Welcome to visit Communications in Theoretical Physics,
Atomic, Molecular, Optical (AMO) and Plasma Physics, Chemical Physics

Investigation of the Rayleigh-Taylor instability in charged fluids

  • Weiping Zhang , 1, ,
  • Zhongzheng Li 2 ,
  • Wenshan Duan , 1,
Expand
  • 1College of Physics and Electronics Engineering, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou 730070, China
  • 2Department of Physics, Gansu Normal University For Nationalities, Hezuo 747000, China

Authors to whom any correspondence should be addressed.

Received date: 2023-06-10

  Revised date: 2023-08-18

  Accepted date: 2023-08-22

  Online published: 2023-09-20

Copyright

© 2023 Institute of Theoretical Physics CAS, Chinese Physical Society and IOP Publishing

Abstract

The present study shows that the Rayleigh-Taylor (RT) instability and its growth rate are strongly dependent on the charge-mass ratio of charged particles in a charged fluid. A higher charge-mass ratio of the charged fluid appears to result in a stronger effect of the magnetic field to suppress the RT instability. We study the RT instabilities for both dusty plasma (small charge-mass ratio of charged particles) and ion-electron plasma (large charge-mass ratio of charged particles). It is found that the impact of the external magnetic field to suppress the RT instability for ion-electron plasma is much greater than that for dusty plasma. It is also shown that, for a dusty plasma, in addition to region parameters such as the external magnetic field, region length, its gradient, as well as dust particle parameters such as number density, mass, and charge of dust particles, the growth rate of the RT instability in a dusty plasma also depends on parameters of both electrons and ions such as the number densities and temperatures of both electrons and ions.

Cite this article

Weiping Zhang , Zhongzheng Li , Wenshan Duan . Investigation of the Rayleigh-Taylor instability in charged fluids[J]. Communications in Theoretical Physics, 2023 , 75(10) : 105501 . DOI: 10.1088/1572-9494/acf288

1. Introduction

A dusty plasma is a unique type of plasma that consists of three distinct components: electrons, ions, and charged dust particles. These dust particles are typically found within a size range of nanometers to several hundreds of micrometers [1, 2]. Dusty plasma, also known as complex plasma, has been the subject of extensive research over the past decades [35]. Dusty plasma is present in a wide range of cosmic environments [3, 68], including the solar system [6], planetary rings [3, 7], interstellar clouds, circumstellar clouds and various space environments [8]. Understanding the properties and behavior of dusty plasmas is crucial for our understanding of many natural phenomena in space.
There are significant differences between dusty plasma and ion-electron plasma due to the relatively large mass of dust particles [911] compared to electrons and ions. One of the obvious differences of the dusty plasma is that the influence of gravity on a dust particle cannot be ignored, particularly on Earth. What is more important is that dusty plasma exhibits complex behavior, including dust acoustic waves [4], dust ion acoustic waves [12], and others [5, 1317]. These unique properties make dusty plasma an intriguing subject for research in astrophysics, space science, and plasma physics.
Over the past few years, researchers have studied a binary dusty plasma that contains two types of microparticles of different sizes [18, 19]. This binary dusty plasma can either be mixed [2022] or form a phase-separated system [2326]. The separation may be caused by spinodal decomposition [25] or an imbalance of external forces [26]. In the latter case, an interface emerges between the separated phases.
As is widely recognized, the Rayleigh-Taylor (RT) instability is a hydrodynamic instability that occurs at the interface between two fluids of different densities when the lighter fluid is accelerated to move into the denser fluid due to an external force [2729]. This instability is a result of the growth of small perturbations or waves that occur at the interface, causing the fluids to mix and form complex patterns. The RT instability has significant applications in various scientific and engineering fields [3036], including astrophysics [37], plasma physics [3841], and others [4246]. Understanding the RT instability is essential for predicting and controlling the behavior of fluids in these applications. Furthermore, there have been many studies on the RT instability in dusty plasmas [27, 28, 4749]. For instance, the stability of stratified dust clouds suspended in anode plasma was analyzed, and the RT instability was detected [28]. Additionally, the RT instability finds broad applications in inertial confinement fusion [50, 51], laboratory plasma [52, 53], as well as astrophysical settings like crab nebulae [54] and supernova remnants [55].
Research on RT instability in dusty plasmas has been conducted [56], and while recent studies have investigated this phenomenon, the effects of external magnetic and electric fields on RT instability are still unclear. The present paper aims to study the influence of the magnetic field on RT instability and has found that the charge-mass ratio of the charged particles in the plasma plays a significant role in RT instability and its growth rate. It is worth noting that the larger the charge-mass ratio of the charged particles, the greater the effect of the magnetic field in suppressing the RT instability. Thus, the external magnetic field's ability to suppress the RT instability in ion-electron plasma is much stronger than in dusty plasma. In addition, it has been discovered that in a dusty plasma, the RT instability and its growth rate are influenced not only by region parameters (such as the external magnetic field, the length and gradient of the region) and dust particle parameters (such as dust particle number density, mass, and charge), but also by electron and ion parameters, including their number densities and temperatures.

2. Theoretical model

2.1. RT instability in a dusty plasma

We will study two typical charged fluids. One is the dusty plasma, the other is ion-electron plasma. Following, we first study RT instability in a dusty plasma, which is composed of dust particles, free electrons, and free ions.
Dusty plasma has been found in space plasma, as well as in the laboratory on earth [5761]. However, it is difficult to form three-dimensional dusty plasma lattice in the laboratory on Earth because of the asymmetric gravity acting on dust particles. Recently, three-dimensional dusty plasma lattices have been achieved under micro-gravity conditions [24] in the Russian-German PK-3 Plus Laboratory aboard the International Space Station (ISS). Furthermore, an interface emerges between two separated phases [18, 19].
To investigate the RT instability at an interface in a dusty plasma, we make the assumption that both electrons and ions can be treated as light fluids that follow the Boltzmann distribution, ${n}_{e}={n}_{e0}\exp \left(\tfrac{e\phi }{{k}_{{\rm{B}}}{T}_{e}}\right)$, ${n}_{i}={n}_{i0}\exp \left(-\tfrac{e\phi }{{k}_{{\rm{B}}}{T}_{i}}\right)$, where ne, ni are the electron number density and ion number density, Te, Ti are the temperatures of electrons and ions, φ is electrostatic potential and kB is Boltzmann constant.
To describe this type of dusty plasma, we utilize the generalized hydrodynamic model, which takes into account the forces produced by the pressure gradient as well as those produced by the electric and magnetic fields acting on the dust particles. The resulting momentum equation for a dusty plasma can be expressed as follows
$\begin{eqnarray}\begin{array}{l}\displaystyle \frac{\partial \vec{u}}{\partial t}+\left(\vec{u}\cdot {\rm{\nabla }}\right)\vec{u}=-\displaystyle \frac{1}{{m}_{d}{n}_{d}}{\rm{\nabla }}{P}_{d}\\ \quad +\displaystyle \frac{{Z}_{d}e}{{m}_{d}}\left({\rm{\nabla }}\phi -\vec{u}\times \vec{B}\right)-\vec{g},\end{array}\end{eqnarray}$
where $\vec{u}$ is the velocity of the dust fluid. Here we assume that $\vec{u}={v}_{d}{\vec{e}}_{y}+{w}_{d}{\vec{e}}_{z}$, ${\vec{e}}_{y}$ and ${\vec{e}}_{z}$ are unit vectors in the y direction and in the z direction respectively.
We consider a model shown in figure 1, where α is the interface, the region I is from z = β to z = α, while the region II is from z = α to z = α + Δ. The gravity force is along the negative direction of the z-axis.
Figure 1. The RT model of two regions. The region I is from z = β to z = α, while the region II is from z = α to z = α + Δ.
For simplicity and generality, we study the waves propagating only in the yoz plane, i.e. the wave number $\vec{k}=(0,{k}_{y},{k}_{z})$. Then the hydrodynamic equations to describe this kind of dusty plasma are as follows
$\begin{eqnarray}\displaystyle \frac{\partial {n}_{d}}{\partial t}+\displaystyle \frac{\partial \left({n}_{d}{v}_{d}\right)}{\partial y}+\displaystyle \frac{\partial \left({n}_{d}{w}_{d}\right)}{\partial z}=0,\end{eqnarray}$
$\begin{eqnarray}\begin{array}{l}\displaystyle \frac{\partial {v}_{d}}{\partial t}+{v}_{d}\displaystyle \frac{\partial {v}_{d}}{\partial y}+{w}_{d}\displaystyle \frac{\partial {v}_{d}}{\partial z}\\ \quad =\displaystyle \frac{{Z}_{d}e}{{m}_{d}}\left(\displaystyle \frac{\partial \phi }{\partial y}\ -\ {w}_{d}{B}_{x}\right)-\displaystyle \frac{1}{{m}_{d}{n}_{d}}\displaystyle \frac{\partial {P}_{d}}{\partial y},\end{array}\end{eqnarray}$
$\begin{eqnarray}\begin{array}{l}\displaystyle \frac{\partial {w}_{d}}{\partial t}+{v}_{d}\displaystyle \frac{\partial {w}_{d}}{\partial y}+{w}_{d}\displaystyle \frac{\partial {w}_{d}}{\partial z}\\ \quad =\displaystyle \frac{{Z}_{d}e}{{m}_{d}}\left(\displaystyle \frac{\partial \phi }{\partial z}+{v}_{d}{B}_{x}\right)-\displaystyle \frac{1}{{m}_{d}{n}_{d}}\displaystyle \frac{\partial {P}_{d}}{\partial z}-g,\end{array}\end{eqnarray}$
$\begin{eqnarray}\displaystyle \frac{{\partial }^{2}\phi }{\partial {y}^{2}}+\displaystyle \frac{{\partial }^{2}\phi }{\partial {z}^{2}}=\displaystyle \frac{e}{{\varepsilon }_{0}}\left({Z}_{d}{n}_{d}+{n}_{e}-{n}_{i}\right),\end{eqnarray}$
where nd refers to the number density of the dust particles, md is the mass of the dust particles, pd is the dust fluid pressure, vd, wd are the velocities of the dust fluid in the y direction and in the z direction, respectively, g is gravity acceleration constant, Zd is the number of charge of the electron residing on the dust particle and is assumed that it is a constant. $\vec{B}$ is the magnetic field intensity, and $\vec{B}={B}_{x}{\vec{e}}_{x}\ +\ {B}_{y}{\vec{e}}_{y}+{B}_{z}{\vec{e}}_{z}$.
The incompressibility condition should be supplemented for the present system. It is valid because the observed dust flows are typically subsonic. The gravitational force on dust is not balanced by the dust pressure, but rather by the pressure of electrons and ions, which are coupled with the dust by electric fields
$\begin{eqnarray}{\rm{i}}{{kv}}_{d1}+\displaystyle \frac{{\rm{d}}{w}_{d1}}{{\rm{d}}z}=0.\end{eqnarray}$
We assume that
$\begin{eqnarray}{n}_{d}={n}_{d0}(z)+{n}_{d1}{{\rm{e}}}^{{\rm{i}}({ky}-\omega t)},\end{eqnarray}$
$\begin{eqnarray}B={B}_{0}+{B}_{1}{{\rm{e}}}^{{\rm{i}}({ky}-\omega t)},\end{eqnarray}$
$\begin{eqnarray}{v}_{d}={v}_{d1}{{\rm{e}}}^{{\rm{i}}({ky}-\omega t)},\end{eqnarray}$
$\begin{eqnarray}{w}_{d}={w}_{d1}{{\rm{e}}}^{{\rm{i}}({ky}-\omega t)},\end{eqnarray}$
$\begin{eqnarray}\phi ={\phi }_{1}{{\rm{e}}}^{{\rm{i}}({ky}-\omega t)},\end{eqnarray}$
where nd0 is the number density of the dust particle at equilibrium state, nd1 is the perturbed number density of the dust particle, vd1 and wd1 are the perturbed velocities of the dust fluid in the y and z directions, respectively, φ1 is the perturbed electric potential, B0 is a constant.
In order to understand the RT instability of the system, we assume that the system is at an equilibrium state initially. Then by linearizing equations (2)-(5), neglecting any nonlinear terms and substituting equations (7)-(11) into equations (2)-(5), we have
$\begin{eqnarray}-{\rm{i}}\omega {n}_{d1}+{w}_{d1}\displaystyle \frac{{\rm{d}}{n}_{d0}}{{\rm{d}}z}=0,\end{eqnarray}$
$\begin{eqnarray}-{\rm{i}}\omega {v}_{d1}=\displaystyle \frac{{Z}_{d}e}{{m}_{d}}\left({\rm{i}}k{\phi }_{1}-{w}_{d1}{B}_{0x}\right)-\displaystyle \frac{1}{{m}_{d}{n}_{d0}}{\rm{i}}{{kP}}_{d1},\end{eqnarray}$
$\begin{eqnarray}\begin{array}{l}-{\rm{i}}\omega {w}_{d1}=\displaystyle \frac{{Z}_{d}e}{{m}_{d}}\left(\displaystyle \frac{{\rm{d}}{\phi }_{1}}{{\rm{d}}z}+{v}_{d1}{B}_{0x}\right)\\ \quad -\displaystyle \frac{1}{{m}_{d}{n}_{d0}}\displaystyle \frac{{\rm{d}}{P}_{d1}}{{\rm{d}}z}-\displaystyle \frac{{n}_{d1}}{{n}_{d0}}g,\end{array}\end{eqnarray}$
$\begin{eqnarray}\begin{array}{l}-{k}^{2}{\phi }_{1}+\displaystyle \frac{{{\rm{d}}}^{2}{\phi }_{1}}{{\rm{d}}{z}^{2}}=\displaystyle \frac{e}{{\varepsilon }_{0}}\\ \quad \times \left[{Z}_{d}{n}_{d1}+\displaystyle \frac{e{\phi }_{1}}{{k}_{{\rm{B}}}}\left(\displaystyle \frac{{n}_{e0}}{{T}_{e}}+\displaystyle \frac{{n}_{i0}}{{T}_{i}}\right)\right].\end{array}\end{eqnarray}$
Simplifying equations (12)-(15), we have
$\begin{eqnarray}\begin{array}{l}-{k}^{2}{\phi }_{1}+\displaystyle \frac{{{\rm{d}}}^{2}{\phi }_{1}}{{\rm{d}}{z}^{2}}=\displaystyle \frac{e}{{\varepsilon }_{0}}\\ \quad \times \left[\displaystyle \frac{{Z}_{d}{w}_{d1}}{{\rm{i}}\omega }\displaystyle \frac{{\rm{d}}{n}_{d0}}{{\rm{d}}z}+\displaystyle \frac{e{\phi }_{1}}{{k}_{{\rm{B}}}}\left(\displaystyle \frac{{n}_{e0}}{{T}_{e}}+\displaystyle \frac{{n}_{i0}}{{T}_{i}}\right)\right],\end{array}\end{eqnarray}$
$\begin{eqnarray}\begin{array}{l}\displaystyle \frac{{\rm{d}}}{{\rm{d}}z}\left({m}_{d}{n}_{d0}\displaystyle \frac{{\rm{d}}{w}_{d1}}{{\rm{d}}z}\right)-{k}^{2}\left({m}_{d}{n}_{d0}+{m}_{d}\displaystyle \frac{g}{{\omega }^{2}}\displaystyle \frac{{\rm{d}}{n}_{d0}}{{\rm{d}}z}\right){w}_{d1}\\ \quad =\ -\displaystyle \frac{{\rm{i}}{k}^{2}e}{\omega }\left[{Z}_{d}{n}_{d0}\displaystyle \frac{{\rm{d}}{\phi }_{1}}{{\rm{d}}z}-\displaystyle \frac{{\rm{d}}}{{\rm{d}}z}\left({Z}_{d}{n}_{d0}{\phi }_{1}\right)\right]\\ \quad -\displaystyle \frac{{ke}}{\omega }\left[{Z}_{d}{n}_{d0}{B}_{0x}\displaystyle \frac{{\rm{d}}{w}_{d1}}{{\rm{d}}z}-\displaystyle \frac{{\rm{d}}}{{\rm{d}}z}\left({Z}_{d}{n}_{d0}{w}_{d1}{B}_{0x}\right)\right].\end{array}\end{eqnarray}$
We now consider a dusty plasma in which there are two different regions, Region I: β < z < α and region II: α < z < α + Δ, see figure 1. We assume that the mass of dust particles in both regions is the same, while the number densities of the dusty plasma in both regions are different, nd0 = nd01 in region I. However, the number density of the dust particles varies with respect to space coordinate z as follows: ${n}_{d0}\left(z\right)={n}_{0}{{\rm{e}}}^{z/L}$ in region II, where constant L represents the number density gradient scale. Then we have from equations (16) and (17)
$\begin{eqnarray}\displaystyle \frac{{{\rm{d}}}^{2}{\phi }_{1}}{{\rm{d}}{z}^{2}}-\left({k}^{2}+{\lambda }_{{}_{D}}^{-2}\right){\phi }_{1}=\displaystyle \frac{e}{{\rm{i}}\omega {\varepsilon }_{0}L}{Z}_{d}{n}_{0}{{\rm{e}}}^{z/L}{w}_{d1},\end{eqnarray}$
$\begin{eqnarray}\begin{array}{l}\displaystyle \frac{{{\rm{d}}}^{2}{w}_{d1}}{{\rm{d}}{z}^{2}}+\displaystyle \frac{1}{L}\displaystyle \frac{{\rm{d}}{w}_{d1}}{{\rm{d}}z}-{k}^{2}\left(1+\displaystyle \frac{g}{L{\omega }^{2}}\right){w}_{d1}\\ \quad =\displaystyle \frac{{\rm{i}}{k}^{2}{{eZ}}_{d}}{\omega {m}_{d}L}{\phi }_{1}-\displaystyle \frac{{{keZ}}_{d}}{\omega {m}_{d}L}{w}_{d1}{B}_{0x},\end{array}\end{eqnarray}$
where ${\lambda }_{D}={\left(\tfrac{{n}_{e0}{e}^{2}}{{\varepsilon }_{0}{k}_{{\rm{B}}}{T}_{e}}+\tfrac{{n}_{i0}{e}^{2}}{{\varepsilon }_{0}{k}_{{\rm{B}}}{T}_{i}}\right)}^{-1/2}$.
Rewriting equations (18) and (19), we have
$\begin{eqnarray}\begin{array}{l}\displaystyle \frac{{{\rm{d}}}^{4}{w}_{d1}}{{\rm{d}}{z}^{4}}+\displaystyle \frac{1}{L}\displaystyle \frac{{{\rm{d}}}^{3}{w}_{d1}}{{\rm{d}}{z}^{3}}\\ \quad -\left[{k}^{2}\left(1+\displaystyle \frac{g}{L{\omega }^{2}}\right)-\displaystyle \frac{{{keZ}}_{d}}{\omega {m}_{d}L}{B}_{0x}+\left({k}^{2}+{\lambda }_{{}_{D}}^{-2}\right)\right]\displaystyle \frac{{{\rm{d}}}^{2}{w}_{d1}}{{\rm{d}}{z}^{2}}\\ \quad -\left({k}^{2}+{\lambda }_{{}_{D}}^{-2}\right)\displaystyle \frac{1}{L}\displaystyle \frac{{\rm{d}}{w}_{d1}}{{\rm{d}}z}\\ \quad +\left({k}^{2}+{\lambda }_{{}_{D}}^{-2}\right)\left[{k}^{2}\left(1+\displaystyle \frac{g}{L{\omega }^{2}}\right)-\displaystyle \frac{{{keZ}}_{d}}{\omega {m}_{d}L}{B}_{0x}\right]{w}_{d1}\\ \quad =\,\displaystyle \frac{{k}^{2}{e}^{2}{Z}_{{}_{d}}^{2}}{{\varepsilon }_{0}{\omega }^{2}{L}^{2}{m}_{d}}{n}_{0}{{\rm{e}}}^{z/L}{w}_{d1}.\end{array}\end{eqnarray}$
In order to know how the growth rate depends on the plasma parameters, we choose some typical plasma parameters as reported experimentally in the previous work [18]. We use e = 1.6 × 10−19 C, ϵ0 = 8.854 × 10−12 F m−1, Zd = 4500, md ∼ 10−14 kg, n0 ∼ 1011 m−3, L = 2.0 m, we find that the order of the right hand side of equation (20) is $\tfrac{{k}^{2}{e}^{2}{Z}_{{}_{d}}^{2}{n}_{0}}{{\varepsilon }_{0}{L}^{2}{\omega }^{2}{m}_{d}}\sim {10}^{-3}$ when k ≈ 0.1, while the order of the last term of the left hand side of equation (20) is $\left({k}^{2}+{\lambda }_{{}_{D}}^{-2}\right)\left({k}^{2}\left(1+\tfrac{g}{L{\omega }^{2}}\right)+\tfrac{{{keZ}}_{d}}{\omega {m}_{d}L}{B}_{0x}\right)\sim {10}^{6}$. Due to this reason, we neglect the right hand side of equation (20). Then, the eigenvalues corresponding to equation (20) are as follows
$\begin{eqnarray}\displaystyle \frac{3}{{L}^{2}}+8\left[{k}^{2}\left(1+\displaystyle \frac{g}{L{\omega }^{2}}\right)-\displaystyle \frac{{{keZ}}_{d}}{\omega {m}_{d}L}{B}_{0x}+\left({k}^{2}+{\lambda }_{{}_{D}}^{-2}\right)\right]=0.\end{eqnarray}$
The dispersion relation is
$\begin{eqnarray}{\omega }^{2}=\displaystyle \frac{{\left(\tfrac{8{{keZ}}_{d}{{LB}}_{0x}}{{m}_{d}}\right)}^{2}-32{k}^{2}{gL}\left[3+8{k}^{2}{L}^{2}+8{L}^{2}\left({k}^{2}+{\lambda }_{{}_{D}}^{-2}\right)\right]}{4{\left[3+8{k}^{2}{L}^{2}+8{L}^{2}\left({k}^{2}+{\lambda }_{{}_{D}}^{-2}\right)\right]}^{2}}.\end{eqnarray}$
The growth rate of the RT instability can be expressed as follows
$\begin{eqnarray}\gamma =\sqrt{-\displaystyle \frac{{\left(\tfrac{8{{keZ}}_{d}{{LB}}_{0x}}{{m}_{d}}\right)}^{2}-32{k}^{2}{gL}\left[3+8{k}^{2}{L}^{2}+8{L}^{2}\left({k}^{2}+{\lambda }_{{}_{D}}^{-2}\right)\right]}{4{\left[3+8{k}^{2}{L}^{2}+8{L}^{2}\left({k}^{2}+{\lambda }_{{}_{D}}^{-2}\right)\right]}^{2}}}.\end{eqnarray}$
Figure 2 shows the dependence of the growth rate of the RT instability on the wave number k for different Zd in figure 2 (a), different B0x in figure 2 (b), different md in figure 2 (c), different values of L in figure 2 (d), different λD in figure 2 (e). The plasma parameters are chosen from the previous work [18] md = 1.3 × 10−14 kg, B0x = 0.4 × 10−4 T, L = 2.0 m, λD = 1.0 × 10−4 m in figure 2 (a). md = 1.3 × 10−14 kg, Zd = 4500, λD = 1.0 × 10−4 m in figure 2 (b). Zd = 4500, B0x = 0.4 × 10−4 T, L=2.0 m, λD = 1.0 × 10−4 m in figure 2 (c). md = 1.3 × 10−14 kg, Zd = 4500, B0x = 0.4 × 10−4 T, λD = 1.0 × 10−4 m in figure 2 (d). md = 1.3 × 10−14 kg, Zd = 4500, B0x = 0.4 × 10−4 T, L = 2.0 m in figure 2 (e).
Figure 2. (a) Dependence of the growth rate of the RT instability on the wave number k for different parameters of Zd = 2700, 3600, 4500, respectively. (b) Dependence of the growth rate of the RT instability on the wave number k for different parameters of B0x = 0.4 × 10−4 T, 0.5 × 10−4 T, 0.6 × 10−4 T, respectively. (c) Dependence of the growth rate of the RT instability on the wave number k for different parameters of md = 3.6 × 10−15 kg, 8.5 × 10−15 kg, 1.3 × 10−14 kg, respectively. (d) Dependence of the growth rate of the RT instability on the wave number k for different parameters of L = 2.0 m, 2.5 m, 3.0 m, respectively. (e) Dependence of the growth rate of the RT instability on the wave number k for different parameters of λD = 6 × 10−5 m, 8 × 10−5 m, 1 × 10−4 m, respectively.
Notice from figure 2 that the growth rate of the RT instability increases as the wave number k increases. It suggests that the shorter the wavelength, the larger the growth rate. It is noted from figures 2(a)-(c) that the magnitude of the electric charge on a dust particle Zd, the external magnetic field B0x and the mass of a dust particle md almost have no effect on the RT instability. Similarly, in order to know how the growth rate depends on the plasma parameters, we choose some typical plasma parameters as reported experimentally in the previous work [18]. We use e = 1.6 × 10−19 C, Zd = 4500, L = 2.0m, k ≈ 0.1, md ∼ 10−14 kg, B0x ∼ 10−4 T, λD ∼ 10−4 m, and find that the order of the first term of the numerator of equation (23) is $\tfrac{8{{keZ}}_{d}{{LB}}_{0x}}{{m}_{d}}\sim {10}^{-6}$, while the order of the second term of the numerator of equation (23) is $32{k}^{2}{gL}[3+8{k}^{2}{L}^{2}+8{L}^{2}({k}^{2}+{\lambda }_{D}^{-2})]\sim {10}^{10}$. Due to this reason, we neglect the first term of the numerator of equation (23). Therefore, the magnitude of the electric charge on a dust particle Zd, the external magnetic field B0x and the mass of a dust particle md almost have no effect on the RT instability. However, it indicates from figures 2(d) and (e) that both the parameters L and λD obviously affect the growth rate of the RT instability. It is found that the growth rate decreases as L increases. It suggests that the larger the number density gradient scale, the less the growth rate of the RT instability. Moreover, the growth rate increases as λD increases. It seems that the larger the Debye length, the larger the growth rate of the RT instability.
It seems that the number density and the temperature of both electrons and ions can affect the RT instability. It indicates that the larger the number densities of both electrons and ions, the smaller the growth rate, while the higher the temperatures of both electrons and ions, the larger the growth rate. It is found that the RT instability and its growth rate not only depend on the region parameters (the external magnetic field, the region length and its gradient) and the dust particles parameters (the number density, the mass and the charge of the dust particle), but also on both electron and ion characters (the number densities, the temperatures of both electrons and ions).

2.2. RT instability in an ion-electron plasma

For comparison, we now consider an ion-electron plasma consisting of electrons and ions, which has been studied extensively in previous works [6266]. In order to investigate the RT instability in an ion-electron plasma, we assume that the electrons follow the Boltzmann distribution, ${n}_{e}={n}_{e0}\exp \left(\tfrac{e\phi }{{k}_{{\rm{B}}}{T}_{e}}\right)$, while the ions are treated as a fluid. The same model is considered for ion-electron plasma, as shown in figure 1. For simplicity and generality, we also study waves propagating only in the yoz plane, i.e. the wave number $\vec{k}=(0,{k}_{y},{k}_{z})$. Then the hydrodynamic equations to describe this kind of ion-electron plasma are as follows
$\begin{eqnarray}\displaystyle \frac{\partial {n}_{i}}{\partial t}+\displaystyle \frac{\partial \left({n}_{i}{v}_{i}\right)}{\partial y}+\displaystyle \frac{\partial \left({n}_{i}{w}_{i}\right)}{\partial z}=0,\end{eqnarray}$
$\begin{eqnarray}\begin{array}{l}\displaystyle \frac{\partial {v}_{i}}{\partial t}+{v}_{i}\displaystyle \frac{\partial {v}_{i}}{\partial y}+{w}_{i}\displaystyle \frac{\partial {v}_{i}}{\partial z}\\ \quad =\displaystyle \frac{e}{{m}_{i}}\left(-\displaystyle \frac{\partial \phi }{\partial y}\ +\ {w}_{i}{B}_{x}\right)-\displaystyle \frac{1}{{m}_{i}{n}_{i}}\displaystyle \frac{\partial {P}_{i}}{\partial y},\end{array}\end{eqnarray}$
$\begin{eqnarray}\begin{array}{l}\displaystyle \frac{\partial {w}_{i}}{\partial t}+{v}_{i}\displaystyle \frac{\partial {w}_{i}}{\partial y}+{w}_{i}\displaystyle \frac{\partial {w}_{i}}{\partial z}\\ \quad =\displaystyle \frac{e}{{m}_{i}}\left(-\displaystyle \frac{\partial \phi }{\partial z}-{v}_{i}{B}_{x}\right)-\displaystyle \frac{1}{{m}_{i}{n}_{i}}\displaystyle \frac{\partial {P}_{i}}{\partial z}-g,\end{array}\end{eqnarray}$
$\begin{eqnarray}\displaystyle \frac{{\partial }^{2}\phi }{\partial {y}^{2}}+\displaystyle \frac{{\partial }^{2}\phi }{\partial {z}^{2}}=\displaystyle \frac{e}{{\varepsilon }_{0}}\left({n}_{e}-{n}_{i}\right),\end{eqnarray}$
where ni refers to the number density of ions, mi is the mass of ions, pi is the ion fluid pressure, vi, wi are the velocities of ion fluid in the y direction and in the z direction, respectively, g is gravity acceleration constant, φ is electric potential, $\vec{B}$ is the magnetic field intensity, $\vec{B}={B}_{x}{\vec{e}}_{x}\ +\ {B}_{y}{\vec{e}}_{y}+{\vec{B}}_{z}{\vec{e}}_{z}$.
Using the incompressibility condition,
$\begin{eqnarray}{\rm{i}}{{kv}}_{i1}+\displaystyle \frac{{\rm{d}}{w}_{i1}}{{dz}}=0.\end{eqnarray}$
We assume that
$\begin{eqnarray}{n}_{i}={n}_{i0}(z)+{n}_{i1}{{\rm{e}}}^{{\rm{i}}({ky}-\omega t)},\end{eqnarray}$
$\begin{eqnarray}B={B}_{0}+{B}_{1}{{\rm{e}}}^{{\rm{i}}({ky}-\omega t)},\end{eqnarray}$
$\begin{eqnarray}{v}_{i}={v}_{i1}{{\rm{e}}}^{{\rm{i}}({ky}-\omega t)},\end{eqnarray}$
$\begin{eqnarray}{w}_{i}={w}_{i1}{{\rm{e}}}^{{\rm{i}}({ky}-\omega t)},\end{eqnarray}$
$\begin{eqnarray}\phi ={\phi }_{1}{{\rm{e}}}^{{\rm{i}}({ky}-\omega t)},\end{eqnarray}$
where ni0 is the number density of ions at equilibrium state, ni1 is the perturbed number density of ions, vi1 and wi1 are the perturbed velocities of the ion in the y and z directions respectively, φ1 is the perturbed potential, B0 is a constant.
In order to understand the RT instability of the system, we assume that the system is at an equilibrium state initially. Then by linearizing equations (24)-(27), neglecting any nonlinear terms and substituting equations (28)-(33) into equations (24)-(27), we have
$\begin{eqnarray}-{\rm{i}}\omega {n}_{i1}+{w}_{i1}\displaystyle \frac{{\rm{d}}{n}_{i0}}{{\rm{d}}z}=0,\end{eqnarray}$
$\begin{eqnarray}-{\rm{i}}\omega {v}_{i1}=\displaystyle \frac{e}{{m}_{i}}\left(-{\rm{i}}k{\phi }_{1}+{w}_{i1}{B}_{0x}\right)-\displaystyle \frac{1}{{m}_{i}{n}_{i0}}{\rm{i}}{{kP}}_{i1},\end{eqnarray}$
$\begin{eqnarray}-{\rm{i}}\omega {w}_{i1}=\displaystyle \frac{e}{{m}_{i}}\left(-\displaystyle \frac{{\rm{d}}{\phi }_{1}}{{\rm{d}}z}-{v}_{i1}{B}_{0x}\right)-\displaystyle \frac{1}{{m}_{i}{n}_{i0}}\displaystyle \frac{{\rm{d}}{P}_{i1}}{{\rm{d}}z}-\displaystyle \frac{{n}_{i1}}{{n}_{i0}}g,\end{eqnarray}$
$\begin{eqnarray}-{k}^{2}{\phi }_{1}+\displaystyle \frac{{{\rm{d}}}^{2}{\phi }_{1}}{{\rm{d}}{z}^{2}}=\displaystyle \frac{e}{{\varepsilon }_{0}}\left(\displaystyle \frac{{n}_{e0}e{\phi }_{1}}{{k}_{{\rm{B}}}{T}_{e}}-{n}_{i1}\right).\end{eqnarray}$
Simplifying equations (34)-(37), we have
$\begin{eqnarray}\begin{array}{l}\displaystyle \frac{{\rm{d}}}{{\rm{d}}z}({m}_{i}{n}_{i0}\displaystyle \frac{{\rm{d}}{w}_{i1}}{{\rm{d}}z})-{k}^{2}({m}_{i}{n}_{i0}+{m}_{i}\displaystyle \frac{g}{{\omega }^{2}}\displaystyle \frac{{\rm{d}}{n}_{i0}}{{\rm{d}}z}){w}_{i1}\\ \quad =\displaystyle \frac{{\rm{i}}{k}^{2}e}{\omega }\left[{n}_{i0}\displaystyle \frac{{\rm{d}}{\phi }_{1}}{{\rm{d}}z}-\displaystyle \frac{{\rm{d}}}{{\rm{d}}z}({n}_{i0}{\phi }_{1})\right]-\displaystyle \frac{{ke}}{\omega }\\ \quad \times \left[{n}_{i0}{B}_{0x}\displaystyle \frac{{\rm{d}}{w}_{i1}}{{\rm{d}}z}-\displaystyle \frac{{\rm{d}}}{{\rm{d}}z}\left({n}_{i0}{w}_{i1}{B}_{0x}\right)\right],\end{array}\end{eqnarray}$
$\begin{eqnarray}-{k}^{2}{\phi }_{1}+\displaystyle \frac{{{\rm{d}}}^{2}{\phi }_{1}}{{\rm{d}}{z}^{2}}=\displaystyle \frac{e}{{\varepsilon }_{0}}\left(\displaystyle \frac{{n}_{e0}e{\phi }_{1}}{{k}_{{\rm{B}}}{T}_{e}}-\displaystyle \frac{{w}_{i1}}{{\rm{i}}\omega }\displaystyle \frac{{\rm{d}}{n}_{i0}}{{\rm{d}}z}\right).\end{eqnarray}$
Similarly, we consider an ion-electron plasma in which there are two different regions. Region I: β < z < α and region II: α < z < α + Δ, see in figure 1, where ni0 = ni01 in region I. While ${n}_{i0}\left(z\right)={n}_{0}{{\rm{e}}}^{z/L}$ in region II. Then we have from equations (38) and (39)
$\begin{eqnarray}\begin{array}{l}\displaystyle \frac{{{\rm{d}}}^{2}{w}_{i1}}{{\rm{d}}{z}^{2}}+\displaystyle \frac{1}{L}\displaystyle \frac{{\rm{d}}{w}_{i1}}{{\rm{d}}z}-{k}^{2}\left(1+\displaystyle \frac{g}{L{\omega }^{2}}\right){w}_{i1}\\ \quad =-\displaystyle \frac{{\rm{i}}{k}^{2}e}{\omega {m}_{i}L}{\phi }_{1}+\displaystyle \frac{{ke}}{\omega {m}_{i}L}{w}_{i1}{B}_{0x},\end{array}\end{eqnarray}$
$\begin{eqnarray}-{k}^{2}{\phi }_{1}+\displaystyle \frac{{{\rm{d}}}^{2}{\phi }_{1}}{{\rm{d}}{z}^{2}}=\displaystyle \frac{{e}^{2}{\phi }_{1}}{{\varepsilon }_{0}{k}_{{\rm{B}}}{T}_{e}}{n}_{0}{{\rm{e}}}^{z/L}-\displaystyle \frac{e}{{\rm{i}}\omega {\varepsilon }_{0}L}{n}_{0}{{\rm{e}}}^{z/L}{w}_{i1}.\end{eqnarray}$
Rewriting equations (40) and (41), we have
$\begin{eqnarray}\begin{array}{l}\displaystyle \frac{{{\rm{d}}}^{4}{w}_{i1}}{{\rm{d}}{z}^{4}}+\displaystyle \frac{1}{L}\displaystyle \frac{{{\rm{d}}}^{3}{w}_{i1}}{{\rm{d}}{z}^{3}}-\left[{k}^{2}\left(1+\displaystyle \frac{g}{L{\omega }^{2}}\right)\right.\\ \quad \left.+\displaystyle \frac{{{keB}}_{0x}}{\omega {m}_{i}L}+\left({k}^{2}+\displaystyle \frac{{e}^{2}{n}_{0}{{\rm{e}}}^{z/L}}{{\varepsilon }_{0}{k}_{{\rm{B}}}{T}_{e}}\right)\right]\displaystyle \frac{{{\rm{d}}}^{2}{w}_{i1}}{{\rm{d}}{z}^{2}}\\ \quad -\left({k}^{2}+\displaystyle \frac{{e}^{2}{n}_{0}{{\rm{e}}}^{z/L}}{{\varepsilon }_{0}{k}_{{\rm{B}}}{T}_{e}}\right)\displaystyle \frac{1}{L}\displaystyle \frac{{\rm{d}}{w}_{i1}}{{\rm{d}}z}+\left({k}^{2}+\displaystyle \frac{{e}^{2}{n}_{0}{{\rm{e}}}^{z/L}}{{\varepsilon }_{0}{k}_{{\rm{B}}}{T}_{e}}\right)\\ \quad \times \left[{k}^{2}\left(1+\displaystyle \frac{g}{L{\omega }^{2}}\right)+\displaystyle \frac{{{keB}}_{0x}}{\omega {m}_{i}L}\right]{w}_{i1}=\displaystyle \frac{{k}^{2}{e}^{2}{n}_{0}{{\rm{e}}}^{z/L}}{{\varepsilon }_{0}{\omega }^{2}{L}^{2}{m}_{i}}{w}_{i1}.\end{array}\end{eqnarray}$
In order to know how the growth rate depends on the plasma parameters, we choose some typical plasma parameters as reported experimentally in the previous work [24]. If we choose e = 1.6 × 10−19 C, ϵ0 = 8.854 × 10−12 F m−1, mi ∼ 10−27 kg, n0 ∼ 1014 m−3, L = 2.0 m, we find that the order of the left hand side of equation (42) $\tfrac{1}{L}\sim {10}^{-1},{k}^{2}\sim {10}^{-2},{k}^{2}\left(1+\tfrac{g}{L{\omega }^{2}}\right)\sim {10}^{-2},\tfrac{{{keB}}_{0x}}{\omega {m}_{i}L}\sim {10}^{-5}$, $\tfrac{{e}^{2}{n}_{0}}{{\varepsilon }_{0}{k}_{{\rm{B}}}{T}_{e}}\sim {10}^{6}$ when k ≈ 0.1, while the order of the right hand side of equation (42) is $\tfrac{{k}^{2}{e}^{2}{n}_{0}}{{\varepsilon }_{0}{\omega }^{2}{L}^{2}{m}_{i}}\sim {10}^{-3}$. Due to this reason, we neglect the small coefficients of equation (42). we have
$\begin{eqnarray}\displaystyle \frac{{{\rm{d}}}^{2}{w}_{i1}}{{\rm{d}}{z}^{2}}+\displaystyle \frac{1}{L}\displaystyle \frac{{\rm{d}}{w}_{i1}}{{\rm{d}}z}-\left[{k}^{2}\left(1+\displaystyle \frac{g}{L{\omega }^{2}}\right)+\displaystyle \frac{{{keB}}_{0x}}{\omega {m}_{i}L}\right]{w}_{i1}=0.\end{eqnarray}$
Moreover, the eigenvalues corresponding to equation (43) are as follows
$\begin{eqnarray}\displaystyle \frac{1}{{L}^{2}}+4\left[{k}^{2}\left(1+\displaystyle \frac{g}{L{\omega }^{2}}\right)+\displaystyle \frac{{{keB}}_{0x}}{\omega {m}_{i}L}\right]=0.\end{eqnarray}$
The dispersion relation is
$\begin{eqnarray}{\omega }^{2}=\displaystyle \frac{{\left(\tfrac{4{{keLB}}_{0x}}{{m}_{i}}\right)}^{2}-16{k}^{2}{gL}\left(1+4{k}^{2}{L}^{2}\right)}{4{\left(1+4{k}^{2}{L}^{2}\right)}^{2}}.\end{eqnarray}$
It seems from equation (45) that ω2 > 0 when the equation of ${B}_{0x}^{2}\geqslant g(1+4{k}^{2}{L}^{2})\displaystyle \frac{{m}_{i}^{2}}{{e}^{2}L}$ is satisfied. It is estimated that when the external magnetic field B0x is larger than 10−8 T, ω2 > 0 may be satisfied since $\displaystyle \frac{{m}_{i}}{e}\sim {10}^{-8}$. Then, we conclude that the external magnetic field can strongly refrain the RT instability for electron-ion plasma. This result is different from that for a dusty plasma about which the external magnetic field only has a weak effect to refrain the RT instability.
When B0x = 0, the dispersion relation is
$\begin{eqnarray}{\omega }^{2}=-\displaystyle \frac{4{k}^{2}{gL}}{1+4{k}^{2}{L}^{2}}.\end{eqnarray}$
The growth rate of the RT instability can be expressed as follows
$\begin{eqnarray}\gamma =\sqrt{\displaystyle \frac{4{k}^{2}{gL}}{1+4{k}^{2}{L}^{2}}}.\end{eqnarray}$
It seems that the dispersion relation equation (46) is consistent with that of the general fluid [67] and therefore there is RT instability.

2.3. Effects of the charge to mass ratio of charged fluids on the growth rate of the RT instability

The present results show that an external magnetic field is more effective on suppressing the RT instability in ion-electron plasma than that in dusty plasma. The explanation for this difference can be inferred by examining both equations (23) and (45). We can define a refrain factor to RT instability which is given by $\sigma \sim \displaystyle \frac{Q}{M}{B}_{0x}$, where Q is the electric charge of the charged particle and M is the mass of the charged particle. Put simply, the degree to which the RT instability is suppressed depends on the product of the external magnetic field and the charge-mass ratio of the charged particles. Due to the much larger charge-mass ratio of ions compared to dust particles, the effect of the external magnetic field in suppressing the RT instability is much more pronounced in ion-electron plasma than that in dusty plasma. In other words, the greater the charge-mass ratio of the charged particle, the stronger the effect of the magnetic field in suppressing the RT instability.

3. Summary and conclusion

The present paper provides a theoretical investigation of the RT instability in different kinds of charged fluid. One is a dusty plasma, while the other is ion-electron plasma. It is found that the charge-mass ratio of charged particles in a charged fluid plays a crucial role in the RT instability and its growth rate. It appears that a larger charge-mass ratio leads to a stronger effect of the external magnetic field in restraining the RT instability. Consequently, the effect of the magnetic field in refraining the RT instability is much more significant in ion-electron plasma compared to dusty plasma due to the ions' larger charge-mass ratio.
It is also found that, for a dusty plasma, the growth rate of the RT instability increases as the perturbed wave number increases. Moreover, the RT instability and its growth rate depend not only on the external parameters of the region (the external magnetic field, the length of the region, and its gradient), the parameters of the dust particles (the number density, the mass, and the charge), but also on the characteristics of both the electrons and ions such as their number densities and their temperatures.
Currently, our research may have potential applications. For example, it is almost impossible to refrain RT instability by an external magnetic field for a dusty plasma. However, it is easy to refrain the RT instability by an external magnetic field for an ion-electron plasma.

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 12275223, 11965019) and by the Foundation of Gansu Educational Committee (No. 2022QB-178).

1
Fortov V E et al 2005 Complex (dusty) plasmas: current status, open issues, perspectives Phys. Rep. 421 1 103

DOI

2
Morfill G E Ivlev A V 2009 Complex plasmas: an interdisciplinary research field Rev. Mod. Phys. 81 1353

DOI

3
Mendis D A Rosenberg M 1994 Cosmic dusty plasma Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 32 419 463

DOI

4
Rao N N Shukla P K Yu M Y 1990 Dust-acoustic waves in dusty plasmas Planet. Space Sci. 38 543 546

DOI

5
Barkan A Merlino R L D'angelo N 1995 Laboratory observation of the dust-acoustic wave mode Phys. Plasmas 2 3563 3565

DOI

6
Goertz C K 1989 Dusty plasmas in the solar system Rev. Geophys. 27 271 292

DOI

7
Mendis D A Rosenberg M 1992 Some aspects of dust-plasma interactions in the cosmic environment IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 20 929 934

DOI

8
Musatenko S I et al 2006 Dusty plasma in the midlatitude ionosphere during meteor showers Geomag. Aeron. 46 173 182

DOI

9
Shukla P K Silin V P 1992 Dust ion-acoustic wave Phys. Scr. 45 508

DOI

10
Choi Y Dharuman G Murillo M S 2019 High-frequency response of classical strongly coupled plasmas Phys. Rev. E 100 013206

DOI

11
De Angelis U Formisano V Giordano M 1988 Ion plasma waves in dusty plasmas: Halley's comet J. Plasma Phys. 40 399 406

DOI

12
Shukla P K 1992 Low-frequency modes in dusty plasmas Phys. Scr. 45 504

DOI

13
Zhang H et al 2017 Freak oscillation in a dusty plasma Phys. Rev. E 95 053207

DOI

14
Tsai Y Y Tsai J Y Lin I 2016 Generation of acoustic rogue waves in dusty plasmas through three-dimensional particle focusing by distorted waveforms Nat. Phys. 12 573 577

DOI

15
Hussain S Hasnain H 2017 Magnetosonic wave in pair-ion electron collisional plasma Phys. Plasmas 24 032106

DOI

16
Lin W Murillo M S Feng Y 2019 Pressure and energy of compressional shocks in two-dimensional Yukawa systems Phys. Rev. E 100 043203

DOI

17
Marciante M Murillo M S 2017 Thermodynamic and kinetic properties of shocks in two-dimensional Yukawa systems Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 025001

DOI

18
Sun W et al 2018 Dissipative solitary wave at the interface of a binary complex plasma Europhys. Lett. 122 55001

DOI

19
Du C R et al 2019 Slow dynamics in a quasi-two-dimensional binary complex plasma Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 185002

DOI

20
Wieben F Schablinski J Block D 2017 Generation of two-dimensional binary mixtures in complex plasmas Phys. Plasmas 24 033707

DOI

21
Hartmann P et al 2009 Collective dynamics of complex plasma bilayers Phys. Rev. Lett. 103 245002

DOI

22
Wysocki A et al 2010 Kinetics of fluid demixing in complex plasmas: role of two-scale interactions Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 045001

DOI

23
Jiang K et al 2011 Initial stages in phase separation of binary complex plasmas: numerical experiments Europhys. Lett. 93 55001

DOI

24
Du C R et al 2012 Experimental investigation on lane formation in complex plasmas under microgravity conditions New J. Phys. 14 073058

DOI

25
Ivlev A V et al 2009 Fluid phase separation in binary complex plasmas Europhys. Lett. 85 45001

DOI

26
Killer C et al 2016 Phase separation of binary charged particle systems with small size disparities using a dusty plasma Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 115002

DOI

27
Dolai B Prajapati R P 2018 The rotating Rayleigh-Taylor instability in a strongly coupled dusty plasma Phys. Plasmas 25 083708

DOI

28
Avinash K Sen A 2015 Rayleigh-Taylor instability in dusty plasma experiment Phys. Plasmas 22 083707

DOI

29
Sen S Fukuyama A Honary F 2010 Rayleigh Taylor instability in a dusty plasma J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys. 72 938 942

DOI

30
Ryutov D D Derzon M S Matzen M K 2000 The physics of fast Z pinches Rev. Mod. Phys. 72 167

DOI

31
Sinars D B et al 2010 Measurements of magneto-Rayleigh-Taylor instability growth during the implosion of initially solid Al tubes driven by the 20-MA, 100-ns Z facility Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 185001

DOI

32
Sinars D B et al 2011 Measurements of magneto-Rayleigh-Taylor instability growth during the implosion of initially solid metal liners Phys. Plasmas 18 056301

DOI

33
Lau Y Y et al 2011 Anisotropy and feedthrough in magneto-Rayleigh-Taylor instability Phys. Rev. E 83 066405

DOI

34
Ryutov D D 2011 Liner-on-plasma system near stagnation: Stabilizing effect of a magnetic cushion Phys. Plasmas 18 064509

DOI

35
Zier J C et al 2012 Magneto-Rayleigh-Taylor experiments on a MegaAmpere linear transformer driver Phys. Plasmas 19 032701

DOI

36
Zhang P et al 2012 Effects of magnetic shear on magneto-Rayleigh-Taylor instability Phys. Plasmas 19 022703

DOI

37
Innes D E et al 2012 Break up of returning plasma after the 7 June 2011 filament eruption by Rayleigh-Taylor instabilities? Astron. Astrophys. 540 L10

DOI

38
Kirkpatrick R C Lindemuth I R Ward M S 1995 Magnetized target fusion: an overview Fusion Technol. 27 201 214

DOI

39
Lindemuth I R Kirkpatrick R C 1983 Parameter space for magnetized fuel targets in inertial confinement fusion Nucl. Fusion 23 263

DOI

40
Lindemuth I R et al 1995 Target plasma formation for magnetic compression/magnetized target fusion Phys. Rev. Lett. 75 1953

DOI

41
Intrator T et al 2002 Experimental measurements of a converging flux conserver suitable for compressing a field reversed configuration for magnetized target fusion Nucl. Fusion 42 211

DOI

42
Slutz S A Vesey R A 2012 High-gain magnetized inertial fusion Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 025003

DOI

43
Ryutov D D et al 2012 Simulating the magnetized liner inertial fusion plasma confinement with smaller-scale experiments Phys. Plasmas 19 062706

DOI

44
Gibbs W W 2014 Triple-threat method sparks hope for fusion: the secrets to its success are lasers, magnets and a big pinch Nature 505 9 11

DOI

45
Awe T J et al 2014 Modified helix-like instability structure on imploding z-pinch liners that are pre-imposed with a uniform axial magnetic field Phys. Plasmas 21 056303

DOI

46
Wang L F et al 2013 Nonlinear evolution of jet-like spikes from the single-mode ablative Rayleigh-Taylor instability with preheating Plasma Sci. Technol 15 961

DOI

47
D'Angelo N 1993 The Rayleigh-Taylor instability in dusty plasmas Science 41 469 474

DOI

48
Veeresha B M Amita Das Abhijit Sen 2005 Rayleigh-Taylor instability driven nonlinear vortices in dusty plasmas Phys. Plasmas 12 044506

DOI

49
Birk Guido T 2002 The onset of Rayleigh-Taylor instabilities in magnetized partially ionized dense dusty plasmas Phys. Plasmas 9 745 747

DOI

50
Betti R et al 1998 Growth rates of the ablative Rayleigh-Taylor instability in inertial confinement fusion Phys. Plasmas 5 1446

DOI

51
Zhou Q H Li D 2007 Revisiting the effects of compressibility on the Rayleigh-Taylor instability Plasma Sci. Technol 9 407

DOI

52
Wang X G et al 2022 Scaling of rise time of drive current on development of magneto-Rayleigh-Taylor instabilities for single-shell Z-pinches Chin. Phys. B 31 025203

DOI

53
Wang X G et al 2019 Numerical study on magneto-Rayleigh-Taylor instabilities for thin liner implosions on the primary test stand facility Chin. Phys. B 28 035201

DOI

54
Porth O Komissarov S S Keppens R 2014 Rayleigh-Taylor instability in magnetohydrodynamic simulations of the Crab nebula Mon. Notices Royal Astron. Soc. 443 547 558

DOI

55
Jun B I 1998 Interaction of a pulsar wind with the expanding supernova remnant Astrophys. J. 499 282 293

DOI

56
Sambandan G Tripathi V K Sayal V K 1999 Rayleigh-Taylor mode-RF coupling in a dusty plasma Phys. Lett. A 262 179 185

DOI

57
Chow V W Mendis D A Rosenberg M 1993 Role of grain size and particle velocity distribution in secondary electron emission in space plasmas J. Geophys. Res.: Space Phys. 98 19056 19076

DOI

58
Horanyi M Goertz C K 1990 Coagulation of dust particles in a plasma Astrophys. J. 361 155 161

DOI

59
Duan W S 2001 Weakly two-dimensional dust acoustic waves Phys. Plasmas 8 3583 3586

DOI

60
Merlino Robert L 2006 Dusty plasmas and applications in space and industry Plasma Phys. Appl. 81 73 110 (http://homepage.physics.uiowa.edu/~rmerlino/Grabbe_Merlino-Ch_52.pdf)

61
Merlino Robert L Goree John A 2004 Dusty plasmas in the laboratory, industry, and space Phys. Today 57 32 38

DOI

62
Guo F et al 2016 Efficient production of high-energy nonthermal particles during magnetic reconnection in a magnetically dominated ion-electron plasma Astrophysical J. Lett. 818 L9

DOI

63
Peng W Q Tian S F Zhang T T 2019 Dynamics of the soliton waves, breather waves, and rogue waves to the cylindrical Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation in pair-ion-electron plasma Phys. Fluids 31 102107

DOI

64
Melzani M et al 2014 The energetics of relativistic magnetic reconnection: ion-electron repartition and particle distribution hardness Astron. Astrophys. 570 A112

DOI

65
De Jonghe J Keppens R 2020 A two-fluid analysis of waves in a warm ion-electron plasma Phys. Plasmas 27 122107

DOI

66
Shahzad K Aman-ur-Rehman Saleem H 2018 A study of the non-Maxwellian pair-ion and pair-ion-electron plasmas Phys. Plasmas 25 022105

DOI

67
Chen F F 2016 Introduction to Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion Cham Springer 202 206

DOI

Outlines

/