Welcome to visit Communications in Theoretical Physics,
Quantum Physics and Quantum Information

Long-time signatures of chaos in large atom-light frequency ratios Rabi model

  • Shangyun Wang , 1, ,
  • Songbai Chen 2, 3 ,
  • Jiliang Jing 2, 3
Expand
  • 1College of Physics and Electronic Engineering, Hengyang Normal University, Hengyang 421002, China
  • 2Key Laboratory of Low-Dimensional Quantum Structures and Quantum Control of Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory for Matter Microstructure and Function of Hunan Province, Department of Physics and Synergetic Innovation Center for Quantum Effects and Applications, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China
  • 3Center for Gravitation and Cosmology, College of Physical Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China

Author to whom any correspondence should be addressed.

Received date: 2024-12-13

  Revised date: 2025-03-21

  Accepted date: 2025-03-21

  Online published: 2025-05-28

Copyright

© 2025 Institute of Theoretical Physics CAS, Chinese Physical Society and IOP Publishing. All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
This article is available under the terms of the IOP-Standard License.

Abstract

As one of the famous effects in the quantum Rabi model (QRM), Rabi oscillation may lead to the occurrence of quantum dynamical behaviors without classical dynamic counterparts, such as quantum collapse and revival effects. In this paper, we focus on studying the long-time quantum signatures of chaos in the large atom-light frequency ratios of the Rabi model. It is shown that the saturated values of the entanglement entropy for initial states located in chaotic sea are higher than that in the regular regions, and the Husimi Q function are more dispersed in phase space. Moreover, we observed that the long-time average entanglement entropy and spin variance correspond well with the semiclassical phase space. Our results imply that the correspondence principle is not invalidated by quantum collapse and revival effects in the large atom-light frequency ratios Rabi model.

Cite this article

Shangyun Wang , Songbai Chen , Jiliang Jing . Long-time signatures of chaos in large atom-light frequency ratios Rabi model[J]. Communications in Theoretical Physics, 2025 , 77(9) : 095104 . DOI: 10.1088/1572-9494/adc3f9

1. Introduction

The correspondence principle is an indispensable cornerstone of quantum mechanics, which bridges classical and quantum worlds. In classical physics, the hallmark of chaotic dynamics is the extreme sensitivity of the time evolution of a system to initial conditions. However, quantum mechanics does not support a similar definition due to the uncertainty principle and the overlap between quantum states. This fundamental incompatibility poses a challenge to the correspondence principle and has motivated a long-standing search for chaotic signatures in quantum systems [1-5].
Defining quantum chaos by analogy with classical chaos faces numerous obstacles. Finding quantum tools which exhibit significant differences between chaotic and regular regions in semiclassical systems has become one of the mainstream solutions for studying quantum chaos. The study of entanglement entropy indicates that in semiclassical quantum systems, the saturated values of entanglement entropy in the chaotic regions are significantly greater than that in the regular regions [6-14]. Specifically, the corresponding relationship between the time-averaged entanglement entropy and the classical phase space is one of the important evidences to test the correspondence principle [15,16]. Because chaos is inherently a dynamical phenomenon, as one of the quasi-probability distribution functions used to visualize quantum wave packet dynamics, the Husimi Q function exhibits significant time-evolution differences between chaotic and regular regions [15-22]. In the classical spin limit, the spin variances of chaotic sea and regular regions exhibit significant differences [23]. Moreover, the level spacing distribution [24-29], Loschmidit Echo [30-35] and out-of-time- ordered correlator (OTOC) [36-48] have been proven to be effective tools for exploring chaos in quantum systems.
For the systems of light interacting with atoms, research related to quantum chaos mainly focuses on the Dicke model [49-56]. The Rabi model [57], as the simplest version of the Dicke model, describes a single-mode cavity field and a two-level atom which interacts via dipolar coupling [58,59]. Since the Rabi model exhibits a similar interaction mechanism to the Dicke model, the chaotic dynamic behaviors should appear in this system [60]. However, the study of chaos in this model has been neglected for a long time owing in part to the number of atoms, and in part to the Rabi oscillations, which generate some effects without classical dynamic counterparts such as quantum collapse and revival [61].
The quantum chaos of a system with quantum collapse and revival effect is of great interest, not only from the horizon of quantum dynamics, but from the viewpoint of the correspondence between quantum and classical mechanics as well. Recently, Irish and Armour [62] studied the semiclassical limit in the quantum Rabi model (QRM) and their results provides important and feasible framework to study the classical-quantum correspondence in this system. Kirkova et al [63] found that the OTOC quickly saturates in the normal phase and undergoes exponential growth in the superradiant phase of QRM when the ratio of level-splitting ω to bosonic frequency ω0 grows to infinity η=ω/ω0. This indicates that chaotic signatures appear in the QRM at effective thermodynamic limits η. On the other hand, using the mean field approximation theory, [64] shows that quantum collapse and revival effects can interfere with the exponential behavior of OTOC in the anisotropic quantum Rabi model. However, it is not yet certain whether the quantum collapse and revival effects affect the long-time signatures of entanglement entropy and the Husimi Q function, which serve as tools for diagnosing quantum chaos. In addition, since there is only one atom in the Rabi model, the difference of the spin variance values between the chaotic and regular regions is still unclear and needs to be investigated further.
In this paper, we will focus on studying the long-time quantum signatures of chaos in QRM which consists of a single cavity field mode interacting with a two-level atom via dipolar coupling. We find that both the long-time average entanglement entropy and the average spin variance correspond well with the semiclassical phase space structure. Moreover, the Husimi Q function exhibits significant differences between the chaotic and regular regions while the splitting and merging behaviors emerge in its evolutionary process.
This paper is organized as follows: in section 2, we introduce briefly the large atom-light frequency ratios of the Rabi model and its semiclassical phase space. In section 3, we investigate the truncated photon number in the QRM when the ratio of level-splitting ω to bosonic frequency ω0 grows to η=ω/ω0 →18. In section 4, we study the correspondence between the distribution of long-time averaged entanglement entropy and the classical Poincaré section. In section 5, we analyze the evolutionary differences of the Husimi Q function with splitting and merging behaviors between chaotic and regular regions in this model. In section 6, we discuss the correspondence between the distribution of time-averaged spin variance and the classical Poincaré section. Finally, we present results and a brief summary.

2. Quantum Rabi model

Let us now briefly introduce the quantum Rabi model which is one of the simplest and most fundamental models describing quantum light-matter interaction. The Rabi Hamiltonian can be expressed as (=1)
$\begin{eqnarray}\begin{array}{r}\hat{H}=\frac{\omega }{2}{\hat{\sigma }}_{z}+{\omega }_{0}{\hat{a}}^{\dagger }\hat{a}+g({\hat{a}}^{\dagger }+\hat{a})({\hat{\sigma }}_{+}+{\hat{\sigma }}_{-}),\end{array}\end{eqnarray}$
where ω is the level-splitting of a two-level atom, ${\hat{a}}^{\dagger }$ and $\hat{a}$ are respectively the creation and annihilation operators of the single-mode cavity with frequency ω0. The coupling g is the strength of the dipolar atom-field interaction and ${\hat{\sigma }}_{+}$, ${\hat{\sigma }}_{-}$ are atomic raising and lowering operators, respectively.
To study the quantum signatures of chaos in the quantum Rabi model, as in [6], we take the initial states to be coherent states since the uncertainty in the phase space is the smallest. The initial quantum states are chosen as
$\begin{eqnarray}\begin{array}{r}| \psi (0)\rangle =| \tau \rangle \displaystyle \otimes | \beta \rangle ,\end{array}\end{eqnarray}$
with
$\begin{eqnarray}\begin{array}{r}| \tau \rangle ={(1+\tau {\tau }^{* })}^{-\frac{1}{2}}{{\rm{e}}}^{\hat{\tau }{\sigma }_{+}}| \frac{1}{2},-\frac{1}{2}\rangle ,\end{array}\end{eqnarray}$
$\begin{eqnarray}\begin{array}{r}| \beta \rangle ={{\rm{e}}}^{-\beta {\beta }^{* }/2}{{\rm{e}}}^{\beta {\hat{a}}^{\dagger }}| 0\rangle ,\end{array}\end{eqnarray}$
and
$\begin{eqnarray}\begin{array}{r}\tau =\frac{{q}_{1}+{\rm{i}}{p}_{1}}{\sqrt{2-{q}_{1}^{2}-{p}_{1}^{2}}},\,\beta =({q}_{2}+{\rm{i}}{p}_{2})/\sqrt{2},\end{array}\end{eqnarray}$
where ∣τ⟩ and ∣β⟩ are Bloch coherent states of atom and Glauber coherent states of bosons, and the states $| \frac{1}{2},-\frac{1}{2}\rangle $ and ∣0⟩ are the ground state of the two-level atom and the vacuum state of the single-mode cavity field, respectively. With the mean field approximation procedure [65],
$\begin{eqnarray}\begin{array}{r}\langle \tau | {\hat{\sigma }}_{+}| \tau \rangle =\frac{{\tau }^{* }}{1+\tau {\tau }^{* }},\end{array}\end{eqnarray}$
$\begin{eqnarray}\begin{array}{r}\langle \tau | {\hat{\sigma }}_{-}| \tau \rangle =\frac{\tau }{1+\tau {\tau }^{* }},\end{array}\end{eqnarray}$
$\begin{eqnarray}\begin{array}{r}\langle \tau | {\hat{\sigma }}_{z}| \tau \rangle =-\frac{1-\tau {\tau }^{* }}{1+\tau {\tau }^{* }},\end{array}\end{eqnarray}$
$\begin{eqnarray}\begin{array}{r}\langle \beta | \hat{a}| \beta \rangle =\beta ,\end{array}\end{eqnarray}$
$\begin{eqnarray}\begin{array}{r}\langle \beta | {\hat{a}}^{\dagger }| \beta \rangle ={\beta }^{* },\end{array}\end{eqnarray}$
the semiclassical Rabi Hamiltonian reads
$\begin{eqnarray}\begin{array}{rcl}{H}_{cl} & \equiv & \langle \tau \beta | \hat{H}| \tau \beta \rangle =\frac{\omega }{2}({q}_{1}^{2}+{p}_{1}^{2}-1)+\frac{{\omega }_{0}}{2}({q}_{2}^{2}+{p}_{2}^{2})\\ & & +g{q}_{1}{q}_{2}\sqrt{4-2({q}_{1}^{2}+{p}_{1}^{2})},\end{array}\end{eqnarray}$
where ${q}_{2}=({a}^{\dagger }+a)/\sqrt{2}$ and ${p}_{2}={\rm{i}}({a}^{\dagger }-a)/\sqrt{2}$. With the classical Hamiltonian (11), we obtain the Poincaré section of the QRM, as shown in figure 1. This mixed phase space section contains both stable island and chaotic sea regions composed of many discrete points. Motion across the boundaries between regular and chaotic regions is classically forbidden.
Figure 1. The Poincaré section for the quantum Rabi model in the case: q2=0, p2 > 0, with ω=18, ω0=1, g=4 and the system energy E=14. Point R1(q1=0.86853, p1=-1.02681, q2=0, p2=3.66657) and C1(q1=-0.2, p1=0, q2=0, p2=6.72904) are situated in stable island and chaotic sea respectively.

3. Truncated photon number

QRM is intuitively far from the so-called thermodynamic limit (N) because there is only one atom, and it seems impossible to achieve the classical-quantum correspondence in this system. On the other hand, the exponential growth of OTOC in the superradiant phase of QRM when the ratio of level-splitting ω to bosonic frequency grows to infinity [63]. This means this model can be considered as a many-body quantum system. A reasonable explanation is that the number of photons in the QRM also tends to infinity as ω/ω0 tends to infinity, and then classical-quantum correspondence can be achieved and quantum chaotic signatures can be distinguished. In this section, we numerically calculate the truncated photon number in QRM when the ratio of level-splitting ω to bosonic frequency ω0 grows to η=ω/ω0 →18. In figure 2, we exhibit the time evolution behavior of the average photon number $\langle {\hat{a}}^{\dagger }\hat{a}\rangle $ with different system photon number N for the initial wave packet centred at point C1. It is shown that the dynamical evolution of $\langle {\hat{a}}^{\dagger }\hat{a}\rangle $ changes with the increase of the initial system photon number N. However, when N exceeds the critical value Nc(Nc ≈ 140), the evolutionary behaviors of $\langle {\hat{a}}^{\dagger }\hat{a}\rangle $ are consistent. In other words, when the initial system photon number exceeds the critical value, i.e., N > Nc, the dynamic effects in the QRM no longer changes with the increase of photon number. This indicates that the system photon number can be truncated at a value which greater than the critical value when the ratio of level-splitting ω to bosonic frequency ω0 grows to 18. Therefore, the large atom-light frequency ratios Rabi model can be considered as a semiclassical many-body quantum system when ω/ω0 grows to large values, and then quantum chaos and classical-quantum correspondence can be studied in this system.
Figure 2. Time evolution of the average photon number $\langle {\hat{a}}^{\dagger }\hat{a}\rangle $ with different the initial system photon number N for the initial coherent states centered at chaotic point C1.

4. Linear entanglement entropy

In this section, we will investigate the quantum signatures of chaos in the QRM via linear entanglement entropy, which is an effective tool to explore chaos in quantum systems including the Dicke model [6,8,16] and the kicked top model [15]. On the other hand, the buildup and decay of entanglement is closely linked with the collapse and revival dynamics [66]. Therefore, it is necessary to re-examine the evolutional behaviors of linear entanglement entropy in chaotic and regular regions of the QRM with quantum collapse-revival effects. The linear entanglement entropy is defined as
$\begin{eqnarray}\begin{array}{r}S(t)=1-{{\rm{Tr}}}_{1}{\rho }_{1}{(t)}^{2},\end{array}\end{eqnarray}$
with the reduced-density matrix
$\begin{eqnarray}\begin{array}{r}{\rho }_{1}={{\rm{Tr}}}_{2}| \psi (t)\rangle \langle \psi (t)| ,\end{array}\end{eqnarray}$
where ${{\rm{Tr}}}_{{\rm{i}}}$ is a trace over the i th subsystem(i=1, 2) and the wave function ∣ψ(t)⟩ is the quantum state of the full system. The quantity S(t) describes the degree of purity of the subsystems and the degree of decoherence. In this paper, we note the time it takes for linear entanglement entropy to reach the saturated value as the critical time tc. When t > tc, we call it as long time. In figure 3, we exhibit the time evolution of linear entanglement entropy for different initial states. It is shown that the difference of linear entanglement entropy between chaotic and regular regions is very diminutive in short time. However, the saturated value of linear entanglement entropy for the initial state located in the chaotic sea is significantly higher than that in the regular region. Moreover, to avoid the randomness of the selection of the initial state, we demonstrate the distribution of the time-average entanglement entropy ${S}_{m}=\frac{1}{T}{\int }_{{t}_{1}}^{{t}_{2}}S(t){\rm{d}}t$ on the Poincaré section in figure 4. We clearly observe a significant dip in Sm and more entanglement generation for initial states localized in chaotic sea compared to those in the regular regions. This difference of linear entanglement entropy between chaotic and regular regions can be measured experimentally [15]. The correspondence between the phase space and the distribution of time-average linear entanglement entropy not only indicates that entanglement entropy can explore quantum chaos in the semiclassical QRM, but also indicates the classical-quantum correspondence can be achieved in QRM.
Figure 3. The time evolution of linear entanglement entropy S(t) for initial states centred at chaotic point C1 and periodic point R1 in figure 1. Here, the system photon number is truncated at 150.
Figure 4. The distribution of time-average entanglement entropy Sm of Poincaré section in figure 1. Here, the system photon number is truncated at 150 and the integral interval is t ∈ [0, 500].

5. Husimi Q function

In the quantum domain, the quantum state is equivalent to its quasi-probability function in the phase space [67]. Among the quasi-probability functions, the Husimi Q function allows one to visualize the dynamical evolution of quantum states in phase space. On the other hand, the collapse and revival of the Husimi Q function have been interpreted theoretically [68-70] and observed experimentally [71-74] in atom-field interaction systems. In this section, we focus on analyzing the time evolution difference of the Husimi Q functions between chaotic and regular regions in the QRM. For the photon coherent state, the Husimi Q function is defined as
$\begin{eqnarray}\begin{array}{r}Q({q}_{2},{p}_{2})=\frac{1}{\pi }\langle {q}_{2},{p}_{2}| {\rho }_{2}| {q}_{2},{p}_{2}\rangle ,\end{array}\end{eqnarray}$
where ∣q2, p2⟩ is the photon coherent state and ρ2 is the reduced-density matrix of the second subsystem. In figure 5, we present the time evolution of the Husimi Q function in phase space. Quantum collapse and revival indeed cause the Husimi Q function to generate some effects without classical dynamical counterparts such as splitting and merging, as shown in figures 5(b) and (f). The difference between figures 5(b) and (f) is extremely microscopic and cannot distinguish chaotic and regular orbits. However, at longer times t > tc, the Husimi Q function with initial states located in chaotic sea are distributed in the outer part of the phase space, as shown in figures 5(c)-(d). This is different from that in the Dicke [75] and two-photon Dicke model [16], where the Husimi function in the chaotic region rapidly distributes throughout the whole phase space. For initial states located in the regular regions, the Husimi Q functions are concentrated in the vicinity of origin point, as shown in figures 5(g)-(h). Obviously, the Husimi Q functions between chaotic and regular regions exhibit significant differences in long time. figure 5 effectively indicates that the Husimi Q function can be considered as an effective tool for diagnosing chaos in the large atom-light frequency ratios Rabi model while quantum collapse-revival effects exist in this system.
Figure 5. The time evolution of the Husimi Q function. The top and bottom panels denote respectively the case in which the initial coherent state centered at the points C1 and R1 in figure 1. Here, the system photon number is truncated at 150.

6. Spin variance

In this section, we will discuss the differences in spin variance between the chaotic sea and stable island in the Rabi model. For the Dicke model, in the spin limit, the spin variance value in chaotic regions are higher than that in regular regions [23]. On the other hand, in the quantum Rabi model, the spin length j=1/2 is far from the spin limit j and the spin variance seems impossible to be used as a tool for diagnosing quantum chaos. However, we still observed that the spin variance ${\rm{\Delta }}{\sigma }_{z}=\langle {\sigma }_{z}^{2}\rangle -{\langle {\sigma }_{z}\rangle }^{2}$ in chaotic regions are higher than that in regular regions, and the distribution of the long-time average Δσz corresponds well with the semiclassical phase space in figure 1, as shown in figure 6. This illustrates that in the bipartite interaction systems which far from the spin limit j, the spin variance Δσz still maintain its diagnostic function for quantum chaos in the large atom-light frequency ratios Rabi model. The correspondence between the spin variance Δσz and semiclassical phase space indicates that the atom in the Rabi model exhibits some statistical characteristics of many-body systems. This means that classical-quantum correspondence in single atomic systems can be achieved through interacting with light.
Figure 6. The distribution of the time-average spin variance Δσz of Poincaré section in figure 1. Here, the system photon number is truncated at 150 and the time interval is t ∈ [0, 500].

7. Summary

We have studied the long-time behaviors of linear entanglement entropy, the Husimi Q function and spin variance in the large atom-light frequency ratios Rabi model. It is shown that both the entanglement entropy and the Husimi Q function can still be used as tools to diagnose quantum chaos in the large atom-light frequency ratios Rabi model while quantum collapse-revival effects exist in this system. At longer times, the Husimi Q function for initial states located in the chaotic sea are distributed along the periphery of phase space. For initial states located in the regular regions, the Husimi Q function is concentrated in the vicinity of origin. Moreover, we find that both the long-time average entanglement entropy and spin variance correspond well with the classical phase space. Quantum collapse and revival indeed generate some quantum effects which without classical dynamics counterparts, such as the splitting and merging of wave packets, but it does not render the correspondence principle ineffective at longer times. Our conclusion not only suggests that the correspondence principle does not become invalidated by quantum collapse and revival effects in the QRM, but also suggests that the multi-body statistical characteristics in a single atomic system can be achieved through interacting with light.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant Nos. 12275078, 11875026, 12035005 and 2020YFC2201400, and Science Foundation of Hengyang Normal University of China under Contract No. 2020QD24. This work is also sponsored by the innovative research group of Hunan Province under Grant No. 2024JJ1006.
1
Gutzwiller M C 1990 Chaos in Classical and Quantum Mechanics Berlin Springer

2
Casati B, Casati B 1995 Quantum Chaos: Between Order and Disorder Cambridge Cambridge University Press

3
Stockmann H 1999 Quantum Chaos: An Introduction Cambridge Cambridge University Press

4
Haake F 2001 Quantum Signatures of Chaos Berlin Springer

5
Stöckmann H-J 2006 Quantum Chaos: An Introduction Cambridge Cambridge University Press

6
Furuya K, Nemes M C, Pellegrino G Q 1998 Quantum dynamical manifestation of chaotic behavior in the process of entanglement Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 5534

DOI

7
Wang X, Ghose S, Sanders B C, Hu B 2004 Entanglement as a signature of quantum chaos Phys. Rev. E 70 016217

DOI

8
Hou X W, Hu B 2004 Decoherence, entanglement, and chaos in the Dicke model Phys. Rev. A 69 042110

DOI

9
Valdez M A, Shchedrin G, Heimsoth M, Creffield C E, Sols F, Carr L D 2018 Many-body quantum chaos and entanglement in a quantum ratchet Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 234101

DOI

10
Kumari M, Ghose S 2019 Untangling entanglement and chaos Phys. Rev. A 99 042311

DOI

11
Lerose A, Pappalardi S 2020 Bridging entanglement dynamics and chaos in semiclassical systems Phys. Rev. A 102 032404

DOI

12
Vardi A 2022 Chaos and bipartite entanglement between Bose-Josephson junctions Phys. Rev. E 106 064210

DOI

13
Liang C, Zhang Y, Chen S 2024 Statistical and dynamical aspects of quantum chaos in a kicked Bose-Hubbard dimer Phys. Rev. A 109 033316

DOI

14
Dowling N, Modi K 2024 Operational metric for quantum chaos and the corresponding spatiotemporal-entanglement structure PRX Quantum 5 010314

DOI

15
Chaudhury S, Smith A, Anderson B E, Ghose S, Jessen P S 2009 Quantum signatures of chaos in a kicked top Nature 461 768

DOI

16
Wang S, Chen S, Jing J 2019 Effect of system energy on quantum signatures of chaos in the two-photon Dicke model Phys. Rev. E 100 022207

DOI

17
Takahashi K, Saito N 1985 Chaos and Husimi distribution function in quantum mechanics Phys. Rev. Lett. 55 645

DOI

18
Piga A, Lewenstein M, Quach J Q 2019 Quantum chaos and entanglement in ergodic and nonergodic systems Phys. Rev. E 99 032213

DOI

19
Pilatowsky-Cameo S 2021 Quantum scarring in a spin-boson system: fundamental families of periodic orbits New J. Phys. 23 033045

DOI

20
Wang Q, Robnik M 2023 Statistics of phase space localization measures and quantum chaos in the kicked top model Phys. Rev. E 107 054213

DOI

21
Wang Q, Robnik M 2024 Mixed eigenstates in the Dicke model: statistics and power-law decay of the relative proportion in the semiclassical limit Phys. Rev. E 109 024225

DOI

22
Mourik V 2018 Exploring quantum chaos with a single nuclear spin Phys. Rev. E 98 042206

DOI

23
Bakemeier L, Alvermann A, Fehske H 2013 Dynamics of the Dicke model close to the classical limit Phys. Rev. A 88 043835

DOI

24
Emary C, Brandes T 2003 Quantum chaos triggered by precursors of a quantum phase transition: the dicke model Phys. Rev. Lett. 90 044101

DOI

25
Emary C, Brandes T 2003 Chaos and the quantum phase transition in the Dicke model Phys. Rev. E 67 066203

DOI

26
D´Alessio L, Kafri Y, Polkovnikov A, Rigol M 2016 From quantum chaos and eigenstate thermalization to statistical mechanics and thermodynamics Adv. Phys. 65 239

DOI

27
Anand N, Styliaris G, Kumari M, Zanardi P 2021 Quantum coherence as a signature of chaos Phys. Rev. Res. 3 023214

DOI

28
Wang Q 2022 quantum chaos in the extended Dicke model Entropy 24 1415

DOI

29
Benet L, Borgonovi F, Izrailev F M, Santos L F 2023 Quantum-classical correspondence of strongly chaotic many-body spin models Phys. Rev. B 107 155143

DOI

30
Jalabert R A, Pastawski H M 2001 Environment-independent decoherence rate in classically chaotic systems Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 2490

DOI

31
Karkuszewski Z P, Jarzynski C, Zurek W H 2002 Quantum chaotic environments, the butterfly effect, and decoherence Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 170405

DOI

32
Gorin T 2006 Dynamics of Loschmidt echoes and fidelity decay Phys. Rep. 435 33

DOI

33
Jacquod P, Petitjean C 2009 Decoherence, entanglement and irreversibility in quantum dynamical systems with few degrees of freedom Adv. Phys. 58 67

DOI

34
Zhu G 2019 Single-photon-triggered quantum chaos Phys. Rev. A 100 023825

DOI

35
Yan B, Cincio L, Zurek W H 2020 Information scrambling and Loschmidt echo Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 160603

DOI

36
Roberts D A, Stanford D 2015 Diagnosing chaos using four point functions in two-dimensional conformal field theory Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 131603

DOI

37
Maldacena J, Shenker S H, Stanford D 2016 A bound on chaos J. High Energ. Phys. 08 106

DOI

38
Hashimoto K, Murata K, Yoshii R 2017 Out-of-time-order correlators in quantum mechanics J. High Energ. Phys. 10 138

DOI

39
Rozenbaum E B, Ganeshan S, Galitski V 2017 Lyapunov exponent and out-of-time-ordered correlator's growth rate in a chaotic system Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 086801

DOI

40
Garcìa-Mata I 2018 Chaos signatures in the short and long time behavior of the out-of-time ordered correlator Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 210601

DOI

41
Jalabert R A, Garcìa-Mata I, Wisniacki D A 2018 Semiclassical theory of out-of-time-order correlators for low-dimensional classically chaotic systems Phys. Rev. E 98 062218

DOI

42
Lin C, Motrunich O I 2018 Out-of-time-ordered correlators in a quantum Ising chain Phys. Rev. B 97 144304

DOI

43
Yan H, Wang J Z, Wang W G 2019 Similar early growth of out-of-time-ordered correlators in quantum chaotic and integrable Ising chains Commun. Theor. Phys. 71 1359

DOI

44
McGinley M, Nunnenkamp A, Knolle J 2019 Slow growth of out-of-time-order correlators and entanglement entropy in integrable disordered systems Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 020603

DOI

45
Zhao W 2021 Super-exponential growth of out-of-time-ordered correlators Phys. Rev. B 103 184311

DOI

46
Zonnios M, Levinsen J, Parish M M, Pollock F A, Modi K 2022 Signatures of quantum chaos in an out-of-time-order tensor Phys. Rev. Lett. 128 150601

DOI

47
Trunin D A 2023 Refined quantum Lyapunov exponents from replica out-of-time-order correlators Phys. Rev. D 108 105023

DOI

48
Ruidas S, Banerjee S 2024 Semiclassical limit of a measurement-induced transition in many-body chaos in integrable and nonintegrable oscillator chains Phys. Rev. Lett. 132 030402

DOI

49
Aguiar M A M, Furuya K 1992 Chaos in a spin-boson system: classical analysis Ann. Phys. 216 291 312

DOI

50
Chávez-Carlos J 2016 Classical chaos in atom-field systems Phys. Rev. E 94 022209

DOI

51
Chaávez-Carlos J 2019 Quantum and classical lyapunov exponents in atom-field interaction systems Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 024101

DOI

52
Pilatowsky-Cameo S 2020 Positive quantum lyapunov exponents in experimental systems with a regular classical limit Phys. Rev. E 101 010202

DOI

53
Villaseñor D 2022 Chaos and thermalization in the spin-boson Dicke model Entropy 25 8

DOI

54
Villasenor D 2024 Classical and quantum properties of the spin-boson Dicke model: chaos, localization, and scarring arXiv:2405.20381

55
Magnani M A B 2024 Quantum multifractality as a probe of phase space in the Dicke model Phys. Rev. E 109 034202

DOI

56
Li J, Chesi S 2024 Routes to chaos in the balanced two-photon Dicke model with qubit dissipation Phys. Rev. A 109 053702

DOI

57
Rabi I I 1937 Space quantization in a gyrating magnetic field Phys. Rev. 51 652

DOI

58
Xie Q, Zhong H, Batchelor M T, Lee C 2017 The quantum Rabi model: solution and dynamics J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 50 113001

DOI

59
Larson J, Mavrogordatos T 2021 The Jaynes-Cummings Model and Its Descendants Bristol IOP Publishing

60
Larson J 2013 Integrability versus quantum thermalization J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 46 224016

DOI

61
Eberly J H, Narozhny N B, Sanchez-Mondragon J J 1980 Periodic spontaneous collapse and revival in a simple quantum model Phys. Rev. Lett. 44 1323

DOI

62
Irish E K T, Armour A D 2022 Defining the semiclassical limit of the quantum Rabi Hamiltonian Phys. Rev. Lett. 129 183603

DOI

63
Kirkova A V, Porras D, Ivanov P A 2022 Out-of-time-order correlator in the quantum Rabi model Phys. Rev. A 105 032444

DOI

64
Wang S, Chen S, Jing J, Wang J, Fan H 2025 Quantum signatures of chaos in anisotropic quantum Rabi model Adv. Quantum Technol. 2400460

DOI

65
Aguiar M, Furuya K, Lewenkopf C H, Nemes M C 1992 Chaos in a spin-boson system: classical analysis Ann. Phys. 216 291 312

DOI

66
Alvermann A, Bakemeier L, Fehske H 2012 Collapse-revival dynamics and atom-field entanglement in the nonresonant Dicke model Phys. Rev. A 85 043803

DOI

67
Cahill K E, Glauber R J 1969 Density operators and quasiprobability distributions Phys. Rev. 177 1882

DOI

68
Eiselt J, Risken H 1991 Quasiprobability distributions for the Jaynes-Cummings model with cavity damping Phys. Rev. A 43 346

DOI

69
Miller C A, Hilsenbeck J, Risken H 1992 Asymptotic approximations for the q function in the Jaynes-Cummings model Phys. Rev. A 46 4323

DOI

70
Ueda M, Wakabayashi T, Kuwata-Gonokami M 1996 Synchronous collapses and revivals of atomic dipole fluctuations and photon fano factor beyond the standard quantum limit Phys. Rev. Lett. 76 2045

DOI

71
Rempe G, Walther H, Klein N 1987 Observation of quantum collapse and revival in a one-atom maser Phys. Rev. Lett. 58 353

DOI

72
Auffeves A 2003 Entanglement of a mesoscopic field with an atom induced by photon graininess in a cavity Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 230405

DOI

73
Lv D, An S, Um M, Zhang J, Zhang J, Kim M S, Kim K 2017 Reconstruction of the Jaynes-Cummings field state of ionic motion in a harmonic trap Phys. Rev. A 95 043813

DOI

74
Kirchmair G 2013 Observation of quantum state collapse and revival due to the single-photon kerr effect Nature 495 205

DOI

75
Angelo R M, Furuya K, Nemes M C, Pellegrino G Q 2001 Recoherence in the entanglement dynamics and classical orbits in the N-atom Jaynes-Cummings model Phys. Rev. A 64 043801

DOI

Outlines

/