The magnetic behavior of a two-electron quantum dot/ring system is analytically studied with electron–electron (e–e) interaction taking into account the Rashba spin–orbit interaction (SOI) and magnetic field. The Jacobi transformation has been employed to separate the Hamiltonian of the system to the center of mass and relative terms. The Schrödinger equation is analytically solved, and energy spectra are obtained. Then, the magnetization and susceptibility are calculated. The magnetization decreases by raising the magnetic field without and with SOI, and also without e-e interaction. Also, the SOI slightly modifies the magnetization of the system without e–e interaction. The susceptibility displays a peak structure as the magnetic field changes from low values to high values. The susceptibility by considering e–e interaction and without the SOI is always negative and its value decreases by rising the magnetic field. The susceptibility displays a transition from diamagnetic to paramagnetic with e–e interaction and SOI.
M Shirsefat, M Servatkhah, S Hosseini. An analytical study of the magnetic properties of the quantum dot/ring system: Rashba, magnetic field, and electron-electron effects[J]. Communications in Theoretical Physics, 2025, 77(4): 045106. DOI: 10.1088/1572-9494/ad7c37
1. Introduction
The physical behaviors of nanostructures are interesting and have potential applications in engineering science. Among the nanostructures, quantum dots (QDs) and quantum rings (QRs) have received much attention. The study of thermodynamic and magnetic properties of QDs and QRs are important challenges in the science of physics [1–7].
The confinement potentials have a crucial role in investigating the thermodynamic and magnetic properties of quantum dot/ring systems. The available confinement potentials such as the Fu–Wang–Jia potential [8, 9] and its special cases also have a substantial role in the accurate prediction of thermodynamic properties for real substance systems and the successful prediction of equilibrium constants for some important chemical reactions [10–14].
In past years, many researchers have tried to study the physical properties of nanostructures analytically [15–19]. Also, many authors have tried to investigate the effects of electron–electron (e–e) interaction, magnetic field, and spin–orbit interaction (SOI) on the physical properties of QDs and QRs [20–25]. As we know, analytical study is very valuable. Although, due to the complicated form of the e–e interaction and SOI, the analytical study of the physical properties of nanostructures requires considerable theoretical effort. The reader can refer to [26–28].
One of the most important physical properties of nanostructures are the magnetic properties. Hitherto, many papers have reported on the magnetic properties of QDs and QRs [29–34]. Recently, Shi et al [35] investigated dynamic magnetic properties and the magnetocaloric effect of a decorated square structure. It is to be noted that the magnetic properties of QDs and QRs change under various factors like SOI, impurity, e–e interaction, and magnetic field. Several articles have reported on the magnetic properties of QDs under Rashba SOI and e–e interaction [29–32, 36–40].
According to the importance of the subject, we have tried to study the magnetic properties of a quantum dot/ring system under a magnetic field, e–e interaction, and Rashba SOI. To reach this goal, we analytically solve the Schrödinger equation and obtain the electron energy levels. Then, we determine magnetization, and magnetic susceptibility under the aforementioned factors.
2. Theory and model
Consider a dot/ring system with two electrons under an external magnetic field $B,$ and the Rashba SOI. The total Hamiltonian of the system is expressed as:
The first term $\left({H}_{0}\right)$ is the Hamiltonian of two electrons without the e–e interaction and the Rashba effect. The second term is the Rashba Hamiltonian, the third term is the e–e interaction, and the fourth term is the Zeeman Hamiltonian. The Hamiltonian of ${H}_{0}$ is given by
where ${m}^{* }$ is the electron effective mass, and ${{\boldsymbol{A}}}_{j}\,=\tfrac{B}{2}\left(-{y}_{j},{x}_{j},0\right)=\tfrac{B{r}_{j}}{2}{\boldsymbol{\varphi }}$ is the vector potential. Also, $V\left({{\boldsymbol{r}}}_{1},{{\boldsymbol{r}}}_{2}\right)$ is the confining potential with two terms, a parabolic-inverse square (PIS), and a Gaussian term. One can write $V\left({{\boldsymbol{r}}}_{1},{{\boldsymbol{r}}}_{2}\right)={V}_{1}\left({{\boldsymbol{r}}}_{1},{{\boldsymbol{r}}}_{2}\right)+{V}_{2}\left({{\boldsymbol{r}}}_{1},{{\boldsymbol{r}}}_{2}\right).$
where ${V}_{0}$ and ${R}_{0}$ are the depth and range of the potential. We suppose that $q=2$ and $r/{R}_{0}\ll 1,$ hence the Gaussian potential can be expressed by:
Here, ${\alpha }_{R}$ is the Rashba coupling parameter, and $\sigma \,=\left({\sigma }_{x},{\sigma }_{y},{\sigma }_{z}\right)$ are the Pauli matrices. The Zeeman term is given by
To solve equation (15), consider the wave function as ${\rm{\Phi }}\left(r,\theta \right)\,=\tfrac{{{\rm{e}}}^{{\rm{i}}m\theta }}{\sqrt{2\pi }}f\left(r\right),$ and obtain:
Considering the radial wave function as $f\left(r\right)\,={{\rm{e}}}^{-c{r}^{2}-dr}\displaystyle \displaystyle \sum _{n}{a}_{n}{r}^{n+k}$ where $\gamma ,$ and $\delta $ are constant. Inserting $f\left(r\right)$ into equation (17), we have:
Considering ${\rm{\Psi }}=\left(\begin{array}{c}u\left(R\right){{\rm{e}}}^{{\rm{i}}m\phi }\\ v\left(R\right){{\rm{e}}}^{{\rm{i}}\left(m+1\right)\phi }\end{array}\right)$ and inserting it into equation (25), one has:
Inserting equations (30) and (31) into (26) and (27). Then, using the recurrence relations, and Bessel differential equation, the energy levels ${E}_{R}$ of the system can be obtained.
where ${E}_{s}$ is the energy eigenvalue, $\beta =1/{k}_{B}T,$ and ${k}_{{\rm{B}}}$ is Boltzmann’s constant. The magnetization, and susceptibility are given by,
We have chosen GaAs to show the numerical results. The following parameters have been employed: ${m}^{\ast }=0.067\,{m}_{0},$ ${g}^{\ast }=-0.44,$ ${\alpha }_{R}$ = 5.4 meV-nm, $\hslash {\omega }_{0}$ = 0.019 meV, and ${V}_{0}$ = 300 meV.
In figure 1(a), a schematic of the quantum dot/quantum ring (QD/QR) structure is shown. This system is composed of a QD separated from a surrounding concentric QR by a tunneling barrier ${V}_{0}.$ Figure 1(b) displays the curve of the actual single-particle potential energy as a function of distance with arbitrary values [32].
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of QD/QR structure; (b) the shape of the actual single-particle potential energy, with arbitrary values.
Figure 2 displays the reduced energy $\left(E/\hslash {\omega }_{0}\right)$ of the two-electron system versus the magnetic field, and without Rashba SOI. Two curves correspond to the ground and first excited states. We know that in the absence of a magnetic field, the energy levels of various states within an atomic orbital are identical. If a magnetic field is applied, the states split according to the Zeeman effect and take a great variety of values. The amount of splitting is entirely dependent on the strength of the field applied. As can be seen, the energy increases as the magnetic field enhances. In the absence of Rashba effect, as the magnetic field increases, the system receives more energy and the energy values ​​increase. According to the obtained relations, the energy of the system depends on the magnetic field value. We can see from figure 2 that a singlet → triplet transition at a critical value of ${B}_{c}$ in the presence of e–e interaction.
Figure 2. Reduced energy $\left(E/\hslash {\omega }_{0}\right)$ versus the magnetic field with e–e interaction and without SOI.
Figure 3 demonstrates reduced magnetization $\left(M/{\mu }_{B}^{* }\right)$ of the two-electron system versus reduced magnetic field $\left({\omega }_{0}/{\omega }_{c}\right)$ without the e–e interaction at $T=1\,{\rm{K}}.$ The plotted curves correspond to the presence and absence of Rashba SOI. It can be seen that the magnetization increases by enhancing $B$ without and with SOI. We know that at low temperatures ($T=1\,{\rm{K}}$ ), only the lower energy states are more likely to be occupied. From the figure, it is observed that the SOI slightly modifies the magnetization of the system. When $B$ rises, the degeneracy is lifted due to the influence of the field on the Landau level and Zeeman splitting.
Figure 3. Reduced magnetization $\left(M/{\mu }_{B}^{* }\right)$ versus the reduced magnetic field $\left({\omega }_{0}/{\omega }_{c}\right)$ without e–e interaction with T = 1 K.
In figure 4, the susceptibility is plotted versus $B$ for different temperatures with and without e–e interaction. As can be seen, the susceptibility rises by increasing the magnetic field, and it has a peak structure. The susceptibility reduces with rising temperature because the system disorder increases. In the presence of e–e interaction, the maximum value of the curve moves to lower magnetic fields. By considering e–e interaction, the system receives more addition energy (third term in equation (1)). When the susceptibility reaches a maximum, the system disorder decreases. We see also the width and height of the plotted curves depend on the temperature. In the absence of SOI, the system order depends on temperature, magnetic field, and e–e interaction. There is a competition between three factors. Since the used temperatures are low, the main competition is between e–e interaction and magnetic field.
Figure 4. The susceptibility versus the magnetic field without SOI.
Figure 5 presents the susceptibility versus temperature without and with e–e interaction for $B$ = 0.5 T. As can be seen, the susceptibility rises by increasing the temperature without and with e–e interaction. With rising the temperature, it seems that a negative saturation occurs. This means that the system obtains a specific order. By considering e–e interaction, more addition energy enters to the system and susceptibility ($\chi =-\tfrac{{\partial }^{2}F}{\partial {B}^{2}}$ ) decreases in the negative direction. It is to be noted that the curves in figures 4 and 5 have been plotted without Rashba SOI.
Figure 5. The susceptibility versus the temperature without SOI for $B$ = 0.5 T.
In figure 6, the susceptibility has been presented versus temperature without and with e–e interaction taking into account Rashba SOI at zero magnetic field. As can be seen, the susceptibility displays a transition from diamagnetic to paramagnetic at a special temperature. The maximum value of the curve moves to lower temperatures in the presence of e–e interaction. Also, the width and height of the curves change with e–e interaction. By considering the SOI, there is an energy splitting as ${E}_{+}$ and ${E}_{-}.$ The occupation probability of each energy branch depends on the temperature, and e–e interaction. By considering e–e interaction, the system obtains more order at low temperatures and the susceptibility shows a maximum at low temperature.
Figure 6. The susceptibility versus the temperature with SOI for $B$ = 0.
Figure 7 demonstrates the susceptibility versus the temperature in the presence and absence of e–e interaction for $B=1\,{\rm{T}}.$ The curves were plotted in the presence and absence of the Rashba SOI. There is a paramagnetic peak in the absence of e–e interaction. The maximum value of the curve with SOI is lower than that without SOI. By increasing the temperature, the thermodynamic fluctuations enhance and the system shows a diamagnetic behavior with and without e–e interaction and Rashba SOI. We also observe that the susceptibility has negative and positive values. This means that the system shows diamagnetic and paramagnetic behaviors. The regions of diamagnetic and paramagnetic depend on the values of the temperature.
Figure 7. The susceptibility versus the temperature with SOI for $B$ = 1 T.
In figure 8, we plotted energies of the two low-lying states of a two-electron QD as a function of field $B$ for ${V}_{0}$ = 20 meV and ${R}_{0}$ = 10 nm. Our results have been compared with the Gaussian potential model [28]. As the magnetic field increases, the energy of the state $l$ = 0 increases but the energy of the states with non-vanishing $l$ decreases. This leads to a sequence of different ground states with $l$ = 0, −1, −2, −3, −4, … with an increase in magnetic field. An interesting phenomenon of energy level crossing happens because the coulomb energy gets smaller and smaller with increasing $\left|l\right|$ along with the average distance between the electrons. In the presence of the e–e interaction, the energy is higher because the e–e interaction is supposed to increase the total energy.
Figure 8. Energies of the two low-lying states of a two-electron QD as a function of magnetic field for ${V}_{0}$ = 20 meV and ${R}_{0}$ = 10 nm. Our results have been compared with the Gaussian potential model [28].
4. Conclusions
The effects of e–e interaction, Rashba SOI, and magnetic field on the susceptibility of GaAs quantum dot/ring system have been theoretically studied. According to the results, it is deduced that the magnetic field, Rashba SOI, and e–e interaction have important roles in the magnetic behavior of the system. The system can show both diamagnetic and paramagnetic behaviors with a proper selection of system parameters. The transition from paramagnetic to diamagnetic depends on temperature. It is also shown that e–e interaction causes singlet–triplet transitions in our system. The position of peak in the susceptibility has been shown to depend on the temperature and also the strength of the e–e interaction. This system can be of interest from the point of view of magnetic device applications. In future, the thermodynamic and also the magnetocaloric properties of the system in the presence of SOI can be studied.
Competing interests
The authors declare that there is no competing interests that might beperceived to influence the results and/or discussion reported in this paper.
Funding
The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript
Author contributions
In this work M Servatkhah proposed and conceived the main idea as the supervisor (Conceptualization). M Shirsefat developed the theory and conducted the formal analysis. Programming has been done by M Shirsefat and S. Hosseini (Advisor). M Servatkhah and S Hosseini verified the analytical methods and investigated the findings of this work (Methodology and validation). The original draft of the paper was written by M Servatkhah, M Shirsefat and S Hosseini, all authors discussed the results and contributed to the review and editing of the final corrected manuscript. The whole process has been done under the supervision of M Servatkhah. The descriptions are accurate and agreed by all authors.
Data availability
The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
PershinY V, NesteroffJ A, PrivmanV2004 Effect of spin–orbit interaction and in-plane magnetic field on the conductance of a quasi-one-dimensional system Phys. Rev. B69 121306
SroujiR, SakrM R2015 Thermopower of a ballistic nanowire subjected to an in-plane magnetic field in the presence of Rashba and Dresselhaus interactions Physica E68 210 214
HashemiP, ServatkhahM, PourmandR2021 The effect of rashba spin–orbit interaction on optical far-infrared transition of tuned quantum dot/ring systems Opt. Quant. Electron.53 567
HashemiP, ServatkhahM, PourmandR2022 Influence of polaron on second and third harmonic generation of tuned quantum dot/ring systems Opt. Commun.506 127551
AraújoJ P, BallesterM Y2021 A comparative review of 50 analytical representation of potential energy interaction for diatomic systems: 100 years of history Int. J. Quant. Chem.121 e26808
LiuG H, DingQ C, WangC W, JiaC S2022 Unified explicit formulations of thermodynamic properties for the gas NO2, and gaseous BF2 and AlCl2 radicals Chem. Phys. Lett.830 140788
ChakrabortyT, ManaselyanA, BarseghyanM, LarozeD2018 Controllable continuous evolution of electronic states in a single quantum ring Phys. Rev. B97 041304 (R)
KhordadR2018 Simultaneous effects of electron-electron interactions, Rashba spin–orbit interaction and magnetic field on susceptibility of quantum dots J. Magn. Magn. Mater.449 510
KirakM2021 Magnetic and thermodynamic properties of GaAs quantum dot confined by parabolic-inverse square plus gaussian potential J. Magn. Magn. Mater.536 167481
KhordadR, MohammadiS A2023 Simultaneous effects of pressure, temperature, and external magnetic field on absorption threshold frequency of tuned quantum dot/ring systems: an analytical study J. Comput. Electron.22 641
El-BakkariK, IqraounE, JaouaneM, ArraouiR, SaliA, Fakkahi1A, Ed-DahmounyA, AzmiH2023 Magnetic field effect on the linear and nonlinear refractive index and optical absorption of a donor in a GaAs quantum ring Phys. Scr.98 085102
Al ShormanM M, NammasF S, HaddadH, ShukriA A2018 Heat capacity and entropy of two electrons quantum dot in a magnetic field with parabolic interaction Chin. J. Phys.56 1057
SharmaH K, BodaA, BoyaciogluB, ChatterjeeA2019 Electronic and magnetic properties of a two-electron Gaussian GaAs quantum dot with spin-Zeeman term: a study by numerical diagonalization J. Magn. Magn. Matter.469 171
LafaurieL G, SuazaY A, LarozeD, GutiérrezW, MarínJ H2024 Thermodynamic properties of an artificial molecule quantum rings: Geometric and external field effects Physica B679 415786
LakaalK, KriaM, El HamdaouiJ, PrasadV V, NautiyalV V, El-YadriM, PérezL M, LarozeD, FeddiE2022 Polaronic corrections on magnetization and thermodynamic properties of electron-electron in 2D systems with Rashba spin–orbit coupling J. Magn. Magn. Mater.551 169042
GoudarziM, KaramdelJ, Hassanabadi Sh ZorriasateinH2022 Investigation of two-electron quantum dot in a magnetic field by using of quasi-exact-solvable method Solid State Commun.344 114669
BhattacharyyaK, DebnathD, ChatterjeeA2023 Rashba effect on finite temperature magnetotransport in a dissipative quantum dot transistor with electronic and polaronic interactions Sci Rep.13 5500
IbrahimN, SaaM A, ShaerA, ElsaidM2021 Effects of Rashba spin–orbit interaction and topological defect on the magnetic properties of an electron confined in a 2D quantum dot effects of Rashba spin–orbit interaction and topological defect on the magnetic properties of an electron confined in a 2D quantum dot J. Taibah Univ. Sci.15 1210
39
ElsaidM K, AliaA A, ShaerA2020 Rashba spin–orbit interaction effects on thermal and magnetic properties of parabolic GaAs quantum dot in the presence of donor impurity under external electric and magnetic fields Chin. J. Phys.66 335