Welcome to visit Communications in Theoretical Physics,
Particle Physics and Quantum Field Theory

Observations on spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking and the mass gap of QCD in finite volume

  • Xiaolan Meng 1, 2 ,
  • Bolun Hu 2 ,
  • Yi-Bo Yang , 1, 2, 3, 4,
Expand
  • 1 University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, School of Physical Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • 2CAS Key Laboratory of Theoretical Physics, Institute of Theoretical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
  • 3School of Fundamental Physics and Mathematical Sciences, Hangzhou Institute for Advanced Study, UCAS, Hangzhou 310024, China
  • 4 International Centre for Theoretical Physics Asia-Pacific, Beijing/Hangzhou, China

Author to whom any correspondence should be addressed.

Received date: 2024-03-08

  Revised date: 2024-04-12

  Accepted date: 2024-04-24

  Online published: 2024-07-23

Copyright

© 2024 Institute of Theoretical Physics CAS, Chinese Physical Society and IOP Publishing

Abstract

We present a lattice quantum chromodynamics (QCD) simulation with 2 + 1 + 1 flavor full QCD ensembles using near-physical quark masses and different spatial sizes L, at a ∼ 0.055 fm. The results show that the scalar and pesudoscalar 2-point correlator with a valence pion mass of approximately 230 MeV become degenerated at L ≤ 1.0 fm, and such an observation suggests that the spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking disappears effectively at this point. At the same time, the mass gap between the nucleon and pion masses remains larger than ΛQCD in the entire L ∈ [0.2, 0.7] fm range.

Cite this article

Xiaolan Meng , Bolun Hu , Yi-Bo Yang . Observations on spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking and the mass gap of QCD in finite volume[J]. Communications in Theoretical Physics, 2024 , 76(9) : 095203 . DOI: 10.1088/1572-9494/ad426f

1. Introduction

Both spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking (SCSB) and confinement are intrinsic features of the strong interaction between quarks and gluons, although their relationship is the subject of debate. Lattice QCD has confirmed the restoration of chiral symmetry and certain aspects of deconfinement at high temperatures [1]. However, there are also studies arguing that the strong interaction between quarks still exists, and therefore, deconfinement is incomplete (e.g. the recent Nf = 2 study [2]). These discussions are based on the spatial correlation function of meson interpolators, which differ from the standard hadron mass and will be sensitive to flavors (or other systematics) [3].
All the above lattice QCD calculations focus on the infinite volume limit mπL ≫ 1, as the finite volume effect on the physical observable can be significant when mπL is not large enough [4]. As evidence, in a Lattice QCD simulation at a ∼ 0.11 fm with mπL ∼ 1 using near-physical light quark mass and L ∼ 1.8 fm, an effective restoration of chiral symmetry in the mesonic two-point functions was observed [5]. A system with mπL ≤ 1 is referred to as the ε-regime of the chiral perturbation theory (χPT) [4], and reasonable leading-order low-energy constants of χPT can be extracted using the above lattice calculations [5].
The finite temperature lattice QCD simulation requires a smaller temporal size to reach higher temperatures. Therefore, one cannot extract the standard ground-state hadron mass based on the long-distance temperature correlation function, and the use of the spatial correlation function would be unavoidable. However, chiral symmetry restoration can also be observed with a long enough temporal size in the ε-regime, allowing reliable extraction of the ground-state hadron mass. In this work, we present a preliminary study on the masses of iso-vector mesons and nucleons at different L, using the clover fermion on the highly improved staggered quark (HISQ) ensembles with near-physical quark masses. We find that the mass gap between the nucleon and pion masses remains, even when L is as small as 0.2 fm.

2. Numerical setup

The ideal choice for the fermion action in the ε-regime simulation is the overlap fermion [6, 7], which preserves the exact chiral symmetry on the lattice, as demonstrated in the previous JLQCD study [5]. However, the overlap fermion can be ${ \mathcal O }(10-100)$ times more expensive than the usual clover fermion used by the CLQCD ensembles [8]. On the other hand, the clover fermion action suffers from additive quark mass renormalization, and therefore requires iterative tuning during the configuration generation to approach the chiral limit. In addition, the HISQ [9] fermion action is a widely used choice in the finite temperature study of QCD, as it is even cheaper than the clover fermion and preserves part of the chiral symmetry. However, residual taste-breaking effects can make the construction of the baryon correlation function highly non-trivial.
A possible efficient solution to take advantage of different fermion actions is to use the HISQ fermion action to generate the configuration, but to employ other fermion actions without taste-breaking effects to calculate the valence quark propagator and hadron correlators. Such a setup suffers from the so-called mixed-action effect, but a recent study [10] suggests that this effect is ${ \mathcal O }({a}^{4})$ and therefore becomes negligible at relatively small lattice spacing. Additionally, the additive chiral symmetry breaking effect of the clover fermion has been shown to be suppressed to a few percent level when non-perturbative renormalization and continuum extrapolation are applied, making it suitable for exploratory studies.
Thus, we chose the HISQ fermion action and one-loop improved Symanzik gauge action used by the milC collaboration to generate the configurations. The bare coupling and quark masses were interpolated to those at a = 0.052 fm based on the parameters used by the MILC configurations [11, 12], as such a lattice spacing is used by the CLQCD ensemble H48P32 [8]. The lattice spacing determined through the Wilson flow [13] is approximately 0.055 fm and close to the target value.
The corresponding effective mass of the pion, ηs, and ηc using this lattice spacing are shown in figure 1. Based on the constant fit at a relatively large t, we can extract mπ = 0.157(8) GeV, which is quite close to the experimental value 0.135 GeV. The ηs mass ${m}_{{\eta }_{s}}=0.681(2)$ GeV is also close to the most precise lattice determination of 0.689 63(18) MeV [14], and the ηc mass ${m}_{{\eta }_{c}}=2.824(1)$ GeV is only 5% lower than the experimental value of 2.98 GeV [15].
Figure 1. The pion, ηs ηc effective masses on the 484 lattice at a ∼ 0.055 fm, using the HISQ action.
For the valence quark, we use the tadpole improved clover fermion action with the hypercubic (HYP) smeared gauge field, and tune the corresponding pion mass to be about 230 MeV on the 484 lattice, which is close to the unitary pion mass and corresponds to mπL ∼ 3. Using even smaller valence pion mass would make the finite volume effect non-negligible at the largest L we used.
In this work, we choose the ratio of the scalar and pseudoscalar 2-point correlators as a criterion for SCSB, since this ratio will be 1 up to the finite quark mass effect after chiral symmetry is restored. Additionally, we consider the mass difference between the nucleon mass mN and 3/2 times the pion mass mπ as a typical example of the QCD mass gap. This difference is around 700 MeV with the physical pion mass and should also be non-zero in the chiral and infinite volume limit, but should approach zero in the deconfined phase of QCD. The factor 3/2 in front of mπ aims to cancel the quark number contribution in the nucleon, which can be important when the finite volume effects become significant, as will be shown in the following calculation. We use the pion instead of other mesons, since it is the only light meson that will not decay with the strong interaction and will be degenerate with a0 without SCSB. The difference mN − 3/2mH for other hadrons H, such as the ρ meson or a1, will be investigated in future studies.
The ensembles we generated for this work are summarized in table 1.
Table 1. Bare coupling 10/g2, dimensionless quark masses ml,s,ca, lattice volume V and number of configurations ncfg.
10/g2 mla msa mca V ncfg
6.784 0.000 731 0.019 75 0.2293 43 × 96 238
83 × 96 350
82 × 32 × 96 100
103 × 96 148
123 × 96 150
163 × 96 146
203 × 96 148
243 × 96 151
323 × 96 98
403 × 96 72
403 × 96 80
483 × 48 100

3. Results

We calculate the hadron temporal two-point correlators, including pseudoscalar (P), scalar (S) and proton (N), with the clover valence mass mu = − 0.0414 at the near-physical point to extract hadron masses according to the formula
$\begin{eqnarray}{{ \mathcal C }}_{{\rm{P}},{\rm{S}}}(t)=\displaystyle \sum _{\vec{x},\vec{y}}\langle {{ \mathcal O }}_{{\rm{P}},{\rm{S}}}(\vec{x},t){{ \mathcal O }}_{{\rm{P}},{\rm{S}}}{\left(\vec{y},0\right)}^{\dagger }\rangle ,\end{eqnarray}$
with the P,S interpolators defined as
$\begin{eqnarray}{{ \mathcal O }}_{{\rm{P}}}=\bar{u}{\gamma }_{5}d,\,{{ \mathcal O }}_{{\rm{S}}}=\bar{u}d,\end{eqnarray}$
and nucleon two-point functions defined as
$\begin{eqnarray}\begin{array}{l}{{ \mathcal C }}_{{\rm{N}}}(t)=\displaystyle \sum _{\vec{x},\vec{y}}{\epsilon }^{{abc}}{\epsilon }^{a^{\prime} b^{\prime} c^{\prime} }\langle \mathrm{Tr}[{{\rm{\Gamma }}}_{e}{u}^{a}(\vec{y},t){d}^{{b}^{T}}(\vec{y},t)(C{\gamma }_{5}){u}^{c}(\vec{y},t)\\ {\,\times \,\bar{d}}^{a^{\prime} }(\vec{x},0)(C{\gamma }_{5}){\bar{u}}^{b{{\prime} }^{T}}(\vec{x},0){\bar{u}}^{c^{\prime} }(\vec{x},0)]\rangle ,\end{array}\end{eqnarray}$
with Γe = (1 + γ4)/2. When computing quark propagators, Coulomb wall sources with random positions in the temporal direction are used to reduce autocorrelation effects between configurations. The values for the pion masses are extracted from fitting correlators by a one-state fit with the fitting range selected to ensure acceptable χ2/d.o.f.∼1,
$\begin{eqnarray}{{ \mathcal C }}_{{\rm{P}}}(t)=A\ \cosh ({m}_{\pi }(T/2-t))\end{eqnarray}$
with the fitting parameters A and mπ. The result is shown in figure 2. We observe clear plateaus in the effective mass meff(t) for all values of L, which suggests that ${{ \mathcal C }}_{{\rm{P}}}(t)$ exhibits exponential decay, regardless of the spatial volume when T is large enough. When L ∼ 0.22 fm, mπ becomes massive around 5 GeV. The mπ rapidly decreases as L increases, and stabilizes at around 230 MeV when L > 1.8 fm.
Figure 2. The non-singlet pion effective masses at different spatial size L.
For proton mass, due to a poor signal at large t, we employ a two-state fit for ${{ \mathcal C }}_{{\rm{N}}}(t)$ at a relatively smaller t in the ensembles with L = 0.22, 0.44, 0.55, 0.66 and 1.76 fm to eliminate the excited state contamination,
$\begin{eqnarray}{{ \mathcal C }}_{{\rm{N}}}(t)={c}_{1}{{\rm{e}}}^{-{m}_{{\rm{N}}}t}(1+{c}_{2}{{\rm{e}}}^{-{\rm{\Delta }}{mt}}),\end{eqnarray}$
where mN, Δm and c1,2 are fitting parameters. The cases with the other L are fitted with the single state (c2 = 0). As shown in figure 3, it is revealed that proton masses also follow similar patterns with changes in volume to pions: mN decreases when spatial extent increases, and tends to about 1 GeV at infinite volume limit. Since pions and nucleons have different numbers of quarks, we define the combination mN − 1.5mπ to examine the mass gap between the proton and pion based on their quark contents. The result in figure 4 shows the mass gap between the proton and pion remains above 0.7 GeV and even increases at small volume, which suggests that the QCD confinement remains even at very small L. From another perspective shown in figure 5, mπL has a lower limit (around 2) and tends towards 6 ∼ 2π at small volumes, which implies that the epsilon regime cannot be reached simply by reducing the spatial volume and QCD is not completely dominated by the possible massless pion field at small L. In addition, the variation in the pion and iso-vector scalar meson a0 two-point function can reflect the nature of chiral symmetry. If chiral symmetry is effectively restored, the quark propagator ${ \mathcal S }(x,y)=\psi (x)\bar{\psi }(y)$ on each individual configuration with negligible quark mass will anti-commutate with γ5, $\{{\gamma }_{5},{ \mathcal S }\}\sim 0$. Thus, we have
$\begin{eqnarray}{{ \mathcal C }}_{{\rm{P}}}(t)=\displaystyle \sum _{\vec{x},\vec{y}}\langle \mathrm{tr}[{\gamma }_{5}{ \mathcal S }(\vec{0},0;\vec{y},t){\gamma }_{5}{ \mathcal S }(\vec{y},t;\vec{0},0)]\rangle =-\,{{ \mathcal C }}_{{\rm{S}}}(t),\end{eqnarray}$
and then ${{ \mathcal C }}_{{\rm{P}}}(t)$ and ${{ \mathcal C }}_{{\rm{S}}}(t)$ will be degenerate. The meson two-point functions are shown in figure 6. When L < 0.7 fm, ${{ \mathcal C }}_{{\rm{P}}}(t)=-{{ \mathcal C }}_{{\rm{S}}}(t)$ holds effectively for all time slices, except t = 0, which may indicate the effective restoration of chiral symmetry. Based on the data shown in the sub-panel of figure 7, the ratio CP/CS is away from 1 by 1%, which could be the finite quark mass effect. When L reaches 0.9 fm, ${{ \mathcal C }}_{{\rm{P}}}(t)$ begins to slightly deviate from $-{{ \mathcal C }}_{{\rm{S}}}(t)$ and significantly deviates as L increases to 1.1 fm, including an unexpected sign change in the latter. The ${{ \mathcal C }}_{{\rm{S}}}(t)$ returns to negative values at L ∼ 1.8 fm and shows faster exponential decay at relatively small t, which corresponds to the physical a0 state (or KK state) in the realistic QCD. The ${{ \mathcal C }}_{{\rm{S}}}(t)$ exhibits irregular behaviour as the volume continually increases, possibly due to the contamination from the other 0++ states.
Figure 3. The nucleon effective masses at different spatial size L.
Figure 4. The mass difference mN − 3/2mπ as a function of L.
Figure 5. The mπL as a function of L.
Figure 6. The pion and iso-vector scalar meson a0 two-point function as a function of t, at L = {0.2, 0.9, 1.1, 1.8} fm.
Figure 7. The chiral symmetry breaking effect CP(t)/CS(t) as a function of L, at t = {0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.4, 0.8} fm.
The mass splitting between the a0 and pion also serves as an indicator of the chiral symmetry breaking. We determine ${m}_{{a}_{0}}$ using the same formula and fitting patterns as in the nucleon case. As depicted in figures 8 and 9, while the mass degeneration of the two mesons occurs naturally as ${{ \mathcal C }}_{{\rm{P}}}(t)=-{{ \mathcal C }}_{{\rm{S}}}(t)$ at L < 0.7 fm, the mass splits are still small with L ∈ (0.9, 1.5) fm, even though an obvious difference has been observed in the two-point functions above 1.1 fm. The ${m}_{{a}_{0}}$ increases to about 0.8 GeV at L ∼ 1.8 fm if we fit ${{ \mathcal C }}_{{\rm{S}}}(t)$ at small t, and then the uncertainty of ${{ \mathcal C }}_{{\rm{S}}}(t)$ increases rapidly with even larger L. This observation may indicate that the chiral phase transition using L as the order parameter would be a crossover, similar to that using T at finite temperature.
Figure 8. The a0 effective masses at different spatial size L.
Figure 9. The non-singlet pion, a0, and nucleon masses mπ, ma0 and mN (upper panel) with different spatial sizes at a ∼ 0.055 fm.
The results of hadron masses are summarized in figure 9, showing mπ and mN stabilization for L > 1.8 fm, suggesting minimal finite volume effects, whereas ${m}_{{a}_{0}}$ exhibits fluctuations due to complex 0+-state contamination. More precisely, the ‘decay’ of a0 on the lattice implies the presence of many (multi-particle) states below the a0 mass with the same JPC, and then the uncertainty of CS will be larger when the weights of the under-threshold states become larger. As depicted in figure 9, the a0 (more precisely, the ground state in the scalar channel) effective mass at 1.1 fm is similar to the corresponding pion mass and then lower than the ππ state; thus, the ‘decay’ cannot occur and the signal of CS is good, as shown in figure 8 (blue diamonds). When L = 1.76 fm, the π(0)π(0) state is lower than the a0 threshold. Therefore, in figure 8, we can observe a pseudo-plateau (green triangles) at small t, which is around the physical a0 mass and also the KK threshold, but the uncertainty increases at large t due to contamination from the π(0)π(0) state. The weights of the π(0)π(0) state increase with even larger L, resulting in a huge uncertainty in the effective mass of CS at L = 2.64 fm, as shown in figure 8 with purple triangles.
We also show an additional case on a 32 × 82 × 96 lattice for comparison in figure 9. The hadron masses ${m}_{\pi ,N,{a}_{0}}$ are quite close to those on the 83 × 96 lattice. It suggests that QCD properties will be dominated by the spatial direction to a shorter extent in those cases.

4. Summary

We studied the hadron spectrum in the finite spatial volume with near-physical quark masses with different L, using the clover valence fermion on the HISQ sea configurations at a = 0.05 fm. The results show that the pion mass receives a huge 1/L correction at small L, leading to an increase in the corresponding mπL when L ≤ 1.2 fm, where the chiral symmetry breaking between the scalar and pseudoscalar correlation functions is effectively restored. At the same time, the mass gap mN − 3mπ/2 is always larger than 700 MeV in the entire L ∈ (0.4, 2.5) fm range we studied. Such an observation suggests that the confinement of QCD can exist when the SCSB is absent.
Our study also suggests that the ε-regime, where mπL ≤ 1, cannot be reached solely by decreasing L, as the pion mass can increase significantly with decreasing L. Since the pion mass has been saturated at L > 1.5 fm, it is possible to further reduce the bare quark mass of the clover fermion to suppress mπ on the 484 lattice without much finite volume effect, and achieve a smaller mπL.
Since the valence clover fermion action we used breaks the chiral symmetry additively, it would be non-trivial to further investigate the origin of the restoration of the chiral symmetry and the remaining mass gap. The overlap fermion action would be more suitable for this task, and the study is ongoing. The mixed-action effect on the above observations would also be a concern, and further study at multiple lattice spacings is also essential.

We thank the MILC collaborations for sharing their inputs into the gauge configurations, and Carleton Detar, Keh-Fei Liu and Shoji Hashimoto for useful information and discussion. The calculations were performed using the MILC [11, 12] and Chroma software suite [16] with QUDA [1719] through the HIP programming model [20]. The numerical calculations were carried out on the ORISE Supercomputer, and HPC Cluster of ITP-CAS. This work is supported in part by NSFC Grant Nos. 12293 060, 12 293 062, 12 293 065 and 12 047 503, the science and education integration young faculty project of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Grant Nos. XDB34030303 and YSBR-101, and an NSFC-DFG joint grant under Grant Nos. 12 061 131 006 and SCHA 458/22.

1
Bazavov A 2012 The chiral and deconfinement aspects of the QCD transition Phys. Rev. D 85 054503

DOI

2
Rohrhofer C, Aoki Y, Cossu G, Fukaya H, Gattringer C, Glozman L Y, Hashimoto S, Lang C B, Prelovsek S 2019 Symmetries of spatial meson correlators in high temperature QCD Phys. Rev. D 100 014502

DOI

3
Chiu T-W 2023 Symmetries of meson correlators in high-temperature QCD with physical (u/d, s, c) domain-wall quarks Phys. Rev. D 107 114501

DOI

4
Gasser J, Leutwyler H 1987 Thermodynamics of chiral symmetry Phys. Lett. B 188 477

DOI

5
Fukaya H, Aoki S, Hashimoto S, Kaneko T, Matsufuru H, Noaki J, Ogawa K, Onogi T, Yamada N (JLQCD) 2008 Lattice study of meson correlators in the epsilon-regime of two-flavor QCD Phys. Rev. D 77 074503

DOI

6
Chiu T-W 1999 Ginsparg-Wilson fermion propagators and chiral condensate Phys. Rev. D 60 034503

DOI

7
Liu K-F 2005 Heavy and light quarks with lattice chiral fermions Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 20 7241

DOI

8
Hu Z-C, Hu B-L, Wang J-H, Gong M, Liu L, Sun P, Sun W, Wang W, Yang Y-B, Zhao D-J 2024 Quark masses and low energy constants in the continuum from the tadpole improved clover ensembles Phys. Rev. D 109 054507

DOI

9
Follana E, Mason Q, Davies C, Hornbostel K, Lepage G P, Shigemitsu J, Trottier H, Wong K (HPQCD, UKQCD) 2007 Highly improved staggered quarks on the lattice, with applications to charm physics Phys. Rev. D 75 054502

DOI

10
Zhao D-J, Wang G, He F, Jin L, Sun P, Yang Y-B, Zhang K (χQCD) 2023 Distance between various discretized fermion actions Phys. Rev. D 107 L091501

DOI

11
Bazavov A MILC 2010 Scaling studies of QCD with the dynamical HISQ action Phys. Rev. D 82 074501

DOI

12
Bazavov A MILC 2013 Lattice QCD ensembles with four flavors of highly improved staggered quarks Phys. Rev. D 87 054505

DOI

13
Lüscher M 2010 Properties and uses of the Wilson flow in lattice QCD J. High Energy Phys. JHEP08(2010)071

DOI

14
Borsanyi S 2021 Leading hadronic contribution to the muon magnetic moment from lattice QCD Nature 593 51

DOI

15
Zyla P A (Particle Data Group) 2020 Review of particle physics PTEP 2020 083C01

DOI

16
Edwards R G, Joo B (SciDAC, LHPC, UKQCD) 2005 The Chroma Software System for Lattice QCD Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. B 140 832 834

DOI

17
Clark M A, Babich R, Barros K, Brower R C, Rebbi C 2010 Solving Lattice QCD systems of equations using mixed precision solvers on GPUs Comput. Phys. Commun. 181 1517

DOI

18
Babich R, Clark M A, Joo B, Shi G, Brower R C, Gottlieb S 2011 Scaling Lattice QCD beyond 100 GPUs arXiv:1109.2935

19
Clark M A, Jo B, Strelchenko A, Cheng M, Gambhir A, Brower R 2016 Accelerating Lattice QCD multigrid on GPUs using fine-grained parallelization arXiv:1612.07873

20
Bi Y-J, Xiao Y, Gong M, Guo W-Y, Sun P, Xu S, Yang Y-B 2020 Lattice QCD package GWU-code and QUDA with HIP arXiv:2001.05706v2

Outlines

/