Welcome to visit Communications in Theoretical Physics,
Topical Reviews: Gravitation Theory, Astrophysics and Cosmology

Chaotic shadows of black holes: a short review

  • Mingzhi Wang , 1 ,
  • Songbai Chen , 2, 3, ,
  • Jiliang Jing , 2, 3
Expand
  • 1School of Mathematics and Physics, Qingdao University of Science and Technology, Qingdao, Shandong 266061, China
  • 2Institute of Physics and Department of Physics, Key Laboratory of Low Dimensional Quantum Structures and Quantum Control of Ministry of Education, Synergetic Innovation Center for Quantum Effects and Applications, Hunan Normal University, Changsha, Hunan 410081, China
  • 3Center for Gravitation and Cosmology, College of Physical Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China

Author to whom any correspondence should be addressed.

Received date: 2022-04-06

  Revised date: 2022-05-03

  Accepted date: 2022-05-11

  Online published: 2022-08-15

Copyright

© 2022 Institute of Theoretical Physics CAS, Chinese Physical Society and IOP Publishing

Abstract

We give a brief review on the formation and the calculation of black hole shadows. Firstly, we introduce the concept of a black hole shadow and the current works on a variety of black hole shadows. Secondly, we present the main methods of calculating photon sphere radius and shadow radius, and then explain how the photon sphere affects the boundary of black hole shadows. We review the analytical calculation for black hole shadows which have analytic expressions for shadow boundary due to the integrable photon motion system. And we introduce the fundamental photon orbits which can explain the patterns of black hole shadow shape. Finally, we review the numerical calculation of black hole shadows with the backward ray-tracing method and introduce some chaotic black hole shadows with self-similar fractal structures. Since the gravitational waves from the merger of binary black holes have been detected, we introduce a couple of shadows of binary black holes, which all have eyebrowlike shadows around the main shadows with the fractal structures. We discuss the invariant phase space structures of the photon motion system in black hole space-time, and explain the formation of black hole shadow is dominated by the invariant manifolds of certain Lyapunov orbits near the fixed points.

Cite this article

Mingzhi Wang , Songbai Chen , Jiliang Jing . Chaotic shadows of black holes: a short review[J]. Communications in Theoretical Physics, 2022 , 74(9) : 097401 . DOI: 10.1088/1572-9494/ac6e5c

1. Introduction

In 2019, the Event Horizon Telescope (EHT) Collaboration captured the first image of the supermassive black hole in the center of the giant elliptical galaxy M87 [17], which opens a new era in the fields of astrophysics and black hole physics. Nowadays, more and more researchers have devoted themselves to the research of black hole shadows. The dark region in the center of a black hole image is the black hole shadow. The dark shadow appears because the light rays close to the black hole are captured by the black hole, thereby leaving a black shadow in the observer's sky. The trajectory of light propagation is determined by the structure of black hole space-time, so the black hole shadow will carry much information about the black hole's space-time. For example, it is a perfect black disk for a Schwarzschild black hole shadow; it gradually becomes a ‘D'-shaped silhouette with the increase of spin parameter for the Kerr black hole shadow [8, 9]; it is a cusp shadow for a Kerr black hole with Proca hair [10] and a Konoplya–Zhidenko rotating non-Kerr black hole [11]. The research of black hole shadows plays a vital role in the study of black holes (constraining black hole parameters) [12, 13], probing some fundamental physics issues including dark matter [1416] and verification of various gravity theories [1722].
Nowadays, a variety of black hole shadows have been investigated in [875]. The shadows of Schwarzschild and Kerr black holes immersed in a Melvin magnetic field become more elongated in the horizontal direction as the magnetic field parameter increases [23, 24]. Some mediums or something else in the universe could affect the light propagation and thus affect black hole shadow. V. Perlick [25] took a non-magnetized pressure-less electron-ion plasma into account to research the influence of the plasma on the shadow of a spherically symmetric black hole. S. Chen [26] found the polarization of light in a special bumblebee vector field and researched the Kerr black hole shadow cast by the polarized lights. For black hole shadow in an expanding universe, A. Grenzebach [27] researched shadows of Kerr–Newman-NUT black holes with a cosmological constant, V. Perlick [28] researched the shadow in the Kottler (Schwarzschild-de Sitter) space-time for comoving observers, P. C. Li [29] researched the shadow of a spinning black hole in an expanding universe. The first image of a Schwarzschild black hole surrounded by a shining and rotating accretion disk was calculated by Luminet [30]. We consider a solution of the superposition of a Schwarzschild black hole with a Bach–Weyl ring and studied the shadows of a Schwarzschild black hole with a Bach–Weyl ring [31]. P. V. P. Cunha [32] researched the shadows of a black hole surrounded by a heavy Lemos–Letelier accretion disk. L. Amarilla [17], S. A. Dastan [18] and L. Fen [19] have researched the shadow of a rotating black hole in extended Chern–Simons modified gravity, in f(R) gravity, and in quadratic degenerate higher order scalar tensor (DHOST) theory respectively. We also studied the effect of a special polar gravitational wave on the shadow of a Schwarzschild black hole [33]. Furthermore, the shadows of a wormhole and naked singularity also are investigated in [3436] and [37, 38] respectively. It is hoped that this information imprinted in black hole shadow can be captured in future astronomical observations including the upgraded Event Horizon Telescope and BlackHoleCam [76] to study black holes and verify various gravity theories.
The black hole shadows investigated in many works are calculated analytically since they have analytic expressions for boundary due to the integrable photon motion system. Taking the Kerr black hole shadow for instance, it has a third motion constant, the Carter constant [77], to make the number of integration constants equal to the degrees of freedom of the photon motion system. It is very convenient to study the black hole shadows. Oppositely, the black hole shadows can only be calculated numerically by the backward ray-tracing method [19, 24, 31, 33, 3945] for the photon motion system with non-integrable. Some null geodesic motions can even be chaotic, thus the black hole shadow appears chaotic phenomenon. The self-similar fractal structures appear in the black hole shadow originating from the chaotic lensing for a rotating black hole with scalar hair [3942], Bonnor black diholes with magnetic dipole moment [43], a non-Kerr rotating compact object with quadrupole mass moment [44] and binary black hole system [4649].
The structure of this short review is as follows. In section 2, we briefly introduce the formation of a black hole shadow and take the Schwarzschild black hole shadow as an example to explain that the photon sphere determines the boundary of the shadow. In section 3, we take the Kerr black hole shadow as an example to review the analytical calculation for black hole shadows and introduce the fundamental photon orbits which can explain the patterns of black hole shadow shape. In section 4, we review the numerical calculation of black hole shadows with the backward ray-tracing method, and introduce some chaotic black hole shadows casted by chaotic lensing. We also introduce a couple of shadows of binary black holes and the relationship between the invariant phase space structures of the photon motion system and black hole shadow. Our summary are given in section 5.

2. The boundary of black hole shadow: the photon sphere

Black hole shadow is a dark silhouette observed in the sky, which corresponds to the light rays captured by a black hole. There may be a misconception that the boundary of a black hole, the event horizon, determines the boundary of the black hole shadow. In point of fact, black hole shadow is about two and a half times larger than the event horizon in angular size [1, 2]. There are two reasons for this situation. Firstly, the boundary of the shadow is determined by the photon sphere outside the event horizon, which is composed of unstable photon circular orbits (the photon sphere radius rps = 3M in the Schwarzschild case, M is black hole mass). Secondly, the bending of light will make the photon sphere look bigger for the observer, which is shown in figure 1(a). In this figure, the black disk represents Schwarzschild black hole, the red circle represents the photon sphere. We assume light emitted from the observer backward in time. The light rays (magenta dotted line) that enter the photon sphere will be captured by a black hole; the light rays (black dash line) that do not enter the photon sphere will fly away to infinity; the light rays (blue line) that spiral asymptotically towards the photon sphere will determine the boundary of black hole shadow. For the observer, they will see the black hole shadow with a radius ${r}_{\mathrm{sh}}=3\sqrt{3}M$ (see the black dash line in figure 1(a)) for the Schwarzschild black hole.
Figure 1. (a) The black disk represents Schwarzschild black hole, the red circle represents the photon sphere rps = 3M, the black dotted line represents black hole shadow with a radius ${r}_{\mathrm{sh}}=3\sqrt{3}M$. (b) The plot of the effective potential Veff with the radial coordinate r for different impact parameter η in Schwarzschild black hole space-time. The red dot represents the photon sphere with rps = 3M.
Now, we take the Schwarzschild black hole as an example to calculate the photon sphere radius rps and shadow radius rsh. The Schwarzschild metric reads as
$\begin{eqnarray}{\rm{d}}{s}^{2}=-A(r){\rm{d}}{t}^{2}+B(r){\rm{d}}{r}^{2}+C(r)({\rm{d}}{\theta }^{2}+{\sin }^{2}\theta {\rm{d}}{\varphi }^{2}),\end{eqnarray}$
where $A(r)=1-\tfrac{2M}{r},B(r)=\tfrac{1}{1-2M/r},C(r)={r}^{2}$. The Hamiltonian ${ \mathcal H }$ of a photon propagation along null geodesics in Schwarzschild black hole space-time (1) can be expressed as
$\begin{eqnarray}{ \mathcal H }=\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}{g}^{\mu \nu }{p}_{\mu }{p}_{\nu }=\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}\left(\displaystyle \frac{{p}_{r}^{2}}{B(r)}+\displaystyle \frac{{p}_{\theta }^{2}}{C(r)}+{V}_{\mathrm{eff}}\right)=0,\end{eqnarray}$
where the effective potential Veff is defined as
$\begin{eqnarray}\begin{array}{rcl}{V}_{\mathrm{eff}} & = & -\displaystyle \frac{{E}^{2}}{A(r)}+\displaystyle \frac{{L}_{z}^{2}}{C(r){\sin }^{2}\theta }\\ & = & \displaystyle \frac{{E}^{2}}{A(r)C(r){\sin }^{2}\theta }\left(A(r){\eta }^{2}-C(r){\sin }^{2}\theta \right).\end{array}\end{eqnarray}$
$E=-{p}_{t}=-A(r)\dot{t}$ and ${L}_{z}={p}_{\phi }=C(r){\sin }^{2}\theta \dot{\varphi }$ are two constants of motion for the null geodesics motion, i.e. the energy and the z-component of the angular momentum, so the impact parameter η = Lz/E also is a constant for the photon motion.
The spherical photon orbits on the photon sphere must satisfy
$\begin{eqnarray}{V}_{\mathrm{eff}}=0,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\displaystyle \frac{\partial {V}_{\mathrm{eff}}}{\partial r}=0.\end{eqnarray}$
Moreover, the spherical photon orbits with ∂2Veff/∂r2 < 0 are unstable; the spherical photon orbits with ∂2Veff/∂r2 > 0 are stable. Without loss of generality, we consider the spherical photon orbits on the equatorial plane also known as light rings (θ = π/2). Solving the equations (4), one can get the photon sphere radius rps = 3M and the impact parameter of the spherical photon orbits on photon sphere ${\eta }_{\mathrm{ps}}=\pm 3\sqrt{3}M$. The impact parameter η > 0 represents the photon rotates counterclockwise for the observer in the north pole of Schwarzschild black hole; the η < 0 represents the photon rotates clockwise. Figure 1(b) shows the plot of the effective potential Veff with the radial coordinate r for different impact parameter η in Schwarzschild black hole space-time. The blue line in this figure represents the curve of Veff with $\eta ={\eta }_{\mathrm{ps}}=\pm 3\sqrt{3}M$, in which there is a point for ${V}_{\mathrm{eff}}=\tfrac{\partial {V}_{\mathrm{eff}}}{\partial r}=0$ and ∂2Veff/∂r2 < 0 representing the unstable spherical photon orbits (photon sphere, r = rps = 3M), marked by the red dot. The Hamiltonian ${ \mathcal H }$ (2) implies that the region of the effective potential Veff > 0 is the forbidden region for the photon motion. From figure 1(b), one can infer that the photons with impact parameter ∣η∣ > ∣ηps∣ cannot reach the event horizon from outside the photon sphere, only the photons with ∣η∣ < ∣ηps∣ can reach the event horizon, it also illustrates that the photon sphere determines the boundary of black hole shadow.
In figure 2, we show the angular radius αsh of shadow for the Schwarzschild black hole, which is calculated by Synge [78] as
$\begin{eqnarray}\sin {\alpha }_{\mathrm{sh}}=\displaystyle \frac{3\sqrt{3}M\sqrt{1-2M/{r}_{\mathrm{obs}}}}{{r}_{\mathrm{obs}}}\,\,\,\,\mathrm{for}\,\,{r}_{\mathrm{obs}}\geqslant 3M.\end{eqnarray}$
We also label the impact parameter ηps for the light rays spiraling asymptotically towards the photon sphere in figure 2, the green dotted line. For the distant observer, the angular radius αsh (5) of black hole shadow can be rewritten as
$\begin{eqnarray}\sin {\alpha }_{\mathrm{sh}}=\displaystyle \frac{| {\eta }_{\mathrm{ps}}| }{{r}_{\mathrm{obs}}}\approx {\alpha }_{\mathrm{sh}}\,\,\,\,\mathrm{for}\,\,{r}_{\mathrm{obs}}\gg M,\end{eqnarray}$
and
$\begin{eqnarray}\tan {\alpha }_{\mathrm{sh}}=\displaystyle \frac{{r}_{\mathrm{sh}}}{{r}_{\mathrm{obs}}}\approx {\alpha }_{\mathrm{sh}}\,\,\,\,\mathrm{for}\,\,{r}_{\mathrm{obs}}\gg M.\end{eqnarray}$
So the impact parameter of the photon sphere is approximately equal to the radius of the black hole shadow, rsh ≈ ∣ηps∣. It also could be derived out by moving the observer to infinity in figure 2.
Figure 2. The angular radius αsh of black hole shadow and the impact parameter ηps for the light rays spiraling asymptotically towards the photon sphere.

3. Analytical calculation for black hole shadows

Many of the current works on black hole shadows have only investigated the case that the geodesic equations for photons can separate variables, and the number of integration constants is equal to the degrees of freedom of the photon motion system, hence the system is integrable. Such as the photon motion system in Kerr black hole space-time has a third motion constant, the Carter constant [77], except for the energy E and the z-component of the angular momentum Lz. Consequently, black hole shadows in the integrable photon motion systems have analytic expressions for the boundary, and make it very convenient to study the shadows of black holes.

3.1. Shadow of a Kerr black hole

Now, we take Kerr black hole for example to analytically calculate black hole shadow. In the Boyer–Lindquist coordinates, the Kerr metric has a form
$\begin{eqnarray}\begin{array}{rcl}{\rm{d}}{s}^{2} & = & -\left(1-\displaystyle \frac{2{Mr}}{{\rho }^{2}}\right){\rm{d}}{t}^{2}+\displaystyle \frac{{\rho }^{2}}{{\rm{\Delta }}}{\rm{d}}{r}^{2}+{\rho }^{2}{\rm{d}}{\theta }^{2}\\ & & +{\sin }^{2}\theta \left({r}^{2}+{a}^{2}+\displaystyle \frac{2{Mra}{\sin }^{2}\theta }{{\rho }^{2}}\right){\rm{d}}{\phi }^{2}\\ & & -\displaystyle \frac{4{Mra}{\sin }^{2}\theta }{{\rho }^{2}}{\rm{d}}t{\rm{d}}\phi ,\end{array}\end{eqnarray}$
where
$\begin{eqnarray}{\rm{\Delta }}={a}^{2}+{r}^{2}-2{Mr},\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,{\rho }^{2}={r}^{2}+{a}^{2}{\cos }^{2}\theta .\end{eqnarray}$
M and a is the mass and spin parameter of the Kerr black hole. The Hamiltonian of a photon propagation along null geodesics in a Kerr black hole space-time can be expressed as
$\begin{eqnarray}\begin{array}{rcl}H(x,p) & = & \displaystyle \frac{1}{2}{g}^{\mu \nu }(x){p}_{\mu }{p}_{\nu }=\displaystyle \frac{{\rm{\Delta }}}{2{\rho }^{2}}{P}_{r}^{2}\\ & & +\displaystyle \frac{1}{2{\rm{\Delta }}{\rho }^{2}}{\left[({r}^{2}+{a}^{2}){P}_{t}+{{aP}}_{\phi }\right]}^{2}+\displaystyle \frac{1}{2{\rho }^{2}}{P}_{\theta }^{2}\\ & & +\displaystyle \frac{1}{2{\rho }^{2}{\sin }^{2}\theta }{\left({P}_{\phi }+{{aP}}_{t}{\sin }^{2}\theta \right)}^{2}=0.\end{array}\end{eqnarray}$
The two conserved quantities in photon motion: the energy E and the z-component of the angular momentum Lz can be obtained as
$\begin{eqnarray}\begin{array}{rcl}E & = & -{p}_{t}=-{g}_{{tt}}\dot{t}-{g}_{t\phi }\dot{\phi },\\ {L}_{z} & = & {p}_{\phi }={g}_{\phi \phi }\dot{\phi }+{g}_{\phi t}\dot{t}.\end{array}\end{eqnarray}$
With these two conserved quantities, the null geodesic equations can be written as [77]
$\begin{eqnarray}\begin{array}{rcl}\dot{t} & = & E+\displaystyle \frac{2{Mr}({a}^{2}E-{{aL}}_{z}+{{Er}}^{2})}{{\rm{\Delta }}{\rho }^{2}},\\ \dot{\phi } & = & \displaystyle \frac{2{MraE}}{{\rm{\Delta }}{\rho }^{2}}+\displaystyle \frac{{\rm{\Delta }}-{a}^{2}{\sin }^{2}\theta }{{\rm{\Delta }}{\rho }^{2}{\sin }^{2}\theta }{L}_{z},\\ R(r) & = & {\rho }^{4}{\dot{r}}^{2}={{\rm{\Delta }}}^{2}{p}_{r}^{2}=-{\rm{\Delta }}[Q+{\left({aE}-{L}_{z}\right)}^{2}]\\ & & +{\left[{{aL}}_{z}-({r}^{2}+{a}^{2})E\right]}^{2},\\ {\rm{\Theta }}(\theta ) & = & {\rho }^{4}{\dot{\theta }}^{2}={p}_{\theta }^{2}=Q-{\cos }^{2}\theta \left(\displaystyle \frac{{L}_{z}^{2}}{{\sin }^{2}\theta }-{a}^{2}{E}^{2}\right).\end{array}\end{eqnarray}$
where the quantity Q is the Carter constant that is the third conserved quantity in the null geodesics in Kerr black hole space-time [77]. It is the Carter constant Q that makes it possible to separate the variables in the null geodesic equations (12), and the photon motion system is integrable. The photon sphere determining the boundary of the black hole shadow satisfies
$\begin{eqnarray}\dot{r}=0,\,\,\,\,\,\mathrm{and}\,\,\,\,\,\ddot{r}=0,\end{eqnarray}$
which yields
$\begin{eqnarray}\begin{array}{rcl}R(r) & = & -{\rm{\Delta }}[Q+{\left({aE}-{L}_{z}\right)}^{2}]\\ & & +{\left[{{aL}}_{z}-({r}^{2}+{a}^{2})E\right]}^{2}=0,\\ R^{\prime} (r) & = & -4{Er}[{{aL}}_{z}-({r}^{2}+{a}^{2})E]\\ & & -2(r-M)[Q+{\left({aE}-{L}_{z}\right)}^{2}]=0.\end{array}\end{eqnarray}$
Solving the equations (14), we find that for the spherical orbits motion of photon the impact parameter η and the constant σ = Q/E2 have the form
$\begin{eqnarray}\begin{array}{rcl}\eta & = & \displaystyle \frac{{L}_{z}}{E}=-\displaystyle \frac{{r}^{2}(r-3M)+{a}^{2}(r+M)}{a(r-M)},\\ \sigma & = & \displaystyle \frac{Q}{{E}^{2}}=\displaystyle \frac{{r}^{3}[4{a}^{2}M-r{\left(r-3M\right)}^{2}]}{{a}^{2}{\left(r-M\right)}^{2}}.\end{array}\end{eqnarray}$
We assume that the static observer is locally at (ro, θo) in zero-angular-moment-observers (ZAMOs) reference frame [8], in which the observer can determine the coordinates of the photons in the sky. The observer basis $\{{e}_{\hat{t}},{e}_{\hat{r}},{e}_{\hat{\theta }},{e}_{\hat{\phi }}\}$ can be expanded in the coordinate basis {∂t, ∂r, ∂θ, ∂φ} as a form [19, 24, 31, 33, 3945]
$\begin{eqnarray}{e}_{\hat{\mu }}={e}_{\hat{\mu }}^{\nu }{\partial }_{\nu },\end{eqnarray}$
where the transform matrix ${e}_{\hat{\mu }}^{\nu }$ obeys to ${g}_{\mu \nu }{e}_{\hat{\alpha }}^{\mu }{e}_{\hat{\beta }}^{\nu }={\eta }_{\hat{\alpha }\hat{\beta }}$, and ${\eta }_{\hat{\alpha }\hat{\beta }}$ is the metric of Minkowski space-time. Generally, it is convenient to choose a decomposition connected to the reference frame in relation to spatial infinity, which is given by [19, 24, 31, 33, 3945]
$\begin{eqnarray}{e}_{\hat{\mu }}^{\nu }=\left(\begin{array}{cccc}\zeta & 0 & 0 & \gamma \\ 0 & {A}^{r} & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & {A}^{\theta } & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 0 & {A}^{\phi }\end{array}\right),\end{eqnarray}$
where ζ, γ, Ar, Aθ, and Aφ are real coefficients. From the Minkowski normalization
$\begin{eqnarray}{e}_{\hat{\mu }}{e}^{\hat{\nu }}={\delta }_{\hat{\mu }}^{\hat{\nu }},\end{eqnarray}$
one can obtain
$\begin{eqnarray}\begin{array}{rcl}{A}^{r} & = & \displaystyle \frac{1}{\sqrt{{g}_{{rr}}}},\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,{A}^{\theta }=\displaystyle \frac{1}{\sqrt{{g}_{\theta \theta }}},\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,{A}^{\phi }=\displaystyle \frac{1}{\sqrt{{g}_{\phi \phi }}},\\ \zeta & = & \sqrt{\displaystyle \frac{{g}_{\phi \phi }}{{g}_{t\phi }^{2}-{g}_{{tt}}{g}_{\phi \phi }}},\quad \gamma =-\displaystyle \frac{{g}_{t\phi }}{{g}_{\phi \phi }}\sqrt{\displaystyle \frac{{g}_{\phi \phi }}{{g}_{t\phi }^{2}-{g}_{{tt}}{g}_{\phi \phi }}}.\end{array}\end{eqnarray}$
Therefore, one can get the locally measured four-momentum ${p}^{\hat{\mu }}$ of a photon by the projection of its four-momentum pμ onto ${e}_{\hat{\mu }}$
$\begin{eqnarray}{p}^{\hat{t}}=-{p}_{\hat{t}}=-{e}_{\hat{t}}^{\nu }{p}_{\nu },\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,{p}^{\hat{i}}={p}_{\hat{i}}={e}_{\hat{i}}^{\nu }{p}_{\nu }.\end{eqnarray}$
With the help of equation (19), the locally measured four-momentum ${p}^{\hat{\mu }}$ can be further written as
$\begin{eqnarray}\begin{array}{rcl}{p}^{\hat{t}} & = & \zeta E-\gamma L,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,{p}^{\hat{r}}=\displaystyle \frac{1}{\sqrt{{g}_{{rr}}}}{p}_{r},\\ {p}^{\hat{\theta }} & = & \displaystyle \frac{1}{\sqrt{{g}_{\theta \theta }}}{p}_{\theta },\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,{p}^{\hat{\phi }}=\displaystyle \frac{1}{\sqrt{{g}_{\phi \phi }}}L.\end{array}\end{eqnarray}$
The spatial position of the observer in the black hole space-time is set to (ro, θo, 0) as shown in figure 3. The 3-vector $\vec{p}$ is the photon's linear momentum with components ${p}_{\hat{r}}$, ${p}_{\hat{\theta }}$ and ${p}_{\hat{\phi }}$ in the orthonormal basis $\{{e}_{\hat{r}},{e}_{\hat{\theta }},{e}_{\hat{\phi }}\}$,
$\begin{eqnarray}\vec{p}={p}^{\hat{r}}{e}_{\hat{r}}+{p}^{\hat{\theta }}{e}_{\hat{\theta }}+{p}^{\hat{\phi }}{e}_{\hat{\phi }}.\end{eqnarray}$
According to the geometry of the photon's detection, we have
$\begin{eqnarray}\begin{array}{rcl}{p}^{\hat{r}} & = & | \vec{p}| \cos \alpha \cos \beta ,\\ {p}^{\hat{\theta }} & = & | \vec{p}| \sin \alpha ,\\ {p}^{\hat{\phi }} & = & | \vec{p}| \cos \alpha \sin \beta .\end{array}\end{eqnarray}$
Figure 3. Perspective drawing of the geometric projection of the photon's linear momentum $\vec{p}$ in the observer's frame $\{{e}_{\hat{r}},{e}_{\hat{\theta }},{e}_{\hat{\phi }}\}$. The red sphere and the point O(r0, θ0, 0) denote the position of black hole and observer, respectively. The vector $\vec{p^{\prime} }$ is the projection of $\vec{p}$ onto plane $({e}_{\hat{r}},{e}_{\hat{\phi }})$ and α is the angle between $\vec{p}$ and plane $({e}_{\hat{r}},{e}_{\hat{\phi }})$, β is the angle between $\vec{p^{\prime} }$ and basis ${e}_{\hat{r}}$.
Actually, the angular coordinates (α, β) of a point in the observer's local sky define the direction of the associated light ray. The coordinates (x, y) of a point in the observer's local sky are related to its angular coordinates (α, β) by [19, 24, 31, 33, 3945]
$\begin{eqnarray}\begin{array}{rcl}x & = & -r\tan \beta {| }_{({r}_{0},{\theta }_{0})}=-r\displaystyle \frac{{p}^{\hat{\phi }}}{{p}^{\hat{r}}}{| }_{({r}_{0},{\theta }_{0})},\\ y & = & r\displaystyle \frac{\tan \alpha }{\cos \beta }{| }_{({r}_{0},{\theta }_{0})}=r\displaystyle \frac{{p}^{\hat{\theta }}}{{p}^{\hat{r}}}{| }_{({r}_{0},{\theta }_{0})}.\end{array}\end{eqnarray}$
In general, the observer is far away from the black hole, so we can take the limit r0 → ∞ . According the equations (12), (15), (21) and (24), we can get the analytic expressions for the boundary of the Kerr black hole shadow
$\begin{eqnarray}\begin{array}{rcl}x & = & -\displaystyle \frac{\eta }{\sin {\theta }_{0}},\\ y & = & \pm \sqrt{\sigma +{a}^{2}{\cos }^{2}{\theta }_{0}-{\xi }^{2}{\cot }^{2}{\theta }_{0}}.\end{array}\end{eqnarray}$
figure 4(a) shows the shadows of the Kerr black hole with a different spin parameter a for the observer's inclination angle i (θ0) = π/2 [40]. Figure 4(b) shows Kerr black hole shadows with different observer's inclination angle i for a = 0.998M [45]. One can find the shadow of the Kerr black hole is related to both the spin parameter a of the black hole and the observer's inclination angle i. As the spin parameter a increases, the shape of the black hole shadow gradually changes from a circle to a ‘D' shape for the observer on the equatorial plane. The appearance of the ‘D' shaped shadow is due to the fact that the radiuses of unstable prograde and retrograde light rings (photon circular orbits on the equatorial plane) are different, which can be expressed as
$\begin{eqnarray}{r}_{\mathrm{lr}}=2M\left(1+\cos \left[\displaystyle \frac{2}{3}\arccos \left(\pm \displaystyle \frac{a}{M}\right)\right]\right).\end{eqnarray}$
It represents the radius of prograde (retrograde) photon circular orbits when taking the ‘–' (‘+') sign.
Figure 4. (a) The shadows of Kerr black hole with a different spin parameter a for the observer's inclination angle i (θ0) = π/2 [40]. (b) The shadows of Kerr black hole with different observer's inclination angle i for a = 0.998M [45].
In addition, one can determine the spin parameter a and the observer's inclination angle θ0 of the Kerr black hole by calculating the deviation of the Kerr black hole shadow from a circle. As shown in figure 5 [13], Rs represents the radius of the Kerr black hole shadow. The deviation parameter δs = Dcs/Rs can represent the deviation of the Kerr black hole shadow from a circle. Figure 6 shows the contour plots of the radius Rs and deviation parameter δs of Kerr black hole shadow as a function of the spin parameter a and the observer's inclination angle i [13]. The plots indicate that Rs and δs can be used as observable measurements to determine the parameters of the black hole.
Figure 5. The radius of Kerr black hole shadow Rs and the deviation Dcs of Kerr black hole shadow from a circle [13].
Figure 6. The contour plots of the radius Rs and deviation parameter δs of Kerr black hole shadow as a function of the spin parameter a and the observer's inclination angle i [13].

3.2. Fundamental photon orbits

For a non-Kerr rotating black hole whose null geodesic equations are integrable, the black hole shadow can also be obtained in the same way for the calculation (10)–(25) of the Kerr black hole shadow. P. V. P. Cunha et al [10] studied the shadow of a Kerr black hole with Proca hair [10], and found black hole shadow has a cusp silhouette, shown in figure 7(a). Further analysis shows that these novel patterns in shadow are related to the non-planar bound photon orbits in some generic stationary, axisymmetric space-time, namely the fundamental photon orbits (FPOs) [10]. Actually, a fundamental photon orbit is one of the photon circular orbits on the photon sphere; all the FPOs will make up the photon sphere determining the shadow boundary, so FPOs can explain the patterns of black hole shadow shape. The left panel of figure 7(b) [10] shows ${\rm{\Delta }}\theta \equiv | {\theta }_{\max }-\tfrac{\pi }{2}| $ and rperi with the impact parameter η of FPOs for the cusp shadow (figure 7(a)), in which there are ten FPOs marked by ‘A1-A4, B1-B3, C1-C3'. Here ${\theta }_{\max }$ denotes the maximal/minimal angular coordinate of an FPO, and rperi is the perimetral radius. The right panel of figure 7(b) shows the spatial trajectories of these ten FPOs in Cartesian coordinates, which move around the black hole. The FPOs A1 and C3 are the unstable prograde and retrograde light rings shown as two black circles on the equatorial plane. Other FPOs are non-planar bound photon orbits crossing the equatorial plane. The continuum of FPOs can be split into one stable branch (the red dotted line) and two unstable branches (the green and blue lines). Obviously, one can find there exists a swallow-tail shape pattern related to FPOs in the η − Δθ plane, which yields a jump that occurred at the FPOs A4 and C1. The discontinuity in these orbits (i.e. rperi(C1) > rperi(A4)) originating from this jump induces the emergence of the cusp shadow. It is shown that the unstable FPOs determine the boundary of shadow, and also can explain the patterns of shadow shape. We studied the shadows of a Konoplya–Zhidenko rotating non-Kerr black hole, and also found the cusp edge for a black hole shadow [11]. The fundamental photon orbits have been used to study black holes for general parameterized metrics [7984], which could be beneficial to testing the Kerr hypothesis through black hole shadows. A plasma is a dispersive medium and the light rays deviate from lightlike geodesics in a way that depends on the frequency. The shadows of black holes in plasma have been also investigated in [8595].
Figure 7. The cusp shadow of a Kerr black hole with Proca hair and the fundamental photon orbits [10].

4. Numerical calculation for black hole shadows

In fact, completely integrable systems are very few in the real world. Schwarzschild or Kerr black holes could be perturbed by some extra gravitational sources (accretion disks or rings), magnetic field, scalar hair, and so on. According to the Kolmogorov–Arnold–Moser theorem [96], if any integrable system gets perturbed, the system will no longer be integrable. Now, the black hole shadows can only be calculated numerically. It is expected that the non-integrable photon motions bring some new patterns and structures in black hole shadows.

4.1. The backward ray-tracing method

For the black holes whose photon motion systems are non-integrable, black hole shadows cannot be calculated analytically. It must make use of the backward ray-tracing method [19, 24, 31, 33, 3945] to obtain the black hole shadow. In this method, the light rays are assumed to evolve from the observer backward in time and the information carried by each ray would be respectively assigned to a pixel in a final image in the observer's sky. The light rays falling down into the event horizon of a black hole correspond to black pixels composing the black hole shadow. With this spirit, we must solve numerically null geodesic equations
$\begin{eqnarray}\displaystyle \frac{{{\rm{d}}}^{2}{x}^{\alpha }}{{\rm{d}}{\tau }^{2}}+{{\rm{\Gamma }}}_{\mu \nu }^{\alpha }\displaystyle \frac{{\rm{d}}{x}^{\mu }}{{\rm{d}}\tau }\displaystyle \frac{{\rm{d}}{x}^{\nu }}{{\rm{d}}\tau }=0,\end{eqnarray}$
where τ denotes the proper time.
One can set a light-emitting celestial sphere as the light source marked by four different colored quadrants, the brown grids as longitude and latitude, and the white reference spot lies at the intersection of the four colored quadrants, which is the same as the celestial sphere in [39, 43, 47], shown in figure 8. The black hole is placed at the center of the light sphere. The observer is placed at the other intersection of the four colored quadrants. Figure 9(a) shows the image of the background light source, in which there is no black hole at the center of the light sphere, seen by the observer with the backward ray-tracing method. Figure 9(b) shows the image of the Schwarzschild black hole seen by the observer. The black disk in the center is the Schwarzschild black hole shadow; the bright-colored image is the image of the background light source. And the white circle is the Einstein ring which is the image of the white reference spot on the light sphere. Obviously, the image shows the curve of space caused by the black hole and the effect of gravitational lensing. Figure 9(c) shows the image of the Kerr black hole with spin parameter a = 0.998M seen by the observer with the inclination angle θ0 = 0. The dragging effect of the black hole can be clearly seen from the image around the black hole shadow. Figure 9(d) shows the image of the Kerr black hole with spin parameter a = 0.998M seen by the observer with the inclination angle θ0 = π/2, it exhibits a ‘D' shaped shadow.
Figure 8. The light-emitting celestial sphere marked by four different colored quadrants, the brown grids as longitude and latitude, and the white reference spot lies at the intersection of the four colored quadrants [39, 43, 47].
Figure 9. (a) The image of the background light source, in which there is no black hole at the center of the light sphere, seen by the observer with the backward ray-tracing method. (b) The image of Schwarzschild black hole seen by the observer. (c) The image of Kerr black hole with spin parameter a = 0.998M seen by the observer with the inclination angle θ0 = 0. (d) The image of Kerr black hole with spin parameter a = 0.998M seen by the observer with the inclination angle θ0 = π/2 [39, 47].

4.2. Chaotic shadows

If the perturbation of a Schwarzschild or Kerr black hole is large enough, some photon motions in the non-integrable photon motion system could become chaotic. The chaotic photon motions are very sensitive to the initial conditions and present the intrinsic random in the system. The black hole shadow will have a huge change caused by chaotic photon motions, it is very necessary to study the new essential features on the patterns and structures of black hole shadow.
We have studied numerically the shadows of a compact object with a magnetic dipole through the technique of backward ray-tracing [43]. The presence of magnetic dipole makes the dynamical system of photon motion non-integrable and affects sharply the shadow of the compact object. The Bonnor black dihole shadow is a concave disk with eyebrows with the larger magnetic dipole parameter, shown in figure 10(a). We find the boundary of shadow in the red box has some layered structures. Amplifying further this shadow boundary, some similar layered structures are found as shown in figure 10(b). We zoom in on the region within the red box in figure 10(b) to get figure 10(c), and continue to zoom in on the region within the red box in figure 10(c) to get figure 10(d). They are self-similar fractal structures caused by the chaotic photon motions. Actually, the main feature of the chaotic shadow is the self-similar fractal structures. Our results show that the chaotic motions of photons could yield the novel patterns for the black hole shadow.
Figure 10. The fractal structures in the shadow of a compact object with a magnetic dipole [43].
P. Cunha [39] studied the shadow of Kerr black holes with scalar hair. The metric functions are determined numerically by solving Einstein field equations and Klein–Gordon equations for scalar fields. The shadow of Kerr black hole with scalar hair is shown in figure 11 [39]. One can find the main shadow is shaped like a hammer, and there are many smaller eyebrow-like shadows on the top and bottom of the main shadow, which have self-similar fractal structures.
Figure 11. The shadow of Kerr black hole with scalar hair [39].
Furthermore, many scholars have studied various black hole shadows with chaotic characteristics, such as Kerr Black hole shadows in Melvin magnetic field [24], Kerr black hole shadow cast by polarized lights [26], the shadows of a Schwarzschild black hole surrounded by a Bach–Weyl ring [31], the shadows of the non-Kerr rotating compact object with quadrupole mass moment [44], binary black hole shadows [4649], and so on.

4.3. Binary black hole shadows

Nowadays, several gravitational wave events have been detected by LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA Collaborations, which are caused by binary black hole (BBH) mergers [97103] or by binary neutron star mergers [104]. It confirmed the existence of BBH in the Universe, and BBHs are expected to be common astrophysical systems.
While the shadow caused by an isolated black hole has been introduced above, what does a binary black hole looks like? D. Nittathe considered the Kastor–Traschen cosmological multiblack hole solution that is an exact solution describing the collision of maximally charged black holes with a positive cosmological constant, and computed the shadows of the colliding of the two black holes [46]. Figure 12 shows the variation of black hole shadows with time t during the collision of the two equal mass black holes. At t = 0 and 1.6, the two black holes are far enough apart that their shadows do not merge. However, one can find that each shadow is a little bit elongated due to the interaction between the two black holes. At t = 3.7 and 5.3, the eyebrowlike shadows appear around the main shadows and grow as the two black holes come close to each other. One can find the two shadows still not merge, and photons can go through between the main shadows. When t = 14.5, two main shadows have merged, and the fractal structures emerge on the boundary of the main shadow and eyebrowlike shadows. When t = 16, the black hole shadow finally turns into a single black disk.
Figure 12. The variation of black hole shadows with time t during the collision of two equal mass black holes [46].
A. Bohn used the simulation of binary black holes inspiral space-time in Taylor's work [105] to research the shadows of BBHs systems of two non-rotating black holes and two rotating black holes [47]. Figure 13 shows the shadows of BBH with the mass ratio m1/m2 = 3 and the spin parameters a1 = 0.7 and a2 = 0.3 respectively [47]. The orbital angular momentum points out of the page in figure 13(a), and points up in figure 13(b). From figure 13, one also can find the main shadows and eyebrowlike shadows with the fractal structures.
Figure 13. The shadows of BBH with the mass ratio m1/m2 = 3 and the spin parameters a1 = 0.7 and a2 = 0.3 respectively. The orbital angular momentum points out of the page in figure (a), and points up in figure (b) [47].
J. O. Shipley [48] researched the shadows of Majumdar–Papapetrou binary black hole that is a solution of two extremally charged black holes in static equilibrium, in which gravitational attraction and electrostatic repulsion are in balance. They explained the eyebrowlike shadows form because lights bypass one black hole of BBH and enter the other. Figure 14 shows the shadow of the Majumdar–Papapetrou binary black hole [48], in which the green regions represent the shadow of one black hole of Majumdar–Papapetrou BBH and the purple regions represent the shadow of the other black hole.
Figure 14. The shadow of Majumdar–Papapetrou binary black hole [48]. The green regions represent the shadow of one black hole of Majumdar–Papapetrou BBH and the purple regions represent the shadow of the other black hole.
P.V.P. Cunha [49] researched the shadows of double-Schwarzschild and double-Kerr black holes which are separated by a conical singularity. Figure 15 shows the shadows of double-Kerr black holes with equal spins (figure (a)) and with opposite spins (figure (b)) [49].
Figure 15. The shadows of double-Kerr black holes with equal spins (figure (a)) and with opposite spins (figure (b)) [49].

4.4. The invariant phase space structures

The invariant phase space structures are one of the important features of dynamical systems, which are applied extensively in the design of the space trajectory of various spacecraft, so they are also applicable to the study of light propagation. J. Grover's investigation [75] shows that the invariant phase space structures play an important role in the emergence of shadow of Kerr black holes with scalar hair. We also studied the invariant phase space structures in the space-time of the compact object with magnetic dipole [43] and found they are associated with the concave shadow with eyebrows (figure 10(a)). The invariant phase space structures include fixed points, periodic orbits and invariant manifolds. The fixed points are the simplest invariant phase space structure which satisfies the following conditions:
$\begin{eqnarray}{\dot{x}}^{\mu }=\displaystyle \frac{\partial H}{\partial {p}_{\mu }}=0,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,{\dot{p}}_{\mu }=-\displaystyle \frac{\partial H}{\partial {x}^{\mu }}=0,\end{eqnarray}$
where qμ = (t, r, θ, φ) and pν = (pt, pr, pθ, pφ). In black hole space-time, the photon circular orbits on the equatorial plane named light rings are fixed points (rlr, π/2, 0, 0) for the photon motion [10, 75]. By linearizing the equations (28), one can obtain
$\begin{eqnarray}\dot{{\bf{X}}}=J{\bf{X}},\end{eqnarray}$
where X = (qμ, pν) and J is the Jacobian. The periodic orbits and invariant manifolds can be determined by the eigenvalues μj of the Jacobian J. The invariant manifolds are invariant under the dynamics, in which there is no trajectory that can cross the invariant manifolds. If the real part of the eigenvalue of the Jacobian J in the linearized equation (29) is less than zero ($\mathrm{Re}({\mu }_{j})\lt 0$), the corresponding eigenspace is an unstable invariant manifold; if $\mathrm{Re}({\mu }_{j})\gt 0$, the corresponding eigenspace is a stable invariant manifold; if $\mathrm{Re}({\mu }_{j})=0$, the corresponding eigenspace is center manifold. Points in unstable (stable) invariant manifold exponentially approach the fixed points in backward (forward) time. According to Lyapunov central theorem, each purely imaginary eigenvalue gives rise to a one-parameter family γε of periodic orbits, the center manifold, which is also known as the Lyapunov family [75], and the orbit γε collapses into a fixed point as ε → 0. Figure 16(a) exhibits the fixed point(black dot), the periodic orbits(the center manifold, black circles), the stable invariant manifold(green lines), and the unstable invariant manifold(red lines). In addition, the periodic orbits also have their own stable and unstable manifolds. As shown in figure 16(b), the green(red) surfaces represent the stable(unstable) manifolds of the periodic orbit (black circle), which exponentially approach the periodic orbit in backward (forward) time [75].
Figure 16. (a) The fixed point(black dot), the periodic orbits (the center manifold, black circles), the stable invariant manifold (green lines) and the unstable invariant manifold (red lines). (b) Stable (green) and unstable (red) manifolds of a periodic orbit (black circle) [75].
In the photon motion system in the space-time of the compact object with a magnetic dipole, there are two fixed points, the counterclockwise and clockwise rotation light rings, shown in figure 17(green dots) [43]. The solid green lines denote a family of periodic Lyapunov orbits arising from the two light rings, which can be parameterized by impact parameter η shown in figure 17. Actually, these periodic Lyapunov orbits are the fundamental photon orbits that make up the photon sphere, so they are responsible for determining the boundary of the black hole shadow.
Figure 17. Light rings (dots) and the corresponding family of periodic Lyapunov orbits (solid line) in the space-time of Bonnor black dihole [43].
Figure 18(a) shows a projection of the unstable invariant manifold (green lines) associated with the periodic orbit for η = −6(red line) in the plane (X, θ) [43], where X is a compactified radial coordinate defined as $X=\sqrt{{r}^{2}-{r}_{h}^{2}}/(1+\sqrt{{r}^{2}-{r}_{h}^{2}})$ [75]. From this figure, one can find the unstable invariant manifold builds a bridge between the photon sphere and the observer with X → 1(black dot). So the cross-sections of unstable invariant manifolds at the observer's radial position could reflect the shape of the black hole shadow. Figure 18(b) shows the Poincaré section(green) at the observers radial position in the plane (θ, pθ) for the unstable invariant manifold of the periodic orbit with η = −6. Moreover, there exists a white region showing a ‘S' shape which corresponds to photons moving outside the unstable invariant manifold. The intersection of the dashed line $\theta =\tfrac{\pi }{2}$ with the unstable manifold denotes the trajectories with η = −6 which can be detected by the observer on the equatorial plane. The shadow of the Bonnor black dihole observed on the equatorial plane is shown in figure 18(c), which is marked with the line for η = −6. One can find the region of the unstable manifold that the dashed line $\theta =\tfrac{\pi }{2}$ passes through in figure 18(b) corresponds to the part of the black hole shadow that the line η = −6 passes through in figure 18(c). And the anchor-like bright zone in the black hole shadow in figure 18(c) originated from the top, middle and bottom parts of the ‘S' shaped white region in the Poincaré section, figure 18(b). It indicates that the formation of black hole shadow is related to the invariant manifolds of certain Lyapunov orbits near the fixed points.
Figure 18. (a) Projection of the unstable invariant manifold (green lines) associated with the periodic orbit for η = −6 (red line) [43]. The dark region is the forbid region of the photon and the black dot represents the position of the observer. (b) The Poincaré section (green) at the observers radial position in the plane (θ, pθ) for the unstable invariant manifold of the periodic orbit with η = −6. (c) The shadow of the Bonnor black dihole observed on the equatorial plane, is marked with the line for η = −6.

5. Summary

In this review, we briefly described the formation and the calculation methods of black hole shadow. We first introduced the conception of black hole shadow, and the great importance of black hole shadow for the study of astrophysics and black hole physics. We also introduced the current works on various black hole shadows. Then we took a Schwarzschild black hole shadow as an example to calculate the photon sphere radius rps and shadow radius rsh, and explained that the boundary of the shadow is determined by the photon sphere composed of the unstable photon circular orbits. Next, we took a Kerr black hole shadow as an example to review the analytical calculation for black hole shadow, it has analytic expressions for shadow boundary due to the integrable photon motion system. And we introduced the fundamental photon orbits which can explain the patterns of black hole shadow shape. Finally, we review the numerical calculation of black hole shadows with the backward ray-tracing method and introduce some chaotic black hole shadows with self-similar fractal structures cast by chaotic lensing. Since LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA Collaborations have detected the gravitational waves from the merger of a binary black hole (BBH), we introduced a couple of shadows of BBHs. They all have the eyebrowlike shadows around the main shadows with the fractal structures. We computed the invariant phase space structures of the photon motion system in black hole space-time and explained the formation of black hole shadow is related to the invariant manifolds of certain Lyapunov orbits near the fixed points.
We hope the black hole shadows obtained by theoretical calculation could provide some theoretical templates for the future astronomical observations announced by the upgraded Event Horizon Telescope and BlackHoleCam. And then the study of black hole shadow could promote the development of black hole physics and verify various gravity theories.

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 12105151, 1187026, 11875025 and 12035005, and the Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. ZR2020QA080.

1

2
(The Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration) 2019 First M87 event horizon telescope results. I. The shadow of the supermassive black hole Astrophys. J. Lett. 875 L1

DOI

3
(The Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration) 2019 First M87 event horizon telescope results. II. Array and instrumentation Astrophys. J. Lett. 875 L2

DOI

4
(The Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration) 2019 First M87 event horizon telescope results. III. Data processing and calibration Astrophys. J. Lett. 875 L3

DOI

5
(The Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration) 2019 First M87 event horizon telescope results. IV. Imaging the central supermassive black hole Astrophys. J. Lett. 875 L4

DOI

6
(The Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration) 2019 First M87 event horizon telescope results. V. Physical origin of the asymmetric ring Astrophys. J. Lett. 875 L5

DOI

7
(The Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration) 2019 First M87 event horizon telescope results. VI. The shadow and mass of the central black hole Astrophys. J. Lett. 875 L6

DOI

8
Bardeen J M 1973 Timelike and null geodesics in the Kerr metric Black Holes (Les Astres Occlus) DeWitt C DeWitt B New York Gordon and Breach 215 239

9
Chandrasekhar S 1992 The Mathematical Theory of Black Holes New York Oxford University Press

10
Cunha P V P Herdeiro C A R Radu E 2017 Fundamental photon orbits: black hole shadows and spacetime instabilities Phys. Rev. D 96 024039

DOI

11
Wang M Chen S Jing J 2017 Shadow casted by a Konoplya–Zhidenko rotating non-Kerr black hole J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 10 051

DOI

12
Li Z Bambi C 2014 Measuring the Kerr spin parameter of regular black holes from their shadow J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 1401 041

DOI

13
Hioki K Maeda K I 2009 Measurement of the kerr spin parameter by observation of a compact object's shadow Phys. Rev. D 80 024042

DOI

14
Konoplya R A 2019 Shadow of a black hole surrounded by dark matter Phys. Lett. B 795 1

DOI

15
Hou X Xu Z Zhou M Wang J 2018 Black hole shadow of Sgr A* in dark matter halo J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. JCAP07(2018)015

DOI

16
Jusufi K Jamil M Salucci P Zhu T Haroon S 2019 Black Hole surrounded by a dark matter halo in the M87 galactic center and its identification with shadow images Phys. Rev. D 100 044012

DOI

17
Amarilla L Eiroa E F Giribet G 2010 Null geodesics and shadow of a rotating black hole in extended Chern–Simons modified gravity Phys. Rev. D 81 124045

DOI

18
Dastan S A Saffari R Soroushfar S Shadow of a charged rotating black hole in f(R) gravity arXiv:1606.06994

19
Long F Chen S Wang M Jing J 2020 Shadow of a disformal Kerr black hole in quadratic DHOST theories Eur. Phys. J. C 80 1180

DOI

20
Stepanian A Khlghatyan Sh Gurzadyan V G 2021 Black hole shadow to probe modified gravity Eur. Phys. J. Plus 136 127

DOI

21
Prokopov V Alexeyev S Zenin O Black Hole shadows: how to fix the extended gravity theory arXiv:2107.01115

22
Younsi Z Psaltis D Özel F Black Hole images as tests of general relativity: effects of spacetime geometry arXiv:2111.01752

23
Junior H C D L Cunha P V P Herdeiro C A R Crispino L C B 2021 Shadows and lensing of black holes immersed in strong magnetic fields Phys. Rev. D 104 044018

DOI

24
Wang M Chen S Jing J 2021 Kerr Black hole shadows in Melvin magnetic field with stable photon orbits Phys. Rev. D 104 084021

DOI

25
Perlick V Tsupko O Y Bisnovatyi-Kogan G S 2015 Influence of a plasma on the shadow of a spherically symmetric black hole Phys. Rev. D 92 104031

DOI

26
Chen S Wang M Jing J 2020 Polarization effects in Kerr black hole shadow due to the coupling between photon and bumblebee field J. High Energy Phys. JHEP07(2020)054

DOI

27
Grenzebach A Perlick V Lammerzahl C 2014 Photon regions and shadows of Kerr–Newman-nut black holes with a cosmological constant Phys. Rev. D 89 124004

DOI

28
Perlick V Tsupko O Y Bisnovatyi-Kogan G S 2018 Black hole shadow in an expanding universe with a cosmological constant Phys. Rev. D 97 104062

DOI

29
Li P C Guo M Y Chen B 2020 Shadow of a spinning black hole in an expanding universe Phys. Rev. D 101 084041

DOI

30
Luminet J P 1979 Image of a spherical black hole with thin accretion disk Astron. Astrophys. 75 228

31
Wang M Chen S Wang J Jing J 2020 Shadow of a Schwarzschild black hole surrounded by a Bach-Weyl ring Eur. Phys. J. C 80 110

DOI

32
Cunha P V P Eiro N A Herdeiro C A R Lemos J P S 2020 Lensing and shadow of a black hole surrounded by a heavy accretion disk J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. JCAP03(2020)035

DOI

33
Wang M Chen S Wang J Jing J 2021 Effect of gravitational wave on shadow of a Schwarzschild black hole Eur. Phys. J. C 81 509

DOI

34
Nedkova P G Tinchev V Yazadjiev S S 2013 The shadow of a rotating traversable wormhole Phys. Rev. D 88 124019

DOI

35
Gyulchev G Nedkova P Tinchev V Yazadjiev S 2018 On the shadow of rotating traversable wormholes Eur. Phys. J. C 78 544

DOI

36
Shaikh R 2018 Shadows of rotating wormholes Phys. Rev. D 98 024044

DOI

37
Ortiz N Sarbach O Zannias T 2015 Shadow of a naked singularity Phys. Rev. D 92 044035

DOI

38
Dey D Shaikh R Joshi P S 2021 Shadow of nulllike and timelike naked singularities without photon spheres Phys. Rev. D 103 024015

DOI

39
Cunha P V P Herdeiro C A R Radu E Runarsson H F 2015 Shadows of Kerr black holes with scalar hair Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 211102

DOI

40
Cunha P V P Herdeiro C A R Radu E Runarsson H F 2016 Shadows of Kerr black holes with and without scalar hair Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 25 1641021

DOI

41
Vincent F H Gourgoulhon E Herdeiro C A R Radu E 2016 Astrophysical imaging of Kerr black holes with scalar hair Phys. Rev. D 94 084045

DOI

42
Cunha P V P Grover J Herdeiro C A R Radu E Runarsson H Wittig A 2016 Chaotic lensing around boson stars and Kerr black holes with scalar hair Phys. Rev. D 94 104023

DOI

43
Wang M Chen S Jing J 2018 Shadows of Bonnor black dihole by chaotic lensing Phys. Rev. D 97 064029

DOI

44
Wang M Chen S Jing J 2018 Chaotic shadow of a non-Kerr rotating compact object with quadrupole mass moment Phys. Rev. D 98 104040

DOI

45
Johannsen T 2013 Photon rings around kerr and kerr-like Black Holes Astrophys. J. 777 170

DOI

46
Nitta D Chiba T Sugiyama N 2011 Shadows of colliding Black Holes Phys. Rev. D 84 063008

DOI

47
Bohn A Throwe W Hbert F Henriksson K Bunandar D 2015 What does a binary black hole merger look like? Class. Quantum Grav. 32 065002

DOI

48
Shipley J O Dolan S R 2016 Binary black hole shadows, chaotic scattering and the Cantor set Class. Quantum Grav. 33 175001

DOI

49
Nitta D Chiba T Sugiyama N 2018 Shadows of exact binary Black Holes Phys. Rev. D 98 044053

DOI

50
Falcke H Melia F Agol E 2000 Viewing the shadow of the Black Hole at the galactic center Astrophys. J. 528 L13

DOI

51
de Vries A 2000 The apparent shape of a rotating charged black hole, closed photon orbits and the bifurcation set A4 Class. Quant. Grav. 17 123

DOI

52
Takahashi R 2004 Shapes and positions of Black Hole shadows in accretion disks and spin parameters of Black Holes Astrophys. J. 611 996

DOI

53
Bambi C Freese K 2009 Apparent shape of super-spinning black holes Phys. Rev. D 79 043002

DOI

54
Amarilla L Eiroa E F 2012 Shadow of a rotating braneworld black hole Phys. Rev. D 85 064019

DOI

55
Eiroa E F Sendra C M 2018 Shadow cast by rotating braneworld black holes with a cosmological constant Eur. Phys. J. C 78 91

DOI

56
Yumoto A Nitta D Chiba T Sugiyama N 2012 Shadows of multi-black holes: analytic exploration Phys. Rev. D 86 103001

DOI

57
Amarilla L Eiroa E F 2013 Shadow of a Kaluza–Klein rotating dilaton black hole Phys. Rev. D 87 044057

DOI

58
Tinchev V K Yazadjiev S S 2014 Possible imprints of cosmic strings in the shadows of galactic black holes Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 23 1450060

DOI

59
Wei S W Liu Y X 2013 Observing the shadow of Einstein–Maxwell–Dilaton–Axion black hole J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 11 063

DOI

60
Huang Y Chen S Jing J 2016 Double shadow of a regular phantom black hole as photons couple to Weyl tensor Eur. Phys. J. C 76 594

DOI

61
Younsi Z Zhidenko A Rezzolla L Konoplya R Mizuno Y 2016 A new method for shadow calculations: application to parameterised axisymmetric black holes Phys. Rev. D 94 084025

DOI

62
Abdujabbarov A Amir M Ahmedov B Ghosh S G 2016 Shadow of rotating regular black holes Phys. Rev. D 93 104004

DOI

63
Abdujabbarov A Rezzolla L Ahmedov B 2015 A coordinate-independent characterization of a black hole shadow Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 454 2423

DOI

64
Atamurotov F Ahmedov B Abdujabbarov A 2015 Optical properties of black hole in the presence of plasma: shadow Phys. Rev. D 92 084005

DOI

65
Abdujabbarov A Atamurotov F Dadhich N Ahmedov B Stuchlík Z 2015 Energetics and optical properties of 6-dimensional rotating black hole in pure Gauss–Bonnet gravity Eur. Phys. J. C 75 399

DOI

66
Atamurotov F Abdujabbarov A Ahmedov B 2013 Shadow of rotating non-Kerr black hole Phys. Rev. D 88 064004

DOI

67
Tsukamoto N 2018 Black hole shadow in an asymptotically-flat, stationary, and axisymmetric spacetime: the Kerr–Newman and rotating regular black holes Phys. Rev. D 97 064021

DOI

68
Cunha1 P V P Herdeiro C A R 2018 Shadows and strong gravitational lensing: a brief review Gen. Rel. Grav. 50 42

DOI

69
Wei S W Liu Y X Mann R B 2019 Intrinsic curvature and topology of shadow in Kerr spacetime Phys. Rev. D 99 041303

DOI

70
Wei S W Zou Y C Liu Y X Mann R B 2019 Curvature radius and Kerr black hole shadow J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. JCAP08(2019)030

DOI

71
Roy R Yajnik U A 2020 Evolution of black hole shadow in the presence of ultralight bosons Phys. Lett. B 803 135284

DOI

72
Long F Wang J Chen S Jing J 2019 Shadow of a rotating squashed Kaluza–Klein black hole J. High Energy Phys. JHEP10(2019)269

DOI

73
Zeng X X Zhang H Q 2020 Influence of quintessence dark energy on the shadow of black hole Eur. Phys. J. C 80 1058

DOI

74
Zeng X X Zhang H Q Zhang H 2020 Shadows and photon spheres with spherical accretions in the four-dimensional Gauss–Bonnet black hole Eur. Phys. J. C 80 872

DOI

75
Grover J Wittig A 2017 Black Hole shadows and invariant phase space structures Phys. Rev. D 96 024045

DOI

76

77
Carter B 1968 Global structure of the kerr family of gravitational fields Phys. Rev. 174 1559 1571

DOI

78
Synge J L 1966 The escape of photons from gravitationally intense stars Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 131 463

DOI

79
Li S Abdujabbarov A A Han W B 2021 Qualifying ringdown and shadow of black holes under general parametrized metrics with photon orbits Eur. Phys. J. C 81 649

DOI

80
Bambi C Testing the kerr paradigm with the Black Hole shadow arXiv:1507.05257 [gr-qc]

81
Ghasemi-Nodehi M Li Z Bambi C 2015 Shadows of CPR black holes and tests of the Kerr metric Eur. Phys. J. C 75 315

DOI

82
Kumar R Ghosh S G 2020 Black Hole parameter estimation from its shadow Astrophys. J. 892 78

DOI

83
Medeiros L Psaltis D Özel F 2020 A Parametric model for the shapes of black-hole shadows in non-Kerr spacetimes Astrophys. J. 896 1

DOI

84
Carson Zack Yagi Kent 2020 Asymptotically flat, parameterized black hole metric preserving Kerr symmetries Phys. Rev. D 101 084030

DOI

85
Atamurotov F Jusufi K Jamil M Abdujabbarov A Azreg-Aïnou M 2021 Axion-plasmon or magnetized plasma effect on an observable shadow and gravitational lensing of a Schwarzschild black hole Phys. Rev. D 104 064053

DOI

86
Wang H M Wei S W 2022 Shadow cast by Kerr-like black hole in the presence of plasma in Einstein-bumblebee gravity Eur. Phys. J. Plus 137 571 arXiv:2106.14602

87
Badía J Eiroa E F 2021 Shadow of axisymmetric, stationary and asymptotically flat black holes in the presence of plasma Phys. Rev. D 104 084055

DOI

88
Li Q Zhu Y Wang T 2022 Gravitational effect of a plasma on the shadow of Schwarzschild black holes Eur. Phys. J. C 82 2

DOI

89
Chowdhuri A Bhattacharyya A 2021 Shadow analysis for rotating black holes in the presence of plasma for an expanding universe Phys. Rev. D 104 064039

DOI

90
Bisnovatyi-Kogan G S Tsupko O Y 2017 Gravitational lensing in presence of plasma: strong lens systems, black hole lensing and shadow Universe 3 57

DOI

91
Huang Y Dong Y P Liu D J 2018 Revisiting the shadow of a black hole in the presence of a plasma Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 27 1850114

DOI

92
Perlick V Tsupko O Y 2017 Light propagation in a plasma on Kerr spacetime: Separation of the Hamilton-Jacobi equation and calculation of the shadow Phys. Rev. D 95 104003

DOI

93
Atamurotov F Ahmedov B Abdujabbarov A 2015 Optical properties of black hole in the presence of plasma: shadow Phys. Rev. D 92 084005

DOI

94
Perlick V Tsupko O Y Bisnovatyi-Kogan G S 2015 Influence of a plasma on the shadow of a spherically symmetric black hole Phys. Rev. D 92 104031

DOI

95
Atamurotov F Abdujabbarov A Han W B 2021 Effect of plasma on gravitational lensing by a Schwarzschild black hole immersed in perfect fluid dark matter Phys. Rev. D 104 084015

DOI

96
Kolmogorov A N 1954 Dokl. Akad. Nauk. SSSR 98 527

Arnold V I 1963 Russian Math. Survey 18 85 191

DOI

Moser J 1962 Nachr. Akad. Wiss. Gttingen Math.-Phys. Kl. II 1 20

97
Abbott B P (LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration) 2016 Observation of gravitational waves from a binary Black Hole merger Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 061102

DOI

98
Abbott B P (LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration) 2016 GW150914: the advanced LIGO detectors in the era of first discoveries Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 131103

DOI

99
Abbott B P (LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration) 2016 GW150914: First results from the search for binary black hole coalescence with Advanced LIGO Phys. Rev. D 93 122003

DOI

100
Abbott B P (LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration) 2016 GW151226: observation of gravitational waves from a 22-Solar-Mass binary Black Hole coalescence Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 241103

DOI

101
Abbott B P (LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration) 2017 GW170104: Observation of a 50-Solar-Mass Binary Black Hole Coalescence at Redshift 0.2 Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 221101

DOI

102
Abbott B P (LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration) 2017 GW170608: Observation of a 19 solar-mass binary black hole coalescence Astrophys. J. 851 L35

DOI

103
Abbott B P (LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration) 2017 GW170814: a three-detector observation of gravitational waves from a binary black hole coalescence Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 141101

DOI

104
Abbott B P (LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration) 2017 GW170817: observation of gravitational waves from a binary neutron star inspiral Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 161101

DOI

105
Taylor N W Boyle M Reisswig C Scheel M A Chu T Kidder L E Szilágyi B 2013 Comparing gravitational waveform extrapolation to Cauchy-characteristic extraction in binary black hole simulations Phys. Rev. D 88 124010

DOI

Outlines

/