2.16567 4.69011 0.250000
0.019 21.2515 3.18497 3.33279 2.75032 1.70858 0.653564 2.17819 4.74452 0.250000
0.020 21.1105 3.17414 3.32195 2.74252 1.73799 0.659166 2.18971 4.79485 0.250000
0.021 20.9716 3.16344 3.31123 2.73480 1.76616 0.664486 2.20027 4.84118 0.250000
0.022 20.8350 3.15288 3.30066 2.72716 1.79308 0.669531 2.20989 4.88362 0.250000
0.023 20.7005 3.14246 3.29020 2.71960 1.81877 0.674309 2.21861 4.92225 0.250000
0.024 20.5681 3.13217 3.27987 2.71212 1.84322 0.678827 2.22647 4.95716 0.250000
0.025 20.4377 3.12200 3.26967 2.70472 1.86645 0.683091 2.23348 4.98845 0.250000
0.026 20.3092 3.11196 3.25958 2.69739 1.88846 0.687108 2.23969 5.01621 0.250000
0.027 20.1827 3.10204 3.24962 2.69013 1.90927 0.690883 2.24511 5.04052 0.250000
0.028 20.0581 3.09224 3.23976 2.68295 1.92889 0.694423 2.24977 5.06146 0.250000
0.029 19.9353 3.08256 3.23003 2.67584 1.94732 0.697731 2.25369 5.07913 0.250000
0.030 19.8142 3.07299 3.22039 2.66879 1.96456 0.700815 2.25690 5.09361 0.250000
Table 5. Numerical results for uncertainty relation in the ground eigenstates for various values of  B, with n, l = 0, A = 0.5 eV α = 0.12.
B $\left\langle {r}^{2}\right\rangle $ $\left\langle r\right\rangle $ Δ (r) r)2 $\left\langle {p}^{2}\right\rangle $ Δ (p) ${\rm{\Delta }}(r){\rm{\Delta }}(p)\geqslant \tfrac{{\hslash }}{2}$ r)2p)2 min $\left\{{({\rm{\Delta }}r)}^{2}{({\rm{\Delta }}p)}^{2}\right\}$
0.001 16.0787 2.76177 2.90712 8.45134 0.262168 0.512023 1.48851 2.21567 0.250000
0.002 15.9690 2.75202 2.89748 8.39540 0.272716 0.522222 1.51313 2.28956 0.250000
0.003 15.7551 2.74242 2.88797 8.34035 0.283053 0.532027 1.53648 2.36076 0.250000
0.004 15.6507 2.73294 2.87857 8.28616 0.293177 0.541458 1.55863 2.42931 0.250000
0.005 15.6507 2.72358 2.86929 8.23283 0.303086 0.550532 1.57964 2.49526 0.250000
0.006 15.5480 2.71435 2.86013 8.18032 0.312779 0.559266 1.59957 2.55864 0.250000
0.007 15.4477 2.70524 2.85107 8.12862 0.322255 0.567674 1.61848 2.61948 0.250000
0.008 15.3475 2.69625 2.84213 8.07770 0.331511 0.575769 1.63641 2.67785 0.250000
0.009 15.2495 2.68737 2.83329 8.02755 0.340548 0.583564 1.65341 2.73376 0.250000
0.010 15.1531 2.67861 2.82456 7.97815 0.349364 0.591070 1.66951 2.78728 0.250000
0.011 15.1531 2.66995 2.81593 7.92947 0.357959 0.598296 1.68476 2.83842 0.250000
0.012 14.9646 2.66140 2.81593 7.92947 0.366332 0.605253 1.69919 2.88725 0.250000
0.013 12.2407 2.65296 2.81593 5.20251 0.374483 0.611950 1.39580 1.94825 0.250000
0.014 14.7816 2.64461 2.79063 7.78763 0.382412 0.618395 1.72571 2.97809 0.250000
0.015 14.6921 2.63637 2.78239 7.74170 0.390119 0.624595 1.73787 3.02019 0.250000
0.016 14.6039 2.62822 2.77423 7.69641 0.397604 0.630558 1.74932 3.06012 0.250000
0.017 14.5176 2.62017 2.76617 7.65175 0.404867 0.636291 1.76010 3.09794 0.250000
0.018 14.4313 2.61221 2.75821 7.60771 0.411908 0.641800 1.77022 3.13367 0.250000
0.019 14.3468 2.60434 2.75032 7.56426 0.418728 0.647091 1.77971 3.16737 0.250000
0.020 14.2635 2.59656 2.74252 7.52140 0.425327 0.652171 1.78859 3.19906 0.250000
0.021 14.1813 2.58887 2.73479 7.47912 0.431706 0.657043 1.79688 3.22878 0.250000
0.022 14.1003 2.58126 2.72715 7.43740 0.437866 0.661714 1.80460 3.25658 0.250000
0.023 14.0203 2.57374 2.71960 7.39623 0.443806 0.666187 1.81177 3.28249 0.250000
0.024 13.9415 2.56629 2.71212 7.35560 0.449529 0.670469 1.81839 3.30656 0.250000
0.025 13.8636 2.55893 2.70471 7.31549 0.455035 0.674563 1.82450 3.32881 0.250000
0.026 13.7868 2.55165 2.69738 7.27590 0.460325 0.678472 1.83010 3.34928 0.250000
0.027 13.7110 2.54444 2.69013 7.23681 0.465401 0.682202 1.83522 3.36801 0.250000
0.028 13.6362 2.53731 2.68294 7.19821 0.470262 0.685756 1.83985 3.38505 0.250000
0.029 13.5623 2.53025 2.67583 7.16010 0.474911 0.689137 1.84402 3.40041 0.250000
0.030 13.4893 2.52327 2.66879 7.12245 0.479349 0.692350 1.84774 3.41414 0.250000
Table 6. Numerical results for uncertainty relation in the ground eigenstates for various values of  B, with n, l = 0, A = 0.5 eV α = 0.13.
B $\left\langle {r}^{2}\right\rangle $ $\left\langle r\right\rangle $ Δ (r) r)2 $\left\langle {p}^{2}\right\rangle $ Δ (p) ${\rm{\Delta }}(r){\rm{\Delta }}(p)\geqslant \tfrac{{\hslash }}{2}$ r)2p)2 min $\left\{{({\rm{\Delta }}r)}^{2}{({\rm{\Delta }}p)}^{2}\right\}$
0.001 13.3957 2.51467 2.65936 7.07218 0.270473 0.520070 1.38305 1.91283 0.250000
0.002 13.3105 2.50638 2.65114 7.02855 0.280120 0.529264 1.40315 1.96884 0.250000
0.003 13.2265 2.49819 2.64302 6.98557 0.283053 0.538131 1.42229 2.02292 0.250000
0.004 13.1438 2.49011 2.63500 6.94322 0.298868 0.546688 1.44052 2.07511 0.250000
0.005 13.0624 2.48212 2.62707 6.90148 0.307966 0.554947 1.45788 2.12543 0.250000
0.006 12.9822 2.47423 2.61923 6.86035 0.316879 0.562920 1.47442 2.17390 0.250000
0.007 12.9031 2.46644 2.61147 6.81979 0.325606 0.570619 1.49016 2.22057 0.250000
0.008 12.8252 2.45875 2.60381 6.77981 0.334145 0.578053 1.50514 2.26544 0.250000
0.009 12.7485 2.45114 2.59623 6.74039 0.342497 0.585232 1.51940 2.30856 0.250000
0.010 12.6728 2.44362 2.58873 6.70151 0.350660 0.592165 1.53295 2.34995 0.250000
0.011 12.5982 2.43619 2.58131 6.66317 0.358633 0.598860 1.54584 2.38963 0.250000
0.012 12.5246 2.42885 2.57398 6.62535 0.366417 0.605324 1.55809 2.42764 0.250000
0.013 12.4521 2.42158 2.56672 6.58804 0.374012 0.611565 1.56971 2.46400 0.250000
0.014 12.3806 2.41441 2.55954 6.55122 0.381416 0.617589 1.58074 2.49874 0.250000
0.015 12.3100 2.40731 2.55243 6.51489 0.388630 0.623402 1.59119 2.53188 0.250000
0.016 12.2404 2.40028 2.54540 6.47904 0.395655 0.629011 1.60108 2.56346 0.250000
0.017 12.1717 2.39334 2.53844 6.44365 0.402489 0.634420 1.61044 2.59350 0.250000
0.018 12.1040 2.38647 2.53155 6.40872 0.409134 0.639636 1.61927 2.62203 0.250000
0.019 12.0371 2.37967 2.52473 6.37424 0.415589 0.644662 1.62760 2.64907 0.250000
0.020 11.9711 2.37295 2.51797 6.34019 0.421856 0.649504 1.63543 2.67465 0.250000
0.021 11.9059 2.36630 2.51129 6.30657 0.427933 0.654166 1.64280 2.69879 0.250000
0.022 11.8416 2.35971 2.50467 6.27337 0.433822 0.658652 1.64971 2.72153 0.250000
0.023 11.7781 2.35320 2.49812 6.24058 0.439524 0.662966 1.65617 2.74289 0.250000
0.024 11.7154 2.34675 2.49162 6.20819 0.445039 0.667112 1.66219 2.76289 0.250000
0.025 11.6535 2.34036 2.48519 6.17619 0.450367 0.671094 1.66780 2.78155 0.250000
0.026 11.5923 2.33404 2.47883 6.14458 0.455510 0.674915 1.67300 2.79892 0.250000
0.027 11.5319 2.32779 2.47252 6.11335 0.460467 0.678577 1.67780 2.8150 0.250000
0.028 11.4723 2.32159 2.46627 6.08248 0.465241 0.682086 1.68221 2.82982 0.250000
0.029 11.4133 2.31546 2.46008 6.05198 0.469831 0.685442 1.68624 2.84341 0.250000
0.030 11.3551 2.30938 2.45394 6.02184 0.474240 0.688651 1.68991 2.85579 0.250000

8. Conclusion

In this work, we develop a class of noncentral potential (noncentral inversely quadratic plus exponential Mie-type potential) to investigate the quantum information of Fisher and Shannon entropies in a Schrödinger equation. We obtained the normalised wave function and energy-eigen equations by solving the radial solution of the Schrödinger equation via the Nikiforov–Uvarov method. We analytically obtain position and momentum space for both Fisher and Shannon entropies and calculation were carried out with ground state wave function where the principal quantum number n and orbital quantum number l equals zero. The numerical computations were only carried out for Fisher information in position and momentum space, since that of Shannon was a great deal more complicated due to the nature of the potential. All computations were carried out for α = 0.1, 0.12 and 0.13 because these are the only set of values that give the expected result. However, the wave function plots and probability density curves were plotted only for α = 0.1 because this is the best value of α that gave the best plot. The normalisation constants were obtained using confluent hypergeometric functions with the help of Mathematica. The expectation values obtained with respect to position entropy decreases with an increase in variation parameter (B), whereas that of momentum increases with an increase in this parameter. All the numerical results obtained are in agreement with existing literature, including Heinsenberg uncertainties for position and momentum. The study of these entropies is very significant in terms of their potential applications in signal processing and examining the electronic structures of atoms.

The authors are very grateful to the editorial team, and especially to the reviewers for their useful comments and corrections, which have significantly helped improve the quality of this article.

1
Maldona P Sarsa A Buendia E Galvez F J 2010 Phys. Lett A 374 3847

DOI

2
Sanudo J Löpez-Rosa R 2009 Phys. Lett. A 373 2549

DOI

3
Garbacjewski P J 2006 J. Stat. Phys. 123 315

DOI

4
Flego S P Plastino A Plastino A R 2011 Ann. Phys. 326 2533

DOI

5
Manzano D Yanez R J Dehesa J S 2010 New J. Phys. 12 023014

DOI

6
Guevara N L Sagar R P Esquivel R O 2005 J. Chem. Phys. 122 084101

DOI

7
Sen K D Angulo J C Antolin J C 2007 Phys. Rev A 76 032502

DOI

8
Howard I A Borgoo A Sen K D Geerlings P 2009 Phys. Lett. A 373 3277

DOI

9
Bercher J F Vignat C 2009 Inforsci 179 3832

DOI

10
Löpez-Ruiz R Nagy A Romera E Sanudo J 2009 J. Math. Phys. 50 1235

DOI

11
Gonzaler-Ferez R Dehesa J s Patil S H Sen K D 2009 Physica A 388 4919

DOI

12
Szabo J B Sen K D Nagy A 2008 Phys. Lett. A 372 5106

DOI

13
Ikhdair S M Sever R 2008 Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 19 221

DOI

14
Hohenberg P Kohn W 1964 Phys. Rev. 374 864

DOI

15
Sen K D 1995 Molecular Similarity, Topics in current Chemistry Heidelberg Springer

16
Sears S B Parr R G Dinur U 1980 Israel J. Chem. 19 165

DOI

17
Frieden B R 1998 Physics from the Fisher Information: A Unification Cambridge Cambridge University Press

18
Reginatto M 1998 Phys. Rev. A 58 17

DOI

19
Shannon C E 1948 Bell syst. Tech. J. 27 623

DOI

20
Kumar A 2005 Indian. J. Pure Appl. Phys. 43 958

21
Dong S Sun G H Dong S H Draayer J P 2014 Phys. Lett A 378 124 130

DOI

22
Agboola D 2008 Acta Physica 120 371

23
Beckner W 1975 Ann. Math. 159 102

DOI

24
Bialynicki B I Mycielski J 1975 Comm. Math. Phys. 44 102

DOI

25
Orlowski A 1997 Phys. Rev. 56 2545

DOI

26
Pooja A Sharma R Gupta A 2017 Int. J. Quant. Chem. 117 25368

DOI

27
Jiao L G Zan L R Zhang Y Z Ho Y K 2017 Int. J. Quant. Chem. 117 25375

DOI

28
Najafizade S A Hassanabadi H Zarrinkamar S 2016 Chin. Phys. B 4 040301

DOI

29
Yahya W A Oyewumi K J Sen K D 2014 Indian. J. Chem. 53A 1307

30
Serrano F A Falaye B J Dong S H 2016 Physica A 446 2545

DOI

31
Nikiforov A F Uvarov U V 1988 Special Functions of Mathematical Physics. Basel Birkhauser

32
Hao J Ho Y K 2019 Int. J. Quant. Chem. 119 e25928

DOI

33
Cao G Zhang Y Cao J 2015 Phys. Lett. A 379 22 23

DOI

34
Okon I B Popoola O O Isonguyo C N 2017 Advances In High. Energy Physics Hindawi 2017 9671816

DOI

35
Hassanabadi H Zarrinkamar H Hamzavi H Rajabi A 2011 Arabian. J. Sci. Eng. 1 37

36
Oyewumi K J Akinpelu F O Agboola A D 2008 Int. J. Theor. Phys. 47 1039

DOI

37
Arda A Sever R 2012 J. Math. Chem. 50 1920

DOI

38
Okon I B Popoola O O Ituen E E 2011 Int. J. Recent Adv. Phys. 2 15

DOI

39
Antia A D Okon I B Umoren E B Isonguyo C N 2019 Ukr. J. Phys. 63 33

40
Arda A Sever R 2009 Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 20 652

DOI

41
Isonguyo C N Okon I B Ikot A N 2014 Bull. Korean. Chem. Soc. 35 343

DOI

42
Guerrero A Sanchez-Moreno P Dehesa J S 2010 J. Math. Theor. 43 305203

DOI

43
Aptekarev A Dehesa J S Martinez A 2010 J. Comp. Appl. Math. 233 1355

DOI

44
Assche W Coussement E 2001 J. Comp. Appl. Math. 127 317

DOI

Outlines

/