Welcome to visit Communications in Theoretical Physics,
Quantum Physics and Quantum Information

Ground state of Rydberg-dressed Bose gas confined in a toroidal trap

  • Lin-Xue Wang 1 ,
  • Hong-Li Yang 1 ,
  • Hui Liu 1 ,
  • Si-Lin Chen 1 ,
  • Ya-Jun Wang 2 ,
  • Xiao-Fei Zhang 1, *
Expand
  • 1Department of Physics, School of Physics and Information Science, Shaanxi University of Science and Technology, Xi'an 710021, China
  • 2Department of Basic Sciences, Air Force Engineering University, Xi'an 710051, China

Author to whom any correspondence should be addressed.

Received date: 2023-09-01

  Revised date: 2023-10-31

  Accepted date: 2023-11-10

  Online published: 2024-01-19

Copyright

© 2024 Institute of Theoretical Physics CAS, Chinese Physical Society and IOP Publishing Printed in China and the UK

Abstract

The experimental realization of Rydberg dressing technology in ultracold atomic systems provides another superior platform for studying novel states of matter and macroscopic quantum phenomena. In this work, based on the mean-field theory, we have investigated the ground-state phases of a two-component Bose–Einstein condensate with Rydberg interaction and confined in a toroidal trap. The effects of the Rydberg interaction and external potential, especially the Rydberg blockade radius, on the ground-state structure of such a system have been investigated in full parameter space. Our results show that the Rydberg blockade radius, which can be regarded as another controllable parameter, can be used to obtain a variety of ground-state phases. More interestingly, it is found that for weak Rydberg interactions, the Rydberg blockade radius breaks the spontaneous rotational symmetry of the system, leading to the formation of a discrete unit cell structure. For strongly interacting cases, it can be used to realize different orders of discrete rotational symmetry breaking.

Cite this article

Lin-Xue Wang , Hong-Li Yang , Hui Liu , Si-Lin Chen , Ya-Jun Wang , Xiao-Fei Zhang . Ground state of Rydberg-dressed Bose gas confined in a toroidal trap[J]. Communications in Theoretical Physics, 2024 , 76(1) : 015102 . DOI: 10.1088/1572-9494/ad0b6e

1. Introduction

With the continuous development of experimental technologies, such as laser cooling and evaporative cooling, ultracold atomic physics has become the frontier of current physics [1, 2]. Compared with traditional condensed-matter physical systems, the ultracold atomic system has distinct characteristics and advantages due to its highly experimental controllability and observable macroscopic quantum properties. It not only provides an ideal platform for the research of atomic and molecular physics, condensed matter physics, quantum information, quantum optics and other fields, but it also has potential application prospects in precision measurement technology, high-precision atomic clock, atomic lasers, and so on [35].
Generally speaking, the interactions between atoms can be divided into short- and long-range interactions. The short-range interaction is usually referred to as a hard-core interaction, which can be modulated by using the Feshbach resonance with a tunable time-dependent magnetic field [6, 7]; while the long-range one can be realized through dipole-dipole and Rydberg interactions, which can be regulated by magnetic fields [8] and the Rydberg dressing technology [911], respectively. Compared with the hard-core contact interaction, where the interaction potential will tend to infinity when the atoms are infinitely close, the long-range Rydberg interaction potential no longer tends to infinity, making the Rydberg-dressed ultracold atomic system an ideal platform for exploring exotic quantum phases displaying simultaneously different types of order [1218]. Previous studies have shown that when the long-range isotropic Rydberg interaction is strong enough, the roton gap is gradually closed, leading to spontaneous breaking of translational symmetry, which provides another way for the experimental formation of supersolids [1921].
In real experiments, most of the ultracold atomic gases are trapped by an external potential. It is well known that the dimension and geometric configuration of the external potential play an important role in determining the ground state of such a system [2225]. Due to its unique topology, the toroidal trap has attracted great attention, and is used to simulate various physical phenomena in traditional condensed matter physics [2632]. Previous work has shown that the interplay between the spin–orbit coupling (SOC) and the toroidal trap results in a rich variety of ground states, such as a modified stripe, an alternately arranged stripe, and countercircling states [33]. In the presence of non-local Rydberg interactions, the system will exhibit various novel supersolid states under the combined effects of SOC and non-local Rydberg interactions [34, 35].
To the best of our current knowledge, there is little work on the effects of Rydberg blockade radius on the ground-state phases of Rydberg-dressed Bose gas confined in toroidal trap, which is what we attempt to do. In this work, we consider a Rydberg-dressed Bose gas confined in a quasi-two-dimensional (Q2D) toroidal trap, with emphasis on the effects of the Rydberg interaction, external potential, and especially the Rydberg blockade radius, on the ground-state structure of such a system. Our results show that the Rydberg blockade radius, which can be regarded as another controllable parameter, can be used to obtain a variety of ground-state phases.

2. Model and method

We begin with a two-component Bose–Einstein condensate with both the contact interactions and Rydberg interactions confined in a Q2D toroidal trap on the x-y plane. Under the mean-field approximation at zero-temperature, the ground state and dynamics of such a system can be described by the coupled Gross–Pitaevskii equations, which can be written as:
$\begin{eqnarray}\begin{array}{l}{\rm{i}}{\hslash }\displaystyle \frac{\partial {{\rm{\Psi }}}_{\uparrow }}{\partial t}=\left(-\displaystyle \frac{{{\hslash }}^{2}{{\rm{\nabla }}}^{2}}{2m}+V({\boldsymbol{r}})+{{\rm{g}}}_{\uparrow \uparrow }| {{\rm{\Psi }}}_{\uparrow }{| }^{2}\right.\\ \,\left.+\,{{\rm{g}}}_{\uparrow \downarrow }| {{\rm{\Psi }}}_{\downarrow }{| }^{2}+{A}_{\uparrow \uparrow }| {{\rm{\Psi }}}_{\uparrow }{| }^{2}+{A}_{\uparrow \downarrow }| {{\rm{\Psi }}}_{\downarrow }{| }^{2}\Space{0ex}{3.5ex}{0ex}\right){{\rm{\Psi }}}_{\uparrow },\\ {\rm{i}}{\hslash }\displaystyle \frac{\partial {{\rm{\Psi }}}_{\downarrow }}{\partial t}=\left(-\displaystyle \frac{{{\hslash }}^{2}{{\rm{\nabla }}}^{2}}{2m}+V({\boldsymbol{r}})+{{\rm{g}}}_{\downarrow \downarrow }| {{\rm{\Psi }}}_{\downarrow }{| }^{2}\right.\\ \,\left.+\,{{\rm{g}}}_{\downarrow \uparrow }| {{\rm{\Psi }}}_{\uparrow }{| }^{2}+{A}_{\downarrow \downarrow }| {{\rm{\Psi }}}_{\downarrow }{| }^{2}+{A}_{\downarrow \uparrow }| {{\rm{\Psi }}}_{\uparrow }{| }^{2}\Space{0ex}{3.5ex}{0ex}\right){{\rm{\Psi }}}_{\downarrow },\end{array}\end{eqnarray}$
where ψi(j) is the order parameter of the i(j)-th component (i(j) = ↑, ↓), and satisfies the normalization condition ∫d2r∣ψi(j)2 = Ni(j) with Ni(j) being the atom number of each component. ${{\rm{\nabla }}}^{2}=\tfrac{{\partial }^{2}}{\partial {x}^{2}}+\tfrac{{\partial }^{2}}{\partial {y}^{2}}$ is the two-dimensional Laplace operator, m is the atomic mass, and r = (x, y). We assume that the system is tightly confined by a strong harmonic trap along the z-direction with frequency ωz and characteristic length ${a}_{z}=\sqrt{{\hslash }/m{\omega }_{z}}$. In this case, the effective contact interaction parameters are given by ${{\rm{g}}}_{{ij}}=\sqrt{8\pi }{{\hslash }}^{2}{a}_{{ij}}/({{ma}}_{z})$. The aij is the corresponding s-wave scattering lengths for intra- and inter-component interactions, which can be adjusted by Feshbach resonance technology [7]. The non-local Rydberg interaction potential can be written as ${A}_{{ij}}({\boldsymbol{r}})=\tfrac{{U}^{{ij}}}{{R}_{c}^{6}+| {\boldsymbol{r}}{| }^{6}}$ with Uij and Rc being the Rydberg interaction strength and the Rydberg blockade radius, respectively [36].
The trapping potential in the x-y plane considered in this work can be written as [33]
$\begin{eqnarray}V({\boldsymbol{r}})=\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}m{\omega }_{\perp }^{2}\left[{V}_{0}{\left(\displaystyle \frac{{r}^{2}}{{a}_{0}}-{a}_{0}{r}_{0}\right)}^{2}\right],\end{eqnarray}$
where $r=\sqrt{{x}^{2}+{y}^{2}}$, ω is the radial trap frequency of the harmonic potential, ${a}_{0}=\sqrt{{\hslash }/m{\omega }_{\perp }}$, V0 and r0 are the width and center height of the toroidal trap, respectively.
By using the Crank-Nicolson finite difference and the backward Euler pseudospectral schemes within an imaginary time propagation approach, we can obtain the mean-field ground states of such a system [3740]. In our numerical simulations, we work in dimensionless units by scaling with the characteristic oscillator length $\sqrt{{\hslash }/m{\omega }_{z}}$ and trap energy ω. We start from proper initial wave-functions to obtain the real ground-state. The lowest-energy states in the different parameter space are obtained until the fluctuation in the norm of the wave function becomes smaller than 10−6. And the spatial steps h = 0.1 and time steps t = 0.001. For the initial data, we prepare the two-dimensional random functions as initial wave functions, and our results show that such random initial data always converges to the ground state of the system considered here.

3. Results and discussions

In what follows, we will perform a detailed study of the effects of Rydberg interactions, external potential, and the Rydberg blockade radius in particular, on the ground-state structure of the system. To this end, we fix the parameters of the external toroidal trap as V0 = 10 r0 = 3 a0 = 5, and assume contact interactions g↑↑ = g↓↓ = g↑↓ = g↓↑ = g = 0. Additionally, for convenience, we rescale the Rydberg interaction strength as ${U}^{{ij}}/{R}_{c}^{4}$ and denote it as Uij (the tilde is omitted for simplicity), and focus on the equal case with U↑↑ = U↓↓ = U↑↓ = U↓↑ = U.
We first consider the effects of the Rydberg interaction on the ground state of the system. It is known that when the Rydberg interaction potential is strong enough, the roton gap of the system is closed, leading to spontaneous translational symmetry breaking of the system. Figure 1 shows the typical ground-state density and phase distributions of the system for fixed Rydberg blockade radius, and for varied Rydberg interactions. Figures 1(a)–(d) show the density distributions of each component (the first and second columns) and the total density distribution of the system (the third column), while figures 1(e)–(g) exhibit the phase distributions corresponding to component ψ in figures 1(b)–(d), respectively. It is easy to see that for the fixed Rydberg blockade radius, the system exhibits continuous-to-discrete rotational symmetry breaking with the increases of Rydberg interactions, as shown in figure 1 for Rc = 3. The density distribution of such a system gradually evolves from a continuous distributed ring structure to a unit cell structure distributed discretely along the azimuth angle, and the size of the unit cell decreases with the Rydberg interaction, which is in a sense reminiscent of our previous results in [34].
Figure 1. Typical ground-state density and phase distributions of a two-component Rydberg-dressed Bose gas confined in a toroidal trap for varied Rydberg interactions. The strength of the Rydberg interactions are U = 400, 600, 800, 1000 for (a)–(d), respectively, while the Rydberg blockade radius is fixed to Rc = 3. (e)–(g) show the corresponding phase distributions of component ψ in (b)–(d), respectively.
From a physics viewpoint, with the increase of the Rydberg interaction, the gap excited by the roton excitation will be gradually closed, leading to the spontaneous breaking of translational symmetry of the system [9]. In addition, the Q2D toroidal trap can be approximately regarded as a quasi-one-dimensional one under the limit case, the system will find it energetically favorable to form crystals with relatively large numbers of particles per unit cell along the azimuth angle direction. Here we want to note that for fixed Rydberg blockade radius, the discrete rotational symmetry of the system remains unchanged, leading to the fixed number of the unit cell. Figures 1(e)–(g) show the phase distributions of component ψ corresponding to figures 1(b)–(d), respectively. It is easy to see that the phase distribution of the system is uniform along the ring and thus there is no phase modulation. This also explains why there is no topological excitations, such as vortex and Skyrmion, in figure 1. Here we want to note that the phase distribution of the system is also uniform in the case of varied Rydberg blockade radius as shown in the following discussion.
We next discuss the effects of the Rydberg blockade radius on the ground-state structure of the system. Figure 2 exhibits the typical ground-state density and phase distributions of the system for the fixed strength of Rydberg interactions, and for the varied Rydberg blockade radius, where the first and third columns show the density distribution and the second and fourth columns show the corresponding phase distribution. For weak Rydberg interaction and small Rydberg blockade radius, it is observed that the density distributions of such two components are uniform along the ring, as shown in figure 2(a) for U = 200 and Rc = 1. In this case, the system presents continuously rotational symmetry. It is interesting to see that the continuously rotational symmetry breaking occurs if we further increase the Rydberg blockade radius, and the density distribution of each component forms unit cell structures distributed discretely along the azimuth angle, as shown in figure 2(b) for U = 200 and Rc = 7. This indicates that when the strength of the Rydberg interaction is not enough to close the roton gap, the spontaneous rotational symmetry breaking of the system can be realized by modulating the Rydberg blockade radius.
Figure 2. Typical ground-state density and phase distributions of a two-component Rydberg-dressed Bose gas confined in a toroidal trap for fixed Rydberg interaction strength and for varied Rydberg blockade radius. The Rydberg blockade radii are Rc = 1, 7 in (a)–(b), respectively. The strength of Rydberg interaction is fixed to U = 200.
With the increase of the strength of Rydberg interaction, the effects of the Rydberg blockade radius on the ground-state structure of the system become more and more interesting. Figure 3 shows the typical ground-state density and phase distributions of the system for a larger Rydberg interaction strength U = 800, and for varied Rydberg blockade radius. The results clearly indicate that with the increase of the Rydberg blockade radius Rc, the size of the unit cell gradually increases, and the number of unit cells along the ring decreases until it reaches four. Consequently, the associated order of rotational symmetry breaking gradually decreases from an initial 12-order to the 4-order, that is C12C6C4. We can thus conclude that the Rydberg blockade radius Rc, which can be regarded as another controllable parameter, can be used to control the order of spontaneous rotational symmetry breaking of the system.
Figure 3. Typical ground-state density and phase distributions of a two-component Rydberg-dressed Bose gas confined in a toroidal trap for fixed Rydberg interaction strength and for varied Rydberg blockade radius. The Rydberg blockade radii are Rc = 3, 6, 9, in (a)–(c), respectively. The strength of the Rydberg interaction is fixed to U = 800. (d)–(f) show the corresponding phase distributions of component ψ in (a)–(c), respectively.
Another interesting question is how the critical value of the Rydberg blockade radius (defined as the occurrence of spontaneous rotational symmetry breaking for fixed Rydberg interaction), changes with the Rydberg interaction. Figure 4 shows the typical density distributions of the system in the presence of spontaneous rotational symmetry breaking for fixed Rydberg interactions. It is easy to see that such critical values of the Rydberg blockade radius decrease with the strength of the Rydberg interactions, as shown in figures 4(a)–(c) for U = 200, 400, 600, respectively, where the corresponding critical values of the Rydberg blockade radius decrease from 7 to 3. In addition, with the increase of Rydberg interactions, the number of unit cells increases while its size decreases, which is consistent with the above results.
Figure 4. Typical density distributions of the system in the presence of spontaneous rotational symmetry breaking for fixed Rydberg interactions. The strength of the Rydberg interactions are U = 200, 400, 600, in (a)–(c), respectively. The Rydberg blockade radii are Rc = 7, 4, 3, respectively.
Finally, we want to note that while the results presented above are representative of the possible range of strength of Rydberg interactions and the Rydberg blockade radii, they do not in any way exhaust all the phases. The richness of the possible ground-state phase lies in the large number of controllable parameters, including the aspect ratios of the external potential, the strength of contact interactions, and so on. However, for the two-dimensional parameter space expanded by the strength of Rydberg interactions and the Rydberg blockade radius, the above ground-state structures are qualitatively unchanged. On the other hand, since the non-local Rydberg interaction potential does not introduce the phase changes, the internal structure of the unit cell is relatively simple. A natural extension of our work is to include a variety of SOC, and to consider the effects of the Rydberg blockade radius on the internal structures and the formation mechanism of topological excitations.

4. Conclusions

In summary, we have investigated the ground-state structure of Rydberg-dressed Bose gas confined in a toroidal trap. The presence of the Rydberg interactions break the continuous rotational symmetry of the system, leading to the formation of unit cells distributed discretely along the azimuth angle. In the case of fixed Rydberg blockade radii, the size of the unit cell decreases with the strength of the Rydberg interaction, while its number is fixed. For the weak Rydberg interaction, the spontaneous rotational symmetry breaking of the system can be realized by modulating the Rydberg blockade radius, and its critical value decreases with the strength of the Rydberg interaction. It is interesting to find that the Rydberg blockade radius can be used to realize discrete rotational symmetry breaking with different order for the strongly interacting system. Our results open up alternate ways for the quantum control of Rydberg-dressed Bose gas.

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grants No. 12005125, No. 12105365, and 12175129 by the Key Research Program of Frontier Sciences of Chinese Academy of Sciences under Grant No. ZDBS-LY-7016; by Shaanxi Fundamental Science Research Project for Mathematics and Physics under Grant No. 22JSY034; by Scientific Research Program Funded by Shaanxi Provincial Education Department Program No. 23JP020 and by the Youth Innovation Team of Shaanxi Universities.

1
Anderson M H Ensher J R Matthews M R Wieman C E Cornell E A 1995 Observation of Bose-Einstein condensation in a dilute atomic vapor Science 269 5221

DOI

2
Davis K B Mewes M O Andrews M R van Druten N J Durfee D S Kurn D M Ketterle W 1995 Bose-Einstein condensation in a gas of sodium atoms Phys. Rev. Lett. 75 3969

DOI

3
Dalfovo F Giorgini S Pitaevskii L P Stringari S 1999 Theory of Bose-Einstein condensation in trapped gases Rev. Mod. Phys. 71 463

DOI

4
Pethick C J Smith H 2002 Bose-Einstein Condensation in Dilute Gases (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)

5
Ueda M 2010 Fundamentals and New Frontiers of Bose-Einstein Condensation (Singapore: World Scientific)

6
Chin C Grimm R Julienne P Tiesinga E 2010 Feshbach resonances in ultracold gases Rev. Mod. Phys. 82 1225

DOI

7
Timmermans E Tommasini P Hussein M Kerman A 1999 Feshbach resonances in atomic Bose-Einstein condensates Phys. Rep. 315 199

DOI

8
Lahaye T Menotti C Santos L Lewenstein M Pfau T 2009 The physics of dipolar bosonic quantum gases Rep. Prog. Phys. 72 126401

DOI

9
Boninsegni M Prokof'ev N V 2012 Colloquium: Supersolids: What and where are they? Rev. Mod. Phys. 84 759

DOI

10
Boninsegni M 2012 Supersolid phases of cold atom assemblies J. Low Temp. Phys. 168 137

DOI

11
Balibar S 2010 The enigma of supersolidity Nature 464 176

DOI

12
Henkel N Cinti F Jain P Pupillo G Pohl T 2012 Supersolid vortex crystals in rydberg-dressed bose-einstein condensates Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 265301

DOI

13
Hsueh C H Tsai Y C Wu K S Chang M S Wu W C 2013 Pseudospin orders in the supersolid phases in binary Rydberg-dressed Bose-Einstein condensates Phys. Rev. A 88 043646

DOI

14
Zhou Y Li Y Q Nath R Li W B 2020 Quench dynamics of Rydberg-dressed bosons on two-dimensional square lattices Phys. Rev. A 101 013427

DOI

15
McCormack G Nath R Li W 2020 Dynamical excitation of maxon and roton modes in a Rydberg-dressed Bose-Einstein condensate Phys. Rev. A 102 023319

DOI

16
Hsueh C H Wang C W Wu W C 2020 Vortex structures in a rotating Rydberg-dressed Bose-Einstein condensate with the Lee-Huang-Yang correction Phys. Rev. A 102 063307

DOI

17
Hao L Zhang Y P 2020 Spin-orbit-coupling-assisted rotonsoftening and superstripes in a Rydberg-dressed Bose-Einstein condensate Phys. Rev. A 102 023327

DOI

18
Barbier M Lütjeharms H Hofstetter W 2022 Supersolid phases of ultracold bosons trapped in optical lattices dressed with Rydberg p states Phys. Rev. A 105 013326

DOI

19
Heidemann R Raitzsch U Bendkowsky V Butscher B Pfau T 2008 Rydberg excitation of Bose-Einstein condensates Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 033601

DOI

20
Henkel N Nath R Pohl T 2010 Three-dimensional roton excitations and supersolid formation in Rydberg-excited Bose-Einstein condensates Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 195302

DOI

21
Han W Zhang X F Wang D S Jiang H F Zhang W Zhang S G 2018 Chiral supersolid in spin-orbit-coupled Bose gases with soft-core long-range interactions Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 030404

DOI

22
Cozzini M Jackson B Stringari S 2006 Vortex signatures in annular Bose-Einstein condensates Phys. Rev. A 73 013603

DOI

23
Malet F Kavoulakis G M Reimann S M 2010 Mixtures of Bose gases confined in concentrically coupled annular traps Phys. Rev. A 81 013630

DOI

24
Sinha S Nath R Santos L 2011 Trapped two-dimensional condensates with synthetic spin-orbit coupling Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 270401

DOI

25
Zhang X F Dong R F Liu T Liu W M Zhang S G 2012 Spin-orbit-coupled Bose-Einstein condensates confined in concentrically coupled annular traps Phys. Rev. A 86 063628

DOI

26
Gupta S Murch K W Moore K L Purdy T P Stamper-Kurn D M 2005 Bose-Einstein condensation in a circular waveguide Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 143201

DOI

27
Olson S E Terraciano M L Bashkansky M Fatemi F K 2007 Cold-atom confinement in an all-optical dark ring trap Phys. Rev. A 76 061404(R)

DOI

28
Lesanovsky I Klitzing W 2007 Time-Averaged adiabatic potentials: versatile matter-wave guides and atom traps Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 083001

DOI

29
Ryu C Andersen M F Cladé P Natarajan V Helmerson K Phillips W D 2007 Observation of Persistent Flow of a Bose-Einstein Condensate in a Toroidal Trap Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 260401

DOI

30
Lesanovsky I Klitzing W 2007 Spontaneous emergence of angular momentum Josephson oscillations in coupled annular Bose-Einstein condensates Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 050401

DOI

31
Brand J Haigh T J Zülicke U 2009 Rotational fluxons of Bose-Einstein condensates in coplanar double-ring traps Phys. Rev. A 80 011602(R)

DOI

32
Smyrnakis J Bargi S Kavoulakis G M Magiropoulos M Kärkkäinen K Reimann S M 2009 Mixtures of Bose gases confined in a ring potential Phys. Rev. Lett. 103 100404

DOI

33
Zhang X F Kato M Han W Zhang S G Saito H 2017 Spin-orbit-coupled Bose-Einstein condensates held under a toroidal trap Phys. Rev. A 95 033620

DOI

34
Zhang X F Wen L Wang L X Chen G P Tan R B Saito H 2022 Spin-orbit-coupled Bose gases with nonlocal Rydberg interactions held under a toroidal trap Phys. Rev. A 105 033306

DOI

35
Chen G P Han W Tu P Qiao C B Zhang X F 2022 Two-component spin-orbit-coupled Bose-Einstein condensates with soft-core long range interactions confined in concentrically coupled annular traps J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 91 114301

DOI

36
Li W Hamadeh L Lesanovsky I 2012 Probing the interaction between Rydberg-dressed atoms through interference Phys. Rev. A 85 053615

DOI

37
Bao W Chern I L Lim F Y 2006 Efficient and spectrally accurate numerical methods for computing ground and first excited states in Bose-Einstein condensates J. Comput. Phys. 219 836

DOI

38
Mithun T Porsezian K Dey B 2013 Vortex dynamics in cubic-quintic Bose-Einstein condensates Phys. Rev. E 88 012904

DOI

39
Antoine X Bao W Besse C 2013 Computational methods for the dynamics of the nonlinear Schrödinger/Gross-Pitaevskii equations Comput. Phys. Comm. 184 2621 2633

DOI

40
Antoine X Duboscq R 2014 GPELab, a Matlab toolbox to solve Gross-Pitaevskii equations I: Computation of stationary solutions Comput. Phys. Comm. 185 2969 2991

DOI

Outlines

/