Welcome to visit Communications in Theoretical Physics,
Mathematical Physics

Conservation laws of the complex short pulse equation and coupled complex short pulse equations

  • Lihua Zhang , ,
  • Bo Shen ,
  • Shuxin Han ,
  • Gangwei Wang ,
  • Lingshu Wang
Expand
  • School of Mathematics and Statistics, Hebei University of Economics and Business, Shijiazhuang 050061, China

Author to whom any correspondence should be addressed.

Received date: 2022-01-15

  Revised date: 2022-04-02

  Accepted date: 2022-05-24

  Online published: 2022-07-01

Copyright

© 2022 Institute of Theoretical Physics CAS, Chinese Physical Society and IOP Publishing

Abstract

In this paper, the complex short pulse equation and the coupled complex short pulse equations that can describe the ultra-short pulse propagation in optical fibers are investigated. The two complex nonlinear models are turned into multi-component real models by proper transformations. Lie symmetries are obtained via the classical Lie group method, and the results for the coupled complex short pulse equations contain the existing results as particular cases. Based on the linearizing operator and adjoint linearizing operator for the two real systems, adjoint symmetries can be obtained. Explicit conservation laws are constructed using the symmetry/adjoint symmetry pair (SA) method. Relationships between the nonlinear self-adjointness method and the SA method are investigated.

Cite this article

Lihua Zhang , Bo Shen , Shuxin Han , Gangwei Wang , Lingshu Wang . Conservation laws of the complex short pulse equation and coupled complex short pulse equations[J]. Communications in Theoretical Physics, 2022 , 74(7) : 075006 . DOI: 10.1088/1572-9494/ac729a

1. Introduction

In the field of optical communications, nonlinear mathematical physical models that can describe the pulse propagation in optical fibers play an important role. The famous nonlinear Schrödinger (NLS) equation [1, 2], the short pulse (SP) equation [3, 4], and the Wadati–Konno–Ichikawa equation [5, 6] have been established respectively to describe different pulse propagations in optical fibers. Based on the SP equation, Feng proposed a new model.
$\begin{eqnarray}{q}_{xt}+q+\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}{\left({\left|q\right|}^{2}{q}_{x}\right)}_{x}=0,\end{eqnarray}$
with $q=q(x,t)$ being a complex-valued function, and the equation was called complex short pulse (CSP) equation [7]. Since $q=q(x,t)$ comprises amplitude and phase, it is more accurate to describe optical waves. The equation (1) can describe the pulse propagation at the scale of attoseconds [8]. The integrability of equation (1) has been studied in [7]. N-soliton solutions, one-order rogue wave and soliton interaction patterns of equation (1) were investigated in [9]. The relationship between the complex coupled dispersionless equations and equation (1) has been found [10]. Periodic solutions, soliton solutions, higher-order breathers and rogue wave solutions for equation (1) have been obtained [11, 12]. Long-time asymptotic behaviour and the general form of two-soliton solutions have been studied via Riemann–Hilbert approach [13, 14]. More results about equation (1) can be seen in [15, 16].
When birefringence effects were considered, the coupled complex short pulse (CCSP) equations
$\begin{eqnarray}\begin{array}{l}{q}_{1xt}+{q}_{1}+\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}{\left(({\left|{q}_{1}\right|}^{2}+{\left|{q}_{2}\right|}^{2}){q}_{1x}\right)}_{x}=0,\\ {q}_{2xt}+{q}_{2}+\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}{\left(({\left|{q}_{1}\right|}^{2}+{\left|{q}_{2}\right|}^{2}){q}_{2x}\right)}_{x}=0,\end{array}\end{eqnarray}$
were proposed [7], with ${q}_{1}$ and ${q}_{2}$ being complex-valued functions concerning $x$ and $t.$ Integrable properties, vector soliton solutions for equation (2) have been studied [7, 17]. Lie symmetries and exact solutions of equation (2) have been obtained [18].
As we know, conservation laws is very fundamental not only in physics, but also in mathematics [19, 20]. Many methods have been developed to find conservation laws [2134]. Recently, the adjoint equation has been applied to derive conservation laws in the nonlinear self-adjointness method and the symmetry/adjoint symmetry pair (SA) method [24, 25]. To our best knowledge, explicit conservation laws of (1) and (2) have not been reported. This paper is concerned with the conservation laws of (1) and (2) by the SA method.
The framework of the rest is shown below. In section 2, we change equations (1) and (2) to real equations, then perform Lie symmetry analysis for the corresponding real equations. In section 3, conservation laws of the real systems is derived using the SA method. The last section is devoted to some conclusions and discussions.

2. Symmetry analysis of equations (1) and (2)

By taking
$\begin{eqnarray*}q=u+{\rm{I}}v,\end{eqnarray*}$
where ${{\rm{I}}}^{2}=-1,\,$ $u$ and $v$ are real dependent variables with respect to $x$ and $t,$ equation (1) is transformed to
$\begin{eqnarray}\begin{array}{l}{u}_{xt}+u+u{{u}_{x}}^{2}+v{v}_{x}{u}_{x}+\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}{u}^{2}{u}_{xx}+\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}{v}^{2}{u}_{xx}=0,\,\,\,\\ {v}_{xt}+v+u{u}_{x}{v}_{x}+v{{v}_{x}}^{2}+\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}{u}^{2}{v}_{xx}+\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}{v}^{2}{v}_{xx}=0.\,\,\,\end{array}\end{eqnarray}$
Using the transformation $u=\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}\,(\hat{u}+\hat{v}),v\,=\displaystyle \frac{1}{2{\rm{I}}}\,(\hat{u}-\hat{v})$ and denoting $\hat{u}=u,\hat{v}=v$ (see (4.20) in [28]), equation (3) are transformed to
$\begin{eqnarray}\begin{array}{l}{{\rm{\Delta }}}_{1}={u}_{xt}+u+\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}{(uv{u}_{x})}_{x}=0,\,\,\,\\ {{\rm{\Delta }}}_{2}={v}_{xt}+v+\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}{(uv{v}_{x})}_{x}=0.\,\,\,\end{array}\end{eqnarray}$
In the following, we will investigate equation (4) instead of equation (1). By taking
$\begin{eqnarray*}{q}_{1}=u+{\rm{I}}v,\,\,{q}_{2}=p+{\rm{I}}q.\end{eqnarray*}$
Equation (2) are changed to
$\begin{eqnarray}\begin{array}{l}{G}_{1}=u{u}_{x}{v}_{x}+v{{v}_{x}}^{2}+p{p}_{x}{v}_{x}+q{q}_{x}{v}_{x}+v+{v}_{xt}\\ \,\,+\,\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}({u}^{2}+{v}^{2}+{p}^{2}+{q}^{2}){v}_{xx}=0,\\ {G}_{2}=u{{u}_{x}}^{2}+v{v}_{x}{u}_{x}+p{p}_{x}{u}_{x}+q{q}_{x}{u}_{x}+u+{u}_{xt}\\ \,\,+\,\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}({u}^{2}+{v}^{2}+{p}^{2}+{q}^{2}){u}_{xx}=0,\\ {G}_{3}=u{u}_{x}{q}_{x}+v{v}_{x}{q}_{x}+p{p}_{x}{q}_{x}+q{{q}_{x}}^{2}+q+{q}_{xt}\\ \,\,+\,\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}({u}^{2}+{v}^{2}+{p}^{2}+{q}^{2}){q}_{xx}=0,\\ {G}_{4}=u{u}_{x}{p}_{x}+v{v}_{x}{p}_{x}+p{{p}_{x}}^{2}+q{q}_{x}{p}_{x}+p+{p}_{xt}\\ \,\,+\,\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}({u}^{2}+{v}^{2}+{p}^{2}+{q}^{2}){p}_{xx}=0,\end{array}\end{eqnarray}$
where $u,v,\,p$ and $q$ are real dependent variables of $x$ and $t.$
As stated by Noether, Lie symmetries have close relationships with conservation laws. Next, we will study Lie symmetries for equations (4) and (5) by the classical Lie symmetry approach. Suppose that the Lie symmetry of equation (4) is expressed as follows:
$\begin{eqnarray}V=X\displaystyle \frac{\partial }{\partial x}+T\displaystyle \frac{\partial }{\partial t}+U\displaystyle \frac{\partial }{\partial u}+V\displaystyle \frac{\partial }{\partial v},\end{eqnarray}$
where the coefficients $X,T,U$ and $V$ are undetermined functions with respect to $x,t,u$ and $v.$ According to procedures of the classical Lie symmetry approach, (6) is determined by
$\begin{eqnarray}\left\{\begin{array}{c}{\left.p{r}^{(2)}V({{\rm{\Delta }}}_{1})\right|}_{{{\rm{\Delta }}}_{1}=0,{{\rm{\Delta }}}_{2}=0}=0,\\ {\left.p{r}^{(2)}V({{\rm{\Delta }}}_{2})\right|}_{{{\rm{\Delta }}}_{1}=0,{{\rm{\Delta }}}_{2}=0}=0,\end{array}\right.\end{eqnarray}$
and $p{r}^{(2)}V$ denotes the second prolongation of $V,$
$\begin{eqnarray}\begin{array}{l}p{r}^{(2)}V=U\displaystyle \frac{\partial }{\partial u}+V\displaystyle \frac{\partial }{\partial v}+{\phi }^{x}\displaystyle \frac{\partial }{\partial {u}_{x}}+{\psi }^{x}\displaystyle \frac{\partial }{\partial {v}_{x}}\\ \,\,\,\,+\,{\phi }^{xx}\displaystyle \frac{\partial }{\partial {u}_{xx}}+{\phi }^{xt}\displaystyle \frac{\partial }{\partial {u}_{xt}}+{\psi }^{xx}\displaystyle \frac{\partial }{\partial {v}_{xx}}+{\psi }^{xt}\displaystyle \frac{\partial }{\partial {v}_{xt}},\end{array}\end{eqnarray}$
with
$\begin{eqnarray}\begin{array}{l}{\phi }^{x}={D}_{x}(U-X{u}_{x}-T{u}_{t})+X{u}_{xx}+T{u}_{xt},\\ {\phi }^{xx}={D}_{xx}(U-X{u}_{x}-T{u}_{t})+X{u}_{xxx}+T{u}_{txx},\\ {\phi }^{xt}={D}_{xt}(U-X{u}_{x}-T{u}_{t})+X{u}_{xxt}+T{u}_{xtt},\\ {\psi }^{x}={D}_{x}(V-X{v}_{x}-T{v}_{t})+X{v}_{xx}+T{v}_{xt},\\ {\psi }^{xx}={D}_{xx}(V-X{v}_{x}-T{v}_{t})+X{v}_{xxx}+T{v}_{xxt},\\ {\psi }^{xt}={D}_{xt}(V-X{v}_{x}-T{v}_{t})+X{v}_{xxt}+T{v}_{xtt},\end{array}\end{eqnarray}$
where ${D}_{x}$ and ${D}_{t}$ are total differential operators. After calculations, the Lie symmetries for equation (4) can be obtained as follows
$\begin{eqnarray}\begin{array}{l}{V}_{1}=\displaystyle \frac{\partial }{\partial x},\,\,\,\,\,{V}_{2}=\displaystyle \frac{\partial }{\partial t},\,\,\,\,\,\,{V}_{3}=-x\displaystyle \frac{\partial }{\partial x}+t\displaystyle \frac{\partial }{\partial t}\\ \,\,\,\,\,\,-\,2v\displaystyle \frac{\partial }{\partial v},\,\,\,{V}_{4}=u\displaystyle \frac{\partial }{\partial u}-v\displaystyle \frac{\partial }{\partial v}.\end{array}\end{eqnarray}$
The Lie symmetries for equation (4) are new, and they can be used to discuss the corresponding symmetry groups, similarity reductions and group invariant solutions of equation (4). Similar work has been done in [32], so here we omit it.
By the same way with equation (4), we can get the Lie symmetries of equation (5)
$\begin{eqnarray}\begin{array}{l}{V}_{1}=\displaystyle \frac{\partial }{\partial x},\,{V}_{2}=\displaystyle \frac{\partial }{\partial t},\,{V}_{3}=-x\displaystyle \frac{\partial }{\partial x}+t\displaystyle \frac{\partial }{\partial t}-u\displaystyle \frac{\partial }{\partial u}\\ \,-\,v\displaystyle \frac{\partial }{\partial v}-p\displaystyle \frac{\partial }{\partial p}-q\displaystyle \frac{\partial }{\partial q},\,{V}_{4}=q\displaystyle \frac{\partial }{\partial p}-p\displaystyle \frac{\partial }{\partial q},\,\\ {V}_{5}=-p\displaystyle \frac{\partial }{\partial u}+u\displaystyle \frac{\partial }{\partial p},{V}_{6}=-q\displaystyle \frac{\partial }{\partial u}+u\displaystyle \frac{\partial }{\partial q},\,{V}_{7}=-q\displaystyle \frac{\partial }{\partial v}\\ \,+\,v\displaystyle \frac{\partial }{\partial q},\,\,{V}_{8}=v\displaystyle \frac{\partial }{\partial u}-u\displaystyle \frac{\partial }{\partial v},\,\,\,{V}_{9}=-p\displaystyle \frac{\partial }{\partial v}+v\displaystyle \frac{\partial }{\partial p}.\end{array}\end{eqnarray}$
In [18], equation (2) have been turned into the same real systems as equation (5). They also studied the Lie symmetries of equation (5), but their results are particular cases of (11).

3. Conservation laws of equations (4) and (5)

Based on the obtained Lie symmetries (10) and (11), we can construct conservation laws for equations (4) and (5) using their Lie symmetries and adjoint symmetries [25, 26].

3.1. Conservation laws of equation (4)

According to [25, 26], one obtains the linearizing operator of equation (4)
$\begin{eqnarray}\begin{array}{l}L\,=\,\left[\begin{array}{lr}\left(1+\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}{u}_{x}{v}_{x}+\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}v{u}_{xx}\right)+\left({u}_{x}v+\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}u{v}_{x}\right){D}_{x}+\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}uv{D}_{xx}+{D}_{xt} & \left(\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}{{u}_{x}}^{2}+\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}u{u}_{xx}\right)+\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}u{u}_{x}{D}_{x}\\ \left(\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}{{v}_{x}}^{2}+\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}v{v}_{xx}\right)+\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}{v}_{x}v{D}_{x} & \left(1+\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}{u}_{x}{v}_{x}+\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}u{v}_{xx}\right)+\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}uv{D}_{xx}+\left(u{v}_{x}+\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}{u}_{x}v\right){D}_{x}+{D}_{xt}\end{array}\right]\,,\end{array}\end{eqnarray}$
and the adjoint linearizing operator
$\begin{eqnarray}{L}^{* }\,=\,\left[\begin{array}{cc}1+\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}u{v}_{x}{D}_{x}+\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}uv{D}_{xx}+{D}_{xt} & -\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}v{v}_{x}{D}_{x}\\ -\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}u{u}_{x}{D}_{x} & 1+\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}{u}_{x}v{D}_{x}+\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}uv{D}_{xx}+{D}_{xt}\end{array}\right]\,.\end{eqnarray}$
Based on the symmetries (10) of equation (4), the symmetry components ${\hat{\eta }}^{\rho }$ of equation (4) are given by
$\begin{eqnarray}\begin{array}{l}{\hat{\eta }}^{1}=({\hat{\eta }}_{1}^{1},{\hat{\eta }}_{2}^{1})=(-{u}_{x},-{v}_{x}),\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,{\hat{\eta }}^{2}=({\hat{\eta }}_{1}^{2},{\hat{\eta }}_{2}^{2})=(-{u}_{t},-{v}_{t}),\\ {\hat{\eta }}^{3}=({\hat{\eta }}_{1}^{3},{\hat{\eta }}_{2}^{3})=(x{u}_{x}-t{u}_{t},-2v+x{v}_{x}-t{v}_{t}),\,\,{\hat{\eta }}^{4}=({\hat{\eta }}_{1}^{4},{\hat{\eta }}_{2}^{4})=(u,-v).\end{array}\end{eqnarray}$
From (13), one obtains the following adjoint linearizing system
$\begin{eqnarray}\begin{array}{l}{L}^{* }{\omega }_{\sigma }=\,\left[\begin{array}{cc}1+\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}u{v}_{x}{D}_{x}+\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}uv{D}_{xx}+{D}_{xt} & -\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}v{v}_{x}{D}_{x}\\ -\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}u{u}_{x}{D}_{x} & 1+\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}{u}_{x}v{D}_{x}+\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}uv{D}_{xx}+{D}_{xt}\end{array}\right]\left[\begin{array}{c}{\omega }^{1}\\ {\omega }^{2}\end{array}\right]\,=\,\left[\begin{array}{c}0\\ 0\end{array}\right],\end{array}\end{eqnarray}$
with ${\omega }^{1}$ and ${\omega }^{2}$ are functions of $x,t,u$ and $v.$ After complicated calculations, we find that the solution to (15) is
$\begin{eqnarray}({\omega }^{1},{\omega }^{2})=(Cv,-Cu),\end{eqnarray}$
where $C$ is a constant. According to [25, 26], this is the adjoint symmetry of equation (4) and we take $C=1$ in the calculation of conservation laws.
Substituting ${\hat{\eta }}^{1}=({\hat{\eta }}_{1}^{1},{\hat{\eta }}_{2}^{1})$ in (14) and $({\omega }^{1},{\omega }^{2})=(v,-u)$ into the conservation laws identity of Theorem 1 in [25], one can obtain the following conservation laws of equation (4) with respect to ${V}_{1}$
$\begin{eqnarray}\begin{array}{l}{X}_{1}=-\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}{{u}_{x}}^{2}{v}^{2}-\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}u{v}^{2}{u}_{xx}+\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}{{v}_{x}}^{2}{u}^{2}+\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}{u}^{2}v{v}_{xx}\\ \,\,\,+\,{u}_{x}{v}_{t}-{v}_{x}{u}_{t},\,{T}_{1}=-{u}_{xx}v+{v}_{xx}u.\end{array}\end{eqnarray}$
Using other pairs ${\hat{\eta }}^{i}\,(i=2,3,4)$ in (14) and $({\omega }^{1},{\omega }^{2})=(v,-u),$ one can obtain other three conservation laws of equation (4)
$\begin{eqnarray}\begin{array}{l}{X}_{2}=-\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}{u}_{x}{u}_{t}{v}^{2}+\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}{v}_{x}{v}_{t}{u}^{2}-\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}u{v}^{2}{u}_{xt}+\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}{u}^{2}v{v}_{xt}\\ \,\,\,\,+\,uv{u}_{t}{v}_{x}-uv{u}_{x}{v}_{t},\,{T}_{2}=-{u}_{xt}v+{v}_{xt}u,\end{array}\end{eqnarray}$
$\begin{eqnarray}\begin{array}{l}{X}_{3}=\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}x{v}^{2}{{u}_{x}}^{2}+\displaystyle \frac{3}{2}{u}^{2}v{v}_{x}-\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}x{u}^{2}{{v}_{x}}^{2}-\displaystyle \frac{3}{2}u{v}^{2}{u}_{x}\\ \,\,-\,2v{u}_{t}+x{v}_{x}{u}_{t}-x{u}_{x}{v}_{t}-\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}t{v}^{2}{u}_{x}{u}_{t}+\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}t{u}^{2}{v}_{x}{v}_{t}\\ \,\,+\,\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}xu{v}^{2}{u}_{xx}-\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}tu{v}^{2}{u}_{xt}-\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}x{u}^{2}v{v}_{xx}\\ \,\,+\,\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}t{u}^{2}v{v}_{xt}+tuv{u}_{t}{v}_{x}-tuv{u}_{x}{v}_{t},\,{T}_{3}={u}_{x}v\\ \,\,+\,xv{u}_{xx}-vt{u}_{xt}+u{v}_{x}-xu{v}_{xx}+tu{v}_{xt},\end{array}\end{eqnarray}$
$\begin{eqnarray}\begin{array}{l}{X}_{4}=-u{v}_{t}-v{u}_{t},\\ {T}_{4}={u}_{x}v+{v}_{x}u.\end{array}\end{eqnarray}$

The validity of the above conservation laws has been checked by Maple. According to [33], there are two different types of trivial conservation laws. In the first type the divergence of the corresponding conserved vector vanishes identically. The conservation laws $({X}_{4},{T}_{4})$ belongs to the first type and is trivial, since ${D}_{x}{X}_{4}+{D}_{t}{T}_{4}\equiv 0.$ The second type of trivial conservation laws are provided by those conserved vectors whose components vanish on the solutions of the considered systems of differential equations. The conservation laws $({X}_{1},{T}_{1})$ and $({X}_{2},{T}_{2})$ belongs to the second type and is also trivial. For example,

$\begin{eqnarray*}\begin{array}{l}{D}_{x}{X}_{1}+{D}_{t}{T}_{1}={D}_{x}{X}_{1}+{D}_{t}{D}_{x}({v}_{x}u-{u}_{x}v)\\ \,=\,{D}_{x}\left({X}_{1}+{D}_{t}({v}_{x}u-{u}_{x}v)\right)+{D}_{t}0,\end{array}\end{eqnarray*}$
and
$\begin{eqnarray*}\begin{array}{l}{\left.\left({X}_{1}+{D}_{t}({v}_{x}u-{u}_{x}v)\right)\right|}_{{{\rm{\Delta }}}_{1}=0,{{\rm{\Delta }}}_{2}=0}=\\ {\left.\left(-\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}{{u}_{x}}^{2}{v}^{2}-\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}u{v}^{2}{u}_{xx}-{u}_{xt}v+\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}{{v}_{x}}^{2}{u}^{2}+\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}{u}^{2}v{v}_{xx}+{v}_{xt}u\right)\right|}_{{{\rm{\Delta }}}_{1}=0,{{\rm{\Delta }}}_{2}=0}\\ \,=\,0.\end{array}\end{eqnarray*}$
Therefore, $({X}_{1},{T}_{1})$ belongs to the second type of trivialness, so is $({X}_{2},{T}_{2}).$ The conservation laws $({X}_{3},{T}_{3})$ is nontrivial and can be simplified to
$\begin{eqnarray*}\begin{array}{l}{X}_{3}={u}^{2}v{v}_{x}-u{v}^{2}{u}_{x}-2v{u}_{t},\\ {T}_{3}=2u{v}_{x}.\end{array}\end{eqnarray*}$
By means of the above nontrivial conservation laws, equation (4) can be written in conservation form
$\begin{eqnarray*}\begin{array}{l}{D}_{x}({u}^{2}v{v}_{x}-u{v}^{2}{u}_{x}-2v{u}_{t})\\ \,+\,{D}_{t}(2u{v}_{x})=-2v{{\rm{\Delta }}}_{1}+2u{{\rm{\Delta }}}_{2}=0.\end{array}\end{eqnarray*}$
The conservation form of (4) can help one find exact solutions of (4) [34].

From (15), we know that the adjoint equations of equation (4) are

$\begin{eqnarray}\begin{array}{l}{{{\rm{\Delta }}}_{1}}^{{\prime} }={\omega }^{1}+{\omega }_{xt}^{1}+\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}u{v}_{x}{\omega }_{x}^{1}-\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}v{v}_{x}{\omega }_{x}^{2}+\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}uv{\omega }_{xx}^{1}=0,\\ {{{\rm{\Delta }}}_{2}}^{{\prime} }={\omega }^{2}+{\omega }_{xt}^{2}-\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}u{u}_{x}{\omega }_{x}^{1}+\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}{u}_{x}v{\omega }_{x}^{2}+\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}uv{\omega }_{xx}^{2}=0.\end{array}\end{eqnarray}$
Taking the solution $({\omega }^{1},{\omega }^{2})=(Cv,-Cu)$ into equation (21), we find that
$\begin{eqnarray*}\begin{array}{l}{\left.{{{\rm{\Delta }}}_{1}}^{^{\prime} }\right|}_{{\omega }^{1}=Cv,{\omega }^{2}=-Cu}=C{{\rm{\Delta }}}_{{\rm{2}}},\\ {\left.{{{\rm{\Delta }}}_{2}}^{^{\prime} }\right|}_{{\omega }^{1}=Cv,{\omega }^{2}=-Cu}=-C{{\rm{\Delta }}}_{{\rm{1}}}.\end{array}\end{eqnarray*}$
According to the definition of quasi-self adjointness [29], we can conclude that equation (4) are quasi self-adjoint.

3.2. Conservation laws of equation (5)

According to [25, 26], one obtains the linearizing operator of equation (5)
$L=\left[\begin{array}{cccc}{(u{v}_{x})}_{x}+u{v}_{x}{D}_{x} & \begin{array}{l}({{v}_{x}}^{2}+v{v}_{xx}+1)+\\ (R+v{v}_{x}){D}_{x}+H\end{array} & {(p{v}_{x})}_{x}+p{v}_{x}{D}_{x} & {(q{v}_{x})}_{x}+q{v}_{x}{D}_{x}\\ \begin{array}{c}({{u}_{x}}^{2}+u{u}_{xx}+1)+\\ (R+u{u}_{x}){D}_{x}+H\end{array} & {({u}_{x}v)}_{x}+{u}_{x}v{D}_{x} & {({u}_{x}p)}_{x}+{u}_{x}p{D}_{x} & {({u}_{x}q)}_{x}+{u}_{x}q{D}_{x}\\ {({q}_{x}u)}_{x}+{q}_{x}u{D}_{x} & {({q}_{x}v)}_{x}+{q}_{x}v{D}_{x} & {({q}_{x}p)}_{x}+{q}_{x}p{D}_{x} & \begin{array}{l}({{p}_{x}}^{2}+p{p}_{xx}+1)+\\ (R+p{p}_{x}){D}_{x}+H\end{array}\\ {({p}_{x}u)}_{x}+{p}_{x}u{D}_{x} & {({p}_{x}v)}_{x}+{p}_{x}v{D}_{x} & \begin{array}{l}({{p}_{x}}^{2}+p{p}_{xx}+1)+\\ (R+p{p}_{x}){D}_{x}+H\end{array} & {({p}_{x}q)}_{x}+{p}_{x}q{D}_{x}\end{array}\right],$
and the adjoint linearizing operator
$\begin{eqnarray}{L}^{* }=\left[\begin{array}{cccc}-u{v}_{x}{D}_{x} & 1+(R-u{u}_{x}){D}_{x}+H & -u{q}_{x}{D}_{x} & -u{p}_{x}{D}_{x}\\ 1+(R-v{v}_{x}){D}_{x}+H & -v{u}_{x}{D}_{x} & -v{q}_{x}{D}_{x} & -v{p}_{x}{D}_{x}\\ -p{v}_{x}{D}_{x} & -p{u}_{x}{D}_{x} & -p{q}_{x}{D}_{x} & 1+(R-p{p}_{x}){D}_{x}+H\\ -q{v}_{x}{D}_{x} & -q{u}_{x}{D}_{x} & 1+(R-q{q}_{x}){D}_{x}+H & -q{p}_{x}{D}_{x}\end{array}\right],\end{eqnarray}$
with
$R=u{u}_{x}+v{v}_{x}+p{p}_{x}+q{q}_{x},S= \frac{1}{2}\left({u}^{2}+{v}^{2}+{p}^{2}+{q}^{2}\right), \\ \,H=S{D}_{xx}+{D}_{xt}.$
From (11), there are nine symmetry components of equation (5), they are given by
$\begin{eqnarray}\begin{array}{l}{\hat{\eta }}^{1}=({\hat{\eta }}_{1}^{1},{\hat{\eta }}_{2}^{1},{\hat{\eta }}_{3}^{1},{\hat{\eta }}_{4}^{1})=(-{u}_{x},-{v}_{x},-{p}_{x},-{q}_{x}),\,\,\\ {\hat{\eta }}^{2}=(-{u}_{t},-{v}_{t},-{p}_{t},-{q}_{t}),\\ {\hat{\eta }}^{3}=\left(-u+x{u}_{x}-t{u}_{t},-v+x{v}_{x}-t{v}_{t},-p+x{p}_{x}\right.\\ \,\,\,\,\,\,\left.-\,t{p}_{t},-q+x{q}_{x}-t{q}_{t}\right),\,\,\\ {\hat{\eta }}^{4}=(0,0,q,-p),\,\,\,{\hat{\eta }}^{5}=(-p,0,u,0),\\ {\hat{\eta }}^{6}=(-q,0,0,u),\,\,\,{\hat{\eta }}^{7}=(0,-q,0,v),\\ {\hat{\eta }}^{8}=(v,-u,0,0),\,\,\,\,{\hat{\eta }}^{9}=(0,-p,v,0).\end{array}\end{eqnarray}$
From (23), one obtains the following adjoint linearizing system
$\begin{eqnarray}{L}^{* }{\omega }_{\sigma }=\left[\begin{array}{cccc}-u{v}_{x}{D}_{x} & 1+(R-u{u}_{x}){D}_{x}+H & -u{q}_{x}{D}_{x} & -u{p}_{x}{D}_{x}\\ 1+(R-v{v}_{x}){D}_{x}+H & -v{u}_{x}{D}_{x} & -v{q}_{x}{D}_{x} & -v{p}_{x}{D}_{x}\\ -p{v}_{x}{D}_{x} & -p{u}_{x}{D}_{x} & -p{q}_{x}{D}_{x} & 1+(R-p{p}_{x}){D}_{x}+H\\ -q{v}_{x}{D}_{x} & -q{u}_{x}{D}_{x} & 1+(R-q{q}_{x}){D}_{x}+H & -q{p}_{x}{D}_{x}\end{array}\right]\left[\begin{array}{c}{\omega }^{1}\\ {\omega }^{2}\\ {\omega }^{3}\\ {\omega }^{4}\end{array}\right]\,=\left[\begin{array}{c}0\\ 0\\ 0\\ 0\end{array}\right],\end{eqnarray}$
with ${\omega }^{i}\,(i=1,2,3,4)$ being functions of $x,t,u,v,p$ and $q.$ The solution to (25) is
$\begin{eqnarray}({\omega }^{1},{\omega }^{2},{\omega }^{3},{\omega }^{4})=(-Cu,Cv,0,0),\end{eqnarray}$
where $C$ is a constant. This is the adjoint symmetry of equation (5) and we take $C=1$ in the following for simplicity.
Substituting ${\hat{\eta }}^{1}=({\hat{\eta }}_{1}^{1},{\hat{\eta }}_{2}^{1},{\hat{\eta }}_{3}^{1},{\hat{\eta }}_{4}^{1})$ in (24) and $({\omega }^{1},{\omega }^{2},{\omega }^{3},{\omega }^{4})$ in (26) into the conservation laws identity of Theorem 1 in [26], one can obtain the following conservation laws of equation (5) with respect to ${V}_{1}$
$\begin{eqnarray*}\begin{array}{l}{X}_{1}=-{u}_{t}{v}_{x}-{u}_{x}vp{p}_{x}-{u}_{x}vq{q}_{x}+u{v}_{x}p{p}_{x}\\ \,\,\,\,+u{v}_{x}q{q}_{x}+uv{{v}_{x}}^{2}+{u}^{2}{u}_{x}{v}_{x}-u{{u}_{x}}^{2}v-{u}_{x}{v}^{2}{v}_{x}\\ \,\,\,\,-\,\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}({u}^{2}+{v}^{2}+{p}^{2}+{q}^{2}){u}_{xx}v\\ \,\,\,\,+\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}({u}^{2}+{v}^{2}+{p}^{2}+{q}^{2}){v}_{xx}u+{u}_{x}{v}_{t},\\ {T}_{1}=-{u}_{xx}v+{v}_{xx}u.\end{array}\end{eqnarray*}$
Substituting other ${\hat{\eta }}^{i}\,(i=2,3,\,{K}\ldots ,9)$ in (24) and $({\omega }^{1},{\omega }^{2},{\omega }^{3},{\omega }^{4})$ in (26), one can obtain other conservation laws of equation (5) with respect to ${V}_{i}\,\,(i=2,3,\,{K}\ldots ,9)$
$\begin{eqnarray*}\begin{array}{l}{X}_{2}=-u{u}_{x}{u}_{t}v+u{v}_{x}{v}_{t}v+u{v}_{x}p{p}_{t}-{u}_{x}vp{p}_{t}+u{v}_{x}q{q}_{t}\\ \,\,\,\,-\,{u}_{x}vq{q}_{t}-\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}({u}^{2}+{v}^{2}+{p}^{2}+{q}^{2}){u}_{xt}v\\ \,\,+\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}({u}^{2}+{v}^{2}+{p}^{2}+{q}^{2})u{v}_{xt}-\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}({p}^{2}+{q}^{2}+{u}^{2}+3{v}^{2})\\ \,\,\times \,{u}_{x}{v}_{t}+\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}({p}^{2}+{q}^{2}+{v}^{2}+3{u}^{2}){u}_{t}{v}_{x},\,\\ {T}_{2}=-{u}_{xt}v+{v}_{xt}u,\end{array}\end{eqnarray*}$
$\begin{eqnarray*}\begin{array}{l}{X}_{3}=\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}({u}^{2}+{v}^{2}+{p}^{2}+{q}^{2}){\left(tu{v}_{xt}-tv{u}_{xt}+xvu\right.}_{xx}\\ \left.\,\,\,\,-\,xu{v}_{xx}+3u{v}_{x}-3v{u}_{x}\right)-x{u}^{2}{u}_{x}{v}_{x}+xu{{u}_{x}}^{2}v\\ \,\,\,\,+\,\displaystyle \frac{t}{2}{u}_{t}{v}_{x}(3{u}^{2}+{v}^{2}+{p}^{2}+{q}^{2})-\displaystyle \frac{t}{2}{v}_{t}{u}_{x}\\ \,\,\,\,\times \,({u}^{2}+3{v}^{2}+{p}^{2}+{q}^{2})+x{u}_{x}{v}^{2}{v}_{x}-xuv{{v}_{x}}^{2}\\ \,\,\,\,-x{u}_{x}{v}_{t}+\,x{u}_{t}{v}_{x}+x{u}_{x}vq{q}_{x}-tu{u}_{x}{u}_{t}v-xu{v}_{x}p{p}_{x}\\ \,\,\,\,-\,xu{v}_{x}q{q}_{x}+tuv{v}_{x}{v}_{t}+tu{v}_{x}p{p}_{t}-t{u}_{x}vp{p}_{t}\\ \,\,\,\,+\,tu{v}_{x}q{q}_{t}-t{u}_{x}vq{q}_{t}+{v}_{t}u-{u}_{t}v+x{u}_{x}vp{p}_{x},\\ {T}_{3}=xv{u}_{xx}-tv{u}_{xt}-xu{v}_{xx}+tu{v}_{xt},\end{array}\end{eqnarray*}$
$\begin{eqnarray*}\begin{array}{l}{X}_{4}=0,\\ {T}_{4}=0,\end{array}\end{eqnarray*}$
$\begin{eqnarray*}\begin{array}{l}{X}_{5}=\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}({u}^{2}+{v}^{2}+{p}^{2}+{q}^{2})({v}_{x}p-{p}_{x}v)+p{v}_{t},\\ {T}_{5}=-v{p}_{x},\end{array}\end{eqnarray*}$
$\begin{eqnarray*}\begin{array}{l}{X}_{6}=\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}({u}^{2}+{v}^{2}+{p}^{2}+{q}^{2})({v}_{x}q-{q}_{x}v)+q{v}_{t},\\ {T}_{6}=-v{q}_{x},\end{array}\end{eqnarray*}$
$\begin{eqnarray*}\begin{array}{l}{X}_{7}=\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}({u}^{2}+{v}^{2}+{p}^{2}+{q}^{2})({q}_{x}u-{u}_{x}q)-q{u}_{t},\\ {T}_{7}=u{q}_{x},\end{array}\end{eqnarray*}$
$\begin{eqnarray*}\begin{array}{l}{X}_{8}=u{u}_{t}-v{v}_{t},\\ {T}_{8}=v{u}_{x}+u{u}_{x},\end{array}\end{eqnarray*}$
$\begin{eqnarray*}\begin{array}{l}{X}_{9}=\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}({u}^{2}+{v}^{2}+{p}^{2}+{q}^{2})(u{p}_{x}-{u}_{x}p)-p{u}_{t},\\ {T}_{9}=u{p}_{x}.\end{array}\end{eqnarray*}$

According to [33], $({X}_{4},{T}_{4})$ and $({X}_{8},{T}_{8})$ is trivial and belongs to the first type, since

$\begin{eqnarray*}{D}_{x}{X}_{4}+{D}_{t}{T}_{4}\equiv 0,\,{D}_{x}{X}_{8}+{D}_{t}{T}_{8}\equiv 0.\end{eqnarray*}$
$({X}_{1},{T}_{1})$ and $({X}_{2},{T}_{2})$ is trivial and belongs to the second type, for example
$\begin{eqnarray*}\begin{array}{l}{D}_{x}{X}_{1}+{D}_{t}{T}_{1}={D}_{x}{X}_{1}+{D}_{t}{D}_{x}({v}_{x}u-{u}_{x}v)\\ \,=\,{D}_{x}\left({X}_{1}+{D}_{t}({v}_{x}u-{u}_{x}v)\right)+{D}_{t}0\end{array}\end{eqnarray*}$
and
$\begin{eqnarray*}{\left.\left({X}_{1}+{D}_{t}({v}_{x}u-{u}_{x}v)\right)\right|}_{{G}_{1}=0,{G}_{2}=0,{G}_{3}=0,{G}_{4}=0}=0.\end{eqnarray*}$
Other conservation laws for equation (5) is all nontrivial and $({X}_{3},{T}_{3})$ can be simplified to
$\begin{eqnarray*}\begin{array}{l}{X}_{3}=({u}^{2}+{v}^{2}+{p}^{2}+{q}^{2})(u{v}_{x}-v{u}_{x})+u{v}_{t}-v{u}_{t},\\ {T}_{3}=u{v}_{x}-v{u}_{x}.\end{array}\end{eqnarray*}$
Using the nontrivial conservation laws, equation (5) can be written in conservation form.

Similar to the case in Remark 2, we can directly obtain the adjoint equations of equation (5) from (25) and they are as follows

$\begin{eqnarray}\begin{array}{l}{{G}_{1}}^{{\prime} }=-u{v}_{x}{\omega }_{x}^{1}+{\omega }^{2}+(v{v}_{x}+p{p}_{x}+q{q}_{x}){\omega }_{x}^{2}\\ \,+\,\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}({u}^{2}+{v}^{2}+{p}^{2}+{q}^{2}){\omega }_{xx}^{2}+{\omega }_{xt}^{2}-u{q}_{x}{\omega }_{x}^{3}\\ -u{p}_{x}{\omega }_{x}^{4}=0,\,\\ {{G}_{2}}^{{\prime} }={\omega }^{1}+(u{u}_{x}+p{p}_{x}+q{q}_{x}){\omega }_{x}^{1}\\ +\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}({u}^{2}+{v}^{2}+{p}^{2}+{q}^{2})\,{\omega }_{xx}^{1}+{\omega }_{xt}^{1}-v{u}_{x}{\omega }_{x}^{2}\\ -v{q}_{x}{\omega }_{x}^{3}-v{p}_{x}{\omega }_{x}^{4}=0,\,\\ {{G}_{3}}^{{\prime} }=-p{v}_{x}{\omega }_{x}^{1}-p{u}_{x}{\omega }_{x}^{2}\\ -p{q}_{x}{\omega }_{x}^{3}+{\omega }^{4}+(u{u}_{x}+v{v}_{x}+q{q}_{x}){\omega }_{x}^{4}\\ +\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}({u}^{2}+{v}^{2}+{p}^{2}+{q}^{2}){\omega }_{xx}^{4}+{\omega }_{xt}^{4}=0,\\ {{G}_{4}}^{{\prime} }=-q{v}_{x}{\omega }_{x}^{1}-q{u}_{x}{\omega }_{x}^{2}+{\omega }^{3}+(u{u}_{x}+v{v}_{x}+p{p}_{x}){\omega }_{x}^{3}\\ \,+\,\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}({u}^{2}+{v}^{2}+{p}^{2}+{q}^{2}){\omega }_{xx}^{3}+{\omega }_{xt}^{3}-q{p}_{x}{\omega }_{x}^{4}=0.\end{array}\end{eqnarray}$
Taking the solution $({\omega }^{1},{\omega }^{2},{\omega }^{3},{\omega }^{4})=(-Cu,Cv,0,0)$ into equation (27), we find
$\begin{eqnarray*}\begin{array}{l}{\left.{{G}_{1}}^{^{\prime} }\right|}_{{\omega }^{1}=-Cu,{\omega }^{2}=Cv,{\omega }^{3}=0,{\omega }^{4}=0}=C{G}_{{\rm{1}}},\\ {\left.{{G}_{2}}^{^{\prime} }\right|}_{{\omega }^{1}=-Cu,{\omega }^{2}=Cv,{\omega }^{3}=0,{\omega }^{4}=0}=-C{G}_{2},\\ {\left.{{G}_{3}}^{^{\prime} }\right|}_{{\omega }^{1}=-Cu,{\omega }^{2}=Cv,{\omega }^{3}=0,{\omega }^{4}=0}=0,\\ {\left.{{G}_{4}}^{^{\prime} }\right|}_{{\omega }^{1}=-Cu,{\omega }^{2}=Cv,{\omega }^{3}=0,{\omega }^{4}=0}=0.\end{array}\end{eqnarray*}$
According to the definition of quasi-self adjointness [29], we know equation (5) are quasi self-adjoint.

From the definition of adjoint symmetry, we can conclude that the determination of the self-adjointness and nonlinear self-adjointness (including quasi self-adjointness, weak self-adjointness, see [27, 30, 31]) in the nonlinear self-adjointness method can be determined by the adjoint symmetry in the SA method.

4. Conclusions and discussions

Recently, the CSP equation and CCSP equations have been proposed and attracted the interest of many researchers. The two equations can be regarded as the NLS equation and coupled NLS equations in the scale of attoseconds. In this paper, explicit conservation laws for equations (4) and (5) is obtained by the SA method. The relationships between nonlinear self-adjointness method and the SA method are investigated. The determination of the self-adjointness and nonlinear self-adjointness is very essential in the nonlinear self-adjointness method, and we find that they can be determined by the adjoint symmetry in the SA method. Also, we find that the conservation laws of equations (4) and (5) derived from SA method is all local. Using the derived nontrivial conservation laws, equations (4) and (5) can be written in conservation form. The conservation form can be employed to derive exact solutions and develop numerical and analytical methods [34].

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 12105073), Science and Technology Program of Colleges and Universities in Hebei Province (No. QN2020144), Science and Technology Plan Project (Special Program for Soft Science) in Hebei Province (No. 20556201D), Scientific Research and Development Program Fund Project of Hebei University of Economics and Business (Nos. 2020YB15, 2020YB12 and 2021ZD07), Youth Team Support Program of Hebei University of Economics and Business.

1
Bilman D Buckingham R Wang D S 2021 Far-field asymptotics for multiple-pole solitons in the large-order limit J. Differ. Equ. 297 320

DOI

2
Ma L Y Zhang Y L Li T Shen S F 2021 New rational and breather solutions of a higher-order integrable nonlinear Schrödinger equation Appl. Math. Lett. 122 107539

DOI

3
Schafer T Wayne C E 2004 Propagation of ultra-short optical pulses in cubic nonlinear media Physica D 196 90

DOI

4
Fakhar K Wang G W Kara A H 2016 Symmetry reductions and conservation laws of the short pulse equation Optik 127 10201

DOI

5
Wadati M Konno K Ichikawa Y 1979 A generalization of inverse scattering method J. Phys. Soc. Japan. 46 1965

DOI

6
Li Z Q Tian S F Yang J J 2021 Soliton resolution for the Wadati–Konno–Ichikawa equation with weighted Sobolev initial data arXiv:2109.07042v1

7
Feng B F 2015 Complex short pulse and coupled complex short pulse equations Physica D 297 62

DOI

8
Yariv A Yeh P 1983 Optical Waves in Crystals: Propagation and Control of Laser Radiation New York Wiley

9
Zhaqilao 2017 The interaction solitons for the complex short pulse equation Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 47 379

DOI

10
Shen S F Feng B F Ohta Y 2016 From the real and complex coupled dispersionless equations to the real and complex short pulse equations Stud. Appl. Math. 136 64

DOI

11
Li B Q Ma Y L 2017 Periodic solutions and solitons to two complex short pulse (CSP) equations in optical fiber Optik 144 149

DOI

12
Ling L M Feng B F Zhu Z N 2016 Multi-soliton, multi-breather and higher order rogue wave solutions to the complex short pulse equation Physica D 327 13

DOI

13
Xu J Fan E G 2020 Long-time asymptotic behavior for the complex short pulse equation J. Differ. Equ. 269 10322

DOI

14
Zhang W G Yao Q Bo G Q 2019 Two-soliton solutions of the complex short pulse equation via Riemann–Hilbert approach Appl. Math. Lett. 98 263

DOI

15
Li Z Q Tian S F Yang J J 2021 Riemann–Hilbert approach and N-soliton formula for the N-component Fokas–Lenells equations arXiv:2101.12697v1

16
Xu J Guo N Li H Y Tu Y Z 2021 On the double-pole solutions of the complex short-pulse equation Mod. Phys. Lett. B 35 2150129

DOI

17
Guo B L Wang Y F 2016 Bright–dark vector soliton solutions for the coupled complex short pulse equations in nonlinear optics Wave Motion 67 47

DOI

18
Kumar V Wazwaz A M 2021 Symmetry analysis for complex soliton solutions of coupled complex short pulse equation Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 44 5238

DOI

19
Yu Z Y Zhang Z G Yang H W 2021 (2+1)-dimensional coupled Boussinesq equations for Rossby waves in two-layer cylindrical fluid Commun. Theor. Phys. 73 115005

DOI

20
Zhang L H Xu F S Ma L X 2017 Optimal system, group invariant solutions and conservation laws of the CGKP equation Nonlinear Dyn. 88 2503

DOI

21
Kara A H Mahomed F M 2006 Noether-type symmetries and conservation laws via partial Lagrangians Nonlinear Dyn. 45 367

DOI

22
Anco S C Bluman G W 1997 Direct construction of conservation laws from field equations Phys. Rev. Lett. 78 2869

DOI

23
Naz R Mahomed F M Mason D P 2008 Comparison of different approaches to conservation laws for some partial differential equations in fluid mechanics Appl. Math. Comput. 205 212

24
Ibragimov N H 2007 A new conservation theorem J. Math. Anal. Appl. 333 311

DOI

25
Eerdun B Bluman G W Kara A H 2016 Conservation laws for some systems of nonlinear PDEs via the symmetry/adjoint symmetry pair method J. Math. Anal. Appl. 436 94

DOI

26
Bluman G W Cheviakov A Anco S 2010 Applications of Symmetry Methods to Partial Differential Equations New York Springer

27
Ibragimov N H Torrisi M Tracina R 2011 Self-adjointness and conservation laws of a generalized Burgers equation J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 43 442001

DOI

28
Matsuno Y 2011 A novel multi-component generalization of the short pulse equation and its multisoliton solutions J. Math. Phys. 52 123702

DOI

29
Zhang L H Si J G 2013 Self-adjointness and conservation laws of two variable coefficient nonlinear equations of Schrödinger type Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 18 453

DOI

30
Ibragimov N H Gandarias M L Galiakberova L R Bruzon M S Avdonina E D 2016 Group classification and conservation laws of anisotropic wave equations with a source J. Math. Phys. 57 083504

DOI

31
Gandarias M L Redondo M Bruzon M S 2012 Some weak self-adjoint Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman equations arising in financial mathematics Nonlinear Anal. Real. 13 340

DOI

32
Gao B He C F 2017 Analysis of a coupled short pulse system via symmetry method Nonlinear Dyn. 90 2627

DOI

33
Ibragimov N H 2010 Nonlinear self-adjointness in constructing conservation laws Arch. ALGA 7 1

34
Ibragimov N H 2012 Method of conservation laws for constructing solutions to systems of PDEs Discontin. Nonlinearity Complex. 1 353

DOI

Outlines

/