Welcome to visit Communications in Theoretical Physics,
Condensed Matter Theory

Interplay between magnetic gap and quasi-particle lifetime in topological insulator ferromagnet/f-wave superconductor junctions

  • Hong Li ,
  • Xinjian Yang
Expand
  • College of Science, China University of Petroleum, Qingdao 266580, China

Received date: 2024-03-06

  Revised date: 2024-04-30

  Accepted date: 2024-04-30

  Online published: 2024-06-12

Copyright

© 2024 Institute of Theoretical Physics CAS, Chinese Physical Society and IOP Publishing

Abstract

Using the modified Blonder–Tinkham–Klapwijk (BTK) theory, the interplay between the lifetime of quasi particles and the magnetic gap in a topological insulator-based ferromagnet/f-wave superconductor (TI-based FM/f–wave SC) tunnel structure is theoretically studied. Two symmetries of f1 and f2 waves are considered for superconducting pairing states. The results indicate that reducing the finite quasi-particle lifetime will induce a transformation of energy-gap peaks into a zero-bias peak in tunneling conductance spectrum, as well as a transformation of energy-gap dips into a zero-bias dip in shot noise spectrum, ultimately resulting in the smoothing of the zero-bias conductance peak and the zero-bias shot noise dip. An increase in magnetic gap will suppress the tunnel conductance and shot noise when the conventional Andreev retro-reflection dominates, but will enhance them when the specular Andreev reflection is dominant. Both specular Andreev reflection and conventional Andreev retro-reflection will be enhanced as the quasi-particle lifetime increases. When Fermi energy equals the magnetic gap, shot noise and tunneling conductance vanish across all energy ranges. These findings not only contribute to a better understanding of specular Andreev reflection in the FM/f–wave SC junction based on TIs but also provide insights for experimentally determining the f-wave pairing symmetry.

Cite this article

Hong Li , Xinjian Yang . Interplay between magnetic gap and quasi-particle lifetime in topological insulator ferromagnet/f-wave superconductor junctions[J]. Communications in Theoretical Physics, 2024 , 76(7) : 075704 . DOI: 10.1088/1572-9494/ad453a

1. Introduction

It is well known that determining the symmetry of pairing potentials in high-TC superconductors is crucial for elucidating the mechanism of superconductivity [1]. Theoretical and experimental studies have confirmed that cuprate superconductors have d-wave pairing symmetry [24], as well as p-wave pairing symmetry in certain bulk ferromagnetic SCs [5, 6]. The authors of [7] theoretically predicted that a YBa2Cu3O6+x cuprate has f-wave symmetry. They even suggested the possibility of observing the f-wave symmetry of superconducting pairing potential with YBCO cuprate in future experiments. So far, many researchers have studied the superconducting tunneling structure involving f-wave pairing symmetry and revealed many important characteristics of their transport characteristics [810].
On the other hand, the interplay between ferromagnetism and superconductivity on the surface of topological insulators (TIs) is also highly desirable due to the unique band structure of TIs [1115]. For example, Soodchomshom discussed the effect of magnetic gap on the tunneling conductance in a topological insulator ferromagnet/superconductor (TI FM/SC) junction [16]. Kang et al investigated the effect of magnetic field on the transport properties of FM/FM/s-wave SC junctions formed on the surface of a three-dimension TI [17]. In addition, the interaction between ferromagnetism and unconventional SC in tunnel junctions based on TI was also investigated. For example, the transport behaviors of quasi particles in TI-based FM/d-wave and f-wave superconducting tunnel structures have been discussed in [18, 19], respectively. All these studies suggest that new qualitative effects may occur when ferromagnetic and superconducting orders coexist in the TI environment. Recently, Majidi and Asgari [20] accurately studied the Andreev reflection (AR) [21] process in superconducting tunnel junctions based on TI. By analyzing the transport properties in the presence of a gate electric field, they theoretically revealed the potential to realize the intra-band specular AR in normal metal/s-wave SC tunnel structures based on TI thin-films. In our previous work, we investigated the specular AR and the conventional retro-reflection in TI-based FM/s-wave and ${d}_{{x}^{2}-{y}^{2}}+i{d}_{xy}$ mixed-wave SC tunnel structures [22, 23]. It is found that the specular AR exists in both types of SC junctions, and the AR process strongly depends on the superconducting pairing potential. However, so far, the AR process especially the specular AR process and the shot noise in FM/f-wave superconducting tunnel structures have not been discussed in detail.
In this work, we aim to theoretically study the magnetic gap effect and the lifetime of quasi particles on the transport properties in FM/f-wave SC tunnel structures based on a thin film TI. Two types of pairing symmetry for SC are chosen: f1 and f2 waves. Using the Dirac–Bogoliubov–de Gennes (DBdG) equation [24] and Blonder–Tinkham–Klapwijk (BTK) theory [25], expressions for the calculation of conductance and shot noise are constructed. Through the analysis of conductance spectrum and shot noise spectrum, the AR processes including specular Andreev reflection and conventional Andreev retro-reflection are discussed in detail.

2. Theoretical model

The model under study is a ferromagnet/f-wave SC junction based on a three-dimensional (3D) thin film TI. The TI surface is considered as the (x, y) plane, and the tunnel current is limited to this plane. In the region of $x\leqslant 0,$ an external magnetic field is applied along the z-direction to induce the magnetization of the FM. Because the z component of magnetization can induce a magnetic energy gap of approximately 2m in the carrier state density of the FM [14], in our calculations, magnetization is perpendicular to the TI surface, i.e. $\mathop{m}\limits^{ \rightharpoonup }=(0,0,m).$ In the $x\gt 0$ region, an external gate potential with a value U is placed above the f-wave SC, resulting in the Fermi energy in the superconducting region being EF + U, where EF represents the Fermi energy in the ferromagnetic region.
The f1 and f2-wave symmetries of the superconducting pairing potential can be written as [19]
$\begin{eqnarray}{{\rm{\Delta }}}_{f}=\left\{\begin{array}{c}{f}_{1}:{{\rm{\Delta }}}_{0}\,\cos \,{\theta }_{s}\left({\cos }^{2}{\theta }_{s}-3{\sin }^{2}{\theta }_{s}\right){{\rm{e}}}^{{\rm{i}}\varphi }\\ {f}_{2}:{{\rm{\Delta }}}_{0}\,\sin \,{\theta }_{s}\left({\sin }^{2}{\theta }_{s}-3{\cos }^{2}{\theta }_{s}\right){{\rm{e}}}^{{\rm{i}}\varphi },\end{array}\right.\end{eqnarray}$
where ${{\rm{\Delta }}}_{0}$ is the maximum superconducting energy gap, ${\theta }_{S}$ represents the incident angle of electrons in the superconducting region, and $\varphi $ is the phase of the order parameter.
The DBdG equation used to describe the FM/ f-wave SC junction based on TI reads [16]
$\begin{eqnarray}\left(\begin{array}{c}\mathop{m}\limits^{ \rightharpoonup }\cdot \mathop{\sigma }\limits^{ \rightharpoonup }+{v}_{F}\mathop{p}\limits^{ \rightharpoonup }\cdot \mathop{\sigma }\limits^{ \rightharpoonup }+U-{E}_{F}\quad {{\rm{\Delta }}}_{f}\\ -{{\rm{\Delta }}}_{f}^{* }\,-{\left(\mathop{m}\limits^{ \rightharpoonup }\cdot \mathop{\sigma }\limits^{ \rightharpoonup }-{v}_{F}\mathop{p}\limits^{ \rightharpoonup }\cdot \mathop{\sigma }\limits^{ \rightharpoonup }+U-{E}_{F}\right)}^{\ast }\end{array}\right)\left(\begin{array}{c}u\\ v\end{array}\right)=\varepsilon \left(\begin{array}{c}u\\ v\end{array}\right),\end{eqnarray}$
where ${v}_{F}$ is the Fermi velocity, $\mathop{\sigma }\limits^{ \rightharpoonup }$ represents the vector of Pauli spin matrices, and $\varepsilon $ is the excitation energy of the quasi particle. Considering the finite lifetime of quasi-particle (${\tau }_{0}$), the BCS-coherence factor is given by ${u}^{2}\,=1-{v}^{2}\,=\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}\left(1+\sqrt{1-\tfrac{{{{\rm{\Delta }}}_{f}}^{2}}{{\left(\varepsilon +{\rm{i}}{\rm{\Gamma }}\right)}^{2}}}\right)$ with ${\rm{\Gamma }}=\tfrac{\hslash }{{\tau }_{0}}$ [26].
Defining $\theta $ is the incident angle of a quasi-particle, the wave function in the FM region is written as
$\begin{eqnarray}\begin{array}{c}{\psi }_{FM}(x)={X}_{e}{{\rm{e}}}^{{\rm{i}}\displaystyle \frac{\sqrt{{{E}_{F}}^{2}-{m}^{2}}}{\hslash {v}_{F}}x\,\cos \,\theta }+{r}_{h}{X}_{h}{{\rm{e}}}^{{\rm{i}}\displaystyle \frac{\sqrt{{{E}_{F}}^{2}-{m}^{2}}}{\hslash {v}_{F}}x\,\cos \,\theta }\\ \,+\,{r}_{e}{X}_{e}{{\rm{e}}}^{-{\rm{i}}\displaystyle \frac{\sqrt{{{E}_{F}}^{2}-{m}^{2}}}{\hslash {v}_{F}}x\,\cos \,\theta }\end{array}\end{eqnarray}$
with ${X}_{e}={\left(1\,\displaystyle \frac{{E}_{F}-m}{\sqrt{{{E}_{F}}^{2}-{m}^{2}}}{{\rm{e}}}^{{\rm{i}}\theta }0\,0\right)}^{{\rm{T}}},$ ${X}_{h}={\left(0\,0\,1\,\displaystyle \frac{{E}_{F}-m}{\sqrt{{{E}_{F}}^{2}-{m}^{2}}}{{\rm{e}}}^{-{\rm{i}}\theta }\right)}^{{\rm{T}}}\,,$ rh and re are the normal and AR scattering coefficients, respectively. The wave function in the superconducting region is given by
$\begin{eqnarray}{\psi }_{SC}(x)={t}_{e}{Y}_{e}{{\rm{e}}}^{{\rm{i}}\displaystyle \frac{{E}_{F}+U}{\hslash {v}_{F}}x\,\cos \,{\theta }_{S}}+{t}_{h}{Y}_{h}{{\rm{e}}}^{-{\rm{i}}\displaystyle \frac{{E}_{F}+U}{\hslash {v}_{F}}x\,\cos \,{\theta }_{S}},\end{eqnarray}$
where ${Y}_{e}={\left(u\,u{{\rm{e}}}^{{\rm{i}}{\theta }_{S}}-v{{\rm{e}}}^{{\rm{i}}{\theta }_{S}-{\rm{i}}\varphi }\,v{{\rm{e}}}^{-{\rm{i}}\varphi }\right)}^{{\rm{T}}},$ ${Y}_{h}={\left(v-v{{\rm{e}}}^{-{\rm{i}}{\theta }_{S}}\,u{{\rm{e}}}^{-{\rm{i}}{\theta }_{S}-{\rm{i}}\varphi }\,u{{\rm{e}}}^{-{\rm{i}}\varphi }\right)}^{{\rm{T}}},$ te and th are the coefficients of transmission as electron- and hole-like carriers, respectively. The wave functions of these two regions satisfy the continuity condition at interface x = 0. Therefore, all coefficients in equations (3) and (4) can be obtained by solving the equation ${\psi }_{FM}(0)={\psi }_{SC}(0).$
According to the modified BTK theory, the conductance of the FM/f-wave SC junction based on TI can be calculated using the following formula [16]
$\begin{eqnarray}G={g}_{0}\sqrt{1-{\left(m/{E}_{F}\right)}^{2}}\displaystyle {\int }_{-{\theta }_{c}}^{{\theta }_{c}}\left(1+{R}_{h}-{R}_{e}\right)\cos \,\theta {\rm{d}}\theta .\end{eqnarray}$
Here ${R}_{h}={\left|{r}_{h}\right|}^{2},$ ${R}_{e}={\left|{r}_{e}\right|}^{2},$ the critical angle is given by ${\theta }_{c}={\sin }^{-1}\tfrac{1+U/{E}_{F}}{\sqrt{1-{\left(m/{E}_{F}\right)}^{2}}},$ and the non-magnetic normal conductance is written as ${g}_{0}=\tfrac{n({E}_{F})w{e}^{2}}{2\pi {\hslash }^{2}{v}_{F}}$ with $n({E}_{F})\sim \tfrac{{E}_{F}}{2\pi {(\hslash {v}_{F})}^{2}}$ the density of the normal state and w representing the width of the junction.
If I is defined as the tunneling current and $\hat{I}(t)$ is the current operator, then the zero-frequency shot noise can be expressed as $S=2\displaystyle {\int }_{-\infty }^{+\infty }{\rm{d}}t\left\langle \left[\hat{I}(t)-\left\langle I\right\rangle \right]\times \left[\hat{I}(0)-\left\langle I\right\rangle \right]\right\rangle $ [27, 28]. At the same time, considering the important role of the Andreev reflection process in the transport of superconducting tunnel junctions, the differential shot noise can be obtained using the following formula [29, 30]
$\begin{eqnarray}\begin{array}{c}S=\displaystyle \frac{4\pi {e}^{3}}{\hslash }\sqrt{1-{\left(m/{E}_{F}\right)}^{2}}\\ \,\times \,\displaystyle {\int }_{-\pi /2}^{\pi /2}\left[{R}_{h}\left(1-{R}_{h}\right)+{R}_{e}\left(1-{R}_{e}\right)+2{R}_{h}{R}_{e}\right]\cos \,\theta {\rm{d}}\theta .\end{array}\end{eqnarray}$

3. Numerical results and discussions

Figure 1 gives the results for the influence of magnetic gap m and quasi-particle lifetime on the conductance in FM/f1-wave SC junctions based on TI, where (a), (b) and (c) respectively show the case of ${\rm{\Gamma }}=0,$ $0.8{{\rm{\Delta }}}_{0},$ and ${{\rm{\Delta }}}_{0}.$ It can be seen from figure 1(a), when ${\rm{\Gamma }}=0,$ that is, without considering the lifetime of quasi particles, two peaks appear at $eV=\pm {{\rm{\Delta }}}_{0}$ in the case of m = 0. These conductance peaks arise due to Andreev resonance occurring at $eV=\pm {{\rm{\Delta }}}_{0}.$ As shown in figures 1(b) and (c), with the increase of ${\rm{\Gamma }},$ namely with the decrease of the finite lifetime of quasi particles, the distance between two conductance peaks gradually decreases until they merge into a zero-bias conductance peak (ZBCP). According to our calculation, further increasing ${\rm{\Gamma }}$ will smooth out the ZBCP. At the same time, one finds that when $m/{E}_{F}\gt 1,$ as ${\rm{\Gamma }}$ increases, the width of ZBCP narrows and the height decreases until it reaches zero. These features of the conductance spectrum suggest that shortening the lifetime of the quasi-Dirac particle will prevent the formation of the Andreev bound state in FM/f1-wave SC junctions based on TI. Comparing figures 1(a)–(c), we can also see that with m increasing from zero to EF, the value of the conductance across the entire energy range decreases to zero regardless of whether the quasi-particle lifetime is considered. When $m\gt {E}_{F},$ the conductance values in the energy range of approximately $(-\sqrt{{{{\rm{\Delta }}}_{0}}^{2}-{{\rm{\Gamma }}}^{2}},\sqrt{{{{\rm{\Delta }}}_{0}}^{2}-{{\rm{\Gamma }}}^{2}})$ increase with an increase in m. This shows that the tunneling conductance is highly dependent on the magnetic gap. If the excitation energy $\varepsilon $ of a quasiparticle is less than ${{\rm{\Delta }}}_{0},$ we can easily verify that ${R}_{e}+{R}_{h}=1,$ because particles with energy below the gap is forbidden to transmit to SC [20]. Therefore, equation (5) becomes $G=2{g}_{0}\sqrt{1-{(m/{E}_{F})}^{2}}\displaystyle {\int }_{-{\theta }_{c}}^{{\theta }_{c}}{R}_{h}\,\cos \,\theta d\theta $ in the case of $\varepsilon \lt {{\rm{\Delta }}}_{0}.$ Correspondingly, the tunneling conductance in the energy range of $(-{{\rm{\Delta }}}_{0},{{\rm{\Delta }}}_{0})$ represents the amplitude of the Andreev reflection. It can be reasonable to infer that in the $m\lt {E}_{F}$ case, the Andreev retro-reflection process mainly determines the characteristics of the tunneling conductance spectrum. However, in the case of $m\gt {E}_{F},$ the specular reflection becomes dominant. This feature indicates that increasing the magnetic gap effect of the TI-based FM/f1-wave SC junction will enhance the specular Andreev reflection but suppress the conventional Andreev retro-reflection.
Figure 1. Conductance varies with bias voltage and magnetic gap for $U=10{E}_{F}$ in FM/f1-wave SC junctions based on TI. Here, (a) ${\rm{\Gamma }}=0,$ (b) ${\rm{\Gamma }}=0.8{{\rm{\Delta }}}_{0}$ and (c) ${\rm{\Gamma }}={{\rm{\Delta }}}_{0}.$
Figure 2 plot the interplay between the magnetic gap effect and the quasi-particle lifetime on the conductance of the FM/f2-wave SC junction based on TI, in which (a), (b) and (c) are the cases of ${\rm{\Gamma }}=0,$ $0.2{{\rm{\Delta }}}_{0}$ and $0.4{{\rm{\Delta }}}_{0},$ respectively. Unlike figure 1(a), when ignoring the lifetime of quasi particles, a ZBCP is obtained for $m\lt {E}_{F}$ as shown in figure 2(a). For $m\gt {E}_{F},$ the ZBCP also appears but sharper compared to $m\lt {E}_{F}$ situation. These different spectral line features are attributed to two different natures of order parameters of f-wave superconductivity, which can be used to distinguish between f1-wave and f2-wave. As ${\rm{\Gamma }}$ increases, the ZBCP rapidly narrows and decreases until becoming smooth as can be seen in figures 2(b) and (c). This indicates that the influence of quasi-particle lifetime on the conductance spectrum is greater in the TI-based FM/f2-wave SC tunnel structure than in the f1-wave SC tunnel structure. However, comparing figures 1 and 2, we find that the influence of m on the conductance spectrum of TI-based FM/f2-wave superconducting tunnel structure is the same as that of the f1-wave SC junction. It then follows that the specular Andreev reflection and Andreev retro-reflection in the TI-based FM/f-wave SC tunneling structure can be distinguished by the phenomenon that the tunneling conductance disappears at $m={E}_{F}.$ This criterion is also applicable to the FM/s-wave, ${d}_{{x}^{2}-{y}^{2}}+i{d}_{xy}$ mixed wave and p-wave SC tunneling structure based on TI [22, 23, 31].
Figure 2. Conductance varies with bias voltage and magnetic gap for $U=10{E}_{F}$ in FM/f2-wave SC junctions based on TI. Here, (a) ${\rm{\Gamma }}=0,$ (b) ${\rm{\Gamma }}=0.2{{\rm{\Delta }}}_{0}$ and (c) ${\rm{\Gamma }}=0.4{{\rm{\Delta }}}_{0}.$
The interaction of the magnetic gap and quasi-particle lifetime on the shot noise in the FM/f1-wave SC junction based on TI is presented in figure 3, where (a), (b), (c) and (d) give the cases of ${\rm{\Gamma }}=0,$ ${\rm{\Gamma }}=0.8{{\rm{\Delta }}}_{0},$ ${\rm{\Gamma }}={{\rm{\Delta }}}_{0}$ and ${\rm{\Gamma }}=1.2{{\rm{\Delta }}}_{0},$ respectively. As shown in figure 3(a), there are two dips obtained at $eV=\pm {{\rm{\Delta }}}_{0}$ in the shot noise spectrum when ${\rm{\Gamma }}=0,$ m = 0, or $m\ll {E}_{F}.$ As m increases, the two dips transforms into two peaks. Comparing figures 3(a)–(d), one can see that the distance between the two dips or peaks gradually decreases with the increase of ${\rm{\Gamma }},$ and then merges into a zero-bias shot noise dip (ZBSD) or ZBSP, finally becomes smooth for $m\lt {E}_{F}.$ In order to see this transformation more clearly, the zero-bias shot noise spectrum for $m=0$ is presented in figure 4. These features of the shot noise spectrum indicate that shortening the lifetime of quasi-Dirac particles will prevent the formation of Andreev resonance peaks and eliminate the dips of FM/f1-wave SC junctions based on TI. It should be noted that the differences of the effect of m on the conductance, when the amplitude of ${\rm{\Gamma }}$ is small, as m increases from zero, the value of shot noise, especially approximately within the energy range of $(-\sqrt{{{{\rm{\Delta }}}_{0}}^{2}-{{\rm{\Gamma }}}^{2}},\sqrt{{{{\rm{\Delta }}}_{0}}^{2}-{{\rm{\Gamma }}}^{2}}),$ first increases, then decreases to zero when $m/{E}_{F}=1,$ and then increase rapidly for $m\gt {E}_{F}.$ This result shows that the shot noise spectrum of the FM/f1-wave SC junction based on TI strongly depends on both the magnetic gap effect and the quasi-particle lifetime.
Figure 3. Shot noise varies with bias voltage and magnetic gap for $U=10{E}_{F}$ in FM/f1-wave SC junctions based on TI. Here, (a) ${\rm{\Gamma }}=0,$ (b) ${\rm{\Gamma }}=0.8{{\rm{\Delta }}}_{0},$ (c) ${\rm{\Gamma }}={{\rm{\Delta }}}_{0}$ and (d) ${\rm{\Gamma }}=1.2{{\rm{\Delta }}}_{0}.$
Figure 4. Zero-bias shot noise varies with bias voltage for $m=0,U=10{E}_{F}$ in TI-based FM/f1-wave SC junctions.
Figure 5 shows the influence of the magnetic gap effect and quasi-particle lifetime on the shot noise spectrum of the FM/f2-wave SC junction based on TI, where (a), (b) and (c) give the cases of ${\rm{\Gamma }}=0,$ $0.2{{\rm{\Delta }}}_{0}$ and $0.4{{\rm{\Delta }}}_{0},$ respectively. We can see from figure 5(a) that, unlike figure 3(a), a ZBSP is obtained when $m\lt {E}_{F}$ and the quasi-particle lifetime is ignored. There is a split in the ZBSP for $m\gt {E}_{F}.$ These differences stem from two different natures of order parameters of the f-wave SC, which can also be used as a criterion to distinguish between f1-wave and f2-wave. One can see from figures 5(b) and (c) that the value of shot noise decreases and the splitting is gradually smoothed out as the quasi-particle lifetime decreases. This indicates that reducing the lifetime of quasi-Dirac particles will both prevent the formation of zero-bias Andreev bound states and suppress proximity effects. Comparing figures 5, 3, 2, and 1, we can see that the shot noise and tunneling conductance have zero values at $m={E}_{F}$ for the entire energy range regardless of whether the quasi-particles lifetime is considered. This can also be easily obtained from equations (5) and (6). At the same time, according to our calculations, the Andreev reflection scattering coefficient ${r}_{h}=0,$ i.e., there is no Andreev reflection for any incident angle. Therefore, $m={E}_{F}$ is the transition point from Andreev reflection being the predominant process to Andreev retro-reflection being the predominant process of the FM/f-wave SC junction based on TI.
Figure 5. Shot noise varies with bias voltage and magnetic gap for $U=10{E}_{F}$ in FM/f2-wave SC junctions based on TI. Here, (a) ${\rm{\Gamma }}=0,$ (b) ${\rm{\Gamma }}=0.2{{\rm{\Delta }}}_{0}$ and (c) ${\rm{\Gamma }}=0.4{{\rm{\Delta }}}_{0}.$

4. Conclusions

In this paper, the interplay between the quasi-particle lifetime and the magnetic gap effect on the conductance spectrum and the shot noise spectrum of the FM/f1-wave and f2-wave SC junction based on TI are theoretically investigated. It is found that due to the two different natures of order parameters of the f-wave superconductivity, for f1-wave and f2-wave, there are differences in both tunneling conductance spectrum and shot noise spectrum. These different features can be used to distinguish between f1-wave and f2-wave. Additionally, we have found that reducing the lifetime of quasi particles will transform the energy-gap peaks into a zero-bias peak in the conductance spectrum, transform the energy-gap dips into a zero-bias dip in the shot noise spectrum, and smooth out the zero-bias conductance peak as well as the zero-bias shot noise dip. An increase in the magnetic gap will suppress the tunnel conductance and shot noise when the conventional Andreev retro-reflection dominates, while it will enhance the conductance and shot noise when the specular Andreev reflection is dominant. The increase of the quasi-particle lifetime will enhance both specular Andreev reflection and Andreev retro-reflection. When Fermi energy equals the magnetic gap, two types of reflections will transform from one dominant to the other dominant.
In summary, the results show that both tunnel conductance and shot noise exhibit different behaviors with changes in the magnetic gap for $m\gt {E}_{F}$ and $m\lt {E}_{F},$ and they also exhibit different behaviors with changes in quasi-particle lifetime for f1 and f2 waves. These different features not only help to better understand the specular Andreev reflection in the FM/f–wave SC junction based on TI but also provide insight into experimentally determining the f-wave pairing symmetry. Furthermore, the phenomenon of tunnel conductance and shot noise vanishing at $m={E}_{F}$ can be used to experimentally distinguish specular Andreev reflection from Andreev retro-reflection.
[1]
Wei J W 2010 Quantum point contact conductance in normal/insulator/metal/dx2-y2 + dixy mixed wave superconductor junctions Solid State Comm. 150 777

DOI

[2]
Scalapino D J, Loh J E, Hirsch J E 1986 d-wave pairing near a spin-density-wave instability Phys. Rev. B 34 8190

DOI

[3]
Kirtley J R 1995 Symmetry of the order parameter in the high-TC superconductor YBa2Cu3O7-δ Nature (London) 373 225

DOI

[4]
Schrieffer J R, Wen X G, Zhang S C 1989 Dynamic spin fluctuations and the bag mechanism of high-TC superconductivity Phys. Rev. B 39 11663

DOI

[5]
Machida K, Ohmi T 2001 Phenomenological theory of ferromagnetic superconductivity Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 850

DOI

[6]
Samokhin K V, Shirokoff D 2005 Phenomenological theory of superconductivity near domain walls in ferromagnets Phys. Rev. B 71 104527

[7]
Adhikary P, Das T 2020 Prediction of f -wave pairing symmetry in YBa2Cu3O6+x cuprates Phys. Rev. B 101 214517

[8]
Bydžovský P, Kamiński R, Nazari V 2016 Dispersive analysis of the s-, p-, d-, and f-wave ππ amplitudes Phys. Rev. D 94 116013

[9]
Rashedi G, Kolesnichenko Y A 2007 Spin polarized transport in the weak link between f-wave superconductors Physica C 451 31

DOI

[10]
Wang W S, Yang Y, Wang Q H 2014 Triplet f -wave pairing in SrPtAs Phys. Rev. B 90 094514

[11]
Hsieh D 2008 A topological dirac insulator in a quantum spin hall phase Nature 452 970

DOI

[12]
Rosenberg G, Guo H M, Franz M 2010 Wormhole effect in a strong topological insulator Phys. Rev. B 82 041104

[13]
Ostrovsky P, Gornyi I, Mirlin A 2010 Interaction-induced criticality in topological insulators Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 036803

[14]
Linder J 2010 Interplay between superconductivity and ferromagnetism on a topological insulator Phys. Rev. B 81 184525

[15]
Yokoyama T, Tserkovnyak Y 2014 Spin diffusion and magneto resistance in ferromagnet/topological- insulator junctions Phys. Rev. B 89 035408

[16]
Soodchomshom B 2010 Magnetic gap effect on the tunneling conductance in a topological insulator ferromagnet/superconductor junction Phys. Lett. A 374 3561

DOI

[17]
Kang C J, Kim S I, Yun C S, Kim C I 2023 Influence of magnetic field on the transport properties of ferromganet/ferromagnet/s-wave superconductor junctions formed on the surface of a three-dimension topological insulator Solid State Commun. 362 115086

DOI

[18]
Suwanvarangkoon A 2011 Tunneling conductance on surface of topological insulator ferromagnet/insulator/(s- or d-wave) superconductor junction: effect of magnetically -induced relativistic mass Physica E 43 1867

DOI

[19]
Goudarzi H, Khezerlou M, Alilou J 2013 Transport properties of topological insulator-based ferromagnet /f-wave superconductor junction J. Super. Nov. Magn. 26 3355

DOI

[20]
Majidi L, Asgari R 2016 Specular andreev reflection in thin films of topological insulators Phys. Rev. B 93 195404

[21]
Andreev A F 1964 The thermal conductivity of the intermediate state in superconductors Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 46 1823

[22]
Li H, Yang X J 2022 Spin transport properties in ferromagnet/superconductor junctions on topological insulator Chin. Phys. B 31 127301

DOI

[23]
Li H, Yang X J 2023 Study of andreev reflection in topological insulator ferromagnet/wave superconductor structures Solid State Comm. 375 115349

DOI

[24]
Beenakker C W J 2006 Specular Andreev reflection in graphene Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 067007

[25]
Blonder G E, Tinkham M, Klapwijk T M 1982 Transition from metallic to tunneling regimes in superconducting microconstrictions: excess current, charge imbalance, and supercurrent conversion Phys. Rev. B 25 4515

DOI

[26]
Pleceník A 1994 Finite-quasiparticle-lifetime effects in the differential conductance of Bi2Sr2CaCu2Oy/Au junctions Phys. Rev. B 49 10016

DOI

[27]
Blanter Y M, Büttiker M 2000 Shot noise in mesoscopic conductors Phys. Rep. 336 1

DOI

[28]
de Jong M J M, Beenakker C W J 1994 Doubled shot noise in disordered normal-metal–superconductor junctions Phys. Rev. B 49 16070

DOI

[29]
Emamipour H 2018 Differential shot noise and Fano factor in a ferromagnet-graphene-superconductor junction J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 449 133

DOI

[30]
Tanaka Y 2009 Theory of topological spin current in noncentrosymmetric superconductors Phys. Rev. B 79 060505

[31]
Li H, Yang X J 2023 Shot noise in topological insulator-based ferromagnet/p-wave superconductor junctions Physica C 614 1354381

DOI

Outlines

/