1. Introduction
2. The model
where g > 0 represents the strength of the cubic self-repulsion, $V(x)={V}_{0}{\sin }^{2}(x)$ and $W(x)={W}_{0}\sin (2x)$ are the real part and imaginary part of complex lattice potential, respectively. V0 and W0 satisfy the ${ \mathcal P }{ \mathcal T }$-symmetry, i.e. V(−x) = V(x), W(−x) = −W(x). V0 and W0 are the amplitudes of the real lattice and imaginary lattice, respectively. Stationary solutions of equation (
to determine the linear stability properties of the QDs in the ${ \mathcal P }{ \mathcal T }$-symmetric optical lattices, we consider small perturbations on the solutions of equation (
where u and ν are the infinitesimal perturbations, the imaginary part of λ represents an unstable growth rate. The superscript * represents the complex conjugation. After substitution into equation (
where
Evidently, the QDs are linearly unstable if λ has an imaginary parts, but they are stable if λ is real.
Figure 1. (a) Typical profile of ${ \mathcal P }{ \mathcal T }$-symmetric optical lattices, where black solid line represents real part, and red imaginary line describes imaginary part. (b) Band-gap structure of ${ \mathcal P }{ \mathcal T }$-symmetric optical lattices. Red solid line: V0 = 0.3, W0 = 0.01. Blue imaginary line: V0 = 0.3, W0 = 0.15. Green dotted-dashed line: V0 = 0.3, W0 = 0.3. (c) Imaginary part of complex eigenvalues corresponding to (b). |
3. Stability analysis for QDs in ${ \mathcal P }{ \mathcal T }$-symmetric optical lattices
Figure 2. The profiles of ${ \mathcal P }{ \mathcal T }$-symmetric QDs in ${ \mathcal P }{ \mathcal T }$-symmetric optical lattices for different values of the condensate norm N = 1 (a) and N = 10 (b). The real and imaginary parts of ${ \mathcal P }{ \mathcal T }$ symmetric optical lattices are V0 = 0.3 and W0 = 0.05, respectively. The other parameters are set as g = 1. |
Figure 3. (a) A phase diagram of the stability of ${ \mathcal P }{ \mathcal T }$-symmetric QDs with respect to N and g in the unbroken ${ \mathcal P }{ \mathcal T }$-symmetric phase (W0 = 0.05). (b) A phase diagram of the stability of ${ \mathcal P }{ \mathcal T }$-symmetric QDs with respect to N and g in the broken ${ \mathcal P }{ \mathcal T }$-symmetric phase (W0 = 0.2). (c) Phase diagram of ${ \mathcal P }{ \mathcal T }$-symmetric QDs relative to W0 and g by fixing N = 4. (d) The stability $\mathrm{Im}[\lambda ]$ versus the condensate norm N corresponds to a longitudinal section of g = 1 in (a). (e) and (f) are direct simulations of the perturbed evolution of ${ \mathcal P }{ \mathcal T }$-symmetric QDs of pentagram markers in (d), respectively. (g) The stability $\mathrm{Im}[\lambda ]$ versus the self-repulsion strength g corresponds to cross section of N = 4 in (a). (g) and (i) are direct simulations of the perturbed evolution of ${ \mathcal P }{ \mathcal T }$-symmetric QDs of pentagram markers in (g), respectively. |
4. Collisions of ${ \mathcal P }{ \mathcal T }$-symmetric QDs
where ψ1(x) and ψ2(x) are the stationary shapes of QDs with normalization N1 and N2, respectively. k is a kick that determines the velocity of droplet. This ansatz approximates a solution comprising two initial QDs located at x0 and −x0. When W0 is relatively small, the collision dynamics of QDs with equal norms is consistent with that in real optical lattices [15]. For a relatively small value of k, the Gaussian-shaped QDs tend to merger into breathers after the collision. With the increase of k, the quasi-elastic collision is restored. For multi-humped QDs, a newly merged quiescent breather occurs after the collision. For the fast-moving QDs, they undergo fragmentation and a majority of the particles keep in the moving ones. We also analyze collision dynamics of QDs with unequal norms in figures 4(a) and (b). In figure 4(a), a Gaussian-shaped droplet (N = 2) collides with a multi-humped droplet with N = 8. It is found that the large droplet forms quiescent breather and the trajectory of the small droplet is deflected, and the two droplets become highly excited, exhibiting internal periodic vibrations. The situation is quite different for QDs in free space [14]. With the increase of k, the two droplets undergo fragmentation after the collision. Unstable solitons can transform into breather-like objects [45]. In figure 4(c), a stable droplet (N = 5.5) collides with an unstable droplet with N = 4. An interesting phenomenon occurs, two droplets tend to merger into breathers after the collision at a relatively small value of k. Besides, the collision between two droplets with N = 4 corresponding to g = 0.57 and g = 0.8 is shown in figure 4(d), respectively. QDs form two breathers of unequal norms after the collision at a relatively small value of k.
Figure 4. Typical examples of density plots for collisions between two ${ \mathcal P }{ \mathcal T }$-symmetric QDs in ${ \mathcal P }{ \mathcal T }$-symmetric optical lattices, launched as per equation ( |