The renowned singularity theorem posits that, under particular circumstances, the gravitational collapse of sufficiently massive stars results in the creation of black holes with spacetime singularities [
1–
3]. One of the primary challenges in classical general relativity is the inevitable presence of these singularities. Conventional black hole solutions, such as the Schwarzschild, Reissner–Nordström, and Kerr metrics, inherently display curvature singularities at their cores. This has led to the proposition that classical general relativity might need revisions in regions where spacetime curvature diverges, suggesting that quantum gravity could offer a resolution to these singularities. However, in the absence of a fully developed quantum gravity theory, attempts to address black hole singularities have turned towards regular black hole models, which are grounded in quantum principles. For instance, Sakharov [
4] and Gliner [
5] suggested that at small
r, the Einstein tensor assumes the form
Gμν = Λ
gμν with Λ ≠ 0, signifying a central de Sitter core characterized by the equation of state
P = −
ρ. This condition effectively establishes an upper limit on the scalar curvature. As a result, the collapsed star stabilizes in a state where the outward de Sitter pressure balances the inward gravitational pull, thereby removing the singularity at the center. In the presence of an event horizon, this leads to what is called a regular black hole. Bardeen [
6] introduced the first regular black hole model, which was subsequently shown to be an exact solution to Einstein’s field equations when coupled with nonlinear electrodynamics (NED) [
7–
9]. Since then, a variety of regular black hole models have been formulated and studied [
10–
15] (for an extensive review, see [
16]). The absence of singularities at the center helps to address issues like Hawking radiation and the information loss paradox [
17]. Hayward [
18] introduced a model that is particularly effective in analyzing the processes of black hole formation and evaporation, presenting a scenario where a vacuum collapses into a regular black hole. This model can also be derived within the framework of NED. When electric charge is included, the Hayward black hole becomes an intriguing model for examining the interactions between spacetime geometry and electromagnetic fields in regular black hole contexts. Electrically charged Hayward black hole solution involves the length factor
l which represents the magnetic charge of a black hole through
g3 = 2
Ml2. It is worth mentioning that the magnetic charge of a black hole is usually modeled in the context of theories predicting magnetic monopoles, such as certain solutions in Einstein–Maxwell or Einstein–Gauss–Bonnet gravity. Studies of black hole shadows, such as those of M87* by the Event Horizon Telescope, can provide constraints on the magnetic charge. For example, in the context of the Hayward black hole, magnetic charges
g have been constrained to values consistent with the black hole’s observed shadow size and shape. Recent analyses, such as those in [
19], constrain
g for M87* to be less than approximately 1.72 (at 1
σ) or 2.12 (at 2
σ), normalized to the black hole mass. Furthermore, in [
20] it has been demonstrated that the regular black hole solutions proposed by Bardeen, Hayward, and Frolov are consistent with current observational constraints. In contrast, the Reissner–Nordström and Einstein–Maxwell-dilaton black hole solutions, for specific physical charge values, result in shadow radii that fall outside the 1
σ confidence interval permitted by the 2017 EHT observations. These models are therefore restricted to the charge ranges 0 <
q ≲ 0.90 and 0 <
q ≲ 0.95, respectively.