Figure
1 gives the results for the influence of magnetic gap
m and quasi-particle lifetime on the conductance in FM/
f1-wave SC junctions based on TI, where (a), (b) and (c) respectively show the case of
${\rm{\Gamma }}=0,$ $0.8{{\rm{\Delta }}}_{0},$ and
${{\rm{\Delta }}}_{0}.$ It can be seen from figure
1(a), when
${\rm{\Gamma }}=0,$ that is, without considering the lifetime of quasi particles, two peaks appear at
$eV=\pm {{\rm{\Delta }}}_{0}$ in the case of
m = 0. These conductance peaks arise due to Andreev resonance occurring at
$eV=\pm {{\rm{\Delta }}}_{0}.$ As shown in figures
1(b) and (c), with the increase of
${\rm{\Gamma }},$ namely with the decrease of the finite lifetime of quasi particles, the distance between two conductance peaks gradually decreases until they merge into a zero-bias conductance peak (ZBCP). According to our calculation, further increasing
${\rm{\Gamma }}$ will smooth out the ZBCP. At the same time, one finds that when
$m/{E}_{F}\gt 1,$ as
${\rm{\Gamma }}$ increases, the width of ZBCP narrows and the height decreases until it reaches zero. These features of the conductance spectrum suggest that shortening the lifetime of the quasi-Dirac particle will prevent the formation of the Andreev bound state in FM/
f1-wave SC junctions based on TI. Comparing figures
1(a)–(c), we can also see that with
m increasing from zero to
EF, the value of the conductance across the entire energy range decreases to zero regardless of whether the quasi-particle lifetime is considered. When
$m\gt {E}_{F},$ the conductance values in the energy range of approximately
$(-\sqrt{{{{\rm{\Delta }}}_{0}}^{2}-{{\rm{\Gamma }}}^{2}},\sqrt{{{{\rm{\Delta }}}_{0}}^{2}-{{\rm{\Gamma }}}^{2}})$ increase with an increase in
m. This shows that the tunneling conductance is highly dependent on the magnetic gap. If the excitation energy
$\varepsilon $ of a quasiparticle is less than
${{\rm{\Delta }}}_{0},$ we can easily verify that
${R}_{e}+{R}_{h}=1,$ because particles with energy below the gap is forbidden to transmit to SC [
20]. Therefore, equation (
5) becomes
$G=2{g}_{0}\sqrt{1-{(m/{E}_{F})}^{2}}\displaystyle {\int }_{-{\theta }_{c}}^{{\theta }_{c}}{R}_{h}\,\cos \,\theta d\theta $ in the case of
$\varepsilon \lt {{\rm{\Delta }}}_{0}.$ Correspondingly, the tunneling conductance in the energy range of
$(-{{\rm{\Delta }}}_{0},{{\rm{\Delta }}}_{0})$ represents the amplitude of the Andreev reflection. It can be reasonable to infer that in the
$m\lt {E}_{F}$ case, the Andreev retro-reflection process mainly determines the characteristics of the tunneling conductance spectrum. However, in the case of
$m\gt {E}_{F},$ the specular reflection becomes dominant. This feature indicates that increasing the magnetic gap effect of the TI-based FM/
f1-wave SC junction will enhance the specular Andreev reflection but suppress the conventional Andreev retro-reflection.